KEMBAR78
Reflective Journal Rubric | PDF | Specification (Technical Standard) | Rubric (Academic)
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
168 views2 pages

Reflective Journal Rubric

This document provides a rubric for assessing reflective journals in a Process Economics and Management course. The rubric evaluates students on an overview and learning objectives, development of reflective data and interpretation, demonstration of learning experience, writing skills, and report format and references. Excellent performance is awarded 17-20% for each criteria, above average performance is 14-16%, average performance is 10-13%, below average is 6-9%, and unsatisfactory is 0-5%.

Uploaded by

salman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
168 views2 pages

Reflective Journal Rubric

This document provides a rubric for assessing reflective journals in a Process Economics and Management course. The rubric evaluates students on an overview and learning objectives, development of reflective data and interpretation, demonstration of learning experience, writing skills, and report format and references. Excellent performance is awarded 17-20% for each criteria, above average performance is 14-16%, average performance is 10-13%, below average is 6-9%, and unsatisfactory is 0-5%.

Uploaded by

salman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Marking Rubric for Reflective Journal (CHEN 4016 Process Economics and Management)

Student Name: ________________________ Student ID: ___________________________

Reflective Journal No.: ________________________ Speaker Name: ___________________________

Assessment Please tick the appropriate rubric for each category Marks
Criteria Excellent Above Average Average Below Average Unsatisfactory
Overview and -Clear and comprehensive -Clear and comprehensive -Clear overview provided. -Overview inadequate. -Overview missing.
learning overview and learning overview and learning -Clear learning objectives -Learning objectives -Learning objectives
objectives objectives provided. objectives provided. provided. unclear. missing.
-A detail biodata of the -Biodata of speaker -Biodata of speaker -Biodata of speaker -Biodata of speaker
speaker is provided. provided is adequate. provided is adequate. provided is inadequate. missing.
(20-17%)
(16-14%) (13-10%) (9-6%) (5-0%)
Development -Reflective data and -Reflective data and -Reflective data and -Reflective data and -Reflective data and
of reflective interpretation provided are interpretation provided is interpretation is adequate. interpretation is interpretation is
data and clear and comprehensive. clear and adequate. inadequate. missing.
interpretation (20-16%) (15-12%) (11-9%) (8-5%) (4-0%)
Demonstration -Clear and comprehensive -Clear and adequate -Adequate demonstration -Inadequate demonstration -Missing
of learning demonstration of learning demonstration of learning of learning experience. of learning experience. demonstration of
experience experience through decision experience. learning experience.
making based on reflective
analysis.
(30-25%) (24-20%) (19-14%) (13-10%) (9-0%)
Writing skills -Language is fully -Spelling, grammar and -Some spelling, grammar -Some spelling, grammar, -Density of spelling,
appropriate. typographical errors are and typographical errors and typographical errors grammar, and typing
-Excellent English rare. are present but not impede communication. errors makes it difficult
expression and clarity with -Language used is formal intrusive. -Language used is too to follow the meaning.
no errors. and appropriate for a -Language used is informal for a professional -Language used is not
professional document. generally formal and document. appropriate for a
professional, with some professional document.
inappropriacies.
(20-18%) (17-14%) (13-10%) (10-7%) (6-0%)
Report format -Fully adheres to the format -Most conforms to format - Generally conforms to - Only partially conforms -Does not conform to
and references and layout specifications. and layout specifications. format and layout to format and layout format and layout
-Both in-text and end of text -Referencing mostly specifications. specifications. specifications.
references used correctly conforms to the required -Referencing generally -Referencing is -Referencing
and appropriately. system. conforms to the required inconsistent. Fails to meet inadequate or
-All illustrations are -Consistently appropriate system (both in-text and both in-text and end of insufficient.
described in the text and and effective use of end of text). text requirements. -Tables and figures are
effectively and illustrations. -All illustrations referred -Some illustrations not unclear.
appropriately used. -All illustrations referred to in the text. referred to the text. –Several illustrations
to in the text. not referred to in the
text.
(10-8%) (7-6%) (5%) (4%) (3-0%)

Total (100%)

You might also like