KEMBAR78
APPENDIX Table 1 | PDF
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views8 pages

APPENDIX Table 1

The document contains tables of data comparing the initial mass, height, final mass, height, mass and height gains, feed consumption, and feed conversion efficiency of broilers fed coconut meat versus commercial feeds. Statistical t-tests were performed on the data to test for significant differences between the two feeding groups.

Uploaded by

jek vin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views8 pages

APPENDIX Table 1

The document contains tables of data comparing the initial mass, height, final mass, height, mass and height gains, feed consumption, and feed conversion efficiency of broilers fed coconut meat versus commercial feeds. Statistical t-tests were performed on the data to test for significant differences between the two feeding groups.

Uploaded by

jek vin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

APPENDIX Table 1.

Initial Mass (kg) of the Broiler

No. T1 (Coconut Meat) T2 (Commercial Feeds)

1 0.10 0.05

2 0.05 0.05

3 0.05 0.05

4 0.05 0.05

5 0.10 0.05

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Variable 1 Variable 2

Mean 0.07 0.05

Variance 0.00075 0

Observations 5 5

Pooled Variance 0.000375

Hypothesized Mean Difference 0

df 8

t Stat 1.632993

P(T<=t) one-tail 0.070557

t Critical one-tail 1.859548

P(T<=t) two-tail 0.141113

t Critical two-tail 2.306004


APPENDIX Table 2. Initial Height (cm) of the Broiler

No. T1 (Coconut Meat) T2 (Commercial Feeds)

1 13.5 12

2 12 12

3 13 12

4 12 12

5 12 13

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Variable 1 Variable 2

Mean 12.5 12.2

Variance 0.5 0.2

Observations 5 5

Pooled Variance 0.35

Hypothesized Mean Difference 0

df 8

t Stat 0.801784

P(T<=t) one-tail 0.222919

t Critical one-tail 1.859548

P(T<=t) two-tail 0.445838

t Critical two-tail 2.306004


APPENDIX Table 3. Final Mass (kg) of the Broiler

No. T1 (Coconut Meat) T2 (Commercial Feeds)

1 1.10 1.30

2 1.20 1.25

3 1.15 1.30

4 1.20 1.30

5 1.15 1.35

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Variable 1 Variable 2

Mean 1.16 1.3

Variance 0.00175 0.00125

Observations 5 5

Pooled Variance 0.0015

Hypothesized Mean Difference 0

df 8

t Stat -5.71548

P(T<=t) one-tail 0.000223

t Critical one-tail 1.859548

P(T<=t) two-tail 0.000446

t Critical two-tail 2.306004


APPENDIX Table 4. Final Height (cm) of the Broiler

No. T1 (Coconut Meat) T2 (Commercial Feeds)

1 34 32

2 31 32

3 35 33

4 34 31

5 35 30

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Variable 1 Variable 2

Mean 33.8 31.6

Variance 2.7 1.3

Observations 5 5

Pooled Variance 2

Hypothesized Mean Difference 0

df 8

t Stat 2.459674775

P(T<=t) one-tail 0.019669352

t Critical one-tail 1.859548033

P(T<=t) two-tail 0.039338705

t Critical two-tail 2.306004133


APPENDIX Table 5. Gain in Mass (kg) of the Broiler

No. T1 (Coconut Meat) T2 (Commercial Feeds)

1 1 1.25

2 1.25 1.20

3 1.10 1.25

4 1.15 1.25

5 1.05 1.30

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Variable 1 Variable 2

Mean 1.11 1.25

Variance 0.00925 0.00125

Observations 5 5

Pooled Variance 0.00525

Hypothesized Mean Difference 0

df 8

t Stat -3.05505

P(T<=t) one-tail 0.00785

t Critical one-tail 1.859548

P(T<=t) two-tail 0.0157

t Critical two-tail 2.306004


APPENDIX Table 6. Gain in Height (cm) of the Broiler

No. T1 (Coconut Meat) T2 (Commercial Feeds)

1 20.5 20

2 19 20

3 22 21

4 22 19

5 23 17

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Variable 1 Variable 2

Mean 21.3 19.4

Variance 2.45 2.3

Observations 5 5

Pooled Variance 2.375

Hypothesized Mean Difference 0

df 8

t Stat 1.949359

P(T<=t) one-tail 0.043539

t Critical one-tail 1.859548

P(T<=t) two-tail 0.087078

t Critical two-tail 2.306004


APPENDIX Table 7. Feed consumption (kg) of the Broiler

No. T1 (Coconut Meat) T2 (Commercial Feeds)

1 2.52 2.52

2 2.52 2.52

3 3.57 3.57

4 3.57 3.57

5 3.57 3.57

6 4.20 4.20

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Variable 1 Variable 2

Mean 3.325 3.325

Variance 0.44835 0.44835

Observations 6 6

Pooled Variance 0.44835

Hypothesized Mean Difference 0

df 10

t Stat 0

P(T<=t) one-tail 0.5

t Critical one-tail 1.812461

P(T<=t) two-tail 1

t Critical two-tail 2.228139


APPENDIX Table 8. Feed Conversion efficiency of the Broiler

No. T1 (Coconut Meat) T2 (Commercial Feeds)

1 2.52 2.02

2 2.02 2.10

3 3.25 2.86

4 3.1 2.86

5 3.4 2.75

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Variable 1 Variable 2

Mean 2.8572 2.518

Variance 0.332299 0.17762

Observations 5 5

Pooled Variance 0.25496

Hypothesized Mean Difference 0

df 8

t Stat 1.062161

P(T<=t) one-tail 0.159586

t Critical one-tail 1.859548

P(T<=t) two-tail 0.319172

t Critical two-tail 2.306004

You might also like