In some countries, university students live with their families, while in other countries,

students choose to study in another city. Do you think there are benefits to living away
from home when studying abroad?
The role of education is perceived as one of the most crucial factors determining the
countries’ development worldwide. While some argue that students choose to study in another
city, others advocate different viewpoints that university students live with their families. In
this essay, both sides of this argument will be comprehensively discussed.
It is widely assumed that studying abroad would undoubtedly bring a variety of benefits to
individuals. Advocates of this form of learning hold the belief that its benefits are apparent.
One of the most prominent points mentioned is that studying abroad could directly lead to
countries' development. According to recent reports, in the VietNam, students who live
independently develop essential skills such as cooking and time management. With regard to
personal development matters, another value of a majority of university students could develop
communication, life skills and new knowledge. In fact, interacting with peers from diverse
backgrounds enhances cultural awareness and communication skills. In brief, the potential
benefits of living away from home to most students are undeniable.
Despite the positive sides, there are other viewpoints about living away from home. A
striking point to cite is that living independently could lead to challenges such as
homesickness and loneliness. A typical illustration of this is that students might struggle to
adapt to a new environment. Instead of benefiting from the comfort of family, students may face
stress and depression.
In conclusion, based on the brief analysis above, it is evident that there are benefits to
living away from home then studying abroad. Compared with most other social issues,
under different circumstances, the arguments about advantages and disadvantages of
living independently need to be flexibly evaluated.
Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child’s development
while others think that it is important for children to go to school.
Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion. Give reasons for
your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The role of education is perceived as one of the most crucial factors determining the child’s
development. While some argue that teaching children at home is best for a childrents’
development, others advocate different viewpoints that it is important for children to go to
school. In this essay, both sides of this argument will be comprehensively discussed.
It is widely assumed that teaching children at home would undoubtedly bring a variety of
benefits to individuals. Advocates of this learning hold the brief that its benefits are apparent.
One of the most prominent points mentioned is that teaching children at home could directly
lead to countries' development. According to recent reports, in the US, there are several parents
who want their children to study at home because they can protect them. With regard to
personal development matters, another value of children studying at home is the safe and
supportive environment it provides. In fact, children learning in traditional schools can be bullied.
In brief, the potential benefits of homeschooling to most children are undeniable.
Despite the positive sides, there are other viewpoints about children learning at school. A
striking point to cite is that homeschooled may miss out on a lot of activities such as
participating in groups. Instead of studying at school, you can develop communication, new
knowledge and social skills.
In conclusion, based on the brief analysis above it is evident that both homeschooling and
traditional schooling have benefits. Compared with most other social issues, under different
circumstances, the arguments about advantages and disadvantages need to be flexibly
evaluated.
The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world’s cities can
be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to
reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be made to encourage
people to use their cars less and public transport more.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The role of transportation is perceived as one of the crucial factors determining the countries’
development worldwide. There is a reality that more and more rising levels of congestion and air
pollution found in most of the world’s cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing
number of private vehicles in use, others advocate different viewpoints. In this essay, both sides
of this argument will be comprehensively discussed.
It is widely assumed that reducing private cars in use would double bring a variety of benefits to
countries and communities. Advocates of this approach hold the belief that its benefits are
apparent. One of the most prominent points mentioned is that fewer cars on the road could
directly lead to convenient transportation. According to recent reports, in Viet Nam, the
government uses several measures such as free public transportation tickets for students, old
people or who have difficult circumstances. With regard to environmental matters, another value
of reducing private cars is the positive impact on air quality. In fact, fewer vehicles on the road
can develop a healthier environment. In brief, the potential benefits of encouraging people to
use their cars less and public transport are undeniable.
Despite the positive side, there are other viewpoints about reducing private cars. A striking point
to cite is that reducing dependency could inconvenience people who rely on cars for daily
activities. A typical illustration of this is that several people living in countries or in the suburbs
may find public transportation difficult. Instead of reducing cars can face challenges in
commuting to work or study.
In conclusion, based on the brief analysis above, it is evident that there are advantages and
disadvantages of reducing private cars and use of transportation. Compared with most other
social issues, under different circumstances, the arguments about positive and negative need to
be flexibly evaluated.
Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient. Others say
that computers have made life more complex and stressful.
Which viewpoint do you agree with? Why?
The role of technology is perceived as one of the most crucial factors determining the
countries’s development worldwide. While some argue that computers have made life more
complex and stressful, others advocate different viewpoints. In this essay, both side of this
argument will be comprehensively discussed.
It is widely assumed that using computers would undoubtedly bring a variety of benefits to
individuals. Advocates of this viewpoint hold the belief that its benefits are apparent. One of the
most prominent points mentioned is that computers have made life easier and more convenient
such as education, professional settings or personal activities. According to recent reports, the
use of computers in the workplace has significantly increased productivity and quality. With
regard to communication matters, another value of computers is that they can connect people
easier and faster. In fact, social media platforms, emails, and video conferencing tools have
made it easier for people to stay in touch, regardless of geographical barriers. In brief, the
potential benefits of computers to aspects of daily life are undeniable.
Despite the positive sides, there are other viewpoints about the impacts of computers. A striking
point to cite is that computers can make life more depressing and stressful. A typical illustration
of this is that the network can lead to information overload and burnout. Instead of
In conclusion, based on the brief analysis above, it is evident that there are advantages and
disadvantages of computers. Compared with most other social issues, under different
circumstances, the arguments about positive and negative technology need to be flexibly
evaluated.
Some people believe that social media sites, such as Facebook or Twitter, have a
negative impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships. Others
believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The role of social media is perceived as one of the most crucial factors determining
development relationships in modern society. While some argue that social media sites such as
Facebook or Twitter have an adverse impact on young people and their ability to form personal
relationships, others advocate different viewpoints that believe that these sites bring people
together in a beneficial way. In this essay, arguments about social media will be
comprehensively evaluated in various aspects.
It is widely assumed that social media would undoubtedly bring a variety of benefits to
individuals. Advocates of this viewpoint hold the belief that its benefits are apparent. One of the
most prominent points mentioned is that social media can lead to numerous conveniences.
According to recent reports, there are several conveniences of social media such as people can
connect with others every time and everywhere. With regard to social media matters, another
value of social media is they can share ideas and experiences. Young people studying these
platforms can develop knowledge, information and mind-set. In brief, the potential benefits of
social media to most young people are undeniable.
Despite the positive site, there are other viewpoints about social media that have a negative
impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships. A striking point is that
young people can be selfish and can not improve communication skills. Instead of benefiting
from the activity on social media they will be stressed and depressed because they become
victims of cyberbullying.
In conclusion, based on the brief analysis above it is evident that social media has positive and
negative impacts on young people. Compared with most other social issues, under different
circumstances, the arguments about social media need to be flexibly evaluated.
Some people think it is acceptable to use animals for the benefit of humans. Others think
it is wrong to exploit animals for human purposes.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The role of animals is perceived as one of the most crucial factors determining the development
of countries’ worldwide. While some argue that people think it is acceptable to use animals for
the benefit of humans, others advocate different viewpoints that this is wrong to exploit animals
for human purposes. In this essay, arguments about animals will be comprehensively evaluated
in various aspects.
It is widely assumed that using animals would undoubtedly bring a variety of benefits to
countries and communities. Advocates of this viewpoint hold the belief that its benefits are
apparent. One of the most prominent points mentioned is that using animals for the benefits of
humans could be lead to the development of life-saving medications which have significantly
improved human health. According to recent reports, animal research has been instrumental in
understanding diseases and developing vaccines which have saved millions of lives. With
regards to economic matters, another value of using animals is agricultural and industrial
production. In fact, livestock farming is the primary source of income and food which plays an
important role in many countries. In brief, the potential benefits of using animals for human
purposes to most societies are undeniable.
Despite the positive sides, there are other viewpoints about exploitation of animals. A striking
point to cite is that using animals for human purposes could lead to ethics concerns. A typical
illustration of this is that animals used in farming or testing can make them stress, harm and
depression.
In conclusion, based on the brief analysis above, it is evident that using animals for human
benefits has brought about significant and economic benefits. Compared with most other social
issues, under different circumstances, the arguments about animal exploitation need to be
flexibly evaluated.
In the future, more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not
travel abroad on holiday.

Do you agree or disagree?

The role of traveling is perceived one of the most crucial factors determining the development of
countries’ worldwide. While some argue that people will choose to go on holiday in their own
contry and not abroad on holiday, others advocate different viewpoint. In this essay, arguments
about traveling will be comprehensively evaluated in various aspects.
It is widely assumed that traveling would undoudtedly bring a variety of benefits to individuals.
Advocates of this viewpoint hold the berief that its are apparent. One of the most prominent
points mentioned is that traveling in their own country could directly lead to people can discover
cultural and natural beauty. According to recent reports, in Vietnam, many people choose local
holidays because the cost of travel is expensive and economic instability. With regard to
economic matters, another value of tourism is it develop local economic. In fact, spending
money on local hotels, restaurants, and attractions helps to create jobs and stimulate economic
growth. In brief, the potential benefits of choosing go to holiday on their on country are
undeniable.
Despite the positve sides, there are other viewpoints about domestic tourism.