KEMBAR78
Customer:: Potential Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (Process FMEA) | PDF | Systems Engineering | Business Process
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views8 pages

Customer:: Potential Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (Process FMEA)

This process FMEA identifies potential failure modes in the manufacturing process and their potential effects. Three key failure modes are discussed: 1. Cracks could form due to improper magnaflux settings, leading to component failure. 2. Dimensional variations could cause improper fitment on the collet. 3. Tapping issues such as worn taps or improper tap settings could result in loose fitments affecting engine operation. Controls are in place like operator training, work instructions, quality plans, inspection steps to prevent, detect, and address failures. Target completion dates are set to further improve the process.

Uploaded by

Rajnish Potdar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views8 pages

Customer:: Potential Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (Process FMEA)

This process FMEA identifies potential failure modes in the manufacturing process and their potential effects. Three key failure modes are discussed: 1. Cracks could form due to improper magnaflux settings, leading to component failure. 2. Dimensional variations could cause improper fitment on the collet. 3. Tapping issues such as worn taps or improper tap settings could result in loose fitments affecting engine operation. Controls are in place like operator training, work instructions, quality plans, inspection steps to prevent, detect, and address failures. Target completion dates are set to further improve the process.

Uploaded by

Rajnish Potdar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

FMEA No

POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS


Revision.
(Process FMEA )
Customer : Revision D
Drawing No. Revision No. : 00 Core Team Supplier C
Part No. Part Name Process Responsibility Prepared
Assly No. Assly Name -- : Key Date : Page
Model Year (S) Vehicle.: FMEA Date
S C O D Reco Responsib
Current Process Control
Potential E L Potential cause (s) / C E R mme ility &
Process Function Potential Failure
Opn. Effects (S) of V A Mechanism (S) Of C T P nded Target
Requirements Mode
Failure E S Failure U Prevention Detection E N Actio Completio
R S R C n (S) n Date

Defective
material will
Magnaflux setting Opr. Training, Supp quality plan
Crack process, failure 8 2 8 80
improper Work instruction verification
of componant in
working

Proper fitment
Draw operation Opr. Training, Supp quality plan
Dimension variation. on collet not 7 1 8 56
parameters not ok Work instruction verification
possible

Incoming Chemical
10 Material not as per Wrong material Opr. Training, Supp quality plan
Inspection 8 composation not as 1 8 64
specification will process Work instruction verification
per specification
Improper setting First piece
Opr. Training, inspection &
Forging not ok 4 2 7 56
Work instruction Inprocess
inspection.
Dimn Not OK
Improper setting First piece
Opr. Training, inspection &
Forging not ok 7 2 7 98
Work instruction Inprocess
inspection.
Wear out tap used , First piece
Fittment
Tapping M12*1.75 Tap change freq inspection &
Problem 7 2 7 98
Go not ok not followed Inprocess
During assy
inspection.
FMEA No
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
Revision.
(Process FMEA )
Customer : Revision D
Drawing No. Revision No. : 00 Core Team Supplier C
Part No. Part Name Process Responsibility Prepared
Assly No. Assly Name -- : Key Date : Page
Model Year (S) Vehicle.: FMEA Date
S C O D Reco Responsib
Current Process Control
Potential E L Potential cause (s) / C E R mme ility &
Process Function Potential Failure
Opn. Effects (S) of V A Mechanism (S) Of C T P nded Target
Requirements Mode
Failure E S Failure U Prevention Detection E N Actio Completio
R S R C n (S) n Date
Wear out tap used ,
Loose fitment at
First piece
final stage it
Tapping M12*1.75 Tap change freq inspection &
occure engine 7 2 7 98
NOGO Answer not followed Inprocess
not lifting by
inspection.
eye bolt

Part mix up
Opr. Training, First piece
Fittment
Work instruction inspection &
Tapping Missing Problem 7 2 7 98
Tagging and Inprocess
During assy
binning inspection.
Broken tap used First piece
Fittment
Tap change freq inspection &
Thread Damage Problem 7 2 7 98
not followed Inprocess
During assy
inspection.
Wrong setting
First piece
Tap depth 23.0±0.2 Customer inspection &
VMC Operation 7 2 Wrong tap used 7 98
20 O/S dissatisfied Inprocess
inspection.
Wrong program setting First piece
Fittment
Tap depth 23.0±0.2 Wrong program inspection &
Problem 7 2 7 98
U/S followed Inprocess
During assy
inspection.
FMEA No
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
Revision.
(Process FMEA )
Customer : Revision D
Drawing No. Revision No. : 00 Core Team Supplier C
Part No. Part Name Process Responsibility Prepared
Assly No. Assly Name -- : Key Date : Page
VMC Operation
20 Year (S) Vehicle.:
Model FMEA Date
S C O D Reco Responsib
Current Process Control
Potential E L Potential cause (s) / C E R mme ility &
Process Function Potential Failure
Opn. Effects (S) of V A Mechanism (S) Of C T P nded Target
Requirements Mode
Failure E S Failure U Prevention Detection E N Actio Completio
R S R C n (S) n Date
Wrong setting Opr. Training, First piece
Customer not Frequency of tool inspection &
Drill depth 28.0 O/S 7 2 7 98
satisfied sharpening is Inprocess
defined inspection.
Wrong setting , First piece
Tapping depth Tool broken Opr. Training, inspection &
Drill depth 28.0 U/S not achive as 7 2 7 98
Work instruction Inprocess
per spec
inspection.
Drill resharpening freq Opr. Training,
First piece
Fittment not followed Work
inspection &
Drill Dia 12+0.3 O/S Problem 4 properly,Wrong drill 2 instruction,Drilll 7 56
Inprocess
During assy used change freq
inspection.
followed
Drill resharpening freq Opr. Training,
First piece
Fittment not followed Work
inspection &
Drill Dia 12+0.3 U/S Problem 7 properly,Wrong drill 2 instruction,Drilll 7 98
Inprocess
During assy used change freq
inspection.
followed
Improper setting
Assembly
Phosphetting cycl Opr. Training,
fitment not 7 2 Inward insp 7 98
time O/S Work instruction
possible
30 Phosphetting
Improper setting
Phosphetting cycl Loose Opr. Training,
7 2 Inward insp 7 98
time U/S Assembly Work instruction
FMEA No
POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
Revision.
(Process FMEA )
Customer : Revision D
Drawing No. Revision No. : 00 Core Team Supplier C
Part No. Part Name Process Responsibility Prepared
Assly No. Assly Name -- : Key Date : Page
Model Year (S) Vehicle.: FMEA Date
S C O D Reco Responsib
Current Process Control
Potential E L Potential cause (s) / C E R mme ility &
Process Function Potential Failure
Opn. Effects (S) of V A Mechanism (S) Of C T P nded Target
Requirements Mode
Failure E S Failure U Prevention Detection E N Actio Completio
R S R C n (S) n Date
packing material not
Damage in proper.
Packing not as per handeling. Packing material not Opr. Training, First packinmg
40 Packing 6 2 8 96
specification Rusty due to used properly. Work instruction inspection
environment.

FPA - First Piece Approval IPIR - Inprocess Inspection Report


Prepared By: `

###
FMEA No.
Revision. No.
Revision Date
Supplier Code
Prepared by
Page

Action Results
S O D R
Action Taken E C E P
V C T N
FMEA No.
Revision. No.
Revision Date
Supplier Code
Prepared by
Page

Action Results
S O D R
Action Taken E C E P
V C T N
FMEA No.
Revision. No.
Revision Date
Supplier Code
Prepared by
Page

Action Results
S O D R
Action Taken E C E P
V C T N
FMEA No.
Revision. No.
Revision Date
Supplier Code
Prepared by
Page

Action Results
S O D R
Action Taken E C E P
V C T N

You might also like