KEMBAR78
Software Verification: AISC-360-16 Example 006 | PDF | Bending | Mechanics
Scribd
Upload
465 views5 pages

Software Verification: AISC-360-16 Example 006

This document summarizes the verification of the composite column design feature in the ETABS software. It presents a composite column design example comparing the output of ETABS to independent hand calculations. The example geometry, material properties, and loads are input into both ETABS and hand calculations. The results for required strength, available strength, required moment, and available moment are compared between the two and show good agreement within 0.07%. The computer file and hand calculations are presented. The conclusion is that the ETABS results show acceptable comparison with the independent hand calculations.

Uploaded by

alejandro mantilla
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
465 views5 pages

Software Verification: AISC-360-16 Example 006

This document summarizes the verification of the composite column design feature in the ETABS software. It presents a composite column design example comparing the output of ETABS to independent hand calculations. The example geometry, material properties, and loads are input into both ETABS and hand calculations. The results for required strength, available strength, required moment, and available moment are compared between the two and show good agreement within 0.07%. The computer file and hand calculations are presented. The conclusion is that the ETABS results show acceptable comparison with the independent hand calculations.

Uploaded by

alejandro mantilla
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Software Verification

PROGRAM NAME: ETABS


REVISION NO.: 0

AISC-360-16 Example 006

COMPOSITE COLUMN DESIGN

EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION
Determine if the 14-ft.-long encased composite member illustrated below is
adequate for the indicated axial forces, shears, and moments. The composite
member consists of an ASTM A992 W-shaped section with normal weight (145
lb/ft3) concrete having a specified compressive strength, f c′ = 5 ksi.

GEOMETRY, PROPERTIES AND LOADING

Member Properties Loading Geometry


W10x45 Height, L = 14 ft
Pr = 1,170 kips
E = 29,000 ksi Mr = 670 kip-ft
Fy = 50 ksi Vr = 95.7 kips

AISC-360-16 Example 006 - 1


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS
REVISION NO.: 0

TECHNICAL FEATURE OF ETABS TESTED


Compression and flexure of composite column (encased).

RESULTS COMPARISON

Independent results are referenced from Example I.11 from the AISC Design
Examples, Version 15.0.

Percent
Output Parameter ETABS Independent
Difference

Required Strength, Pu (k) 1,170 1,170 0.00%

Available Strength, ΦPn (kip) 2,362 2,360 0.07%

Required Strength, Mu (k-ft) 670 670 0.00%

Available Strength, ΦbMn (k-ft) 671.6 671.3 0.04%

Interaction Equation H1-1a 1.38 1.38 0.00%

COMPUTER FILE: AISC-360-16 EXAMPLE 006.EDB

CONCLUSION
The ETABS results show an acceptable comparison with the independent results.

AISC-360-16 Example 006 - 2


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS
REVISION NO.: 0

HAND CALCULATION
Properties:
Materials:
ASTM A992
E = 29,000 ksi, Fy = 50 ksi, Fu = 62 ksi
5000 psi normal weight concrete
Ec = 3,900 ksi, f c′ = 5 ksi, wconcrete = 145 pcf
Section dimensions and properties:
W10x45
bf = 8.02 in, d= 10.1 in, tf = 0.620 in
As = 13.3 in2, Isx = 248 in4, Isy = 53.4 in4
Concrete area
h1 = 24.0 in, h2 = 24.0 in.

Ag = 24 • 24 = 576 in 2 , Asr = 6.32 in 2 ,


8 • 0.79 =
Moment of inertia of reinforcing rebars about the elastic neutral axis of the composite
section:
πdb4 π(1) 4
I sri
== = 0.0491in.4
64 64
∑i 1=
I sri + ∑ i 1 I sri ei2
n n
=I=
sr

8 • 0.0491 + 6 • 0.79 • 9.52 + 2 • 0.79 • 02 in.4


=
= 428 in.4

Moment of inertia values for the concrete about each axis are determined as:
I cx = I gx − I sx + I srx
244
= − 248 − 428 = 26,972in.4
12
I cy = I gy − I sy + I sry
244
= − 53.4 − 428 = 27,167 in.4
12

AISC-360-16 Example 006 - 3


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS
REVISION NO.: 0

Compression capacity:
Nominal Compressive Strength:
ΦcPn= 2,360 kips as computed in Example I.9

Bending capacity:
Maximum Nominal Bending Strength:
h
Zr = ( Asr − Asrs )  2 − c 
2 
 24 
= ( 6.32 − 1.58 )  − 2.5  = 45.0 in.3
 2 
h1 • h2 2
Zc
= − Zs − Zr
4
24 • (24) 2
= = 3,356 in.3
− 54.9 − 45.0
4
0.85 • f c′ • Z c
M D = Fy • Z s + Fyr • Z r +
2
0.85 • 5 • 3,356 12,576.5 kip-in.
= 50 • 54.9 + 60 • 45.0 + = = 1, 048 kip-ft
2 12 in./ft
d d
Assuming hn is within flange  − t f < hn ≤  :
2 2

0.85 f c' ( Ac + As − db f + Asrs ) − 2 Fy ( As − db f ) − 2 Fyr Asrs


hn =
2 0.85 f c' ( h1 − b f ) + 2 Fy b f 

0.85 • 5 ( 556 + 13.3 − 10.1 • 8.02 + 1.58 ) − 2 • 50 (13.3 − 10.1 • 8.02 ) − 250 • 60 • 1.58
hn =
2 0.85 • 5 ( 24 − 8.02 ) + 2 • 50 • 8.02 
= 4.98 in.

Check assumption:
 10.1   10.1 
 − 0.620  ≤ hn ≤  
 2   2 
4.43 in. <
= hn 4.98 in. ≤ 5.05 in. assumption O.K.

AISC-360-16 Example 006 - 4


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS
REVISION NO.: 0

Available Bending Strength:


d  d 
Z sn =
Z s − b f  − hn   + hn 
2  2 
 10.1   10.2 
=54.9 − 8.02  − 4.98   + 4.98  =49.3 in.3
 2  2 
Z cn = h1 • hn2 − Z sn
=24 • (4.98) 2 − 49.3 =546 in.3
0.85 • f c′ • Z cn
M nx = M D − Fy • Z sn −
2
0.85 • 5 • 546 8,951.2 kip-in.
= 12,576.4 − 50 • 49.3 − = = 746 kip-ft
2 12 in./ft
Φ b M nx =0.9 • 746 =671.3 kip-ft

Interaction Equation H1-1a:


Pu 8  Mu 
+   ≤ 1.0
Φ c • Pn 9  Φ b • M n 
1,170 8  670 
+   ≤ 1.0
2,360 9  671.3 
1.38 > 1.0 n.g.

AISC-360-16 Example 006 - 5

You might also like