Synthesis
Synthesis
ASQ has collected a series of total quality management case studies to illustrate the
impact a TQM system can have on your organization.
Each organization is unique in terms of the culture, management practices, and the
processes used to create and deliver its products and services. Quality management
strategy vary from organization to organization; however, a set of primary
elements should be present in some format.
1. Top management learns about and decides to commit to TQM. TQM is identified as
one of the organization’s strategies.
2. The organization assesses current culture, customer satisfaction, and quality
management systems.
3. Top management identifies core values and principles to be used, and
communicates them.
4. A TQM master plan is developed on the basis of steps 1, 2, and 3.
The TQM element approach takes key business processes and/or organizational
units and uses the tools of TQM to foster improvements. This method was widely used
in the early 1980s as companies tried to implement parts of TQM as they learned them.
Examples of this approach include quality circles, statistical process control, Taguchi
methods, and quality function deployment.
The guru approach uses the teachings and writings of one or more of the leading
quality thinkers as a guide against which to determine where the organization has
deficiencies. The organization makes appropriate changes to remedy those
deficiencies. For example, managers might study Deming’s 14 points or attend the
Crosby College. Afterward, they would work on implementing the approach learned.
Organizations using the Japanese total quality approach examine the detailed
implementation techniques and strategies employed by Deming Prize-winning
companies and use this experience to develop a long-range master plan for in-house
use. This approach was used by Florida Power and Light—among others—to
implement TQM and to compete for, and win, the Deming Prize.
When using this model, an organization uses the criteria of a quality award (e.g.,
the Deming Prize, the European Quality Award, or the Malcolm Baldrige National
Quality Award), to identify areas for improvement. Under this approach, TQM
implementation focuses on meeting specific award criteria.
Although some argue that this is not an appropriate use of award criteria, some
organizations do use this approach and it can result in improvement.
The history of total quality management (TQM) began initially as a term coined
by the Naval Air Systems Command to describe its Japanese-style management
approach to quality improvement. An umbrella methodology for continually improving
the quality of all processes, it draws on a knowledge of the principles and practices of:
1920s Some of the first seeds of quality management were planted as the
principles of scientific management swept through U.S. industry.
Businesses clearly separated the processes of planning and carrying
out the plan, and union opposition arose as workers were deprived of a
voice in the conditions and functions of their work.
The Hawthorne experiments in the late 1920s showed how worker
productivity could be impacted by participation.
1930s Walter Shewhart developed the methods for statistical analysis and
control of quality.
1950s W. Edwards Deming taught methods for statistical analysis and control
of quality to Japanese engineers and executives. This can be
considered the origin of TQM.
Joseph M. Juran taught the concepts of controlling quality and
managerial breakthrough.
Armand V. Feigenbaum’s book Total Quality Control, a forerunner for
the present understanding of TQM, was published.
Philip B. Crosby’s promotion of zero defects paved the way for quality
improvement in many companies.
Today TQM is the name for the philosophy of a broad and systemic approach
to managing organizational quality.
Quality standards such as the ISO 9000 series and quality award
programs such as the Deming Prize and the Malcolm Baldrige National
Quality Award specify principles and processes that comprise TQM.
TQM as a term to describe an organization's quality policy and
procedure has fallen out of favor as international standards for quality
management have been developed. Please see our series of pages
on quality management systems for more information.
These total quality management principles can be put into place by any
organization to more effectively implement total quality management. As a total quality
management philosophy, Dr. Deming’s work is foundational to TQM and its
successor, quality management systems.
10 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
The terms "leadership" and "management" tend to be used interchangeably.
Management refers to a company's management structure as its leadership, or to
individuals who are actually managers as the "leaders" of various management teams.
While there are people who seem to be naturally endowed with more leadership
abilities than others, anyone can learn to become a leader by improving particular skills.
History is full of people who, while having no previous leadership experience, have
stepped to the fore in crisis situations and persuaded others to follow their suggested
course of action. They possessed traits and qualities that helped them to step into roles
of leadership.
Steve Jobs is a classic example of someone who learned to lead despite not
being born a natural leader. After starting Apple Computer with Steve Wozniak in 1976,
he was fired by the board of directors in 1985 when the company was facing intense
competition and internal disagreement about the future direction of the business. Later,
after founding Pixar Animation Studios and NeXT Computer, he was eventually rehired
by Apple in 1997 as CEO and went on to develop the revolutionary iPod, iPhone, and
many other products.
11 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
By all accounts, Steve Jobs was a mercurial genius who, early in his career,
routinely yelled at employees, co-workers, partners, and vendors. According to some
ex-employees of Apple and NeXT, he was intolerant of anything he viewed as a failure,
and his foul-mouthed tirades were the stuff of legend. He apparently believed in brutal
honesty and considered other people's feelings irrelevant. He did not conduct formal
reviews with employees and was sparing with praise for a job well done.
Jobs died on October 5, 2011, at the age of 56. Even after his death, his
reputation and his company lives on. An October 2018 article in Forbes
magazine stated, "Today, precisely seven years after [Jobs'] passing, his name is still
synonymous with visionary, genius, innovator, and icon." He could not have
accomplished much of what he did—and Apple probably woudn't be around today—had
Jobs not developed into a leader.
Strategy has many definitions, but generally involves setting strategic goals,
determining actions to achieve the goals, and mobilizing resources to execute the
actions. A strategy describes how the ends (goals) will be achieved by the means
(resources). The senior leadership of an organization is generally tasked with
12 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
determining strategy. Strategy can be planned (intended) or can be observed as a
pattern of activity (emergent) as the organization adapts to its environment or competes.
13 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
SYNTHESIS
1. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
It is seen as a key performance indicator within business and is often part of a Balanced
Scorecard. In a competitive marketplace where businesses compete for customers,
customer satisfaction is seen as a key differentiator and increasingly has become a key
element of business strategy.
14 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
retention. Studies indicate that the ramifications of satisfaction are most strongly
realized at the extremes."
On a five-point scale, "individuals who rate their satisfaction level as '5' are likely to
become return customers and might even evangelize for the firm. (A second important
metric related to satisfaction is willingness to recommend. This metric is defined as "The
percentage of surveyed customers who indicate that they would recommend a brand to
friends." When a customer is satisfied with a product, he or she might recommend it to
friends, relatives and colleagues. This can be a powerful marketing advantage.)
"Individuals who rate their satisfaction level as '1,' by contrast, are unlikely to return.
Further, they can hurt the firm by making negative comments about it to prospective
customers. Willingness to recommend is a key metric relating to customer satisfaction
They hypothesize that objective quality does have a positive effect on perceived
quality contemporaneously, in the short term, and in the long term. They also
hypothesize that a decrease in objective quality has a greater effect on customers’
perceptions than does an increase. Further, they suggest that increases in quality will
have larger short-term effects for brands with good reputations than for brands with poor
reputations and that decreases in quality will have larger short-term effects for brands
with poor reputations than for brands with good reputations.
15 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
On average, they find that the effect of a change in objective quality is not fully
reflected in customers’ perceptions of quality until after about six years. In the first year
after a quality change, only about 20% of the total customer reaction over time is
realized. These reactions are significantly larger and occur more quickly for a decrease
in quality than for an equivalent increase. Interestingly, they also find that brand
reputation has a double advantage. High-reputation brands are rewarded three years
earlier than low-reputation brands for an increase in quality and punished one year
slower for a decrease in quality. These differences in response time are a meaningful
measure of brand equity.
3. CUSTOMER COMPLAINT
16 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
No amount of discussing with professionals, friends, or colleagues will ever replace the
information that a company can receive from a real customer.
Is convenience important?
Asking consumers directly: This tactic comes across particularly effective during
the point-of-purchase at a retail store because consumers are being probed on
their experiences while they are shopping.
Focus groups: This involves gathering a number of customers, sitting them down,
and discussing a range of issues relevant to a company’s business. The
advantage of using this method over a questionnaire is that it will yield more
detailed information and feedback, rather than “tick the box” style responses from
a questionnaire. In-person focus groups and one-on-one interviews are helpful
tools that provide explanation of product or consumer-related issues because you
are going to the main source directly.
17 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
Telephone: Some surveys can be conducted via phone. These yield a more
private conversation exchange between the customer and the service provider.
Instant feedback
Recently, many organizations have implemented feedback loops that allow them to
capture feedback at the point of experience. For example, National Express, one of the
UK’s leading travel companies, has invited passengers to send text messages while
riding the bus. This has been shown to be useful, as it allows companies to improve
their customer service before the customer defects, thus making it far more likely that
the customer will return next time.
x
The famous Quality Trilogy was first developed and written by Joseph M. Juran.
As you all know, Juran is a management consultant and an Engineer, specialized in
Quality management.
18 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
The Quality Trilogy explained by Juran is: Any organization taking up a journey in
Quality Management will have to have three Processes in place, which are: i) Quality
Planning ii) Quality Control and iii) Quality Improvement. Though the above three may
sound similar, they have different objectives and serve different purposes of Quality
Management.
ii. Quality Control: Once the processes are defined, the responsibility is now with
operations, to adhere to the processes and specifications required by the
product/service. For this purpose periodic checks and inspection has to be done,
metrics need to be tracked, to ensure that the process is in control and meets
specifications and the metrics need the set target. Wherever there is a defect a
19 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
corrective and preventive action needs to be done, and root cause has to be arrived at.
Also the deviation in the metrics and process audit results need to be monitored and
corrected for meeting the required target as specified by the processes.
iii. Quality Improvement: However robust the process design and the product features
are, there are chances that it may fail to meet customer requirements and design
targets. It might be due to some special causes that are present in the system and
might be due to change in business scenarios, customer requirements, market
completion and many more forces. The role of Quality Improvement is to identify and
prove the need for improvement from the exiting performance levels even though they
meet the target and devise means and ways to achieve the new target and implement
them successfully.
All the three processes are interlinked and will affect one another in due course
of the journey. Thus the processes are corrected individually and streamlined to help
each other in Quality Management journey, the end objective.
20 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
SYNTHESIS
Statistical Process Control (SPC) is not new to industry. In 1924, a man at Bell
Laboratories developed the control chart and the concept that a process could be in
statistical control. His name was William A. Shewart. He eventually published a book
titled “Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control” (1939). The SPC
process gained wide usage during World War II by the military in the munitions and
weapons facilities. The demand for product had forced them to look for a better and
more efficient way to monitor product quality without compromising safety. SPC filled
that need. The use of SPC techniques in America faded following the war. It was then
picked up by the Japanese manufacturing companies where it is still used today. In the
1970s, SPC started to gain acceptance again due to American industry feeling
pressure from high quality products being imported from Japan. Today, SPC is a
widely used quality tool throughout many industries.
21 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
quality, efficiency and cost reduction. Many companies still rely only on inspection after
production to detect quality issues. The SPC process is implemented to move a
company from detection based to prevention based quality controls. By monitoring the
performance of a process in real time the operator can detect trends or changes in the
process before they result in non-conforming product and scrap.
Before implementing SPC or any new quality system, the manufacturing process
should be evaluated to determine the main areas of waste. Some examples of
manufacturing process waste are rework, scrap and excessive inspection time. It would
be most beneficial to apply the SPC tools to these areas first. During SPC, not all
dimensions are monitored due to the expense, time and production delays that would
incur. Prior to SPC implementation the key or critical characteristics of the design or
process should be identified by a Cross Functional Team (CFT) during a print review
or Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) exercise. Data would then
be collected and monitored on these key or critical characteristics.
Variable data
22 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
Attribute data
Control Charts
One of the most widely used control charts for variable data is the X-bar and R
chart. X-bar represents the average or “mean” value of the variable x. The X-bar chart
displays the variation in the sample means or averages. The Range chart shows the
variation within the subgroup. The range is simply the difference between the highest
and lowest value. The following steps are required to build an X-bar and R chart:
Designate the sample size “n”. Usually 4 or 5 are common sample sizes used in
many industries. Remember the sample size should be 8 or less. Also determine
the frequency that the sample measurements will be collected.
Start collecting your initial set of samples. A general rule is to collect 100
measurements in groups of 4 which would result in 25 data points.
Calculate the average value for each of the 25 groups of 4 samples.
Calculate the range of each of the 25 samples of 4 measurements. The range is
the difference between the highest and lowest value in each set of 4 sample
measurements.
Calculate X-dbar (the average of the averages), which is represented on the X-
bar chart by a solid centerline.
Calculate the average of the sample ranges or “R” values. This will be the
centerline of the Range chart.
Calculate the Upper and Lower Control Limits (UCL, LCL) for each chart. To be
clear, the control limits are not the spec limits set by the engineer on the drawing.
The control limits are derived from the data. Most engineers utilize statistical
software that will perform the calculations automatically.
Once the chart is setup, the operator or technician will measure multiple samples,
add the values together then calculate the average. This value is then recorded on a
control chart or X-bar chart. The range of the subgroups is also recorded. The sample
measurements should be taken and recorded in regular intervals, including date and
23 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
time to track the stability of the process. Watch for any special or assignable causes
and adjust the process as necessary to maintain a stable and in control process.
The X-bar and R chart is merely one example of the different control charts available
for process monitoring and improvement. For assistance in determining the best
practices to improve your processes, contact one of the many professionals at Quality-
One.
The data points recorded on a control chart should fall between the control limits,
provided that only common causes and no special causes have been identified.
Common causes will fall between the control limits whereas special causes are
generally outliers or are outside of the control limits. For a process to be deemed in
statistical control there should be no special causes in any of the charts. A process in
control will have no special causes identified in it and the data should fall between the
control limits. Some examples of common cause variation are as follows:
Variation in material properties within specification
Seasonal changes in ambient temperature or humidity
Normal machine or tooling wear
Variability in operator controlled settings
Normal measurement variation
Adversely, special causes generally fall outside of the control limits or indicate a drastic
change or shift in the process. Some examples of special cause variation are below:
Failed controllers
Improper equipment adjustments
A change in the measurement system
A process shift
Machine malfunction
Raw material properties out of design specifications
Broken tool, punch, bit, etc.
Inexperienced operator not familiar with process
24 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
When monitoring a process through SPC charts the inspector will verify that all data
points are within control limits and watch for trends or sudden changes in the process.
If any special causes of variation are identified, appropriate action should be taken to
determine the cause and implement corrective actions to return the process to a state
of statistical control.
There are other variations or patterns of data points within the control limits that should
also be tracked and investigated. These include but are not limited to:
Runs where 7 or more data points are in a row on one side of the process
centerline
Changes in the normal spread of data, where multiple data points fall either
farther apart or closer together
Trends which are represented by 7 or more data points consistently raising or
declining
Shifts in the data spread above or below the normal mean
By addressing any special causes, trends or shifts in the process we can assure we
are producing parts that meet the customer’s requirements. Remember the control
limits should always fall between the spec limits determined by the engineer and / or
the customer. For more information regarding the SPC process and available tools,
mentoring, training or assistance in implementation of SPC, contact one of the Subject
Matter Experts (SME) at Quality-One. We are always ready to provide any assistance
or information you made need.
25 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
SPC - Control Charts
26 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
SYNTHESIS
Total quality management (TQM) tools help organizations to identify, analyze and
assess qualitative and quantitative data that is relevant to their business. These tools
can identify procedures, ideas, statistics, cause and effect concerns and other issues
relevant to their organizations. Each of which can be examined and used to enhance
the effectiveness, efficiency, standardization and overall quality of procedures, products
or work environment, in accordance with ISO 9000 standards (SQ, 2004). According to
Quality America, Inc. the number of TQM tools is close to 100 and come in various
forms, such as brainstorming, focus groups, check lists, charts and graphs, diagrams
and other analysis tools. In a different vein, manuals and standards are TQM tools as
well, as they give direction and best practice guidelines to you and/or your staff. TQM
tools illustrate and aid in the assimilation of complicated information such as:
The list goes on, though essentially TQM tools can be used in any situation, for any
27 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
number of reasons, and can be extremely effective if used properly.
TQM Tools
The following are some of the most common TQM tools in use today. Each is used for,
and identifies, specific information in a specific manner. It should be noted that tools
should be used in conjunction with other tools to understand the full scope of the issue
being analyzed or illustrated. Simply using one tool may inhibit your understanding of
the data provided, or may close you off to further possibilities.
2) Histograms
To illustrate and examine various data element in order to make decisions regarding
them Effective when comparing statistical, survey, or questionnaire results.
3) Run Chart
Follows a process over a specific period of time, such as accrual rates, to track high
and low points in its run, and ultimately identify trends, shifts and patterns.
28 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
4) Force Field Analysis
To identify driving and restraining forces occurring in a chosen process in order to
understand why that particular process functions as it does. For example, identifying the
driving and restraining forces of catering predominantly to genealogists. To identify
restraining forces that need to be eradicated, or driving forces that need to be improved,
in order to function at a higher level of efficiency.
5) Focus Groups
Useful for marketing or advertising organizations to test products on the general
public.
· Consist of various people from the general public who use and discuss your product,
providing impartial feedback to help you determine whether your product needs
improvement or if it should be introduced onto the market.
An affinity diagram, which can be created using anything from enabling software to
post-it notes organized on a wall, is a tool to organize brainstorming ideas
· To identify the various tasks involved in, and the full scope of, a project.
29 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
.8) Flowcharts and Modeling Diagrams
· Identify areas where workflow may be blocked, or diverted, and where workflow is
fluid.
· Identify where steps need to be added or removed to improve efficiency and create
standardized workflow
11) PDCA
30 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
· This is a cyclical style to be iterated until the process is perfected. All of these TQM
tools can be easily created and examined by using various types of computer software
or by simply mapping them out on paper. They can also be easily integrated into team
meetings, organizational newsletters, marketing reports, and for various other data
analysis needs. Proper integration and use of these tools will ultimately assist
in processing data such as identifying collecting policies, enhancing work flow such as
mapping acquisition procedures, ensuring client satisfaction by surveying their needs
and analyzing them accordingly, and creating an overall high level of quality in all areas
of your organization.
31 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
SYNTHESIS
ISO 9000
ISO 9000 can help a company satisfy its customers, meet regulatory requirements, and
achieve continual improvement. It should be considered to be a first step or the base
level of a quality system.
DESCRIPTION
This American National Standard (ANS) is an identical adoption of ISO 9000:2015. The
text of this ANS does not differ in any way from ISO 9000:2015.
This standard provides the fundamental concepts, principles and vocabulary for quality
management systems (QMS) and provides the foundation for other QMS standards.
This International Standard is intended to help the user to understand the fundamental
concepts, principles and vocabulary of quality management, in order to be able to
effectively and efficiently implement a QMS and realize value from other QMS
standards.
32 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
This standard describes the fundamental concepts and principles of quality
management which are universally applicable to the following:
This standard specifies the terms and definitions that apply to all quality management
and quality management system standards developed by ISO/TC 176.
33 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
a stand-alone document, but must be implemented as a supplement and in conjunction with
ISO 9001:2015.
After October 01, 2017, audits cannot be conducted to ISO/TS 16949 and organizations must
transition to the new IATF 16949 in line with their current audit cycle, according to the
allowable timing requirements. Failure to conduct the audit within the allowable timing
requirements requires the organization to start over with an initial certification audit. The
transition audit shall be the duration of a recertification audit plus additional time for a
documentation review. All supporting functions on site or at a remote location shall be
included in the transition process.
A Quality Management System based on IATF 16949:
Is a method of defining how an organization can meet the requirements of its
customers and other stakeholders
Promotes the idea of continual improvement
Requires organizations to define objectives and continually improve their processes
in order to reach them
Emphasizes defect prevention
Includes specific requirements and core tools from the automotive industry
Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP)
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA)
Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)
Promotes reduction of variation and waste in the supply chain
Requires documented and implemented corporate responsibility polices
The IATF 16949 standard provides guidance and tools for companies and organizations who
want to ensure that their products consistently meet customer requirements and that quality
and customer satisfaction are consistently improved. Requirements for certification to IATF
16949 are defined in the 2016 Revision 5 of the rules for achieving and maintaining IATF
recognition.
34 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
The IATF 16949 standard is a supplemental standard and is used in conjunction with the ISO
standards:
IATF 16949 – establishes the Automotive supplemental requirements of a quality
management system
ISO 9001 – defines the base requirements of a quality management system
ISO 9000 – covers the basic concepts and language
ISO 9004 – focuses on how to make a quality management system more efficient
and effective
ISO 19011 – provides guidance on internal (1st party) and external (2nd party)
audits of quality management systems
ISO 31000 – outlines risk management principles and guidelines
IATF 16949 defines the criteria for an automotive-based QMS with the goal to become 3rd
party registered. It can be used by any supplier, large or small, and should be applied
throughout the automotive supply chain. In fact, there over 65,000 suppliers worldwide which
are currently certified to ISO/TS 16949. All requirements of IATF 16949 are applicable unless
suppliers do not provide product design related functions. Requirements are generic and are
intended to be applicable to any supplier providing design and development, production and,
when relevant, assembly, installation and services of automotive related products, including
products with embedded software. The IATF 16949 standard is applicable to sites of the
organization where manufacturing of customer-specified production parts, service parts,
and/or accessory parts occur.
The standard is based on seven Quality Management Principles, including a strong customer
focus, the motivation and implication of top management, the process approach and continual
improvement.
These Quality Management Principles are defined as follows:
1. Customer focus
2. Leadership
3. Engagement of people
4. Process approach
5. Improvement
6. Evidence-based decision making
35 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
7. Relationship management
Implementing IATF 16949 ensures that customers receive consistent, good quality products
and services, which in turn may bring many business benefits. IATF 16949 specifies
requirements for a Quality Management System when an organization wants to:
Demonstrate its ability to consistently provide products that meet customer and
applicable statutory, regulatory and product safety requirements
Enhance customer satisfaction through the effective application of the system
Implement processes for improvement of the system
Define overall context, who is affected and what they expect
Clearly state objectives and identify new business opportunities
Put customers first, making sure their needs are consistently met and enhance their
satisfaction
Have repeat customers, increase customer loyalty, add new clients and increase
business
36 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
Expand into new markets, as some sectors and clients require IATF 16949 before
doing business
Identify and address the risks associated with your organization
Work in a more efficient way to increase productivity and efficiency, bringing internal
costs down
Become more socially responsible through the documentation and implementation
of corporate responsibility polices
Compliance to the IATF 16949 standard can be done at any time but is typically used when:
Customers specify this requirement as part of the contract
Organizations want to improve their products and customer satisfaction
Organizations’ deciding to develop and implement any new or improved QMS is a strategic
decision. All efforts should be focused on the identification and minimization of risk while
meeting and exceeding customer and organizational goal and objective requirements.
Organizations should make a commitment to:
Recognize direct and indirect customers as those who receive value from the
organization
Understand customers current and future needs and expectations
Link the organization’s objectives to customer needs and expectations
Communicate customer needs and expectations throughout the organization
Plan, design, develop, produce, deliver and support products to meet customer
needs and expectations
Measure and monitor customer satisfaction and take appropriate actions
Determine and take actions on interested parties needs and expectations that can
affect customer satisfaction
Actively manage relationships with customers to achieve sustained success
Become more socially responsible
Provide necessary resources to ensure product safety requirements are met
37 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T
IATF 16949 Compliance can be achieved through Quality-One’s Seven Phase Approach:
1. Executive and Management Overview / Planning
2. Gap Assessment and Planning
3. Documentation
4. Implementation and Training
5. Internal Assessment and Management Review
6. 3rd Party Registration Assessment
7. Sustain and Continual Improvement
38 | P H D 7 1 4 – T O T A L Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T