10 VII July 2022

https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.45464
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

Design and Analysis of Prestressed Shell Roof

Structures
Niranjan. B. Satyannavar1, Dr. R. Subhash Chandra Bose2, K.M. Shivashankar3
1
Post graduation student, Department of civil engineering
2
Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering

Abstract: In this paper, pre-stressed precast substantial Shell roof structures is proposed as an option in contrast to customary
roof structures. plan of shell roof top utilizing supported concrete is extremely challenging. To oppose the high strain in base
harmony, the substantial support should be pre-stressed. Here, the displaying of various setups of prestressed precast substantial
shell roof structures is finished utilizing Staadpro v8i programming by changing its mathematical boundaries, for example,
shapes, slant, length and dispersing of the support and investigation and streamlining is done to find the best and best
prestressed precast substantial Shell roof structures designs fit to different circumstances feasible way of life implies
reconsidering our approaches to everyday life, how we purchase and how we sort out our day to day existence. It is likewise
about modifying how we mingle, trade, share, instruct and construct personalities. It implies changing our social orders and
living in agreement with our common habitat. As residents, at home and at work, a large number of our decisions - on energy
use, transport, food, waste, correspondence and fortitude - contribute towards building economical ways of life In India,
customary practices that are feasible and climate well-disposed keep on being a piece of individuals' lives. India has a past filled
with low carbon impression and way of life. These should be energized, rather than supplanted by more current yet
unreasonable practices and advancements. This is likewise relevant to other non-industrial nations where there is a developing
interest in elective models of advancement, and on restoring green cognizance drawing on conventional societies.
Keywords: Precast Concrete, RCC cylindrical shell roof structures, STAAD PRO V8i, Prestressed precast shell structures

I. INTRODUCTION
As we move towards a reasonable planet, the creating scene is confronted with the predicament of a requirement for quick
development of lodging and foundation on one hand and the imperatives of maintainability on the other. Nonetheless, a more critical
glance at neighbourhood qualities and innovation somewhere else can prompt intelligent fixes. Shells are a more proficient primary
structure than the generally utilized section pillar outlines, which utilize twisting strength and henceforth underutilize the underlying
limit of materials. Better underlying productivity permits shell structures than be lightweight, lessening the interest for materials.
The wide scope of conceivable material arrangements - from compacted earth to concrete - takes into consideration a fitting
neighbourhood material to be utilized in the acknowledgment of the underlying structure. Shell structures are in no way, shape or
form an advanced creation. Proof of the earliest vaulted structures comes from Mesopotamia in 3000BC: a 5000-yearold
Mesopotamian internment chamber with a barrel vault of approx. 1m range is in plain view at the Berlin Museum of Prehistory and
Ancient History.
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
1) Himayat Ullah & Sagheer Ahmad (2007) - Fastening results gained using the Analytical shell model of be finished considering
Kirchhoff-Low hypothesis. It was associated with the Semi observational to Buckle coefficients model for redressing the
irregularities among speculation & test data. Numerical fastening assessment, model be analysed by both direct & non-straight
strategy to anticipate catching strength. They derived mentioned straight speculation should be utilized instead concluding
mode shapes aided assessment of different cylinder moulded shells see be finished using SAP 2000.
2) Ravindra Rai & Umesh Pendharkar (2012) – This paper. mathematical model was isolating on various cut off points changing
their thickness & clear of and stream. They contemplated all model having unique reach and same thickness & piece of most
over top powers lies at that segment where two shells are coexisted with one another. models having same reach without
various thickness it is observed mentioned piece of most silly second, most important powers and most absurd loads is staying
same anyway because reduce in thickness entire second, powers & stresses are diminished.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 1117
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

3) Mahmoud Shariati (2010) - Circulated paper on numerical and exploratory focus on fastening of barrel moulded sheets
presented to centre burden. Paper deals about convincing during length, region point & different cut-off conditions on fastening
weight & post catching of CK20 round & empty board. ABAQUS programming has been used for the numerical examination
and the results contemplated that development long downfalls the catching weight and region point changes extends the
fastening load. The precast strategies are all the more notable as a result of its uniqueness & quality. Shell structures are more
appropriate for precast material on account of its light weight.
4) Bandyopadhyay et al (2015) - The variety of bend is the troublesome experienced in the examination of these shells. The
limited component strategy is involved here for the investigation of summed up doubly bended shells and is applied to
shortened and full conoids of various limit conditions. Perspectives proportions and levels of truncation. An eight hubs
Isoperimetric limited component with five levels of opportunity for each hub, including three interpretations and two pivots, is
used. The precision is checked by finishing the outcomes got by the current examination with those current in the writing.
Results are introduced in various conoidal shells and a bunch of ends are shown up at in light of a parametric report.
5) Koteswara Rao et al (2012) - The restricted part showing and assessment of essentially evaluated (FG) shell structures under
different stacking, for instance, warm and mechanical. Free vibration assessment of basically surveyed (FG) roundabout shell
structure has also been presented. To focus on the effects of critical limits on the responses of FG shell structures, various sorts
of shells have been thought of. The reactions acquired for FG shells are contrasted and the homogeneous shells of unadulterated
ceramic and unadulterated metal (steel) shells and it has been seen that the reactions of the FGM shells are in between the
reactions of the homogeneous shells. In light of the examination a few significant outcomes are introduced and examined for
thick as well as dainty shells.
6) Bhiimarsaddi et al (2014) - Studied the free also, undamped vibration of an isotropic roundabout tube-shaped shell is dissected
with higher request uprooting model leading to a more reasonable illustrative variety of cross over shear strains. The technique
reaction of barrel shaped shells. The frequencies acquired from the current investigation shear hypothesis.
7) Salvatore brischetto et al (2016) - Proposes the investigation of the estimation of the arch terms in the 3D harmony shell
conditions utilized for the free vibration examination of one layered and diverse composite and sandwich structures 3D balance
conditions composed for round shells deteriorate into 3D conditions for tube shaped shells and plates taking into account one of
the two radii of bend or both as endless, individually The guess of and flow terms has been presented in 3D balance conditions
to concentrate on its belongings as far as recurrence values.

A. Objectives
The main objectives of the project are:
1) To find the viability of prestressed precast shell roof structures.
2) To design and its configuration for various circumstances.
3) To plan the construction against Dead load, Live load and Wind load.
4) To Analysis and Design the Load Combinations.
5) To get ideal support setup of pre-stressed precast shell roof structures.
6) To approve and check the conceivable outcomes of execution of general PC program Staadpro v8i programming for Shell roof
investigation and plan.

B. Aim and Scope of the Project

Further degree of study is in assessment & discernment in Effectiveness of shell structure alongside logical examination of non-
edged shell without edged shaft part shell. Considering calculation during weight because of self-weight, imposed weight & seismic
powers & belonging mix on similar plan or edged shaft shell structure. There is prevent degree to contemplate overall economy
during prestressed substantial cylinder formed shell without prestressed concrete imploded plates. There is prevent degree to
contemplate overall economy of RCC fell plates & prestressed imploded plate rooftop. There is prevent degree to ponder overall
economy during prestressed autonomously twisted shell without prestressed doubly twisted shell.

III. METHODOLOGY
In this review, to play analysis in pre-stressed shell roof top structure, information's like shapes, aspects, material properties,
programming's which are generally utilized for investigation were gathered from the writing study and survey. Models of
prestressed shell roof supports are then planned, loads are appointed and investigated and improvement is finished.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 1118
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

In this review, Staadpro v8i programming has been taken on to show, upgrade and dissect the prestressed shell rooftop supports.
Staadpro represents Extended Three-layered Analysis of Building System which is a plan situated programming program uniquely
worked for the investigation of building structures. Results were assessed and ends were made.

A. Description Of Model And Cases

Structrural Modelling Of Rc Member
Present work done an attempt have been created theoretically to evaluate Economical directrices during prestressed cylindrical
shells rooftop structures.
Length of Shell: 25meter
Width of chord: 10meter
Semi-Central Angles: 30degrees 35degrees and 40degrees Design codes IS:2204 – 1962.
Imposed weight: 0.75 KN/m2 (as per IS:875)
Shells thickness– 75mm
Grade of Concrete – M40
Reinforcement steel Bars – HTS bars
Loss ratio – 0.8
The accompanying loads are out for the investigation of the displayed roof structures

B. Initial Decision on shape

Resulting to chasing after a decision on the shape the accompanying stage is to perspective the roof. In this part the reach and sagitta
of the housetop will be described. These two limits are crucial for shell plan as in the end they control its basic approach to acting.

C. Rise of the Shell

Prior to foundation of the ascent of the rooftop, the progression of powers in a rooftop, exposed to concentrated load, should be
researched. Since shells are math-based structures, it is simply certain that different computations for the round housetop can
achieve detached essential direct.

Fig 1. Shape of Curved beam showing utilized as single shell need following facts.

D. Calculation of Loads
The accompanying framework in plan is to perceive the stores circling back to the development. Load factors are resolved using
Eurocodes which lead to design potential gains of a couple of kinds of weights.
1) Dead Load: It is a consistent burden that follows up on the construction because of oneself load of the individuals, the upheld
structure, alongside suffering connections or different embellishments. The review with dead loads is considered in the structure
plan and all the while in the materials unit weight. These heaps are determined as indicated in IS 875-1987. These are
conditions instead membrane hypothesis of a shell without circular directrices. The Self weight or load shell is taken as 24
kN/m3. The stresses are determined at the boundary conditions & also at semi focal point.
2) Live Load: For the situation of rooftop support, live burden might be the heap oppressed by dust load, disseminated, sway
burden and vibration, different factors like breeze, seismic, snow alongside temperature varieties, differential settlement, creep,
shrinkage, and so forth the review proposes expecting live loads in the plan of structures, with the end goal of primary
wellbeing of structures. Live loads are determined according to IS 875-1987 (section II).
Wherefrom the shells are explored as the rooftop for structures, the Imposed weight of shell is taken as 0.75kN/m2 according to
Bureau of Indian Standard Building Code (2005).

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 1119
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

Fig 2. Shows grid covers bended slab utilized as single shell need following data.

Table 1. Shows relocation Data because of applied load cases on shell (Beam) structure.

Table 2. Shows relocation Data because of applied load cases on shell (Grid) structure.

Table 3. Shows Normal stress, circumferential & longitudinal stresses because of applied weight.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 1120
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

Table 4. Shows major stress & displacement on shell element because of applied weight.

Fig 3. Model shell roof cylindrical tube structure

Fig 4. Model during Wire cylindrical tube-shaped shell without support.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 1121
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

Fig 5. Cylindrical shell tube shaped structure model with support.

E. Loading Conditions for the Model

Three various loading combinations are utilized for the analysis. Since buckling is being considered we determined load factors for
extreme breaking point model was made by showing outer inward elements of shell & cutting them. shell have been fit using a 3D
strain part of C3D4 which is a 4noded tetrahedron part. Reduced size of overall part has been given 50. fit model of construction is
shown in figure 4. For expected of round & empty shell without reinforcement, two events see be made without first being shell
alone & second being support alone. implanted necessity was utilized to introduce steel into substantial shell. Surface of shell during
be given as latitude strain along top surface of shell as shown in figure 5 & besides pile not entirely settled presence instead layer
examination. heap was given as displayed in figure.

Fig 7. Shell structure loading

F. Wire mesh details
The edge shafts, ribs and stiffeners are corresponded, including the Auto-Mesh capacity for edges, while the shell sheets are
harmonized, using the Face Map-Mesh ability. In the two cases network sizes rely upon 10 divisions of each subsurface (which
make up the entire shell). Mid-side center points are made during the cross segment, things being what they are. While grid the most
noteworthy mark of the vault, care is removed to remain from time of quadrilaterals with extraordinary corners.

Fig 6. shows Meshed model of Cylindrical shell roof structure.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 1122
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

G. Boundary Edge Conditions

Fixed or cinched limit conditions are decided to be applied as line support on the edge of the shell. Showed that the proper help is
better for locking contemplations in the event of consistently disseminated stacking. This is a direct result of firmness of the shell is
expanded close to the edge shaft.
The breaking point conditions of shell are assuming converse edges of edge people as tracked down in figure 6. Along one side
vertical migration is caught and on contrary side both vertical & level movements are caught. static gamble procedure for
examination is finished to vanquish the precariousness occurring in the static general system.

Fig 8. Boundary edge situations of the cylindrical shell roof structure.

Fig 9. Stresses of round and hollow shell with reinforcement

Graph 1. Loading deformity graph of structure with reinforcement

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 1123
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

Fig 10. Stresses values of round & hollow shell without reinforcement

Graph 2. Loading deformation graph of the structure without reinforcement

IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

A. Design Procedure And Analysis
Graph 3. Comparative analysis of cost for circular directrices

Graph No.3 Comparative analysis of cost for parabolic directrices

Graph 4. Comparative analysis of cost for inverted catenary directrices

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 1124
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

Graph 5. Comparative analysis of cost for cycloidal directrices

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS DURING COST (Rs) PER UNIT VOLUME INSTEAD SEMI CENTREL ANGLE 300

2800
SEMI 2750
CENTRAL
2700
ANGLE - 30°
COST/m2

2600
2470
2500
2394 2369
2400

2300

2200

2100
CIRCULAR PARABOLIC INVERTED CYCLOIDAL
CATENARY

DIRECTRIX

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 1125
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS DURING COST (Rs) PER UNIT VOLUME INSTEAD SEMI CENTREL ANGLE 350

SEMI
2800
CENTRAL
ANGLE - 35° 2767
2700

COST/m2
2600

2500
2506
2400 2450
2412
2300

2200
CIRCULAR PARABOLIC INVERTED CYCLOIDAL
CATENARY
DIRECTRIX

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS DURING COST (Rs) PER UNIT VOLUME INSTEAD SEMI CENTREL ANGLE 400

SEMI
2800 CENTRAL 2744

2700 ANGLE - 40°

2600
2512
2500 2442 2457

2400

2300

2200
CIRCULAR PARABOLIC INVERTED CYCLOIDAL
CATENARY

Prestressed substantial cylinder molded shell roofs:

Figures Showing it is seen understood Parabolic Directrices gives most negligible cost for semi point of convergence 30
degrees & Circular Directrices gives most insignificant cost instead semi points of convergence 35 degrees 40degrees by virtue
of prestressed round & empty shells presented to gravitational weights.
As semi point of convergence extends 30degrees to 40degrees cost per unit locale covered exceed.
Cylinder molded shell between shell with help & without substantial support have been inspected & nitty gritty. strain values
acting along edges of plan still up in air & found out. going without closes see be procured:
There were 85% addition in the strain values between conventional course of action & shell without help.
135% extension in tension qualities between plan & shell model made through Finite Element Methods.
Blunders in tension part potential gains of the thin barrel molded shell are principally a result of the technique for assessment.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 1126
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 10 Issue VII July 2022- Available at www.ijraset.com

V. CONCLUSION
The shell structure arranged as a shaft part miss the mark for picked plan detail however shell as a system outlined part passes for
likewise express condition.
Arranged bar shell structure get moreover thickness (0.1 m) as differentiation with 0.08 meter gave later use during wind load case
as indicated by stack applied. bar shell structure has no redirection aside from system shell grants aversion instead flexibility &
reasonability clarification for this mistake to be flexural disillusionment & development in pressure support in shaft shell part. strain
delivered because of applied weight causes versatility twisting impact of this plan is that shell arranged as point of support
construction breakdown under load while the shell arranged as system outlined structure really go against pressure additionally,
safely act to counter distorting.

REFERENCES
[1] SP 38 (S &T):1987-Handbook of encapsulated plans of constructions with steel rooftop brackets (regardless of cranes) Based on IS Codes.
[2] IS: 1893-2002: Criteria for seismic tremor safe plan of constructions
[3] IS: 875 [Part1] 1987-Code of practice for Design loads
[4] IS: 875 [Part 3] 2015- Design loads (other than tremor) for structures and constructions - code of training.
[5] IS: 456-2000- Plain & reinforced concrete code practice – IIT Kanpur
[6] IS:2204-1962- Code of practice for construction of reinforced concrete shell roof.
[7] IS:1343-1980- Code of practice for Prestressed reinforced concrete.
[8] G.S. Ramaswamy text book practice for design & construction of concrete shell roofs.
[9] N. Krishna Raju- practice for prestressed concrete problems & solutions.
[10] V.K. Chauhan- design & construction rooftop shells.
[11] Mohmed shairati- A numerical & experimental study of buckling cylindrical panels subjected to compressive axial load.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 1127