Republic of the Philippines
Tarlac State University
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
CENTER OF DEVELOPMENT
Lucinda Campus, Tarlac City
Tel. No. (045) 982-6062; fax No. (045) 982-0110
Re-Accredited Level III by the Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universities of the Philippines
RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT TEACHERS
Name of Student Teacher: _______________________________________________________
Course and Major: ______________________________________________________________
Name of the Student Teaching Supervisor: __________________________________________
Name of Cooperating Teacher: ____________________________________________________
Name of Cooperating School: _____________________________________________________
Date of Local/General Demonstration Teaching: _____________________________________
Subject Matter/ Topic: ________________________________
Time Started: ________________Time Finished: __________
Direction: THIS IS NOT A CHECKLIST. Please indicate your rating using 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75
and the like in the appropriate space provided for each item for a fair and efficient evaluation of
the demonstration teaching.
Outstandin Above Average
g Average 2.5 – 3.0
1.0 – 1.5 1.75 – 2.25
I. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerisms that
tend to disturb the students’ attention.
C. The teacher’s personality is strong enough
to command respect and attention.
D. The teacher shows dynamism and
enthusiasm.
E. The teacher has well-modulated voice.
II. LESSON PLANNING
A. Lesson plan is well prepared.
B. There is congruence between:
1. objective and subject matter
2. objective and teaching procedure
3. objective and formative test
4. objective and assignment
III. CONTENT
A. The teacher demonstrates in- depth
knowledge of the subject matter.
B. He/She is able to integrate values and relate
lessons to actual life situations.
C. Keeps abreast of new ideas and
understanding in the field.
D. Gives sufficient and concrete examples to
create meaningful learning experiences.
Form No.: TSU-COD-SF-06 Revision No.: 01 Effectivity Date: August 13, 2019 Page 1 of 2
Form No.: TSU-COD-SF- 06 Revision No.: 00 Effectivity Date: AUGUST 6 2019 Page 1 of 2
IV. TEACHING METHODS
A. Method/s used was/were suited to the needs
and capabilities of the students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt
his/her method to the students’ capabilities.
C. Visual aids and/or multimedia presentations
were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the
formative test after teaching.
V.CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
1. Attendance
2. Assignment/Homework/Agreement
3. Practice exercises
4. Group work/projects
5. Passing in and out of the room
6. Correcting, distributing, and collecting paper
B. Order and discipline were present in the classroom.
C. Visual aids were within easy reach of the teacher
during his/her teaching.
VI. QUESTIONING SKILLS
The teacher’s questioning skill stimulates discussion
in different ways such as:
1. probing for learner’s understanding
2. helping students articulate their ideas and thinking
process
3. promote risk-taking and problem solving
4. facilitate factual recall
5. encourage convergent and divergent thinking
6. stimulate curiosity
7. helps students to ask questions
Adopted from: Experiential Learning Courses Handbook
Average: ________________
Comments and Suggestions:
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
_______
_______________________________________
(Signature over printed name of the rater)
Form No.: TSU-COD-SF-06 Revision No.: 01 Effectivity Date: August 13, 2019 Page 2 of 2
Form No.: TSU-COD-SF- 06 Revision No.: 01 Effectivity Date: AUGUST 6 2019 Page 2 of 2
Form No.: TSU-COD-SF- 06 Revision No.: 01 Effectivity Date: AUGUST 6 2019 Page 2 of 2
