FIT9137 S1 2024 Assignment 2 – Network
Design PPT Presentation & Report – Marking Guide
Submission Guidelines:
● This assessment task is done individually, and you will be required to work to apply your
knowledge, to analyze network design topics.
● In this assessment you will develop a critique PowerPoint presentation on an RFP
Request for Proposal on the network design.
● This will cover the first four learning outcomes of the unit.
● All submissions are to be made via Moodle, where Turnitin is enabled.
● Assignments not submitted through Moodle will not be considered. Submissions must
be made by the due date. Assignments left in draft mode will also not be accepted.
The Turnitin similarity score will be used in determining the level, if any, of academic integrity
issues. Turnitin will check websites, Journal articles, the Web and your own class member
submissions for plagiarism. If this is a concern, you will have a chance to change your
assignment and re-submit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior to the submission due
date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed, you cannot make re-submissions and
you will need to accept the similarity score as there will be no chance for changing. Thus, plan
early and submit early to take advantage of this feature. You can upload files multiple times in
draft mode, but please remember we only see the final submission, and the date and time you
submitted will be recorded.
Submission files:
● Your document should be a single pdf/PPT document containing your presentation
slides. In addition, you will be submitting the Video presentation file along with your
presentation slides.
● When you submit the assignment in Moodle, please make sure the submission is not left
in the draft mode. Before the expiry of the deadline make sure, the submission is made
final. If the submission is left in draft state, it will be deemed as NOT submitted and will
NOT be marked.
Warning: Important Submission check for every student: It is students’ responsibility to check
if their submitted work is markable by our teaching team. It is recommended that every student
immediately download their own work (e.g., recorded video/PDF file, etc) before finalising their
submission, and check if the assignment would be downloadable/readable/markable by a tutor.
If the teaching team is unable to mark your submission, your submission may receive a mark of
zero. Once you complete this check, make sure to finalise your submission by the due date and
time.
PPT Presentation – Marking
The following is suggested as presentation slides structure, but you can make it
instinctive and adapt to your requirements:
● Title page
● A Brief Summary of Problem Definition
● Important Information and Diagram listed in Section 2.1 (see assignment detail sheet)
● Conclusions and Recommendations
● References (You would usually stop here in your recorded video)
● Appendix (This may contain information listed in Section 2.2 and can only be included in
your slides not in video).
Note: Turnitin will be used to check for Plagiarism; disciplinary action will be taken
within the Monash Academic Integrity & Misconduct School policy and laws.
Allocation of Marks
Student ID’s Names
Assignment Assessment description Marks Marks Scored
Part-I: Network Design components based on the
Assignment specifications, relevancy, related
articles, technical design details and specifications
70
used, and other design requirements and clarity in
the design of all the other relevant network
components
Part-II: Presentation – Literature review with
relevancy to the topic selected, quality of PPT slides,
visual presentation, explanation, participation in
presentation with clear understanding of their
work, video and audio being clear. Note that the
30
students should show prowess in explanation,
knowledge and understanding while presentation.
Finally, the recording should be clear with student’s
voice and video with the recording showing the
presenters presence/face in the video.
100
General Assessment Rubric
Exceptional Admirable Acceptable Unsatisfactory
Extremely well
organized report; Presented in a thoughtful manner; Somewhat organized; ideas were Choppy and confusing; format
Presentation (30) logical format that there were signs of organization, not presented coherently, and was difficult to follow;
was easy to follow; and most transitions were easy to transitions were not always transitions of ideas were
flowed smoothly from follow, but at times ideas were smooth, which at times abrupt and seriously distracted
one idea to another unclear (15-24) distracted the reader (10-14) the reader (0-9)
and cleverly
conveyed; the
organization
enhanced
effectiveness of the
report (25-30)
Totally accurate and Mostly accurate and complete; Somewhat accurate and Completely inaccurate and
Completeness complete; all relevant
(30) a few inconsistencies, errors or complete; more than a few incomplete; many
information was
lack of information (15-24) inconsistencies, errors or lack of inconsistencies, errors or lack of
precise and explicit
information (10-14) information (0-9)
(25-30)
Showed detailed
understanding of topic. Showed above average
Went beyond to understanding of topic. Did a very Showed only a basic Exhibited little or no
Correctness (40) research information; good job of researching; utilized understanding of topic. Used the understanding of topic. Did not
solicited material in materials provided to their full material provided in an utilize resources effectively; did
addition to what was potential; solicited more than 6 acceptable manner, but did not little or no fact gathering on the
provided; brought in types of research to enhance report; consult any additional resources topic (1-14)
personal ideas and at times took the initiative to find (15-21)
information to enhance additional information (22-34)
report; and utilized
more than 8 additional
resources to support
report (35-40)
(End)
