Page |1

PES UNIVERSITY
(Established under Karnataka Act No. 16 of 2013)

100-ft Ring Road, Bengaluru – 560 085, Karnataka, India

Report on

‘The Role of Technology in Enhancing Audit

Efficiency in Bengaluru.’

Submitted by

Deeksha T. Bosmia

(PES1UG22BC085)

June - July 2024

Under the guidance of

External Guide: Internal Guide:

Balaji LH Prof. Harshita BM
Chartered Accountant (CA) Assistant Professor
Balaji Sumant & Co.,
FACULTY OF COMMERECE & MANAGEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF B.Com
PROGRAM – B.Com
 Page |2

FACULTY OF COMMERCE AND

MANAGEMENTDEPARTMENT OF

COMMERCE

PROGRAM: B. Com

CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the Internship Project Report entitled

‘The Role of Technology in Enhancing Audit

Efficiency in Bengaluru.’

is a bonafide work carried

out by

Deeksha T. Bosmia (PES1UG22BC085)

In partial fulfillment for the completion of IV semester course work in the Program of Study
B.COM underrules and regulations of PES University, Bengaluru during the period June-July
2024. It is certified that all corrections/suggestions indicated for internal assessment have been
incorporated in the report. The study report has been approved as it satisfies the IV semester
academic requirements in respect of Internship/Secondary Study.

Signature with date & Seal Signature with date & Seal Signature with date & Seal
Internal Guide Chairperson Dean of Faculty

Name of the student: Deeksha T. Bosmia

 Page |3

DECLARATION

I, Deeksha T. Bosmia, hereby declare that the dissertation entitled, “The Role of Technology

in Enhancing Audit Efficiency in Bengaluru.”, is an original work done by me under the

guidance of Dr./Prof./Mr./Ms. Harshitha BM, Assistant Professor, PES University, and is

being submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for completion of the 4 th Semester

course work in the Program of Study B.COM in PES UNIVERSITY.

PLACE:
BANGALORE
DATE:

NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE CANDIDATE: Deeksha T. Bosmia

 Page |4

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am personally thankful to my university for giving me the opportunity to do my project work

at Balaji Sumant & Co. It has given me exposure and great knowledge about various
departments. It has truly given me firsthand experience which helpedme to grasp and relate
to the theoretical knowledge much better.

I would also like to thank my company guide Mr. Balaji LH who helped me explore and gain
knowledge to my satisfaction. I would like to thank the Vice Chancellor, of PES University
Dr. Suryaprasad J, along with the Dean, Faculty of Commerce & Management Studies, Dr.
Shailashree Haridas, and Our Department Chairperson, Dr. Anupama G.

Also, I would like to thank my internal guide Prof Harshitha BM for guiding me and
throwing light on the areas to focus on throughout my project journey. Lastly, I would like to
thank my parents and friends for supporting and walking with me through my Internship
Project work journey.
 Page |5

CERTIFICATE PICTURE.
 Page |6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PARTICULARS Sl. No.

CHAPTER -1
Introduction to the Study 8
CHAPTER -2
Industry Profile 25
CHAPTER -3
Company Profile 32
CHAPTER -4
Review of Literature 47
CHAPTER -5
Research Methodology 58
CHAPTER -6
Data Analysis and Interpretation 64
CHAPTER -7
Findings, Suggestions and Conclusion 85
CHAPTER -8
Learning Outcomes 90
CHAPTER -9
Blog 94
 Page |7

Abstract:
This study focuses on the transformative impact of technology on audit efficiency in the context
of Bengaluru. Technology has remarkably transformed the traditional nature of auditing, which
was labor-intensive and manual. Advanced digital tools, at present the most recent—AI, machine
learning, blockchain, and cloud computing—have taken auditing to a different level by
accomplishing audits more efficiently, precisely, and comprehensively.

First to be introduced were electronic spreadsheets and then CAATs, marking the shift from
manual to computer-based processes, thereby saving time and effort in analyzing the data with
more accurate results for the audits. Advanced data analytics and AI have further augmented
auditors by automating data processing, pattern recognition, and prediction of financial risks,
which inform and improve audit accuracy and effectiveness.

Leveraging blockchain technology, an immutable, transparent, and secure ledger system improves
data verification and reduces threats of fraud. Cloud computing enables scalable, on-demand
access to data and resources, enabling the audit teams to collaborate for transaction verification in
real-time and monitor transactions in real-time.

The darker side is that with such great benefits, overdependence on high-end audit technology
poses data security, ethical threats, and continuous human resource buildup as glaring challenges.
Balancing technological efficiency and human judgment is quite important for delivering accuracy
and reliability in audit findings.

The findings support the requirement for the auditing profession to couch with technology
developments but not so much that it loses the ability of skepticism and critical thinking to detect
even the minutest differences in the books. While technology enables auditing, it is rather supposed
to complement human capacity in forms of intuition and professional judgment than replace it.

Keywords:
Audit Efficiency, Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Blockchain, Cloud
Computing, Data Analytics, Financial Audits.
 Page |8

CHAPTER-1
Introduction to the Study
 Page |9

1. Introduction: The Role of Technology in Enhancing Audit Efficiency in

Bengaluru.

1.1. Background Of the Study:

The dynamics of technological growth have brought about major changes in the scaling up of
auditing and thus revising obsolete techniques of audit. In earlier times, audits were
cumbersome manual procedures involving a mountain of paperwork, on-spot inspection of
documents, padded paper audits, and testing by samples.

The issue with these methods is that they were not only time-consuming but also constrained,
and could not provide a deeper understanding of intricate financial transactions and operational
activities.

Optimization enabled by advanced technology with the arrival of sophisticated technology-

based tools and digital solutions, the auditor has a variety of software platforms, ability for
data analytics, use of AI-driven algorithms, and machine learning features. These have allowed
simplified and automated data entry, extraction and analysis in audit processes like never
before, reducing the time and effort in these tasks dramatically.

Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the application of technology in analyzing financial

information has improved the ability to investigate a broader range of issues. With AI and
machine learning algorithms, auditors can examine large volumes of data, find patterns,
features, and latent dangers that are not caught by the traditional methods. Therefore, this
provides opportunities for accurate audits as well as catching such fraudsters.

Furthermore, real-time data processing and monitoring have increased efficiency of audits
through immediate access to important information for auditors. Henceforth with respect to
cloud computing and digital collaboration tools they facilitate seamless communication and
sharing of information among audit teams as well as clients and stakeholders irrespective of
distance.
 P a g e | 10

In addition to that, technological incorporation into auditing enhances responsiveness to

regulatory compliance requirements. Inclusion of updated regulations within auditing software
guarantees that these examinations are conducted according to new standards and criteria.
Compliance risks can be reduced while still enhancing the reliability and validity of audit
findings at the same time

The world is moving towards using technology in all spheres of life, and this has brought
numerous issues to the auditors. Among the most important are data security, ethical concerns
with respect to AI adoption and the need for continuous skill development among audit
professionals. Nonetheless, it is worth mentioning that technology is not a mere future
facilitator of audit efficiency, accuracy or strategic value but instead a current bedrock that
defines modern day auditing practices in the world.

1.2. Introduction to the Study:

Technological changes have been able to transform many sectors including auditing. Audit
technology integration is a function that has brought about functional, qualitative and dramatic
modifications enhancing efficacy, precision and overall performance. This study examines the
role of technology in improving audit efficiency among Chartered Accountancy (CA) firms as
well as companies that perform auditing.

Evolution of Auditing through Technology:

Traditionally, auditing used to be a labor-intensive process that took up a lot of time but due
to technological advances it has evolved greatly. The era where auditors had to use manual
papers during audits is long gone since there are digitalized systems. Technology has redefined
the traditional mechanisms of auditing and made it more effective, successful, and accurate.

1.2.1. Traditional Auditing Methods:

1. Manual Processes: Earlier, auditing was an arduous manual process involving the physical
verification of documents, which created an overwhelming quantity of paperwork and
examination of the ledger with precision. The auditors had to actually collect and examine the
financial records since they were physical pieces of paper just like the case with invoices and
 P a g e | 11

receipts. The process was highly tedious and always subject to human error. From a practical
point of view, there were a number of major logistical issues related to processing as well as
storing documents.

2. Time-Consuming: It was necessary to meet with business staff; it was necessary to actually
visit client locations to fetch documents and also to conduct on-site document evaluations. The
auditing process had a lot of human labor intervention at every step of the way, from the first
planning to the last reporting; this resulted in audit cycles that may last for many weeks or
months.

3. Narrow Scope: Being manual in the past, the audits mostly consisted of sampling rather than
in-depth examination. Instead of going through every page of every transaction due to
limitations of time and resources, auditors normally select a small yet representative sample to
assess and measure. This technique may lead to the discovery of severe problems, but on most
occasions, the small discrepancies escaped detection.

4. High Risk of Errors: The manual process increased the risk of errors in terms of computation,
interpretation, and entries of data. Even small errors had the potential of significantly affecting
the results of the audit.

5. High Costs: Traditional audit was expensive and cumbersome for auditing companies just
as much as their customers. The entire audit fee was increased by the necessity of physical
document storage space, travel cost of on-site checks, and also the high usage of people for
manual work. These could, separately, be very demanding of small companies or groups with
a smaller pool of funds.

6. Limited Analytical Capabilities: Not having advanced analytical capabilities, auditors could
only rely on visual inspections and simple calculations to perform a search for unusual
transactions and patterns. They could hence not perform complex investigations relating to
fraud detection, trend analysis, and predictive modelling. The extent of results that the audit
could achieve both in scope and depth was therefore limited as technology-based analytical
processes could not be performed.
 P a g e | 12

1.2.2. Emergence of Basic Digital Tools:

1. Electronic Spreadsheets: Software such as Microsoft Excel fully revolutionized the

processing of information. Instead of doing things by hand, auditors were able to calculate,
produce statements and analyze information in a lot less time. This process greatly
diminished the time it took to do simple calculations as well as organize information.
Spreadsheets enabled automatizing complex computations and mathematical procedures,
which reduced the possibility of human error. Excel also enabled the creation of data
visualization charts and graphs that meant results could be presented succinctly and clearly
on a far fewer number of pages.
2. Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques (CAATs): The first CAATs employed software for
carrying out repetitious operations such as data extraction, sampling, and trend analysis,
thus decreasing the time taken and increasing the accuracy of auditors. Previously, huge
sets of data were difficult to analyze by manual techniques in a sufficient amount of time;
these technologies altered this. Further, CAATs allowed easy detection of irregularities and
discrepancies within financial data, thereby allowing auditors to better detect possible
problems and fraud.
3. Large-scale Data Handling: Advanced data analytics software by auditors permits quick
and efficient processing and analysis of large volumes of data. This will effect a
transformation in which more profound auditing processes would bring about patterns and
irregularities not visible with the traditional manual means.
4. Predictive analytics: Same predict probable risks and financial outcomes hence better
preparation for auditing can be made and one) apprehensive risks can be dealt proactively
with.
5. Online Data Repositories: The internet data storage was developed to ensure that the
auditors can access centralized important financial data as well as records. The websites
are normally updated by the customers or third-party service providers and were therefore
an easy way of assisting auditors in getting the needed information without going through
physical documents. As a result, auditors could now log on to access the latest information
at their own convenience, making the whole process of data gathering and evaluation more
 P a g e | 13

efficient. Security was another area where online data repositories helped, as data there can
be encrypted and access restricted.

Therefore, the auditing profession has undergone a tremendous change, from the traditional
auditing techniques to the utilization of basic digital tools in auditing work practice. Traditional
auditing techniques were characterized by manual processes that involved a lot of paperwork and
were very costly. Such techniques not only took a long time in completion but were also highly
prone to errors and limited in scope and ability for various analyses. Automatic spreadsheets,
Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques, and advanced data analysis tools tremendously evolved
auditing. They rendered the auditing process more efficient, accurate, and comprehensive. They
enabled the auditors to deal with large-scale transactions more effectively with greater speed and
accuracy. The latest digital tool increased the capacity for more sophisticated analyses. The
transaction data was available to the auditors remotely and more securely. This development in
audit techniques not only enhanced audit quality but reduced the cost as well. It also increased the
power to spot potential issues and fraud. These technologies, continuously adopted and integrated,
have opened the doors to more advanced digital innovations, enhancing the auditing process even
further.

1.2.3. Advanced Data Analytics:

Advanced data analytics tools are designed to deal efficiently with voluminous data; hence, this
allows auditors to perform broad and more detailed audits that may be capable of unravelling
intricate patterns and irregularities hardly hoped to be seen via manual procedures. These historical
data are used to learn through statistical analyses of such records and machine learning methods
in order to implement predictive analytics as this will help out in enhancing audit planning through
prediction of possible risks and even finances related to the outcomes. It improves audit efficiency
and effectiveness as auditors, by automating processing and analysis of data, will have more time
to interpret results and share value with stakeholders.

Examples of Advanced Data Analytics:

Machine Learning Platforms: Such as Python, R programming language.

 P a g e | 14

Fraud Detection Software: Tools such as ACL (Audit Command Language) Analytics, SAS
(Statistical Analysis System) Fraud Framework.

1.2.4. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML):

Artificial intelligence or AI is the expression used to refer to machines being able to think like
human beings. With their program, these machines are designed to learn and think as human beings
would do. AI in auditing involves the analysis of data, making decisions, and performing various
tasks that usually need human intelligence. The AI could be used for conducting data entry work
in an automated mode, running patterns of financial transactions and detecting anomalies or even
emulate audit scenarios to identify the potential risks.

Machine learning, or ML, is a subfield of artificial intelligence related to the proper creation of
algorithms that enable computers to learn from data in order to make predictions or judgments
based on that learning. The application of ML algorithms in auditing can help analyze huge data
sets to identify trends, classify transactions, and even make financial outcome predictions: for
example, ML models can be trained to detect unusual spend patterns which may clarify fraudulent
activities or discover factors which contribute to financial risk.

This table presents a basic comparison, stressing AI as a generic term embracing several
technologies and ML as just one subset focusing on learning technologies.

Aspect Artificial Intelligence (AI) Machine Learning (ML)

Goal Emulate the essential way human Develop algorithms that will make it
beings learn, reason, and solve possible for computers to learn from
problems cognitively. patterns in data and automatically
make decisions.
Scope Robotics and machine learning— It especially focuses on algorithms
hearing natural language that learn from data.
processing—are on point.
 P a g e | 15

Learning They can learn through experiences It can be applied in both forecasting
and information, develop new and in decision-making since it can
behaviors over time, and give learn from both labelled and
consent. unlabeled inputs.
Applications Other uses include gaming, finance, Applications include data mining,
and health. pattern detection, and predictive
analytics.
Dependency Can work with or without large The volume of data needed for
on Data quantities of data, subject to training the models is enormous.
application.
1.2.5. Blockchain Technology:

Blockchain technology can offer a distributed and secure ledger system, it has become a game-
changer in auditing. Blockchain technology empowers auditors to check and review any relevant
transactions real-time. This is possible on their distributed network without seeking the help of any
middleman that provides greater transparency and reduced risk of fraud and also an added level of
accuracy of audit trails created through an immutable record of transactions. Blockchain therefore
greatly improves the efficiency in audits hugely by automating the data verification process and
enhancing the quality of data. At the same time, it ensures compliance with what is required by
the regulatory authorities. Cores of its application in various industries are growing with every
day. In years to come, audit efficiency is likely to be even more reliable and effective.

1.2.6 Cloud Computing:

Cloud computing gives auditors scalable, on-demand remote access to computer resources and
data storage, this nearly totally revamped the audit process. Technologies of these clouds let
auditors be more productive in performing audits, respond to instant communication with clients,
team members, and have secure access to current financial data from anywhere. Because cloud
computing embeds encryption and access controls, it has no physical infrastructures that enhance
audit flexibility and data security but also ease the management of audit workflows from all aspects
 P a g e | 16

of work, such as planning and data collecting to the analysis and reporting phase of audits, thus
improving the overall quality of the audits and provision of client services.

1.2.7. Integration of Advanced Audit Software:

The latest audit software has developed the audit field by enhancing efficiency, effectiveness, and
accuracy. These software products; for instance, CaseWare, ACL Analytics handle audit working
from planning up to the reporting stage and do many routine tasks like data extracting, sampling,
and data analysis. They let the auditors attend higher-level jobs that must be attended by valuation
and proficiency. Moreover, such advanced auditing software also enables live collaboration of the
audit team members with their clients where the communication and access to data become much
more seamless. Such technologies come with advanced tools to assess vulnerabilities, monitor
compliance, and generate reports. As a result, auditors can deliver more insightful and more
detailed audit results while complying with strict regulations in a much more effective way.

1.2.8 Enhancements Brought by Technology:

Technology has offered excellent advances to the audit process, which has altered traditional
ways of doing things in many significant perspectives, such as the following:

1. Efficiency: preponderance of tools of automation and advance software automate tedious

activities such as data entry and extraction and reconciliation; hence reduces instances of
manual labor and time wastage on repetitive and unproductive duties. In this regard, auditors
get time allocated to meaningful analysis and decision-making.

2. Accuracy: On the other hand, digital tools reduce human error or inaccuracy in handling and
calculating data, thereby providing greater accuracy or precision in audit findings. By using
machine learning algorithms, large data sets can be analyzed for anomalies and patterns which
signal risk or fraudulent activities, thereby making audit outcomes more reliable.

3.Scope and Depth: Technology allows auditors to perform more extensive audits by testing
the entire dataset, not as a sample. This will give a better scope and better comprehension of
financial data, hence detecting irregularities or trends which are more likely to influence
financial reports.
 P a g e | 17

4. Real-time Monitoring and Reporting: Due to cloud-based platforms and real-time access to
data, auditors can monitor every single transaction and financial activity on a continuous basis.
This facility will help to have proactive risk management and very timely reporting for
stakeholders with most up-to-date insights and better decision-making.

5. Collaboration and Communication: Digital tools help easy collaboration among audit teams
and with the clients. Remote data access and secure communication channels improve
efficiency and responsiveness, especially in those global audits that require involvement
among multiple stakeholders and numerous locations.

1.3. Statement of the Problem:

Problem Statement: Advanced Audit Technology may diminish auditors’ dependency on human
judgement, potentially overlooking financial differences and compromising audit accuracy.

Advanced audit technology is increasingly being used within today's business climate as a means
through which to gather enhanced capability and accuracy in audit processes. Technologies such
as advanced data analytics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning increase the capacity and
capabilities in the processing of large data volumes at higher speeds while detecting anomalies that
might otherwise be missed by human auditors. However, with this growing dependence on
technology, there are also fears that it will drastically dim down the dependence of auditors on
human judgment, which is very important in finding out very small and intricate differences in
finances, thus giving assurance of accuracy.

First of all, fine audit technology can quite comfortably finish routine tasks or analyze data sheets,
but in perspective, these are not good at comprehending the subtleties of financial transactions. It
is professional judgment that enables the auditor to interpret the financial information, set the same
in the broader economic environment, and bring practical experience to the fore in detecting
irregularities that may not come to the fore through automated processes. Rather, human insight
looks into the relevance and implications of financial information in cases where such data may
be incomplete or ambiguous.
 P a g e | 18

Moreover, there is the risk that auditors will have an overdependency on technology that will bring
in complacency and less focus on critical thinking and skepticism. The overdependency could
overlook subtle financial discrepancies that require a deep understanding of the client's business,
practices of the industry, and potential fraud schemes. Even though these are powerful tools, they
cannot be at par with intuition and analytical skills built up over years through auditing practice.
It becomes the duty of the auditor to balance efficiency by borrowing from technology and
applying his or her own judgment in choosing procedures to perform comprehensive and accurate
audits.

However, the efficiency of the audit technology is directly proportional to the quality of the inputs
in terms of data and the algorithms. Accurate conclusions would be possible to draw only if the
data used are error-free and unbiased. Such errors might remain undetected without the intervening
hand of humans. It is the auditor's task to verify such data and interpret the results that these tools
produce. They should continually question, verify, and test the outcomes to ensure that the
technology supplements their judgment, not replaces it.

This places the fact that, much as advanced auditing technology has numerous advantages coupled
with efficiency and data processing, it is equally vital to acknowledge the boundaries within which
it has to be used. One major risk to the accuracy of an audit would be the potential lessening of
auditors' reliance on human judgment. Therefore, it also becomes very critical that these
technologies have to be implemented in a way that complements human judgment not replace it.
These tools must be learned, and auditors must be trained in their use so their professional
skepticism and analytical talents can be focused on the identification of financial inconsistency.

1.4. Objectives of role of technology in enhancing audit efficiency:

1. To establish benefits and challenges of technology adoption in auditing:

This objective aims at assessing the advantages as well as the difficulties of technology in auditing.
It evaluates the means and ways technology enhances audit quality, efficacies, customer happiness
among others; it also represents various risks when it came into place such as implementation
costs, security issues, and upgrading skills among many more.
 P a g e | 19

2. To evaluate the mechanisms of ongoing monitoring and auditing enabled by

automated warnings and real-time data feeds:

Continuous auditing deals with real-time streams of data and produces warnings automatically so
as to have constant monitoring of your financial data. This objective chases the ways and means
of those techniques which brings improvement and enhancement in audit timeliness, accuracy and
risk detection by providing auditors with instant insight into financial transactions and operational
activities.

3. To ascertain the future trends and further areas of research in Audit technology:

It predicts any future development in audit technology about AI, blockchain, IoT and Predictive
analytics. It can monitor emerging trends by which further researches can be made for upgrading
the audit procedures, their adaptability to technological developments etc.

4. To study the role of data analytics platforms enhancing the audit decision making
processes and provide insightful action points

Data analytics platforms help auditors in digging deep into the vast sets of data for relevant
information and necessary recommendations to aid auditors in decision-making. Such objective
aims at ascertaining how data analytics platforms will help in effecting data-driven audit
Strategies, enhance auditors' risk assessment capabilities, and provide auditors with more informed
recommendations for their clients.

5. To identify good practice and strategies for training auditor in the effective use of new
technologies:

It is focused on how best to train audit professionals on the new technologies through workshops,
certificatory programs, ongoing education programs, among others. The objective seeks to
determine best practices that would help in facilitating technology skills adoption and integration
into audit practices.
 P a g e | 20

1.5. Need for the Study:

The auditing profession is undergoing rapid change due to the phenomenal growth of technology
and increased regulatory requirements. Bengaluru, nicknamed the Silicon Valley of India, is sure
to be at the forefront of this change and has within itself almost all types of businesses—from the
most traditional ones to the most high-tech, leading-edge start-ups. In this regard, despite the
potential benefits, the adoption and integration of advanced technological tools into auditing
processes are still very patchy and underutilized, hence creating the need for comprehensive
research on this topic.

1. Challenges in Efficiency and Accuracy: Conventional auditing techniques are laboriously

time-consuming, subject to human errors, and unable to express their findings among the
growing volumes and complexities of financial data. Armed with sophisticated
technologies such as AI, machine learning, and data analytics, auditors can gain much
better efficiencies and accuracy levels. This study is of extreme importance in identifying
the specific technological tools that will reduce audit processes, minimize manual errors,
and enhance the quality of audits in Bengaluru. Once auditing firms understand these tools
and their manner of implementation, they will be placed at a much better position to meet
all the requirements by regulatory bodies and expectations of clients alike.

2. Enhancing Professional Judgment: While technology confers a number of benefits, there

have been concerns that the role played by human judgment during the audit process may
be lost in that light. Professional skepticism and analytical skills in an auditor are
quintessential to interpreting data, identifying nuances, and capturing what perhaps no
automated tool ever will. This paper is needed to further understand how these technologies
can aid human judgment and not displace it—how auditors would help remain cautious yet
proactive in their assessment. It wants to make an equilibristic balance between that basic
role that the auditor plays, and how technology could improve that capability.
3. Bridging Digital Adoption Gap: The extent to which auditing firms in Bangalore have
adopted advanced auditing technologies varies greatly. This may result in differences in
audit quality and efficiency by firm size. Smaller firms or those with reduced resources
 P a g e | 21

tend to fall behind their large peers who have the capabilities to afford to invest in
sophisticated technologies. The research will look into the barriers for the adoption of
technology and seek to find a way to bridge this gap so that every firm, regardless of size,
can have access to the benefit derived from the adoption of technology. This could serve
as a guide on how to rightfully integrate technology to make the playing field level and
thus help to preserve uniform audit standards throughout the industry as a whole.

4. Client Transparency and Satisfaction: With increasing demands from clients for
transparency and real-time insights into their financial health, advanced audit technologies
can provide more detail and accessibility to enable clients' understanding and trust in the
audit process. The research will focus on how technological tools can be used for better
client communication and satisfaction to underpin client relationships and long-term
partnership development. This research will enable firms to understand clients' perception
of technology-enabled audits in order to modify the services to better meet the client's
needs.

5. Future-Proofing the Audit Profession: In view of the changing trends in technology, it is

essential that the audit profession remains ahead of the curve of change. The study would
help auditing firms at Bengaluru forecast upcoming changes and prepare for them by
analyzing trends and future directions in audit technology. The research shall strive to
provide a strategic framework for auditing firms by determining best practices and
innovative solutions that can indicate the way for the future proofing of their operations in
a setting that is fast changing.

Conclusion:

This will, therefore, clearly justify the requirement of the study to be well educated on the role of
enhancement in audit technology efficiency within Bengaluru City. This would prove an important
research study for the requirement it would provide with insights and practical solutions in the
challenges of efficiency and accuracy, professional judgment, adoption gap, improvement in
clients' transparency and satisfaction, and assurance in future proofing the audit profession. It aims
 P a g e | 22

at ensuring that Bengaluru-based auditing firms can fully exploit technological developments so
as to offer superior, efficient, and reliable audit services in an increasingly complex market place.

1.6. Scope of the study:

Auditing has traditionally been done with manual processes characterized by enormous
paperwork, physical scrutiny of documents, and test methods based on samples. Auditors
physically went to places to verify financial records, conduct inspections of internal controls, and
obtain evidence by direct physical inspection. It was clumsy, slow, and limited—it even happened
that due to resource constraints one had to narrow down the area to a few transactions only.

But with the growing trend of technology utilization in audition procedures, auditing has taken an
entirely different turn. Utilization of advanced technology tools by auditors in the current world,
such as artificial intelligence and machine learning and data analytics platforms can improve the
effectiveness and efficiency of the auditing procedure. AI and machine learning algorithms run
tasks of data entry, information extraction, recognition of patterns, etc. This has resulted in
efficiency gains by reducing human error and accelerating the processing speed of data. Today,
auditors can run masses of data through data analytics software like Tableau and Power BI in a
matter of minutes and get results that display major trends, deviances, and potential risk, which
may be difficult, if not impossible, to determine by traditional means.

It has made it imperative to have safe and transparent recording of transactions, advanced trails of
audits, and enabled real-time verification of the financial transactions. RPA automates the run-of-
the-mill audit procedures. Therefore, auditors are free to perform value-added services such as
strategic analysis and risk assessment. The cloud provides remote access to audit data, thus
increasingly facilitating collaboration among global audit teams and enhancing flexibility and
scalability of the audit.

Despite all these developments, there are concerns about data security, ethical considerations, and
also continuous professional development. Auditors will have to work around all these
complexities to fully utilize the potential offered by technology in performing audits that are not
only efficient and accurate but also meet the demands of regulatory compliance and stakeholder
trust. As more and more of these technologies find their way into audit firms' practices, knowing
 P a g e | 23

the effects, together with professional evolution, empowers auditor practitioners to derive the best
out of audit efficiency amid the rapid change in digitization.

1.7. Limitations Of the Study:

1. Technological Dependence: To the extent that the auditor is model-dependent on evolved

technological tools such as Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, they do not have
to be as dependent on judgmental expertise or critical analysis. Hence, subtleties in
financial complexities can go unobserved because they may elude the automated detection
systems. There's a possibility that poor examination and validation of assumptions or
methodologies used may occur through technological game-changing processes, affecting
in general the accuracy or reliability of audit findings.
2. Data Privacy and Security Concerns: Digital solutions and cloud-based platforms adapted
for audits may raise relevant issues in data privacy and security. An auditor should be in a
position to ensure that sensitive financial information is well guarded against unauthorized
access, breaches, or cyber-attacks. Such a study risks missing the many vulnerabilities
inherent in digital infrastructures or pertaining to data sharing across jurisdictions with
wide differences in regulatory compliance and data protection laws.
3. Ethical Consideration: The ethical concerns that most commonly arise with the use of AI
and machine learning algorithms in the processes of auditing are not fully accounted for.
These include biases embedded within algorithms, ethical implications of decision-making
by machines, and the need for transparency regarding how technology is going to impact
the outcome of audits. The increased potential for professional skepticism and ethical
requirements could be/challenging if one is to rely on the automated systems in making
such complex decisions that are ruled traditionally by human judgment.
4. Practical Implementation Challenges: There is a likelihood that practical barriers to
adopting and integrating new technologies within auditing practice would not be examined.
Such barriers could include, among others, technology acquisition and maintenance costs,
compatibility with the IT infrastructure, and continuous training and upskilling for audit
professionals. This could particularly be the case for smaller audit firms or organizations
 P a g e | 24

with limited resources in the effective harnessing of advanced technology tools. This would
further widen the gap in auditing efficiency based on digital literacy.
5. Generalizability of findings: The findings of the study could be specific to some kinds of
audits say, financial or compliance-related audits or geographical regions only and might
not capture varied practices and challenges met by auditors within the global context.
6. It is thus possible that the observed variations in the regulatory framework and auditing
standards of different nations may further constrain the generalizability of findings, making
the results only relevant at a local level with respect to technology adoption in audits.
7. Continuous Technological Innovation: In this area may quickly render the conclusions of
this study obsolete. This might be realized through new innovations in audit technologies,
based on blockchain applications or real-time data analytics, which would transform
auditing practice beyond the recognition of existing research. Researchers and practitioners
should be highly sensitive to new trends and continuously update their knowledge and
practices to acclimatize and exploit the full potential of evolving technologies on audit
efficiency.
8. Constraints of Availability of Resources: Those constraints connected with accessing the
latest technological tools could be related to smaller audit firms or to environments
constrained by limited resources, therefore setting a possible limit for diffusing technology-
driven audit methodologies. Such a study may not recognize the differences in
technological structures and resources available to different audit firms, which may render
the findings of the use of technology in improving audit efficiency biased.
 P a g e | 25

CHAPTER-2
Industry Profile
 P a g e | 26

2.1. Industry Profile:

The chartered accountancy sector forms a very dominant component of the financial services
industry, and its services are very vast and largely important for the proper financial health and
compliance with the regulatory framework for a large number of stakeholders consisting of
business entities, government departments and agencies, public-interest organizations, and
individuals. CA firms are engaged in providing the following significant services: external and
internal auditing, tax consultancy and compliance, financial reporting, corporate finance advice,
and regulatory compliance. The services ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability in all
financial statements; hence these services contribute immensely to the reliability of a company's
financial information being presented to the stakeholder.

In the field of chartered accountancy, audits basically ensure transparency and reliability in
financial reports from all sectors. External audits done through CA firms offer critical appraisals
substantiating financial statements, thereby reassuring stakeholders of the precision in the stated
financial positions of business entities, being a true and fair view. The approach has contributed
towards ascertaining the accuracy of the financial reports and earned the confidence of the
creditors, investors, and the public at large.

Contrastingly, the internal audit has been directed towards an organization's system of internal
control, process of managing risk, and governance structure. As part of accomplishing their
mandate, internal auditors are sure to bring to light flaws and areas that are proving ineffective and
inefficient with an operational performance-impacting weaknesses. Recommendations that
eventuate from internal audits are process improvement, risk mitigation, and strengthening of
internal controls that result in operational efficiency enhancement and achieving compliance with
organizational policies and regulatory requirements.

They come in handy where financial irregularity or fraud is suspected. These audits are those
undertakings that help in finding fraud with detailed investigations applying forensic accounting
techniques. The forensic auditors investigate financial records, transactions, and other evidence
item by item to find any discrepancies and gather evidence that will be admissible in court. CA
 P a g e | 27

firms assist organizations to safeguard their financial integrity through forensic audits and
initiation of appropriate legal action against people who are involved in financial races.

CA firms are involved in providing organizations with crucial support with respect to financial
reporting requirements. This essentially relates to the proper preparation of the financial reports of
organizations, comprising all relevant statements, like balance sheets, income statements, and cash
flow statements, all of which are prepared in accordance with corresponding accounting standards
and regulations. Ultimately, these financial reporting statements may hold a very important view
of the organization’s financial position and performance. Accordingly, CA firms help in enforcing
accountability and transparency through proper compliance with the reporting requirements of
financial reports that indicate how a company is viewed by its stakeholders, for example, creditors,
investors and governments.

Other than traditional financial reporting, CA firms identify and develop some specialized advisory
services related to corporate finance. This kind of activity involves strategic advice on different
finance-related issues like M&A, capital raising activities, and financial restructuring. With this,
CA firms try to help their clients optimize the financial structure, enhance profitability, and place
themselves strategically in the market place. CA firms play a very important role in facilitating
complex financial transactions, relying on their expertise in financial analysis, risk assessment,
and market dynamics, and ensure that their clients achieve their strategic objectives.

The second role of CA firms is to guide their clients through working on the changing regulatory
landscapes. They stay updated on new regulations and changes that affect the clients' industries
and ways of operation. CA firms also advise their clients on the need to know the regulatory
requirements facing various enterprises in their line of duty so as to minimize their risk of non-
compliance and other legal liabilities. It means the firm conducts regular reviews of operations by
their clients, identifies cases of non-compliance, and provides recommendations on remedial
actions with the aim of ensuring that such operations are in tandem with the set standards of
regulation. Through proactive steps that instead deal with issues of regulatory compliance, CA
firms enable their clients to gain long-term strength and a good reputation in the various industrial
sectors of operation.
 P a g e | 28

There are many aspects in which challenges face the chartered accountancy industry: the issue of
intensive competition and that of talent acquisition and retention and cybersecurity threats. Firms
have to be up to date but adaptive in the dynamic, yet complex environment of regulations.
Professional skills remain in high demand, and the retention of top talents is a constant challenge
under the highly competitive forces of the market. Cybersecurity becomes most crucial amidst
such rising threats against financial information.

Despite all these challenges, this segment has tremendous growth potential. Increasing financial
regulatory complexity, combined with technological advances and a increasing demand for broad
advisory services, provides a platform for firms to expand services linked to strategic value for
clients. Those firms that will succeed are those which use the regulatory changes as an opportunity,
leverage technology and provide services more tailored to the individual client's needs.

Chartered accountants (CAs) are especially needed in the field of finance because they have to
protect both integrity and transparency in recording the financial information. They serve as the
trusted advisors for the business and other people to navigate through the dangerous waters of
finance while ensuring compliance in regulatory requirements. Statements that must accurately
express financial lien position of their clients should be prepared and verified by the CAs. This
comprises accounting standards and principles that ensure integrity as well as transparency. In
maintaining the monetary standards of disclosure, CAs maintain accuracy and reliability that
bolsters the trustworthiness of the stakeholders, such as investors, creditors, and regulatory
authorities. Beyond Compliance, CAs offer strategic guidance for clients to make heads or tails
out of financial complexities. They interpret financial ratios, analyze trends, and examine financial
data so that customers can make decisions from an informed perspective. Even for financial
planning or budgeting and forecasting, the same applies. The CA advises on the best possible
course of action to achieve the long-term financial goals and deliver the optimal financial results.
Given their expertise in financial analysis and management, round the clock CAs help clients
optimize the financial operations by assessing profitability and cost-cutting opportunities and
better cash flow management. CA's make operational efficiency and profit possibilities more
plausible therefore sustainable business growth through effective financial strategies. Conclusion
Amongst the most trusted professionals in the world, CAs assure accuracy and reliability with
 P a g e | 29

respect to the financial information while giving strategic advice of infinite value that supports
business growth and sustainability. With expertise in the area of financial reporting, audit
processes, tax planning, as well as strategic advisory services, they strengthen the financial system
through promoting transparency and integrity and effective financial management practices.

2.2. History of the Industry:

Early Origins:
The field of accounting is as old as the ancient civilizations that gave rise to the first
bookkeeping and auditing systems. On the other hand, the formalization of accounting as a
profession really began in the 19th century.
19th Century: Recognition and Formalization:
It is in Scotland that really took off the more contemporary notion of chartered accountancy. The
Institute of Accountants in Edinburgh was established in 1854 as the first professional
accountancy body, introducing the first professional accounting designation, that of Chartered
Accountant, CA. England: After Scotland, in 1880, the Institute of Chartered Accountants in
England and Wales was formed and set the standards for the profession in England and Wales.
India: The accounting profession in India was adopted by the establishment of the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) in 1949. ICAI is now one of the largest accounting bodies
in the world as well.

In 20th Century Growth and Expansion:

Global Expansion: on a large scale. Many countries make provision for institutes within their
jurisdiction, of which a few examples are Australia, with the ICAA, now CA ANZ, and Canada,
with the CICA, now CPA Canada.
Regulatory Role: By the century, CAs developed a very close relationship with the matters of
financial reporting, regulatory compliance, and corporate governance. On this count, they played
a very vital role in maintaining the integrity of the financial markets.
Scope of Services: About the Chartered Accountancy Industry
Auditing: Chartered accountants are conventionally thought of as being engaged in auditing the
financial statements to ensure that they portray a fair picture and comply with the accounting
 P a g e | 30

standards.
Taxation: They extend services in regard to tax planning, compliance, and advisory for guiding
individuals and businessmen in the complex maze of tax laws.
Financial Advisory: It involves strategic advice to clients in regard to mergers, acquisitions,
investment strategies, and financial planning. Management Consultancy: They provide
management consulting, risk management, and improvement of performance to enable
organizations to become more efficient and profitable ventures. Forensic Accounting: It is that
branch of accounting that deals with interference in financial frauds and litigation matters
indispensably.

Sectoral Patterns: Accounting now joins the list of fields that have changed with artificial
intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics, simply because of the efficiency, accuracy,
and capacity to give a deeper view that they can offer.
Key Organizations:
International Federation of Accountants: It is a global organization that represents professional
accountants around the world as it represents the accountancy profession within a variety of
global forums and promotes the interests of the profession as a whole.
Big Four: Deloitte, PwC, EY, and KPMG corner the market with their diversified services. They
have thousands of CAs working across geographies.
National Institutes: Organizations such as ICAI, ICAEW, AICPA, and CPA Australia have a
significant presence in making sure that the profession is regulated properly and standards are set
along with education and certification. Chartered Accountancy in India
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Formed on 1 July 1949 under the Chartered
Accountants Act, 1949. The ICAI controls the profession in India, conducting examinations of
applicants and awarding the CA qualification; it also exercises a general control over the
profession, enforcing a high standard of ethical and professional conduct on its members. The
membership of ICAI is vast, consisting of practicing CAs, corporate personalities, and members
in advisory capacity in public service and academia.
 P a g e | 31

Need and Contribution in Indian Economy:

Compliance with Regulations: CAs see that the concerns remain within the four walls of
financial acts and junctions of tax laws and, hence, bring in transparency and accountability.
Economic Advising: They provide vital financial advice to businesses, helping them make
proper decisions and strategic planning.
Public Trust: They have an important role in terms of the maintenance of public trust in financial
reporting and corporate governance.

Challenges and Opportunities:

Challenges Opportunities
Keeping pace with the rapid changes in Within the current globalization and
technology, managing regulatory technological advancement, there exist a host
complexities, and maintaining ethical of opportunities in advisory services, forensic
standards are some of the major challenges it accounting, and international practice.
faces.

Conclusion:
The history and evolution reflect that chartered accountancy is one of the intrinsic parts of the
world economy. Chartered accountants, at present times, are regarded as very significant in
relation to financial accuracy and compliance matters and strategic financial planning. With an
evolving industry on the back of technology and a changing regulatory landscape, CAs must
continue evolving if they want to remain relevant and continue offering advisory services of
value. For Bengaluru, located at the heart and considered to be the heartbeat of India's economic
growth, the role of CAs assumes great significance and becomes instrumental in supporting
businesses and fostering a robust financial environment.
 P a g e | 32

CHAPTER-3
Company Profile
 P a g e | 33

3.1. Organizational Details:

Incorporated in 2014, BALAJI L H & CO is a firm of Chartered Accountants offering services of

Audit and Assurance, Taxation, Outsourcing, and Advisory. Respected for our professional ethics,
technical expertise drawn from the perspicacity of several years and a team of highly competent
professionals, we have efficacious solutions to the needs of our clients running into deep
engagements. Our philosophy is that of partnering with our clients and not like a distant service
provider.

Since all businesses are intrinsically different, we make sure that our services also cater to the
client's specific needs and drive out the 'one-size-fits-all' standardization. We recruit, nurture,
motivate and retain some of the highest and sharpest talents existing, who generate quality in the
work and present the best solutions.

We have state-of-art infrastructure, wide network, best practices and people development
programs. Under the able direction of proprietor, BALAJI L H & CO team strength is uniquely
positioned to provide to Client’s quality opinions and services. Our Interdisciplinary approach
renders to give clients seamless value. Serving to the wider spectrum of Society for more than
seven years, enjoying unparalleled reputation and respect with clients who trust us and rely on us
for our expertise, professionalism.

Our Values: Our philosophy, principles and values are so finely knitted in our culture fabric that
our beliefs are shared amongst all and which helps us earn our client's trust and respect.

Partnership: Being distant service provider can be an option, but we believe to be close to the
client's requirements & do collaborate with our clients in all our engagements. Working with them
as a team and take ownership and responsibility for the services we render to create long lasting
partnerships.

Integrity: Our services are intended to protect our customer's interests. Via transparent processes,
in keeping with the highest ethical standards, we guarantee customer confidentiality and our
credibility as well. While working hand in hand with our customers, we remain absolutely
independent in order to deliver unbiased opinions.
 P a g e | 34

Passion: We care for our client's success. By fostering a highly stimulating work environment,
working with utmost dedication and commitment and focusing on delivery and execution, our
professionalization and performance is just not satisfying but delight our client’s organization /
institution.

Excellence: Through continuous emphasis on quality and the implementation of the best practices
as per the suggestions with maximum institutions and regulatory bodies, we do our work with
excellence, add value to our clients, and strive to establish ourselves in this world of supremacy.

3.2. History of the Chartered Accountant Firm (BALAJI LH & Co.)

Founding and Early Years (2014-2017)

Incorporated in the year 2014, BALAJI L H & CO began operation as a firm of Chartered
Accountants rendering professional services in the nature of Audit and Assurance, Taxation,
Outsourcing, and Advisory. The firm was considered professional from the very beginning, with
the virtues of technical expertise and loosely based on years of experience from its founders and
a team of highly competent professionals. What made the firm different from the rest was the
philosophy of the house toward client partnership, not just being another service provider. The
result is engagement-driven deep relationships with its clientele.
Growth and Expansion, 2017-2020
As the firm grew, it took forward its rate of service tailoring to the specific needs of the clients
and rejected the idea of standardization as one-size-fits-all. In this entire phase, taking a step
toward recruitment, training, and holding extremely capable talent was what BALAJI L H & CO
focused on. This continuous focus on people development ensured that the best work and
solutions would be rendered, time and again, on a consistent basis.
It also invested in state-of-the-art infrastructure and created a broad network of best practices to
develop more service delivery capabilities. Strong leadership of the proprietor was key to
shaping the direction of the firm, which would be uniquely placed to provide quality opinions
and services to the clients.

Building the Reputation (2020-2022)

By 2020, BALAJI L H & CO had earned a name for its interdisciplinary approach, rendering
 P a g e | 35

seamless value to its clients. From serving all sections of the common epoch, styles earned
unparalleled respect and trust of its clientele, coupling with its proficiency and professionalism.
The inbuilt values of partnership, integrity, passion, and excellence in the firm's culture and way
of life are deemed as the simple keys to success.
It not only a philosophy of the firm of intense client partnership, transparency in whatever the
firm did and the stick to strictest ethical code, which would ensure that the complete
confidentiality of the client and the keeping at loggerheads of any conflicts of interest that would
be taken care of the interest of a businessman as it would also establish its credential for
complete credibility.
Transition to BALAJI SUMANATH & CO (2022-Present), Rebranding and New Leadership:

Year 2022 it was the sea change in BALAJI L H & CO; it was reformed and given the new face
of BALAJI SUMANATH & CO, turning another page in the old book and presenting a new
rebuilt identity that will provide the clients with rejuvenated services.
The company was founded in 2014 and later rebranded as BALAJI L H & CO. The name was
changed again to BALAJI SUMANATH & CO in 2022. The organization always puts customer
success, quality, and honesty at the top of its priority list. Its first encounter with the commitment
to innovate and adapt developed and changed either to meet the changing needs of the customer
or the industry. And by the yardstick of ethical standards, professional competence, and
customer-oriented methodology, BALAJI SUMANATH & CO is heading to be a sure and
reliable business partner for different companies based in Bengaluru.
 P a g e | 36

3.3. Vision and Mission:

Vision Mission
To continue being a leading chartered To provide leading-edge technological solutions
accountancy firm that leverages cutting-edge to ensure proficiency in audit services, uphold a
technology to be at the core of changing audit culture of continued improvement and excellence.
efficiency, bringing about incomparable accuracy We seek to empower our clients through
and transparency in the dynamic financial insightful, true, and timely financial information
landscape for our clients as we uphold the highest standards of integrity
and professional ethics.

3.4. Milestones of Balaji LH & Co.

 2014 Incorporation - Balaji L H & Co. comes into existence to commence its journey in
offering Audit and Assurance, Taxation, Outsourcing, and Advisory services.
 From thereon develop credibility by building trust with the client base and earning a
reputation for the same by customizing the service philosophy for itself of not being a
service provider, but rather a partner.
 Team Development and Talent Retention: Attract, educate, inspire, and retain
exceptionally talented individuals who contribute to the firm's success and caliber.
 It is very important to develop and facilitate the growth of modern infrastructure and
network; if the company has to deliver superior service and distinctive high-caliber
solutions to its clients.
 It is because of our interdisciplinary approach that we will be able to offer seamless value
across many service areas for our clients.
 7 Years Ago, 2021: Committed more than seven years of service to diversified clients and
the regeneration of unparalleled goodwill within the respective industry.
 Strong Values Upheld: Integrity, partnership, passion to see clients succeed, and excellence
are but a few core values integral to the culture and operations of the firm.
 P a g e | 37

 Industry Recognition: This may consist of industry-recognized awards for excellence in

delivery and customer satisfaction.
 These are the milestones that reflect growth, professional excellence, and building of a
strong, client-driven system for Balaji L H & Co. across all the years of its operation since
2014.
 P a g e | 38

3.5. Organization Structure:

BALAJI SUMANT & CO.

Chartered accountants

CA. BALAJI L H & CA. SUMANTH Professionally qualified

B. ACHARYA associates

Proprietor

CS. RAM PRASAD CS. ANANTH BHAT NR BADRINARAYAN CA. Sumanth B.

M.N Acharya

This chart represents the organizational structure of the Chartered Accountant Firm
(BALAJI SUMANT & Co.)
 P a g e | 39

3.5.1. About the Proprietors:

CA. BALAJI L H, BCom, FCA:

A Fellow member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, qualified in the year 2011, is the
founder of the firm. He belongs to Bangalore district of Karnataka. His areas of specialization
include Direct and Indirect Taxation, Audit & Assurance, and management consultancy.

He had specialization in Income Tax consulting and representations. He also holds qualification
and experience in the field of system audits and Standard operating procedures, internal audits,
implementation of systems, internal controls, internal checks to streamline the policies and
procedure of large corporates.

3.5.2. About Professionally qualified associates:

CS. Ram Prasad M N, BCom, ACS:

A qualified Company Secretary He belongs to Tumkur Taluk of Karnataka, and a field experience
in Secretarial matters, Direct & Indirect Tax, Internal Audit, and full-hand experience in ERP
Implementation, He executes the following; He executes Secretarial Compliances, Secretarial
Audits, Search Reports, and other Audit Work in erstwhile firm.

CS. Ananth Bhat, BCom, ACS:

A qualified Company Secretary belongs to Bangalore Taluk of Karnataka and has experience in
the field of Secretarial Practice, has authoritative in the field of Company law matters and also has
proficiency is statutory compliance matters, IPR matters.

N R Badrinarayan:

He is specialized in Payroll accounting, labor law cases, monthly filing of PF and ESI and PT
returns and with various Government departments and offices.
 P a g e | 40

CA. Sumanth B Acharya, BCom, ACA:

He is an associate member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and hails from the
Bangalore district of Karnataka. He specializes in management consultancy, audits including
system audits, risk audits, SOX audit, and management consultancy.

3.6. SWOC Analysis:

SWOC Analysis of CA firms:

Strengths:

1. Professional Expertise: CA firms have immense professional expertise and knowledge in

a range of subjects like auditing, taxation, financial reporting, and advisory services.
2. Trust and Credibility: CA firms have maximum trust and integrity in respect of fairness
and accuracy of financial statements. Their credibility with consumers, other regulatory
bodies, and stakeholders all grows as a result.
3. Regulation Compliance: They assist in keeping their clients on the right side of the law
through updates on the ever-changing regulation landscape that ensures they are compliant
with all existing set regulations. They ensure that clients avoid falling into the wrong hands
of the law.
4. Scope of Services: With an aim of meeting the varying needs of their clients, the services
offered by such firms span from audit and assurance to tax advising and corporate finance.
5. Client Relationship: A personal, long-term, and trust-based relationship with clients is the
very basis of excellent customer retention rates.

Weakness:

1. Resource-Intensive: The very nature of audit and assurance services may be laborious and
time-consuming. This is more likely to affect efficiency and profitability.
2. High Dependence on Key Personnel: This means that the company is in line in case this
highly skilled professional is left in the firm.
3. Scalability Issues: It will not find it easy to expand its operations because services are by
their very essence personalized and driven by expertise.
 P a g e | 41

4. Technological Adaptions: Continuous need to invest in and adapt to new technologies

troublesome and resource-consuming.
5. Fee Pressure: Intensive competition and client demand for low-cost services can drive
firms to reduce their fees and put pressure on profitability.

Opportunities:

1. Technological advancements: the ability to increase efficiency in work, improving the level
of service through the technology the state-of-the-art technologies using artificial
intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics.
2. Global Expansion: The expansion of our services and offerings to better serve our clients'
needs on a global scale; this includes the ability to support our clients with international
tax planning, financial planning, and compliance.
3. Specialized Services: Forensic accounting, risk management, and strategic financial
planning make a name in this area of special consulting services.
4. Regulatory Changes: With new and changing regulations, compliance consulting and
advisory services are in demand.
5. Opportunities Outsourcing: Trends It is in the modern trend that more and more businesses
are hiring out their financial functions. This trend of outsourcing provides the scope to
expand outsourcing services.

Challenges:

1. Intensive Competition: Intensive competition from large multinational accounting firms

and also smaller firms with expertise in niches, which gives an impact on share in the
market and profitability also.
2. Regulatory Complexity: Continuously changing regulations demand firms to be updated
and be responsive to these changes, which is resource-intensive.
3. Talent Acquisition and Retention: With a competitive job market, attracting and retaining
the best talent is not easy to do and a high rate of turnover will disrupt the operation.
4. Economic Uncertainty: Slowdowns and market fluctuations can affect both the budgets of
the clients and demand for services.
 P a g e | 42

5. Cyber Security Threats: It demands the existence of some concrete cybersecurity measure
in place that would assist in protecting the sensitive financial information; but the cost for
the implementation of such a measure would be costly and/or complicated.

3.6.1. SWOC Analysis of Balaji Sumant & Co.

Strengths:

1. Ethics and Technical Proficiency: This refers to the company's standing in these aspects.
2. Client-Centric Approach: This means an individualized approach to products and services
that will help gain the client's trust and ultimately provide scope for long-term
relationships.
3. Competent Team: Very competent experts. Very innovative and good quality solutions.

Weaknesses:

1. Dependency on people: The owner and other key people present a very high dependency.
2. Operational Intensity: Resource-Intensive nature of audit and assurance services.
3. Scalability: Challenges associated with very rapid scaling of personalized, high-quality
services.

Opportunities:

1. Tech Integration: This refers to the integration of more refined technologies that enhance
innovation and efficiency in service delivery.
2. Service Diversification: Expanding into strategic advisory services and global markets.
3. Regulatory Consulting: They open new avenues for non-main stream advisory services like
regulatory consulting.

Challenges:

1. Competitive Market: Competing with Small and Big Alike.

2. Regulatory Adaptation: Keep abreast and adapt to changes in regulations.
3. Talent Dynamics: Attracting and retaining the best in a highly competitive environment.
 P a g e | 43

3.7. Functional Areas:

Auditing and Assurance: External auditing refers to the independent examination of financial
statements and other such declarations. Assurance services are stipulated to help provide more
transparency and credibility to concerned stakeholders. Ensuring standards of Auditing and
regulations are adhered to.

Taxation Services: There are advisory services related to tax planning strategies to minimize tax
liabilities. Preparation and filing of individual, business, and organizational taxes are also
undertaken. Handling audits issued by the taxes department and handling various other tax-related
issues.

Accounting and Financial Reporting: Update and maintain proper accounting records. Balance
sheets, income statements, cash flow statement and other financial statements to be prepared.
Insights on various aspects of financial performance and trends to be provided to support the
owner-manager for making informed decisions

Corporate Finance and Advisory: Support M&A transactions. Fund raising and financial
restructuring to be advised Financial due diligence to be performed for evaluation purposes of
investment proposals

Regulatory and Compliance Services: Their compliance with the applicable laws and regulations
and accounting standards will be ensured. The actions conducted by internal auditors include
conducting internal audits regarding the conformance of their organization to internal controls and
governance frameworks and advising on regulatory change that impacts businesses.

Management Consulting: Advice on strategy on business improvement in performance. Achieving

Cost Optimization and Operational Efficiencies. Feasibility-study, market research for business
expansion

Balaji Sumant & Co. ties together all these functional areas in terms of offer to the end-users
comprehensive financial and advisory services the diverse needs of businesses, organizations, or
individuals soliciting expert guidance on accounting and finance. Thus, its services help ensure
 P a g e | 44

financial compliance, optimize operational efficiency, and assist strategic decision-making for
sustainable business growth.

3.8. Services Offered:

Financial/Banking Consultancy: Balaji Sumant & Co. prides itself on providing full-fledged
financial and banking consultancy services while catering to more critical client needs, including
the preparation of projects for sanction of finance from financial institutions, managing profiles,
coordinating foreign investments, and the preparation of DSCR. They engage in a wide range of
activity-from detailed project reports for profile enhancement to liaising foreign investments to
debt service coverage ratio assessment-to aid the best possible financial strategy for their clients
and to see that clients reach respective business goals through proper operations within throbbing
market spaces.

Management Consultancy: Balaji Sumant & Co. provides management consultancy services so
that organizations can enable quality performance within all their operational departments. It
involves aiding clients in the preparation of Standard Operating Procedures, effective
organizational policy development, and investment advisory services to ensure the efficiency of
the business process and strategic financial decisions today in a business.

Tax Representation and Advisory: Balaji Sumant & Co. provides management consultancy
services so that organizations can enable quality performance within all their operational
departments. It involves aiding clients in the preparation of Standard Operating Procedures,
effective organizational policy development, and investment advisory services to ensure the
efficiency of the business process and strategic financial decisions today in a business.

Other Services: Income Tax Compliances, GST Compliances, Internal Audit, Company Audit,
Income Tax Audit, GST Audit, Transfer Pricing Audit, Company Registration, Company ROC
Compliances, Bank Audit, Partnership Registration, TDS Compliances, Shops and Establishment,
Due Diligence, Accounting Services, 12A & 80G Registration, Audit Assistance, Trust
Registration, Legal Entity Identification Number (LEI) Registration, Import Export Code,
Trademark & Copyright Registration, Udhyam Aadhar (MSME) Registration.
 P a g e | 45

3.9. Job Description:

Balaji Sumant & Co., offers a comprehensive finance and advisory services with a view to
operational efficiency, adherence to concerned financial laws, regulations, and guidelines, and
effective strategic decisions concerning the long-term sustainability of every stakeholder in the
corporate, organizational, or individual sectors. As a Finance Intern, we will be part of hands-on
projects with respect to different accounting and finance functions directly involved with our
seasoned team of professionals on audits, financial reporting, tax compliance, and advisory
services. The purpose of the internship is to understand the 'financial services industry in-depth'
and to further develop practical skills in a professional environment.

1. Auditing and Assurance: The external audit is performed with the aim of ascertaining that
the financial accounts adhere to the rules and standards of auditing. Provide more
confidence to stakeholders through services rendered in enhancing trust and transparency.
2. Taxation Services: Assist in preparing and filing returns of individual, business, and
organizational taxes. Assist strategies for tax planning that reduce liabilities of taxation and
assist in the handling of audits and other tax issues.
3. Accounting and Financial Reporting: Assist in maintaining proper functioning of
accounting records and in compiling financial statements, consisting of balance sheets,
income statements, and cash flow statements. Ensure adequate insight into financial
performance and trends for decision-making purposes.
4. Corporate Finance and Advisory: Be involved in M&A transactions, activities relating to
fund-raising, and financial restructuring. Engage in financial due diligence to review
investment proposals.
5. Regulatory and Compliance Services: Assist internal audits to confirm that the business is
in compliance with the laws, regulations, and accounting standards. Offer assistance in
advising on changes in regulations that might affect businesses.
6. Management consulting: Renders investment advice to businesses so that they become
more efficient in execution and strategic decision-making; firms provide updates to the
organization's policies and standard operating procedures from time to time.
 P a g e | 46

3.10. Learning Outcomes:

In my dealings with different GST software and ITR filing processes, I picked up a diversified
skill set in tax preparation and financial data management. I learned to efficiently manage GST
software like SPEQTA-GST and OPTOTAX by adding clients and extracting critical tax reports,
including GSTR-1, GSTR-2A, GSTR-2B, and GSTR-3B. It not only involved getting a good
mastery of the software but also the intricacies of every report so that they were generated correctly
and formatted properly for further analysis. In this, I acquired practical skills in comparing and
reconciling these reports—making sure accuracy in sales and calculation of ITC by matching
GSTR-1 with GSTR-3B for sales data and GSTR-2A with GSTR-3B for ITC (non-reverse
charges.) This process refined in me a greater regard for detail and developed the skills of spotting
anomalies in data both of which are important in maintaining accurate financial records.

Furthermore, I had to develop Excel spreadsheets that organized information about clients in
structured format including B2C and B2B information, along with purchase details. Manipulating
these large data sets to bring out final working summaries, trends, and anomalies was possible by
using advanced Excel functions like pivot tables. This multidimensional information recording
proficiency in Winman GST software further enabled me to store and analyze systematic GST
data, merging the different data sources into one coherent system. The experience taught me the
requirement for accuracy regarding entry and management of data to ensure that all information
was correct and current. Additionally, I handled GSTR1 filing for clients with efficacy by
managing and validating extensive data of sales to ensure precision. I also learned the preliminary
preparation in filing ITR importing the vital client information, such as TDS, interest income, and
other financial information through CA ERP software. This work helped develop my technical
skills in using specific tools meant for accounting in the preparation of taxation compliance while
improving the quality of ensuring accuracy and completeness of the finances.
 P a g e | 47

CHAPTER-4
Literature of Review
 P a g e | 48

4.1. LITERATURE REVIEW:

(Hongdan Han, 24 November, 2022)

This paper looks at how artificial intelligence uses blockchain in auditing by accountants and its
impact on accounting. The research identifies event-based accounting, real-time reporting, triple
entry system of bookkeeping and continuous assurance as the main areas considered. The main
aim of this study is to use agency and stakeholder theories to investigate, among other things,
how information asymmetry can be reduced through the use of blockchains. It also gives a
suggestion of warning organizations about challenges they might face if they adopt such systems
while at the same time cautioning them against potential risks associated with these technologies.
Future scholars should take into consideration these results when conducting their own research
in efforts aimed at advancing business practices in addition to creating an environment where
professionals work together with policymakers as well as system developers towards establishing
blockchains for accounting & auditing purposes.

(George Salijeni, 13 April, 2018)

The research establishes how, through interviews with experts and publicly available documents,
the integration of Big Data and Data Analytics (BDA) into audit practices is observed. The
literature review focuses on three key areas: the impact of BDA on the relationship between
auditors and their clients, changes in audit engagements due to BDA, and critical obstacles to
technology adoption in the audit field. In sum, the findings have potential for further research
and represent one of the first empirical observations of the perspective on the rise of
BDA in auditing.

(Jodie Moll, 4 November, 2019)

The journal articulates how the integration of BDA into audit practices has been empirically
observed through interviews with experts and publicly available documents. The literature
review has these key pointers: the impact of BDA on the relationship between the auditor and his
auditor client, modifications in audit engagements due to BDA, and critical obstacles to
technology adoption in audit. The results are likely to lead to further research and are probably
one of the first empirical observations from the perspective of the rise of BDA in audit.
 P a g e | 49

(Daniela Mancini, 21 September, 2021)

This paper aims to explore the role smart technologies—such as Artificial Intelligence (AI),
Internet of Things (IoT), Blockchain, and Analytics—have on the accounting environment. The
study uses a combined qualitative research methodology that included a structured and
systematic review of the existing literature to examine the body of scientific paper production
from 2000 to 2020. The results unlock four research paths: as technologies in need of innovative
management, impacting touch affecting the AE, sources generating relevant implications, and
factors harbingers correctly pointing toward new knowledge, skills, and abilities. The joint
investigation of AE and smart technologies is a milestone for the future development of the
academically and professionally oriented accounting research proposal and suggests a new
framework, the SmartCheck Framework, for future research designs.

(Yingying Zhang, June 8, 2020)

Technological advances, among which are big data, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and
blockchain, have significantly influenced the accounting profession. These factors have caused
an evolution in the changing expectations of both accounting professionals and accounting
educators and have expanded the demand for experienced IT professionals considering taking the
accounting training. The paper brings together these technologies and how new capabilities for
accounting graduates can be considered, and how institutions of higher learning that offer
accounting education can adjust to these changes. It also investigates the challenges and possibly
available opportunities considered from new technology and their implications for accountancy.

(Max Gotthardt, 27 May, 2020)

The recent growth of technology over the past few decades has impacted the accounting and
auditing profession so much, especially in the automation of judgment systems and those
requiring human intervention. Two rapidly growing greenfield projects are Robotic Process
Automation (RPA) and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Nevertheless, theoretical frameworks have
not been elaborative enough for greenfield success in the practical implementation of systems.
Hence, this study is contributing by showing the overview of a changing RPA ecosystem and
finding critical challenges for successful implementation.
 P a g e | 50

(Beryl Odonkor, 01 January, 2024)

The paper explores the effect of Artificial Intelligence on the traditional practice of accounting,
with a concentration on financial reporting, auditing, and decision-making processing. It looks at
evolution and sophistication of manual methods to artificial intelligence methods and pinpoints
both opportunities and challenges. Toward this end, the paper investigates the integration of AI
in accounting areas, its effectiveness in enhancing accuracy and efficiency, and strategic
implications in a systematic review of literature and bibliometric analysis. Results show that the
use of AI improved the accuracy of financial reporting and its efficiency by automating routine
tasks and enabling predictive analytics. Challenges include the requirement for skilled personnel,
data privacy, and high cost. The paper suggests and recommends a balanced approach to
investment that emphasizes continuous learning; adaptation; strategic planning; investment in AI
competency, keeping in mind the aspect of ethics; and concurrence with the regulations.

(Pavel Castka C. S., 10 June, 2020)

The COVID-19 pandemic has a huge effect on Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSS)
certification and auditing services. The usual on-site auditing approach is greatly restricted, and
it remains unclear when full-scale use might be resumed. This paper analyzes the initial
responses of 21 top VSS members-ISEAL-to COVID-19 using their publicly available
responses. The role of technologies in VSS responses is further put into focus, with significant
uptake of Remote Auditing and ICT, though constrained by limiting conditions. The lessons
learned from the crisis and the potential that remote auditing holds for changing the landscape in
the adoption of advanced technologies are discussed.

(Menna Tarek, 2 May, 2017)

This paper has tried to map the structure of the body of knowledge that links digital technologies
and auditing. This will be performed through a bibliometric analysis of 256 articles to establish
the most relevant traits of scholars debating audit and technology considering areas such as
publications, most productive countries, most cited authors, and publication impact. This paper
also performs co-word analysis using social network analysis tools. The results show that
academic interest in the topic is increasing dramatically. Besides, the analysis of the articles
 P a g e | 51

reviewed has detected three fundamental topics: continuous auditing and monitoring, the use of
software tools, and connections with information systems. The article contributes to this
literature stream by examining the current state of research on the use and application of
technology in the audit profession, identifying gaps, and proposing avenues for future research.

(Roszkowska, 5 April, 2021)

This paper has tried to map the structure of the body of knowledge that links digital technologies
and auditing. This will be performed through a bibliometric analysis of 256 articles to establish
the most relevant traits of scholars debating audit and technology considering areas such as
publications, most productive countries, most cited authors, and publication impact. This paper
also performs co-word analysis using social network analysis tools. The results show that
academic interest in the topic is increasing dramatically. Besides, the analysis of the articles
reviewed has detected three fundamental topics: continuous auditing and monitoring, the use of
software tools, and connections with information systems. The article contributes to this
literature stream by examining the current state of research on the use and application of
technology in the audit profession, identifying gaps, and proposing avenues for future research.

(Ivy Munoko, 08 January, 2020)

Majority of the accounting firms are using AI to a great scope amongst their auditing and
advisory processes. Some of the noted benefits include time-saving, quicker data analysis,
enhanced accuracy, and improved client service. Big 4 uses AI for various functions such as
audit-planning, risk-assessments, transactions tests, analytics, and the preparation of audit work-
papers. There is also a risk of creating some unintended consequences, and thus, to avoid these,
the researchers are also trying to find some of the ethical issues related to AI in the context of
auditing. To maximize the effectiveness of these frameworks, the researchers combine two
futuristic ethical frameworks. Based on prior studies and inferences on auditing firms, the
conceptual analysis is provided for practical ethical and social issues related to AI.
Responsibility delivery and policy-governance on the circle of emerging technology
are also analyzed.
 P a g e | 52

(Pavel Castka C. S., 4 March, 2020)

Majority of the accounting firms are using AI to a great scope amongst their auditing and
advisory processes. Some of the noted benefits include time-saving, quicker data analysis,
enhanced accuracy, and improved client service. Big 4 uses AI for various functions such as
audit-planning, risk-assessments, transactions tests, analytics, and the preparation of audit work-
papers. There is also a risk of creating some unintended consequences, and thus, to avoid these,
the researchers are also trying to find some of the ethical issues related to AI in the context of
auditing. To maximize the effectiveness of these frameworks, the researchers combine two
futuristic ethical frameworks. Based on prior studies and inferences on auditing firms, the
conceptual analysis is provided for practical ethical and social issues related to AI.
Responsibility delivery and policy-governance on the circle of emerging technology
are also analyzed.

(Rita Lamboglia, 21 September 2022)

The present paper intends to map the conceptual structure of the body of knowledge that links
Digital Technologies and Auditing, also giving a better understanding of this research stream. In
order to identify main features of the community of scholars debating audit and technology,
descriptive performance indicators are analyzed, such as publications, productive countries and
authors, publication impact, number of citations per country, and most cited articles. The paper
used co-word analysis paved with social network analysis tools to comprehend the conceptual
structure of the dataset. Results shows increased interest by the scholarly community on the
theme, reflected by attention to three major topics: continuous auditing and continuous
monitoring; the use of software tools; and relations between information systems and audit. It
reviews the current state of research into technology use and application within the audit
profession. The paper identifies gaps in the literature and puts forward a research agenda for
future studies in this area.

(Friday Imen, 31 January 2020)

The paper examines the effect of information technology on the accountancy profession in
respect of the preparation of financial statements. Accountants encountered issues of delay,
 P a g e | 53

errors, and storage problems associated with books of account. With the introduction of
advanced information technology tools, they are better equipped today to prepare and present
financial statements accurately. The internet has also increased access to financial reports for
external users. In this view, future accountants and accounting processes would have to be cloud-
based, communicate with Artificial Intelligence machines, invest in Big Data and cyber-security,
and explore the potential of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality for answering user
information needs. Thus, accountants and accountancy firms have to embrace new IT skills and
tools while keeping up with changing technology

(Hasan, January 2022)

This paper reviews the applicability of Artificial Intelligence in the accounting and auditing
profession, with the challenges posed by Industry and the requirement for collaboration between
disciplines to accomplish the wider application of AI. This is expected to give better efficiency,
productivity, and accuracy. This is because of the impending problems presented by these three
technologies. To that effect, academia has to reconceptualize the accounting curriculum,
regulators to come up with revolutionary policies, and professional bodies to redesign their
development and training processes. The days ahead will completely reshape the accounting and
auditing profession, dominated by professional hybrids who will emerge as leaders in
their own rights.

(Hassan Damerji, 14 January 2021)

The assessment is done to determine the perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of AI on
the decision to adopt AI technology among accounting students. An online questionnaire was
administered on the web to capture demographic information, perception of technology
readiness, and perception toward the adoption of technology. The results indicate that technology
readiness has a significant influence on the adoption of AI. But with mediation analysis using
hierarchical regression, results indicated that perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived
usefulness (PU) mediate the relationship between technology readiness and AI adoption.
 P a g e | 54

(Anastassia Fedyk, 07 July 2022)

It measures the role of artificial intelligence on audit quality and efficiency. In this paper, the
authors use a dataset of more than 310,000 resumes from the 36 largest audit firms to identify AI
workers. The AI workforce is male, young, and holds a technical degree. Additionally, AI is a
specialized function inside the company, with employees focusing on a small number of teams
and regions. The results demonstrate that investing in AI has the potential to save costs, improve
the caliber of audits, and eventually take the position of human resources auditors. However, it
takes a few years for this workforce impact to materialize. One-standard-deviation change in
recent AI investments is related to a 5% decrease in the likelihood of audit restatement and a
0.9% decrease in audit fees, accompanied by a decrease in accounting employees. In-depth
interviews with 17 audit partners from the eight largest U.S. public accounting firms support the
study, which indicated that AI is centrally developed and has wide usage within the audit field.

(Mohammed Muneerali Thottoli T. K., 12 August 2022)

This study examines the association between auditing techniques and information
communication technology traits, including adoption, confidence, knowledge, and training. The
study used the method of quantitative analysis to collect data from 89 respondents from different
auditing companies. The responders were chartered accountants in Kerala. The findings showed
that there was a negative link with information communication technology (ICT) confidence, but
a positive correlation with ICT adoption, competency, and training. According to the report, all
audit companies should actually use customized software for audit practice, together with a good
understanding of ICT usage and an appropriate level of training. This is implied by the
availability of ICT-competent workers. Some of the limitations towards this study are limited
variables of ICT in audit practice and refinement of the model with variables such as challenges
of ICT, perceived benefits, and models of UTAUT. The paper highlights being able to address
the challenges relating to ICT for non-big four audit firms and thus enhance the need to be self-
equipped for the IT world in fairly presenting financial statements.
 P a g e | 55

(Mohammed Muneerali Thottoli E. R., 8 September 2022)

The present study aims to examine the impact of emerging technology on auditing practice by
accounting professionals. The required data was collected from newly practicing chartered
accountants of India who are partners of sole proprietorship or partnership firms. The results
indicated a positive relationship between technology adoption, perceived benefits, technological
challenges, and ease of use and auditing practice. However, there was barely any connection
between perceived advantages and auditing practice. This initiative will assist technology-
enabled audit research by providing a space for more investigation into the expanding
information technology components. The benefits that these organizations' owners and partners
stand to get from the expanding field of technology-enabled auditing are clarified by the current
study. This is an angle that hasn't been well studied in previous studies. The results add to what
is previously known about the perceived benefits, technical obstacles, and usability of
technology-enabled audit tools in the auditing and accounting literature.

(Saleh Mohammed Al-Sayyed, 4 December 2021)

This was based on an investigation into how, among the population of certified auditors in the IT
companies in Jordan, artificial intelligence influences audit evidence. In carrying out the
descriptive research design using a structured questionnaire, the researchers contacted 314
auditors and were able to establish that expert systems had a significant impact on audit
evidence, while the neural network technology did not. The audit offices in Jordan are
encouraged to take a greater interest in AI technologies due to their scientific importance in
improving the gathering of audit evidence. The findings establish the importance of AI
technologies in the future of auditing practices.

(Yuliya Serpeninova, 3 April 2020)

The article discusses the adoption of information technology in auditing. Auditors are adopting
the use of computer-assisted audit techniques. From the research, it can be noted that the size of
the firm has a great influence on CAAT adoption; the auditor size greatly goes together with
advancements in technology. Some common CAATs include audit software, electronic
spreadsheets, and electronic working papers. Program languages can also be used by auditors for
 P a g e | 56

access and manipulation of data. Specific tasks or solving of audit functions are also done using
utility software and specialized audit software. The paper proposes the improving of aspects that
influence the adoption of audit technology: technological, organizational, and environmental, to
increase acceptance.

(Andrea M. Rozario, February 2018)

Smart contracts quests, running self-executable procedures with disclosure of results, are
currently changing financial statement audits. Hence, audit quality may improve with enhanced
information demand through the provision of more timely and relevant reporting. The authors of
this paper have sought to apply blockchain-based smart contracts in auditing in order to achieve
better data analytics that enables real-time reporting for efficient and transparent auditing.

(Bernard Owusu Antwi, June 2024)

AI will change auditing by making it much easier to spot fraud and financial irregularities. These
AI-powered technologies quickly scan massive amounts of data for patterns and deviations that
could be signs of fraud. They do this by utilizing machine learning algorithms and cutting-edge
data analytics. Fewer chances would be kept open, and problems would remain undetected in
very few instances. Artificial intelligence may further identify subtle or complex fraud patterns,
for example, odd patterns of transactions or inconsistencies in financial accounts. It can highlight
the probable dangers by using predictive analytics; this aids the auditor to efficiently use his
resources. On the contrary, the implementation of AI is going to be associated with a number of
challenges related to data quality, algorithmic biases, and the like, apart from maintaining
transparency. For fully exploiting the potential of AI, the auditor should be able to manage these
challenges while being updated about evolving AI technologies and regulatory requirements.

(Ebere Ruth Onwubuariri B. A., June 2024)

AI transforms risk assessment in audit planning and execution by efficiency, accuracy, and
strategic decision-making. Conventional techniques used to depend on historical data-based,
static models of risk assessment. In contrast, AI-driven methods use vast datasets that are
continually updated, self-improving, and learn from new information. AI algorithms identify the
 P a g e | 57

different patterns and anomalies to understand where auditors should put more focus and
resources on high-risk areas. Second, it improves strategic planning with the ability to gain real-
time insights into the main emergent risks, solving issues before they become critical. There are
challenges to the integration of AI in Risk Assessment: data quality, transparency, and ethical
concerns. Notwithstanding these challenges, AI-driven risk assessment is taking auditing plan
development and execution to the next level in promoting resilience and accountability of
institutions.
 P a g e | 58

CHAPTER-5
Research Methodology
 P a g e | 59

5.1Hypothesis:
H1: Advanced technology greatly improves Bengaluru's audit efficiency by reducing time and
cost.
Null Hypothesis (H0): Advanced technology does not enhance audit efficiency in Bengaluru,
neither does it reduce time and cost.

5.2 Population and Sample:

Two important concepts in research design, data collection, and inference are population and
sample. We will revisit the concepts now using your scenario where you have conducted a
survey targeting auditors and persons working in CA firms.

Population:

Definition: The population is the total group of people or things you are interested in researching
to draw conclusions about it includes all possible subjects of consideration that meet your
research criteria.

Population: All the auditors and personnel associated with the CA firms.
Scope: This may include auditors, tax consultants, financial advisors, accountants, and all
professionals aligned with the CA firms based in multiple regions and jurisdictions.
Size: This precisely is a variable characteristic of this population based on geographical area and
number of CA firms and professionals in practice.

Sample:
Definition: This is the subset of the population from which data are actually collected. It only
needs to be representative to the best of one's ability, for generalizing the findings.
Sample Size: 83 respondents who filled out your Google Form survey.
Sampling Criteria: These are auditors or persons working in the CA firms, hence representing the
target population.
 P a g e | 60

5.3. Primary Sources of Data:

1. Questionnaires: Quantitative and qualitative questionnaires to elicit responses from either

persons or groups relevant in the setting of the research. These may be an online survey,
mail, telephone, or in-person interview.
2. Interviews: Direct interaction between the researcher and the respondents, either
structured, semi-structured, or unstructured interviews. Interviews are in-depth questions
that elicit insight into opinions, experiences, and reactions relative to study goals.
3. Experiments: An intentional change in a variable or circumstance is made, and the
measurement of observation follows next in a controlled environment. At least the data
obtained from such an experiment is to be used for testing hypotheses or cause-and-effect
correlations.
4. Observations: Systematic observation ensures that the behavior, interaction, or events that
are being studied are recorded as they happen in real-time settings. Case study as a
method of research yields direct knowledge about events as and when these take place in
nature.
5. Measurements and Tests: In this case, the physical measurements, evaluations, or tests
conducted generate the maximum amount of quantitative data. It comprises performance
reviews, psychometric evaluations, and lab testing.

5.3.1 Purpose of Primary Data:

1. Specific Research Objectives: The nature of primary data collection is made with specific
research questions, hypotheses, or objectives of the researcher in mind.
2. Contextual Relevance: This has the effect that ensures that the data to be collected will be
of direct relevance to the research context and provide real insights, which are current,
tenable, and applicable to whatever focus the study may have.
3. Data Authenticity: The primary data are more accurate and reliable since they are
collected directly from the original source; hence, there are minimal chances of bias or
misinterpretation as in the case of secondary data.
 P a g e | 61

5.3.2 Challenges of Primary Data Collection:

1. Resource-Intensive: The collection of primary data may be time-consuming and resource-

intensive in terms of instrument design, recruiting respondents, and fieldwork.
2. Possible Bias: Biases on the part of participants, response, or researcher at this stage of
data collection should be controlled to obtain reliability and validity of findings.
3. Ethical Issues: Issues related to ethics, such as informed consent, confidentiality, and
rights of the participants, have to be addressed in all instances of data collection.

Conclusion:

This research paper has primarily depended upon primary data as the basis for the research
methodology. Google Forms provided a platform for the structured administration of these
questionnaires in collecting the data. Direct contact with the targeted audience was assured by
the chosen research instrument, which permitted gathering data specific to the aim and context of
the research.

Data collection was effectively done and was accessible via Google Forms, recording a wide
coverage and real-time responses from the participants. It helped in detail in the well-worked
designing of the plan of the surveys whose effectiveness would be accorded to answering the
research questions while soliciting the ethical concerns related to privacy on the part of the
participants and the confidentiality of the data.

It is in this regard that the use of primary data in this research, obtained from Google Forms,
availed unique insights with empirical evidence pertaining directly to the set objectives. The
rigorous analysis ensured the needed validity, reliability, and relevance to draw meaningful
conclusions that would contribute towards knowledge within the respective field.

5.4 Data Collection Method:

Google Forms is used for collecting data from auditors and persons associated with CA firms.
First, the form of the survey was properly designed by setting clear objectives and is, hence,
structured in a logical order, with a demographic question first, followed by specific queries
about the roles and experiences of the respondents. The questionnaire encompasses different
 P a g e | 62

questions. The questionnaire was then distributed through professional networks and social
media, and appropriately targeted the category of interest. It is of importance, to a very great
extent, to also stipulate the timing schedule of when their responses would be assured, and
reminders are sent to maximally encourage participation. Responses were exported to a Google
Sheet for analysis after the data collection period. This will be user-friendly, affordable, spread
across any device, and allow for real-time monitoring of data and integration with data analysis
tools.

5.5 Tools and Techniques Used:

Questions
Years of exposure in Auditing. 17 25 14 14 12

From your perspective, do you think 11 25 20 17 8

technology can enhance audit
efficiency?
How often do you use the technology 16 17 26 13 10
in auditing process?
How has the use of technology 13 24 15 16 14
impacted the efficiency of the audits?
What are the challenges you have 13 11 22 16 20
faced while implementing the
technology in your auditing process?
How important do you think 15 23 16 19 9
technology is in auditing?
How would you see the balance 17 22 27 16 -
between Human Assessment and
Technological Tools evolving in
auditing?
Do you think the technological tools 11 26 17 12 16
which are being used will make audits
transparent and understandable for the
clients?

Overall, how satisfied are you with the 13 38 15 7 9

current state of technology in your
workspace?

From the above let’s calculate Mean and Standard Deviation

 P a g e | 63

Total Mean Mean2 Standard Deviation

82 2.743902 9.353659 2.57094459
82 2.792683 9.304878 2.5519003
82 2.804878 9.463415 2.58041403
82 2.926829 10.36585 2.7274575
82 3.231707 12.32927 3.01621633
82 2.804878 9.512195 2.58984885
82 2.512195 7.365854 2.20310203
82 2.95122 10.4878 2.7452842
82 2.52439 7.768293 2.28995686

TAKEN:
MEAN MEAN2
CODE 1 1
2 4
3 9
4 16
5 25
Link to Excel
 P a g e | 64

CHAPTER-6
Data Analysis and Interpretation
 P a g e | 65

6.1 Data Analysis:

The below table is with the reference to the response on “Years of exposure in
Auditing.”
PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
ANALYSIS
1 Year 17 20.7 %
2 Years 25 30.5 %
3 Years 14 17.1 %
4 Years 14 17.1 %
5+ Years 12 14.6 %
TOTAL 82 100 %

Years of exposure in Auditing.

30
25
25

20 17
14 14
15 12

10

0
1 2 3 4 5+

1 Year of Experience, 20.7% Its second largest, forming 20.7%, contained those with 1 year of
experience. This represents a high percentage of new entrants into the profession, who may be
still settling into their profession or acquiring relevant skills.

2 Years of Experience: One of the largest is represented by people with 2 years of auditing
experience 30.5%. That means the early phase of auditing careers for most—bringing fresh
perspectives and updated knowledge about auditing practices.
 P a g e | 66

3 Years of Work Experience: The percentage response of those having 3 years of work
experience is 17.1%. This group consists of those who have survived the early years of launching
their career and are likely to have started maturing in auditing experience and knowledge.

4 Years of Work Experience: Another 17.1% of the respondents have 4 years of experience. This
is much like the 3-year group. These would have gathered considerable experience and should
take up more challenging auditing tasks and responsibilities.

5+ Years of Experience: Not explicitly mentioned in the summary, but by simple subtraction of
percentage points one can interpret that the residual percentage of 14.6 % corresponds to those
with respondents having more than 4 years of experience.

In conclusion, the auditing experience of the 82 respondents shows a workforce largely

composed of young professionals in the early career stage: 30.5% have 2 years and 20.7% have 1
year of experience, which shows serious inflow into the profession of new blood bringing fresh
perspectives. Another 17.1% of the respondents each have 3 and 4 years of experience,
indicating a grouping that is maturing in expertise and probably moving into more complex areas
of responsibility. Only 14.6% have been in the field for more than 4 years and are likely
seasoned professionals with leadership or mentorship responsibilities. Such diverse experience
underscores the importance of comprehensive training programs and mentoring opportunities
that would help in continuous development for auditors at any stage of their careers.
 P a g e | 67

The below table is with the reference to the response on “What is the main
objective for using technology in your audit work?”
PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
ANALYSIS
Data collection 8 9.8 %
Risk assessment 10 12.2 %
Reporting 9 11 %
Documentation 16 19.5 %
Data analysis 23 28%
Document creation 8 9.8%
Customer service 8 9.8%
TOTAL 82 100 %

What is the main objective for using technology

in your audit work?
23
25

20 16
15
9 10
8 8 8
10

The data shows how technology is used for a number of auditing tasks. It, therefore, plays a big
role in managing the rising volume and complexity of audit data.

Data Analysis (28%): Technology is used by an auditor in sorting, filtering, and then
transforming the raw data to a form suitable for detailed analysis. It identifies patterns or links
the technology to the data to show uncharacteristic risks or anomaly. This helps in prompt
management of risks and accuracy during the audit.

Documentation (19.5%): Technology has made documentation easier, but compared to data
analysis, the effect is not as high. Digital documentation tools make it easier to keep accurate and
organized records, thus improving efficiency and general ease of access.
 P a g e | 68

Risk Assessment (12.2%): Technology analyzes the historic audit data and industry trends to
assess possible risk areas for particular audit engagements. Chimera-like software computes
inherent risk and control risk, which aids the auditor in constructing effective risk management
strategies.

Reporting (11%): Technology makes it easier to write up audit reports, quite often supplemented
by audit automation gadgets and document management systems to ensure complete and timely
reporting.

Other areas of technology use:

Customer Service accounts for 9.8 %. With this, the role of technology will only be minor during
audits, which would serve to support interactions and probably manage client communications.
Document Creation accounts for 9.8 %. Technology helps in the development of documents
related to audits, but it is narrowly applied as compared to data analysis and documentation.
Data Collection accounts for 9.8 %. Data collection is paramount, but less application of
technology tends to be witnessed here, with manual support processes being complimented by
digital means.

In conclusion, as we can see the data shows the prominent place technology assumes in different
auditing tasks: data analysis at 28% and documentation at 19.5%. Technology makes processes
associated with these areas more effective and efficient by enabling the manipulation of data for
risks and keeping records in an organized manner. Although the impact is also felt on risk
assessment at 12.2% and even on reporting at 11%, technology's role in customer service,
document creation, and data collection is comparably small at 9.8% each. Details of such
technology are therefore beyond the scope of this book. Overall, technology is a must for the
rising volume and complexity of audit data, although its application differs across the different
auditing functions.
 P a g e | 69

The below table is with the reference to the response on “From your perspective,
do you think technology can enhance audit efficiency?”
PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
ANALYSIS
Strongly Agree 11 13.6 %
Agree 25 30.9 %
Neutral 20 24.7 %
Disagree 17 21 %
Strongly Disagree 9 9.9 %
TOTAL 82 100 %

From your perspective, do you think technology

can enhance audit efficiency?
30
25
25
20
20 17

15
11
10 8

0
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree

The data represents the perception of auditors regarding the potential of technology to enhance
the audit process. The data shows that this manifests as a generally optimistic view, with
different levels of agreement and skepticism.
Strongly Agree: 30.9 %, The largest number of those responding to the survey were those who
agreed that technology has enormous potential for enhancing audit efficiency.
There is considerable confidence in the belief that technology will heavily benefit auditors by
managing the tedium of the audit process, hence making it effective and accurate.
 P a g e | 70

A fair share of the respondents, 24.7%, were neutral about the effect of technology on audit
efficiency. The reason for this could have been because they did not know about or have
experience with technology in auditing hence no clear necessary view on the impact, or because
they had a balanced view on this impact. It means that these auditors do not see an apparent
benefit or detriment to using technology.
21% of respondents disagree with the claim that technology increases the effectiveness of audits.
This group can be concerned about the price associated with new technologies, fear that
technology will take away from their jobs, or just not realize the advantages that technology
actually brings about.
Agree strongly 13.6% and strongly disagree 9.9%
Combining the responses, 44.5% of auditors either strongly agree 13.6% or agree with the
statement that technology enhances audit efficiency to a great extent.
On the opposite end, 9.9 percent strongly disagree, bringing forth a minority of huge reservations
in regard to technology's role in auditing. This subgroup may be more resistant to change due to
demands about job security or simply out of doubt of the effectiveness of the technological
solution.

In conclusion, there is an overall positive expectation on the part of auditors for the enhancement
that technology can bring to auditing processes; 30.9% strongly agree, while an additional 13.6%
agree on the positive impact. However, a surprising 24.7% are neutral, possibly because of a lack
of awareness or experience with technology about auditing. Whereas 21% strongly disagree,
another 9.9% somewhat disagree, often citing concerns about the cost, security of jobs, or just
being skeptical about the benefits that technology can offer in general. These findings underline
the need for further education and training, as well as focused initiatives to address misgivings
and ensure that technology is effectively adopted into auditing.
 P a g e | 71

The below table is with the reference to the response on “How often do you use
the technology in auditing process?”

PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

ANALYSIS
Always 16 19.5 %
Often 17 20.7 %
Sometimes 26 31.7 %
Rarely 13 15.9 %
Never 10 12.2 %
TOTAL 82 100 %

How often do you use the technology in

auditing process?
30
26
25

20 17
16
15 13
10
10

0
Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never

A joint 71.9% indicated that they use technology either "Always," "Often," or "Sometimes" in
the auditing process, pointing toward a wider acceptance and integration of technology into the
auditing practice. Always (19.5%): This means that almost one-fifth of the auditors always used
technology, hence highlighting its importance in the day-to-day activities and procedures of audit
work. Often (20.7%): Approximately one-fifth of the respondents use technology often, which
indicates the regular application of the technological instrument, but not constant usage.
Sometimes, it is 31.7%, representing the largest chunk, noting a balanced approach whereby
technology would be used where necessary. An important minority of 28.1 percent of the
 P a g e | 72

respondents answered "Rarely" or "Never" with regard to using technology in their auditing
processes. Rarely 15.9%: A fair number of auditors seldom use technology, which may indicate
resistance to change or particular audit areas where technology is not as viable. Never (12.2%):
On the other, another smaller yet relatively sizable group does not use any technology
whatsoever. This could be due to various factors, including lack of access and corresponding
training, or the nature of tasks done in audits.

In conclusion we can see that, 71.9% of auditors using technology "Always," "Often," or
"Sometimes," this sets the basis for wide integration of technology into auditing practices. Of
this percentage, 19.5% always use technology; this goes to prove how relevant technology has
become in everyday audit practice. Another 20.7% use it often, thus showing regular reliance on
technological tools. Another 31.7% use technology sometimes, indicating that in their cases, it is
applied where tasks require it. Another 28.1% of the respondents rarely or never use technology,
possibly due to resistant behavior, low applicability in certain audit tasks, or access and training
constraints.
 P a g e | 73

The below table is with the reference to the response on “How has the use of
technology impacted the efficiency of the audits?”
PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
ANALYSIS
Significantly improved 13 15.9 %
Moderately improved 24 29.3 %
Significantly decreased 15 18.3 %
Moderately decreased 16 19.5 %
No Impact 14 17.1 %
TOTAL 82 100 %

How has the use of technology impacted the

efficiency of the audits?
30
24
25

20
15 16
13 14
15

10

0
Significantly Moderately Significantly Moderately No Impact
Improved Improved Decreased Decreased

The data given shows nuanced insight into how technology impacts efficiency among the
respondents. The largest segment, at 29.3%, indicated that nearly one-third of the respondents
who returned their responses felt technology had moderately improved their efficiency. This
generally implies a positive perception but is not very strong. Moderately Improved (29.3%):
This is the largest group in the graph, indicating that a high number of respondents believe
technology makes a quite noticeable yet overwhelming positive difference to their efficiency.
Possible reasons might include any new set of better time management tools with enhanced ways
of communication and productivity enhancement which may help but do not transform
completely their work. Moderately Decreased (19.5%): Almost one-fifth of the respondents
 P a g e | 74

reported that technology moderately decreases their efficiency. It might be because of the time-
wasting tendency taken as a characteristic of social media, constant notifications, or even
learning curves for new technologies. Significantly Reduced (18.3%): A full 18.3 percent said
technology greatly reduces their productivity. Among possible reasons are over-reliance on
technology, technical glitches, or stress and lack of productivity stemming from poorly designed
systems. Significantly improved (15.9%): The smallest group, although still a substantial
minority, said technology greatly enhances their productivity, almost one in six. It could also
include those who have managed to integrate new state-of-the-art tools and systems into their
workflows, through which they have benefited from high productivity improvements. No Impact
(17.1 %): As we can see that 17.1% of the respondents responded that technology does not at all
affect their efficiency. This percentage shows that for almost every one in five persons,
technology does neither add to nor detract from one's productivity. The reason for this neutrality
might be due to various factors, such as the nature of their job is not too dependent on
technology, or due to the fact that technology was balanced to be integrated and not disrupt the
normal work flow neither would it significantly aid it. This group might yield further insight into
developing a feel for how technology solutions can be tailored to meet diverse needs, generally
improving efficiency.

In conclusion, we see that the data clearly show that for a mixed number of respondents,
technology creates either a positive or negative impact on efficiency. Whereas a large proportion
do feel that technology moderately improves their efficiency by 29.3%, others experience a
moderately decrease by 19.5% and significantly decreased by 18.3%, respectively. Again, only a
very small minority 15.9% in this case report significantly increases in productivity, but this time
17.1% say there has been no change which mean there’s No Impact. The mixed responses here
again reinforce that whether technology can enhance productivity or not depends on a number of
things: including the technology, who is using it and how, and in what setting. Productivity
enhancing technology solutions would make them if attuned better to individual user desires or
context.
 P a g e | 75

The below table is with the reference to the response on “What are the challenges
you have faced while implementing the technology in your auditing process?”
PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
ANALYSIS
High costs 13 15.9 %
Lack of training 11 13.4 %
Resistance to change 22 26.8 %
Data security concerns 16 19.5 %
Integration with existing 20 24.4 %
systems
TOTAL 82 100 %

What are the challenges you have faced while

implementing the technology in your auditing
process?
25 22
20
20
16
15 13
11
10

0
High Costs Lack of training Resistance to Data security Integration with
change concerns existing systems

The data provided highlights the most common challenges the respondents face in implementing
new technology within their organizations.
Resistance to change at 26.8%. Resistance to change as such occupies the second greatest
challenge, insinuating that a substantial proportion of these respondents are usually resistant to
change and adopting new technology. This may be due to fear of the unknown, general unease
with the new process, or perhaps satisfaction with the present system. The solution to this
 P a g e | 76

problem is effective change management: clear communication, proof of benefits, and employee
involvement in the process.
Integration with Existing Systems–24.4% Challenges of integration with existing systems are at
the top of the list of the most common problems. In essence, most businesses have complex
processes or systems that cannot easily be integrated with today's technology.
Data Security Concerns: 19.5 percent the data security concern remains a significant concern in
the minds of the majority of the respondents, portraying the growing awareness of and need to
protect sensitive information. New technologies can bring along vulnerabilities if managed
improperly, opening the window for a possible data breach and loss of customer confidence.
Security Challenge: Putting in place robust security measures, carrying out regular security
audits, and employee education on good practice in keeping data safe meet this challenge.
High Costs 15.9% one of the major difficulties with implementing new technology is cost.
These may include high costs for new hardware and software, licensing fees, associated
continuous maintenance .It puts organizations in the dilemma of measuring long-term benefits of
new technology with the initial investment and how to reduce cost through approaches like
phased implementation or finding cheaper options and alternatives.
Lack of Training 13.4% the least reported challenge is the lack of training, though a significant
number of the respondents still experience it. Another danger that may arise as a result of
insufficient training is underutilization of the new technology, mistakes, and reduced production.
Employees should undergo rigorous training programs and also be consistently supported to
acquire the necessary competence and confidence in using the new technology.
In conclusion, the results indicated that human resistance to change, integration with existing
systems, concerns over the security of the data, high cost, and lack of training are the top challenges
in deploying new technology at organizations. Overcoming these challenges—by adopting
effective change management, stringent measures of security, cost-reduction strategies, and
comprehensive training plans—shall, therefore, enable the successful adoption of new technology.
Those are the ways through which organizations could help themselves better to reap benefits from
the advancement of technology and enhance their efficiency and productivity.
 P a g e | 77

The below table is with the reference to the response on “How important do you
think technology is in auditing?”
PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
ANALYSIS
Very Important 15 18.3 %
Important 23 28 %
Neutral 16 19.5 %
Unimportant 19 23.2 %
Not Important at all 9 11 %
TOTAL 82 100 %

How important do you think technology is in

auditing?
25 23

19
20
16
15
15

9
10

5
0
0
Very important Important Neutral Unimportant Not Important at
all

The results of the survey on the importance attributed to technology in auditing reflect diverse
opinions within the observed entities. Although 46.3% rated their response as very important or
important, a sizeable number—19.5%—were neutral. 34.2%, therefore, reported that this would
be unimportant or not at all important. This goes on to establish mixed sentiments associated
with its role and benefits for the audit procedure.

Very Important (18.3 %): A small number of 15 respondents out of 82 attached very importance
to technology in auditing. This means the auditors perceived the technology as a key ingredient
that may enhance the audit process's efficiency, accuracy, and effectiveness.
Important (28%): Few of the respondents find technology important. One notices here, due to the
 P a g e | 78

large number, that there is significant recognition of the fact that technology can benefit auditing,
although it may not be viewed as absolutely critical.
Neutral (19.5%): This bred a neutrality attitude towards the importance of technology in auditing
to a fair number of the respondents to as many as 16 out of 82. This could be attributed to
various causes, including no experience with technology, uncertainties over the benefits or
probably a balanced view on the impact of technology.
Not important (23.2%): A significant percentage of the respondents do not attach much
importance to technology at all. Unless the benefits of using technology in performing audit
work are made known to these auditors, it could be that the contexts in which they work do not
warrant any pressing need to result in significant benefits or that they are skeptical about the
efficiency of technological tools.
Not Important at All (11%): The smallest group of the respondents thinks that technology is not
important at all in auditing. This might be prompted by self-defense due to resistance to change,
satisfaction with the methods currently employed, or concerns relating to costs and complexities
associated with implementing new technologies.

In conclusion, the results indicate that views on the importance of technology in auditing are
divided. While 46.3% of the respondents viewed it as very important or important, thus
indicating a strong belief in the many benefits to be reaped from its adoption, 34.2% felt that the
subject is unimportant or not important at all. Another 19.5% were neutral, thus showing
uncertainty or no experience. This generally demonstrates a need to create more awareness and
thereby demonstrate advantages of technology in order to increase its acceptance within the
auditing field.
 P a g e | 79

The below table is with the reference to the response on “How would you see the
balance between Human Assessment and Technological Tools evolving in
auditing?”
PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
ANALYSIS
Human assessment will 17 20.7 %
remain primary
Equal balance between 22 26.8 %
Human Assessment and
Technological Tools
Technological Tools will 27 32.9 %
take a leading role
Human Assessment will 16 19.5 %
become secondary
TOTAL 82 100 %

How would you see the balance between

Human Assessment and Technological Tools
evolving in auditing?
30 27
25 22
20 17 16
15
10
5
0
Human assessment Equal balance Technological Tools Human Assessment
will remainprimary between will take a leadingrole will
HumanAssessment becomesecondary
and Technological
Tools

The data conveys the perception of the respondents on what would be the balance between
human assessment and technological tools in auditing. The number of participants in this survey
is 82.
Technological Tools Will Take a Leading Role (32.9%): The largest proportion of the
respondents, consider that auditing technological tools will take the lead. This means that there is
 P a g e | 80

great anticipation for technological domination of the audit process shortly, due to data analytics,
AI, and automation.
Equal Weight between Human Judgment and Technological Tools (26.8%): One-fifth of the
respondents, 22 see equal weight between human assessment and technological tools. That
means most auditors would want to see a collaborative approach whereby human judgment and
technology go hand in hand.
Human Assessment Will Stay Primary (20.7%): A full 17 of the 82 strong minority believe
assessment by humans will still be primary. It can only be presumed that this group of
respondents believes in the irreplaceable value of human judgment and expertise in the auditing
process.
Human Assessment Will Come Second 1(9.5%): One smaller group of 16 out of 82 sees human
assessment becoming secondary. This view means that, on one hand, the human input is
advisable, but on the other hand, it will be overweight by capabilities in technological tools to
carry out the tasks.

In conclusion, it is conferred by survey data that there are diverse views on the balance of human
assessment and technological tools within the undertaking of auditing 32.9% believe technology
will assume a lead role, 26.8% expect an equal balance where human judgment and technology
complement each other, and 20.7% of the respondents consider human assessment to be primary.
On the other hand, 19.5% believe that humans' analysis will become secondary. Generally, it
indicates a trend toward increasing integration with technology but also respect for a human
element.
 P a g e | 81

The below table is with the reference to the response on “Do you think the
technological tools which are being used will make audits transparent and
understandable for the clients?”
PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
ANALYSIS
Strongly Agree 11 13.4 %
Agree 26 31.7 %
Disagree 17 20.7 %
Strongly Disagree 12 14.6 %
Neither agree or disagree 16 19.5 %
TOTAL 82 100 %

Do you think the technological tools which are

being used will make audits transparent and
understandable for the clients?
30 26
25

20 17 16
15 11 12

10

0
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Neither agree or
disagree

Results of the survey share mixed feelings about how effective technological tools are in giving
clients transparency and understandability of audits.

Agree (31.7%): The highest proportion of the respondents, agree that technological tools give
audits transparency and understandability. Generally, it shows acceptance and positive
perception towards the current technological solutions.
 P a g e | 82

They are likely to find that the tools provide information, make it accessible, and generally de-
mystify the audit process. This group could benefit from improvements in existing tools and thus
be placated and likely far more receptive to future technological advancements.

Strongly Agree (13.4%:)A smaller, but meaningful, percentage of the respondents, fall into the
strongly agree group. These respondents are strong believers in technological tools and believe
that these have made a significant impact in the audit process. This feedback from this group
could be very instrumental in bringing out those key features leading to high satisfaction and
hence replicate them for other users in the tools.

Disagree (20.7%): A fair number, of the respondents actually express their disagreement with
this statement, alluding to dissatisfaction or ineffective current technological tools. The
technological aid could have been a problem, not user-friendly and/or unduly complex, etc. that
would have made life more difficult to live for these respondents.

Strongly Disagree (14.6 %): A smaller, but substantive percentage strongly disagree thereby
holding a very negative perception about the technological tools. These respondents must have
had particularly bad experiences and faced significant barriers to using the tools effectively; their
comments are likely to provide critical insight into stacking problems that need improvement and
guide the development of more user-centered solutions.

In conclusion, the opinions about the effectiveness of technological tools in improving audit
transparency and understandability are mixed; nearly half, 45.1%, from the responding clients
show a strong positive perception, underlining the value that they bring to many. Further
emphasizing these features may increase its adoption and satisfaction. Conversely, a large
minority of 35.3% reported dissatisfaction and highlighted areas that may want improvement.
 P a g e | 83

The below table is with the reference to the response on “Overall, how satisfied are
you with the current state of technology in your workspace?”
PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
ANALYSIS
Very satisfied 13 15.9 %
Satisfied 34 46.3 %
Dissatisfied 15 18.3 %
Very dissatisfied 7 8.5 %
Neither agree or disagree 9 11 %
TOTAL 82 100 %

Overall, how satisfied are you with the current

state of technology in your workspace?
38
40
35
30
25
20 15
13
15
9
10 7

5
0
Very satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Neither agree or
disagree

Satisfied (46.3 %): The largest group of respondents are satisfied with the current state of
technology, indicating general approval and contentment though might still see room for some
small-scale improvements.
Very Satisfied (15.9%): Many respondents were very much satisfied with the efficiency,
reliability, and user-friendliness of the technology.

Dissatisfied (18.3%): This group was dissatisfied; maybe due to old-fashioned systems, frequent
technical issues, or having missed more relevant facilities, their concerns addressed, it could
make quite a difference.
Very Dissatisfied (11%): These are the respondents who are having serious issues with the
 P a g e | 84

technology because it does not let them be as productive and efficient as possible. Their
responses represent critical areas needing immediate attention for overhaul.

Neutral Perception (8.5%): A minor portion of the respondents were neutral in their opinions,
which suggests that they have mixed feelings or no strong opinion either way. If this group can
be engaged, then subtle improvements could be made to move them into the satisfied group.
In conclusion we can see that the results of the survey show 62.2%of the respondents were very
satisfied with the current technology in their workspace, and at the same time, a fair proportion,
such as 29.3% are dissatisfied. Therefore, one can engage the neutral by attending to specific
concerns of those dissatisfied groups to improve the general situation and satisfy them in terms
of productive output.
 P a g e | 85

CHAPTER-7
Findings, Suggestions and Conclusion
 P a g e | 86

7.1. Findings:

Q1. Years of exposure in Auditing.

The largest number of the respondents had exposure for 2 years with 30.5%.
Next were those with 1 year of experience or the new entrants who accounted for 20.7%.
The percentage of those with 3 and 4 years of exposure stood at 17.1% for both categories.
And those with 5+ years of experience accounted for 14.6%.

Q2. What is the main objective for using technology in your audit work?
As shown by the analysis of data, which ranked first at 28%.
It was followed by documentation at 19.5%.
Risk assessment came third at 12.2%, followed by reporting at 11%.
Customer service accounted for 9.8%, document creation accounted for 9.8%, and data
collection accounted for 9.8%.

Q3. From your perspective, do you think technology can enhance audit efficiency?
44.5% agree or strongly agree, 24.7% are neutral, and 30.9% disagree or strongly disagree.

Q4. How often do you use the technology in auditing process?

71.9% use it "Always," "Often," or "Sometimes.
28.1% "Rarely" or "Never" use it.

Q5. How has the use of technology impacted the efficiency of the audits?
45.2% found that technology improves efficiency moderately or significantly.
37.8% found this decreases efficiency.
17.1% found that it has no impact.
 P a g e | 87

Q6. What are the challenges you have faced while implementing the technology in your
auditing process?
The top challenges were resistance to change, 26.8%, and integration with existing systems,
24.4%. Data security concerns were 19.5%, and high costs were 15.9%. Lack of training, at
13.4%, was the least reported challenge.

Q7. How important do you think technology is in auditing?

46.3%: of importance/great importance
34.2%: unimportant/not important at all
19.5%: neither important nor unimportant.

Q8. How would you see the balance between Human Assessment and Technological Tools
evolving in auditing?
32.9% believe that technological tools will assume primacy
26.8% foresee an equal balance
20.7% believe human assessment will be primary
19.5% human assessment will become secondary

Q9. Do you think the technological tools which are being used will make audits transparent
and understandable for the clients?
45.1% strongly agree/agree that technology has enhanced transparency
35.3% strongly disagree/disagree
19.5% neutral

Q10. Overall, how satisfied are you with the current state of technology in your workspace?
62.2% very satisfied/satisfied
26.8% very dissatisfied/dissatisfied
11.0% neutral.
 P a g e | 88

7.2. Suggestions:

Training and Support: Provide proper training programs so that the gap in skills for new technology
can be bridged for employees. This may include workshops, online courses, or hands-on sessions
based on different levels of proficiency. Resources and ongoing support, such as a help desk or
knowledge base, enable staff adjustments to new tools and systems more amply.

Change Management: Design open communication policies for resistance management;

underline the benefits and needs of new technology. Engage the staff in the process and elicit
employee suggestions. Training or provision for employee support will greatly help in reducing
the discomfort of adaptation.
Cost Management: On financial pressures, cost-effective solutions and phased implementation
should be explored. Cost-benefit analysis is going to show the efficient technologies. Cloud-based
solutions and SaaS models reduce the up-front costs. Phased change spreads the expenses through
time, allowing adjustments in response to feedback.

Integration Solutions: Invest in technologies that can integrate well into the existing systems with
minimal disruptions on the ground. Where compatibility and interoperability matter most, vet these
technologies through various assessment and testing measures before putting them live on the
platform. It improves the general efficiency and the operations are preserved.

Security Requirements: In place should be strong mechanisms of security, including multi-factor

authentication and encryption. Testing for flaws in these mechanisms should be routine and is also
part of security audits that investigate any concerns with data security. It can prevent breaches and
maintain the privacy of sensitive information, but setting up trust with the client by training
employees regarding the best practices in cybersecurity and compliance will be ensured.

Client Communication: Leverage technology to help clients understand audits and introduce more
transparency into the process. There should be compact, clear reports that enable the client to have
a better understanding of their financial data and issues encompassing them. Client-friendly tools
and communication lay the basis for long-term client satisfaction and trust.
 P a g e | 89

7.3. Conclusion:
The current study is an attempt to figure out if there are any significant influences of technology
on audit efficiency in Bengaluru. The findings are that integration with technology is vastly
preferred because it saves time, money, and greatly enhances efficiency. Auditors, mainly with 2
years of experience, use technology for a slew of purposes: documentation, risk assessment, and
reporting.
While the majority of auditors indicate the frequent use of technology and related benefits, the
five big challenges persist: resistance to change, integration problems, data security concerns,
high costs, and a lack of training. It is, therefore, very relevant to consider how to address these
challenges by providing comprehensive training and managing change effectively while
deploying cost-effective solutions and robust security measures under the circumstances.
The study also pointed out that the human assessment needs to have a correct balance with
technological tools in auditing. A number of respondents believe technology will become the
primary one, although some responders do see an equal balance or continued importance of
human input.
Overall, technology is seen to enhance transparency and client understanding of the audit.
Satisfaction with current technology use in auditing is high, thus indicating acceptance and
appreciation of its benefits.
Blockchain technology offers an immutable, transparent, and secure ledger system, thereby
improving data verification by greatly reducing the threats of fraud. Moreover, cloud computing
delivers flexible, on-demand access to data and associated resources that will allow audit teams
to collaborate in real time during verification or checking of any transactions while monitoring
transactions in real time.
 P a g e | 90

CHAPTER -8
Learning Outcomes
 P a g e | 91

8.1. Bibliography:

Anastassia Fedyk, J. H. (07 July 2022). Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process?

Andrea M. Rozario, M. A. (February 2018). Auditing with Smart Contracts.

Bernard Owusu Antwi, B. A. (June 2024). Enhancing audit accuracy: The role of AI in detecting financial
anomalies and fraud. Finance & Accounting Research Journal.

Beryl Odonkor, S. K. (01 January, 2024). The impact of AI on accounting practices: A review: Exploring
how artificial intelligence is transforming traditional accounting methods and financial reporting.

Daniela Mancini, R. L. (21 September, 2021). Four research pathways for understanding the role of smart
technologies in accounting.

Ebere Ruth Onwubuariri, B. A. (June 2024). AI-Driven risk assessment: Revolutionizing audit planning and
execution. Finance & Accounting Research Journal.

Friday Imen, J. I. ( 31 January 2020). Information technology and the accountant today: What has really
changed?

George Salijeni, A. S.-T. (13 April, 2018). Big Data and changes in audit technology: contemplating a
research agenda.

Hasan, A. R. (January 2022). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Accounting & Auditing.

Hassan Damerji, A. S. (14 January 2021). Mediating effect of use perceptions on technology readiness
and adoption of artificial intelligence in accounting.

Hongdan Han, R. K. (24 November, 2022). Accounting and auditing with blockchain technology and
artificial Intelligence: A literature review.

Ivy Munoko, H. L.-L. (08 January, 2020). The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in
Auditing.

Jodie Moll, O. Y. (4 November, 2019). The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of
accountants: New directions for accounting research.

Max Gotthardt, D. K. (27 May, 2020). Current State and Challenges in the Implementation of Smart
Robotic Process Automation in Accounting and Auditing.

Menna Tarek, E. K. (2 May, 2017). The implication of information technology on the audit profession in
developing country: Extent of use and perceived importance.

Mohammed Muneerali Thottoli, E. R. (8 September 2022). Emerging technology and auditing practice:
analysis for future directions.
 P a g e | 92

Mohammed Muneerali Thottoli, T. K. (12 August 2022). Characteristics of information communication

technology and audit practices: evidence from India.

Pavel Castka, C. S. (10 June, 2020). Technology-enhanced Auditing in Voluntary Sustainability Standards:
The Impact of COVID-19.

Pavel Castka, C. S. (4 March, 2020). Technology-enhanced auditing: Improving veracity and timeliness in
social and environmental audits of supply chains.

Rita Lamboglia, D. L. (21 September 2022). Exploring the relationship between audit and technology. A
bibliometric analysis.

Roszkowska, P. (5 April, 2021). Fintech in financial reporting and audit for fraud prevention and
safeguarding equity investments.

Saleh Mohammed Al-Sayyed, S. F.-A. (4 December 2021). The effect of artificial intelligence technologies
on audit evidence.

Yingying Zhang, F. X. (June 8, 2020). he Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain on the Accounting
Profession.

Yuliya Serpeninova, S. M. ( 3 April 2020). Computer-assisted audit techniques: classification and

implementation by auditor.

8.2. Annexure:
Q1. Years of exposure in Auditing.

Q2. What is the main objective for using technology in your audit work?

Q3. From your perspective, do you think technology can enhance audit efficiency?

Q4. How often do you use the technology in auditing process?

Q5. How has the use of technology impacted the efficiency of the audits?

Q6. What are the challenges you have faced while implementing the technology in your auditing
process?

Q7. How important do you think technology is in auditing?

Q8. How would you see the balance between Human Assessment and Technological Tools
evolving in auditing?
 P a g e | 93

Q9. Do you think the technological tools which are being used will make audits transparent and
understandable for the clients?

Q10. Overall, how satisfied are you with the current state of technology in your workspace?
 P a g e | 94

CHAPTER -9
Blog
 P a g e | 95

Introduction:

Most of the auditing changes are coming on an accelerated basis as firms become more
integrated digitally. Moreover, technological advances are also introducing artificial intelligence,
machine learning, and cloud computing into auditing. All these changes have changed auditing
today. Technology accelerates auditing by improving its accuracy, speed, and insight. Moreover,
technology is also empowering auditors with the automation of repetitive activities and efficient
ways of searching for abnormalities in data. It goes without saying that with changing times, the
increase in financial transactions and the rules to follow through in an organization will increase.
This blog, however, elaborates on how technology has changed the notion of audit effectiveness
and what that really would mean for the auditor profession moving forward.
IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY ON AUDIT EFFICIENCY:
1. Simplifying the Gathering and Interpretation of Data: The data collection and analysis also
take the greatest number of man-hours of any in auditing. All this changes with modern, leading-
edge technology – AI and machine learning –. Nowadays, large volumes can be auto-collected,
collated quickly, and accurately, showing patterns that would otherwise remain obscure to
human judgment. This has greatly reduced the incidence of errors at the same time increasing the
speed and accuracy of findings of the audit process.
2. Improving Auditor Efficiency: The more time-consuming, manual activities can now be
automated. This will allow auditors to work on higher-order tasks. AI-driven tools will allow
auditor analysis of financial records, pointing out possible problems and giving them vital
insight. This change will mean that more auditor hours can then be dedicated to risk assessment
and advisory services, which will, as a consequence, give greater value to clients with deeper and
more actionable insights.
3. Improvement in Accuracy and Reduction of Errors: Manual auditing is subject to human error,
which may defeat the very purpose of an audit. These risks are minimized through technological
tools that leverage machine learning algorithms, wherein the tool learns and improves with the
availability of more data. The algorithms work to strengthen the ability of the methods involved
for detecting inconsistencies and errors; this helps ensure that the audits become more reliable
over time. The process gives way to increased confidence in the results regarding the audit.
 P a g e | 96

4. Enabling Real-Time Auditing: In the past, audits used to be done on a regular basis, say on an
annual or quarterly basis. The arrival of real-time data analytics technologies allows for
continuous auditing. Real-time auditing means financial transactions and compliance can be kept
under monitor at all times. The proactive approach keeps the issues identified and addressed as
they arise and not months down the track when it may already be too late, therefore keeping the
organization compliant and building overall financial health.
5. Addressing Ethical and Security Concerns: Though there are huge benefits to technology in
auditing, certain ethical and security considerations need to be addressed. Artificial intelligence
and machine learning go together with transparency, precisely in the use and sharing of data and
algorithmic decision-making. That is, of course, without mentioning the issues regarding data
privacy and security, mainly when these entail sensitive information about customers' financial
status. The auditor shall have to be most careful about biases in algorithms and assess whether
the technology he uses answers to any ethical standards.
CONCLUSION:
The place and integration of technology in auditing are associated not only with the fulfilling of a
trend but rather with changing the paradigm in the profession. Technology has reshaped the
landscape of the audit, from data collection to the rise in auditor productivity and improving
accuracy. But with all these associated are ethical and security challenges that one needs to
maximize safeguarding. Over time, as digital tools continue to evolve, so they will drive audit
efficiency ever closer toward faster, more accurate, and insightful audits than have ever been
possible in the past. The modern auditor of the future will be empowered with seamless blends of
financial acumen and technological expertise, bolstering the position of the auditor in their
capability to deploy cutting-edge tools to achieve superior audit results.
P a g e | 97
P a g e | 98
P a g e | 99
P a g e | 100
P a g e | 101
P a g e | 102
P a g e | 103