KEMBAR78
Deriving MRS From Utility Function, Budget Constraints, and Interior Solution of Optimization | PDF | Teaching Mathematics | Economies
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views9 pages

Deriving MRS From Utility Function, Budget Constraints, and Interior Solution of Optimization

1. The document discusses deriving the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) from a utility function. MRS is the slope of the indifference curve and represents the rate at which a consumer is willing to substitute one good for another to maintain the same level of utility. 2. It also discusses the budget constraint, which shows the combinations of goods that are affordable given prices and income. The slope of the budget line represents the rate at which a consumer must give up one good to obtain more of another good. 3. When prices or income change, the budget line shifts or rotates accordingly, altering the set of affordable bundles. 4. For an interior solution where both goods are consumed in positive amounts,

Uploaded by

dijojnay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views9 pages

Deriving MRS From Utility Function, Budget Constraints, and Interior Solution of Optimization

1. The document discusses deriving the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) from a utility function. MRS is the slope of the indifference curve and represents the rate at which a consumer is willing to substitute one good for another to maintain the same level of utility. 2. It also discusses the budget constraint, which shows the combinations of goods that are affordable given prices and income. The slope of the budget line represents the rate at which a consumer must give up one good to obtain more of another good. 3. When prices or income change, the budget line shifts or rotates accordingly, altering the set of affordable bundles. 4. For an interior solution where both goods are consumed in positive amounts,

Uploaded by

dijojnay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

1 Utility Function, Deriving MRS 1

Lecture 5

Deriving MRS from Utility Function, Budget


Constraints, and Interior Solution of
Optimization

Outline
1. Chap 3: Utility Function, Deriving MRS
2. Chap 3: Budget Constraint
3. Chap 3: Optimization: Interior Solution
1 Utility Function, Deriving MRS
Examples of utility:
Example (Perfect substitutes).

U(x,y) = ax + by.

Example (Perfect complements).

U(x,y) = min{ax,by}.

Example (Cobb-Douglas Function).

Example (One good is bad).

U(x,y) = −ax + by.

An important thing is to derive MRS.

= = Slope of Indifference Curve|.


1 Utility Function, Deriving MRS 2

10

7
U(x,y)=ax+by=Const
6

y
4

0
0 2 4 6 8 10
x

Figure 1: Utility Function of Perfect Substitutes

10

5
y

U(x,y)=min{ax,by}=Const
4

0
0 2 4 6 8 10
x

Figure 2: Utility Function of Perfect Complements


1 Utility Function, Deriving MRS 3

10

y
U(x,y)=Axayb =Const
4

0
0 2 4 6 8 10
x

Figure 3: Cobb-Douglas Utility Function

10

5
y

U(x,y)=−ax+by=Const
4

0
0 2 4 6 8 10
x

Figure 4: Utility Function of the Situation That One Good Is Bad


4
2 Budget Constraint

Because utility is constant along the indifference curve,


u = (x,y(x)) = C,=⇒

∂u ∂u dy
+ = 0,=⇒
∂x ∂y dx
dy ∂u

− dx = ∂u∂x .
∂y

Thus,
∂u

MRS = ∂u∂x .
∂y Example
(Sample utility function).
u(x,y) = xy 2 .
Two ways to derive MRS:
• Along the indifference curve

xy 2 = C.

c
y=
.
x
Thus,
dy √c y
MRSd = −dx = 2x3/2 = 2x .
• Using the conclusion above

=
.

2 Budget Constraint
The problem is about how much goods a person can buy with limited income.
Assume: no saving, with income I, only spend money on goods x and y with
the price Px and Py.
Thus the budget constraint is
5
Px · x + Py · y I.

Suppose Px = 2, Py = 1, I = 8, then
2x + y 8.
The slope of budget line is

=
Bundles below the line are affordable. Budget
line can shift:
2 Budget Constraint

10

6
y

4 2x+y≤8

0
0 2 4 6 8 10
x

Figure 5: Budget Constraint


3 Optimization: Interior Solution 6
10

6 2x+y≤8

y
5

4 2x+y≤6
3

0
0 2 4 6 8 10
x

Figure 6: Budget Line Shifts Because of Change in Income


10

6 2x+y≤8

5
y

4 x+y≤4
3

0
0 2 4 6 8 10
x

Figure 7: Budget Line Rotates Because of Change in Price

• Change in Income Assume I′ = 6, then 2x+y = 6. The budget line shifts right
which means more income makes the affordable region larger.

• Change in Price Assume = 2, then 2x + 2y = 8. The budget line changes


which means lower price makes the affordable region larger.

3 Optimization: Interior Solution


Now the consumer’s problem is: how to be as happy as possible with limited
income. We can simplify the problem into language of mathematics:
7
+
max U(x,y)subject to
0 x,y
0

Since the preference has non-satiation property, only (x,y) on the budget line can
be the solution. Therefore, we can simplify the inequality to an equality:

xPx + yPy = I.

First, consider the case where the solution is interior, that is, x > 0 and y > 0.
Example solutions:

• Method 1
3 Optimization: Interior Solution 8

10

y
4 U(x,y)=Const

2 Pxx+Pyy=I

0
2 4 6 8 10
x

Figure 8: Interior Solution to Consumer’s Problem

From Figure 8, the utility function reaches its maximum when the
indifferent curve and constraint line are tangent, namely:

=
– If
,

then one should consume more y, less x.


– If
,

then one should consume more x, less


y. Intuition behind = :
is the market price of x in terms of y, and MRS is the price of x in
terms of y valued by the individual. If Px/Py > MRS, x is relatively
expensive for the individual, and hence he should consume more y.
On the other hand, if Px/Py < MRS, x is relatively cheap for the
individual, and hence he should consume more x.
• Method 2: Use Lagrange Multipliers

L(x,y,λ) = u(x,y) − λ(xPx + yPy − I).


3 Optimization: Interior Solution 9

In order to maximize u, the following first order conditions must be


satisfied:

∂L ux
=0= = λ,
∂x ⇒ Px
∂L uy
=0= = λ,
∂y ⇒ Py
∂L

∂λ = 0 =⇒ xPx + yPy − I = 0.

Thus we have
=

• Method 3

Since xPx + yPy + I = 0,

=
Then the problem can be written as

=
At the maximum, the following first order condition must be satisfied:

∂y Px ux + uy( )=
ux + uy(− ) = 0.
∂x Py
=⇒
Px ux =
.
Py uy

You might also like