Mutual Funds
Mutual Funds
1110
MUTUAL FUNDS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After going through the chapter student shall be able to understand
Basics of Mutual Funds- Including its concepts and benefits etc.
Evolution of the Indian Mutual Fund Industry
Types of Mutual Funds
(1) Structural Classification (2) Portfolio Classification
Evaluating performance of Mutual Funds
(1) Net Asset Value (NAV) (2) Costs incurred by Mutual Fund
(3) Holding Period Return (HPR)
The criteria for evaluating the performance
(1) Sharpe Ratio (2) Treynor Ratio
(3) Jensen’s Alpha (4) Sortino Ratio
Advantages and Disadvantages of Mutual Fund
Factors influencing the selection of Mutual Funds
Signals highlighting the exit of the investor from the Mutual Fund Scheme
Money Market Mutual Funds (MMMFS)
Exchange Traded Funds
Side Pocketing
Tracking Error
Real Estate Investment Trusts (ReITs)
Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs)
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
Mutual Funds
Basics of Mutual
Funds
Sponsor
Trustee
Asset Management
Company
On the basis of
Based on On the basis of
On the basis of clasification of
Investment Investment
Structure portfolio
objective Portfolio
Management
Open Close
Active Equity
Ended Ended
Passive Debt
Hybrid
Arbitrage Funds
Performance Measurement
Jenson
Cost Point to Rolling Sharp & Alpha & Alpha &
Incurred Point Return Return Treynor ratio Sortino Benchmarking
Ratio
Signals Highlighting the Exit of the Investor from the Mutual Fund Scheme
Side Pocketing
Tracking Error
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) & Infrastructure Investment Trusts (INVITs)
1. MEANING
A Mutual Fund is a pool of funds from a diverse cross section of society, that imparts the benefits of
scale and professional management to the investors, which otherwise would not have been available
to them. The rationale for any pooling of service is two-fold: affordability and convenience. Office
commuters can go to the office by own vehicle or taxicab, which is the synonym for do-it-yourself in
the context of investments. The other way of doing the office commute is by public transport like bus
or train, which essentially is the pooling concept, bringing transport within the reach of those people
who cannot afford their own vehicle. The synonym here is the Mutual Fund. To be noted, it is not
just affordability due to which people may take to public transport; there could be reasons like saving
the hassles of maintaining and driving own vehicle. The other benefit in the mutual fund context is
professional management and tracking of investments.
The diagram above illustrates that a mutual fund is a common pool of investments of a cross section
of investors. To understand the concept better, please look at the following diagram:
A Mutual Fund is a pool of investment funds of several investors who have a common investment
objective. The asset management company that manages the day-to-day running of the fund invests
the money collected in securities like stocks, bonds etc. The investors, called unit holders as they
hold units in the pool proportionate to their investment, earn from the appreciation in the investments
and dividend / coupon received in the fund. Thus, a Mutual Fund is the most suitable investment for
the common man as well as HNIs since it offers an opportunity to invest in a diversified,
professionally managed basket of securities at a relatively low cost.
2. EVOLUTION
2.1 History of Mutual Funds (Global)
A mutual fund, as the term suggests, is a pooling of resources of many investors and is managed
by professionals. The concept of pooling money for investments has been there for a long time. It
began in the Netherlands in the 18th century; today it is a growing, international industry with fund
holdings accounting for trillions of dollars in the United States alone. The closed-end investment
companies launched in the Netherlands in 1822 by King William I is supposedly the first mutual
funds. Another theory says a Dutch merchant named Adriaan van Ketwich whose investment trust
created in 1774 may have given the king the idea. The concept spread to Great Britain and France,
and then to the United States in the 1890s.
2.2 Expansion
By the late 1920s, there were quite a few mutual funds in the USA. With the stock market crash of
1929, some funds were wiped out, particularly the leveraged ones. The creation of the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the Securities Act of 1933 put certain safeguards for investor
protection.
Despite the global financial crisis of 2008-2009, the story of the mutual fund is far from over. In fact,
the industry is still growing. In the U.S. alone there are more than 10,000 mutual funds and fund
holdings are measured in the trillions of dollars.
The mutual fund industry in India started in 1963 with the formation of Unit Trust of India, at the
initiative of the Government of India and Reserve Bank of India. The history of mutual funds in India
can be broadly divided into four distinct phases:
Unit Trust of India (UTI) was established in 1963 by an Act of Parliament. It was set up by the
Reserve Bank of India and functioned under the Regulatory and administrative control of the
Reserve Bank of India. In 1978 UTI was de-linked from the RBI and the Industrial Development Bank
of India (IDBI) took over the regulatory and administrative control in place of RBI. The first scheme
launched by UTI was Unit Scheme 1964. At the end of 1988, UTI had ` 6,700 crore of assets under
management.
1987 marked the entry of non- UTI, public sector mutual funds set up by public sector banks and
Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC). SBI
Mutual Fund was the first non- UTI Mutual Fund established in June 1987 followed by Canbank
Mutual Fund (Dec 87), Punjab National Bank Mutual Fund (Aug 89), Indian Bank Mutual Fund (Nov
89), Bank of India (Jun 90), Bank of Baroda Mutual Fund (Oct 92). LIC established its mutual fund
in June 1989 while GIC had set up its mutual fund in December 1990. At the end of 1993, the mutual
fund industry had assets under management of `47,004 crore.
With the entry of private sector funds in 1993, a new era started in the Indian mutual fund industry,
giving the Indian investors a wider choice of fund families. Also, 1993 was the year in which the first
Mutual Fund Regulations came into being, under which all mutual funds, except UTI, were to be
registered and governed. The erstwhile Kothari Pioneer (now merged with Franklin Templeton) was
the first private sector mutual fund registered in July 1993.
The 1993 SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations were substituted by a more comprehensive and revised
Mutual Fund Regulations in 1996. The industry now functions under the SEBI (Mutual Fund)
Regulations, 1996.
The number of mutual fund houses went on increasing, with many foreign mutual funds setting up
funds in India and the industry has witnessed several mergers and acquisitions. As at the end of
January 2003, there were 33 mutual funds with total assets of ` 1,21,805 crore. The Unit Trust of
India with `44,541 crore of assets under management was way ahead of other mutual funds.
There are various entities involved in the overall structure. They are explained as below:
Sponsor
Sponsor is the entity that creates a mutual fund. The rules are set by the Securities and Exchange
Board of India, in the Mutual Fund Regulations of 1996. Sponsor is defined under the SEBI
regulations as any person who, acting alone or in combination with another body corporate,
establishes a mutual fund. Sponsor is the promoter of the fund. A Sponsor could be a bank, a
corporate or a financial institution. Sponsors then form a Trust and appoint a Board of Trustees. The
sponsor also appoints Custodian.
As per SEBI regulations, a sponsor must contribute at least 40% of the net worth of the Asset
Management Committee (AMC) and possess a sound financial track record over five years prior to
registration. Sponsor signs the trust deed with the trustees. Sponsor creates the AMC and the trustee
company and appoints the board of directors of companies, with SEBI approval. Sponsor should
have at least a 5-year track record in the financial services business and should have made a profit
in at least 3 out of the 5 years. The AMC’s capital is contributed by the sponsor. Sponsor should
contribute at least 40% of the capital of the AMC.
Trust
The Mutual Fund is a trust under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882. The trust deed is registered under the
Indian Registration Act, 1908. The Trust oversees the safekeeping of the unit holders’ investments.
Trustee
The Board of Trustees i.e., the body of individuals, looks after safeguarding the interest of the unit
holders. At least 2/3rd of the Trustees is independent i.e. not associated with the Sponsor. A mutual
fund in India is form as Trust under Indian Trust Act, 1882. The trust-mf is managed by the Board of
Trustees. The Board of Directors i.e. Trustees do not manage the portfolio of securities directly
rather they supervise the work of AMC (Asset Management Company) and ensure that the fund is
managed by stated objectives and as per SEBI regulations.
Trusts always work for the interest of unit holders, and it is created through a document called Trust
Deed that is executed by sponsors in favor of Trustees. The Trustees being the primary guardians
of unit holder’s funds and assets, they must ensure that the investor’s interests are safeguarded and
that the AMC operations are as per regulation laid down by SEBI. SEBI mandates a minimum of
2/3rd independent directors on the board of the trustee company. Trustees are appointed by the
sponsor with SEBI approval. The trustees make sure that the funds are managed according to the
investor’s mandate.
The AMC is under the supervision of its own board of directors and the directors of trustees and
SEBI. The trustees are empowered to terminate the appointment of AMC and appoint a new AMC
with prior approval of SEBI and unit holders. The AMC, in the name of the Trust, manages different
investment schemes as per the investment management agreement with the trustees. A Director of
AMC should have complete professional experience in finance.
The AMC cannot act as a trustee of any other MF. The AMC always acts in the interest of unit
holders (investor). The AMC gets a fee for managing the funds, according to the mandate of the
investors. At least ½ of the AMC’s Board should be of independent members. An AMC cannot
engage in any business other than portfolio advisory and management. An AMC of one fund cannot
be Trustee of another fund. AMC should be registered with SEBI. Also, AMC signs an investment
management agreement with the trustees.
Sometimes there is an exit load in an open-ended fund. It means if the investor exits within that
period, there will be a penalty charged on the exit value, but liquidity is available nonetheless at the
cost of the exit load. It is a matter of discipline so that the investor comes in with the requisite horizon
in mind and if she exits within that period, she pays adequate compensation to the other investors
who are staying back.
The implications of open-ended funds for the AMC are fund (or Scheme) corpus size volatility; fund
size increases when investors purchase units from the AMC and fund size comes down when
investors redeem units.
An open-ended fund comes into existence through the New Fund Offer (NFO) process and the Fund
(or Scheme) parameters are decided by the NFO documents - Scheme Information Document (SID)
and Key Information Memorandum (KIM). There is another document called Scheme Additional
Information (SAI).
There is no defined maturity date for open-ended funds. If there is a single investor- the Scheme
continues to be in existence. There are limitations on maximum holding by a single investor: it is
referred to commonly as the 20/25 rule i.e., there must be a minimum 20 investors to float a Scheme
and maximum permissible holding per investor is 25%.
Broadly, open-ended funds are much more popular than closed ended as the mutual fund industry
is supposed to provide investment solutions along with liquidity that is available at any point of time.
Close Ended Funds are meant to fulfil a particular requirement.
Active Funds are mutual funds where the fund manager plays an active role in deciding whether to
buy, sell or hold the investments. Active funds employ a variety of strategies to construct and
manage their portfolios. For example, to outperform the entire market and others acting as powerful
hedges against unforeseen market declines or corrections. In an Active Fund, the Fund Manager is
‘Active’ in deciding whether to Buy, Hold, or Sell the underlying securities and in stock selection.
Active funds adopt different strategies and styles to create and manage the portfolio.
The investing strategy and style are explicitly available in the Scheme Information document (offer
document). Active funds seek to outperform their benchmark index in terms of returns. Furthermore,
the fund strategy determines its risk and return characteristics. Active funds are expected to
generate better returns (alpha) than the benchmark index. The risk and return in the fund will depend
upon the strategy adopted. Active funds implement strategies to ‘select’ the stocks for the portfolio.
Passive Funds:
Passive funds are the index funds which track the market index and try to generate returns in line
with the index. Fund managers of the passive funds invest in the components of the underlying index
in the same proportion as the index. The objective of the passive funds is to generate market like
returns. Passive Equity funds are the index funds which follow equity indices like Nifty 50 index or
any of the sectoral indices.
If you are a beginner and find it challenging to choose the right equity investment for your portfolio,
passive equity funds are the ideal choice for you. These are simple, low cost and easy to track.
Passive Funds hold a portfolio that replicates a stated Index or Benchmark, for example, Index
Funds and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)
In a Passive Fund, the fund manager has a passive role, as the stock selection / Buy, Hold, Sell
decision is driven by the Benchmark Index and the fund manager / dealer merely needs to replicate
the same with minimal tracking error.
Difference Between Active and Passive Funds:
(i) Active Funds
• Rely on professional fund managers who manage investments.
• Aim to outperform Benchmark Index.
• Suited for investors who wish to take advantage of fund managers' potential for
generating higher income.
• Suited for investors who want to allocate exactly as per market index.
• Lower Expense ratio hence lower costs to investors and better liquidity.
• Regular Income
• Liquidity
• Tax-Saving
Mutual funds also offer investment plans, such as Growth and Dividend options, to help tailor the
investment to the investors’ needs.
(Source: https://www.amfiindia.com/investor-corner/knowledge-center/types-of-mutual-fund-schemes.html)
a. Equity Schemes
Equity Schemes are those schemes which invest in Equity Shares. The target here is capital
appreciation and they are riskier due to equity component. Markets are considered to have
cycles thus these funds are considered better from the long-term perspective, as in the short
term, markets can be volatile.
b. Debt Schemes
Debt Schemes invest in fixed income securities thus target fixed income. The idea here is
diversification and they are safer than equity funds. But the quality of debt instrument in which
the fund is investing is always to be considered and selected. If the quality, i.e. safety of
investment, is more then obviously the returns will be lower and vice versa. Thus, there are
different types of debt funds which are differentiated based on safety and returns they offer.
“The more the credit risk, the greater the return and less the credit risk lessor the return”.
c. Hybrid Schemes
Hybrid funds Invest in a mix of equities and debt securities. SEBI has classified Hybrid funds
into 7 sub-categories as follows:
(i) Conservative Hybrid Fund - 10% to 25% investment in equity & equity related
instruments; and 75% to 90% in Debt instruments.
(ii) Balanced Hybrid Fund - 40% to 60% investment in equity & equity related
instruments; and 40% to 60% in Debt instruments.
(iii) Aggressive Hybrid Fund - 65% to 80% investment in equity & equity related
instruments; and 20% to 35% in Debt instruments.
(iv) Dynamic Asset Allocation or Balanced Advantage Fund -Investment in equity/ debt
that is managed dynamically (0% to 100% in equity & equity related instruments; and
0% to 100% in Debt instruments).
(v) Multi Asset Allocation Fund - Investment in at least 3 asset classes with a minimum
allocation of at least 10% in each asset class.
(vi) Arbitrage Fund - Scheme following arbitrage strategy, with minimum 65% investment
in equity & equity related instruments.
(vii) Equity Savings Fund - Equity and equity related instruments (min.65%); debt
instruments (min.10% and derivatives (min. for hedging to be specified in the SID).
(i) Retirement Fund - Lock-in for at least 5 years or till retirement age whichever is
earlier.
(ii) Children’s Fund - Lock-in for at least 5 years or till the child attains age of majority
whichever is earlier.
(iii) Index Funds/ ETFs - Minimum 95% investment in securities of a particular index.
(iv) Fund of Funds (Overseas/ Domestic) - Minimum 95% investment in the underlying
fund(s).
(v) Hybrid funds - Invest in a mix of equities and debt securities. They seek to find a
‘balance’ between growth and income by investing in both equity and debt.
A multi-asset fund offers exposure to a broad number of asset classes, often offering a level
of diversification typically associated with institutional investing. Multi-asset funds may invest
in several traditional equity and fixed income strategies, index-tracking funds, financial
derivatives as well as commodities like gold. This diversity allows portfolio managers to
potentially balance risk with reward and deliver steady, long-term returns for investors,
particularly in volatile markets.
f. Arbitrage Funds
“Arbitrage” is the simultaneous purchase and sale of an asset to take advantage of the price
differential in the two markets and profit from price difference of the asset on different markets
or in different forms. An arbitrage fund buys a stock in the cash market and simultaneously
sells it in the Futures market at a higher price to generate returns from the difference in the
price of the security in the two markets. The fund takes equal but opposite positions in both
the markets, thereby locking in the difference.
The positions must be held until expiry of the derivative cycle and both positions need to be
closed at the same price to realize the difference. The cash market price converges with the
Futures market price at the end of the contract period. Thus, it delivers risk-free profit for the
investor/trader. Price movements do not affect the initial price differential because the profit
in one market is set off by the loss in the other market. Since mutual funds invest their own
funds, the difference is the return.
Hence, Arbitrage funds are a good choice for cautious investors who want to benefit from a
volatile market without taking on too much risk.
(Source:https://www.amfiindia.com/investor-corner/knowledge-center/types-of-mutual-
fund-schemes.html)
A. Equity Schemes:
For debt funds, the classification is based on Macaulay Duration, and not based on Average Maturity
of Modified Duration.
The calculation of Macaulay Duration has been dealt with in the Chapter – Security Valuation in the
Advanced Financial Management Paper of CA Final Course.
C. Hybrid Schemes:
Sr. Category of Scheme Type of scheme
No. Schemes Characteristics (uniform description of scheme)
1 Conservative Investment in equity & An open-ended hybrid scheme
Hybrid Fund equity related investing predominantly in debt
instruments – between instruments
10% and 25 % of total
assets
Investment in Debt
instruments – between
75% and 90% of total
assets
2 Balanced Hybrid Equity & Equity related An open-ended balanced scheme
Fund instruments – between investing in equity and debt
40% and 60 % of total instruments
assets.
Debt instruments –
between 40% and 60% of
total assets
No arbitrage would be
permitted in this scheme
Aggressive Hybrid Equity & Equity related An open-ended hybrid scheme
Fund instruments – between investing predominantly in equity
65% and 80% of total and equity related instruments
assets;
Debt instruments –
between 20% and 35% of
total assets
3 Dynamic Asset Investment in equity / An open-ended dynamic assets
Allocation or debt that is managed allocation fund
Balanced dynamically
Advantage
4 Multi Assets Invests in at least three An open-ended scheme investing
Allocation asset classes with a in the three different asset classes
minimum allocation of at
least 10% each in all
three asset classes
5 Arbitrage Fund Scheme following An open-ended scheme investing
arbitrage strategy. in arbitrage opportunities
Minimum investment in
3.5 SEBI Allowed Flexicap Plans in Relief to Fund Houses Facing Tight
Regulation
The Securities and Exchange Board of India introduced flexicap schemes under the broader equity
mutual fund category. The move came as a relief to fund houses which operated multicap schemes
after the capital markets regulator tightened investment norms for this category. The majority of the
large multicap schemes were shifted to the new flexicap category. Kotak Standard Multicap Fund,
the largest scheme in the category was renamed Kotak Standard Flexicap. The fund manager,
investment process and fund portfolio remained the same. The new category gave the fund manager
flexibility to invest in a mix of large, midcap and smallcap stocks. The scheme needs to invest at
least 65% of the corpus to equity, SEBI said in a circular.
The decision to introduce flexicap schemes followed protests from a section of the mutual fund
industry after the regulator on September 11, 2020, unexpectedly asked multicap funds to allocate
at least 25% of their portfolios to large-, mid- and smallcap stocks each. Till then, there were no
investment restrictions for this product, resulting in many of these schemes holding as much as 75%
of their portfolios in largecap stocks, resembling large and midcap schemes as per SEBI’s
classification. Multicap portfolios manage 20% of the industry's equity assets under management.
Motilal Oswal Multicap Fund, another large scheme in the category, was also being shifted to the
flexicap category. Most multicap funds got their schemes reclassified into the flexicap category.
Fund managers of large multicap funds were opposed to staying in this category under the new
investment rules, which would require them to shift a large chunk of their corpus in largecap stocks
to small and midcaps. They feared the rush to make obligatory purchases of illiquid smaller stocks
to meet the norms that would drive up these stocks and be detrimental to the multicap investor.
ratio of the Direct Plan translates to higher returns on the investments which keep compounding
over the years. Thus, the investment in the Direct Plan would be worth more over a period, in
comparison to investment in the Regular Plan of the same scheme. It should be however borne in
mind that the difference between NAV of Direct Plan and Regular Plan tends to be marginal.
Direct Plans are for those who prefer to invest DIRECTLY in a mutual fund scheme without the help
of any distributor/agent. Investing in a Direct Plan is like buying a product from the manufacturer
directly, whereby the cost to the customer would be lower. Except that, investing in a mutual fund
scheme directly is not as simple as buying some item from a factory outlet, because choosing a
mutual fund scheme requires adequate knowledge and awareness of the mutual fund product,
especially the risks that are associated with the potential rewards. Choosing a Direct Plan means
making your own decisions about fund/scheme selection (and the related execution work) which not
everyone may be capable of.
In short, Direct Plan is suited for those who understand what kind of mutual funds are needed for
different kinds of investment needs, can research these independently, and are able to
identify/shortlist the funds to invest in, and then go through the process of investing without the help
of an intermediary. However, when the markets fall and investment values come under pressure,
independent advice from a professional advisor can help one stay the course. Thus, a Direct Plan
makes sense only if you have adequate knowledge and capability to select good funds yourself; or
are willing to seek professional advice from a registered investment adviser for a fee.
While the Direct Plan makes sense for knowledgeable, Do-it-Yourself (DIY) investors, it may not be
suited for all investors, especially new and inexperienced investors. So, if you are a new and
inexperienced investor or unsure of which scheme to invest in and need guidance/assistance in
investing, you may be better off seeking the help of a mutual fund distributor and investing in a
Regular Plan.
Expense Ratio: Under SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, Mutual Funds are permitted to
charge certain operating expenses for managing a mutual fund scheme – such as sales & marketing/
advertising expenses, administrative expenses, transaction costs, investment management fees,
registrar fees, custodian fees, audit fees – as a percentage of the fund’s daily net assets.
All such costs for running and managing a mutual fund scheme are collectively referred to as ‘Total
Expense Ratio’ (TER). The TER is calculated as a percentage of the Scheme’s average Net Asset
Value (NAV). The daily NAV of a mutual fund is disclosed after deducting the expenses.
(Source: Amfi Website)
Scheme Information Document (SID):
Scheme Information Document contains basic information about the scheme which investors should
know about before investing. The scheme information document usually runs into several pages and
may seem too technical for novice investors. However, it has very useful scheme related information,
which can help investors make informed investment decisions. However, some key information
which investors should look for and read in the scheme information document are as follows:
• Other information
Statement of Additional Information (SAI):
This document is essentially an addendum to the SID. Information provided in the SAI includes the
following: -
(i) Constitution of the mutual fund i.e. the Asset Management Company of the scheme,
scheme sponsors and trustees. The sponsor is the promoter of the Asset Management
Company. The sponsor provides capital, creates a board of trustees and sets up the Asset
Management Company (AMC). The role of the trustees is to protect the interest of investors,
monitoring the AMC and ensuring compliance with regulations.
(ii) Key information about the AMC i.e. Key personnel of the AMC, key associates of the AMC
like Bankers, Custodians, Registrars, Auditors and Legal Counsel, Financial and legal issues
etc.
SIPs offer a strategic shield against the unpredictable tides of the financial markets. By adhering to
consistent investments, SIPs ensure that the average purchase cost remains stable over the long
term.
In practical terms, when market conditions are buoyant, you acquire fewer units of your chosen
investment, and during market downturns, you secure more units for your investment. This key
difference between SIP and mutual fund investing can provide investors with a risk-mitigation
strategy and potentially higher returns over time.
(ii) Power of Compounding
The power of compounding in SIP refers to reinvesting the returns generated by your mutual fund
investments back into the same fund. Over time, this process leads to exponential growth as your
returns earn additional returns.
The longer you stay invested, the more significant the compounding effect becomes, potentially
resulting in substantial wealth accumulation, making SIP an effective strategy for long-term financial
goals.
Let's consider two friends, Alice and Bob. Alice started investing `10,000 annually in an SIP at 25,
with an expected SIP return rate of 10% per annum. Over 30 years, she has made a total contribution
of ` 3,00,000. On the other hand, Bob started his investments at the age of 35 and invested ` 10,000
annually, expecting a 10% annual return. Over 20 years, Bob's total investment amounted to
` 2,00,000.
(Source: https://www.kotak.com/en/stories-in-focus/mutual-funds/what-is-sip.html)
(iii) Law of averages:
If NAV of the units comes down SIP helps in averaging, as investor is investing the same amount of
money every month (period) the no. of units he/she can buy with that amount is more as the NAV
has come down, which will reduce the overall cost of the portfolio of mutual fund. When the NAV
starts recovering again the breakeven point arrives early because of law of averages.
Lump Sum Investment:
In a lump sum, it means a single, bulk amount invested a one-time mutual fund investment. It is just
like FD. It is different than SIP where the money was pumped in periodically. In Lump sum money is
invested in one shot and without the intention to repeat it periodically.
The Systematic Transfer Plan (STP): It eliminates the additional burden involved in moving or
transferring funds between mutual fund schemes. When you have a large quantity of money to invest
in one go, this is the option you should pick. It does assist you in distributing your money over time
to lessen the effects of dealing with the market at its highest point. It is preferable to go from equity
plans to debt schemes and vice versa when you want to be risk-adverse with a plan.
Systematic Withdrawal Plan (SWP): One can periodically take out a predetermined amount of
money from one’s assets by using a systematic withdrawal plan. Retirees benefit most from this plan
because they may require a consistent income stream most of the time. But they also use this
technique to invest in new schemes or adjust their existing investments.
i.e., if hypothetically the entire portfolio were to be liquidated, how much would be realized. Since
each investor holds units in the pool of funds, the valuation is published in terms of per unit, so that
the value of one’s holdings can be computed. The formula for computation of NAV is:
Market Value of Investments heldby the Fund+ Value of Current Assets -
Value of Current Liabilities andProvisions
NAV=
No.of Units on the valuation date before redemption
or creation on units
From the above formula, it can be observed that from the market value of the investments as on that
day, we must add the cash equivalents or other current assets and need to deduct any expenses
that have accrued but not paid out, so that the NAV represents a true and fair picture. That is the
reason it is called ‘net’ asset value i.e., it is net of liabilities, expenses, etc.
Example
From the following information in respect of a mutual fund, calculate the NAV per unit:
`
Cash and Bank Balance 6,00,000
Bonds and Debenture (unlisted) 7,50,000
Both exchange-traded funds and closed-end mutual funds can publish indicative net
asset value (iNAV) (ETFs).
The calculation agent will utilise the established prices of all securities in the portfolio to
get the overall asset value, which is then reduced by the fund's liabilities and divided by
the number of shares to determine the indicative net asset value (iNAV).
(ii) Comparing net asset value and indicative net asset value (NAV)
The iNAV is a tool that aids in preserving trading of assets close to par value. It provides a
glimpse of a fund's worth that is almost real-time thanks to iNAV reports that are sent out every
15 seconds. A fund may be able to avoid considerable premium and discount trading by reporting
an iNAV.
Because they fall under the Investment Company Act of 1940's definition of a mutual fund
investment, closed-end funds, and ETFs compute net asset values. The funds trade like stocks
on the open market, with transactions taking place at the market price, while they determine a
daily net asset value.
8. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
It comes as a statutory warning that “mutual fund investments are subject to market risks . . . past
performance is not an indication of future performance”. Very few people read it or understand the
importance of the statement. The implication of the statement is that the performance we are looking
at today is the result of certain investment decisions taken by the fund manager in the past. The
fund manager is ultimately a human being, and future decisions may or may not be as effective and
hence future returns from that fund may or may not be as good.
Even though past performance may not be repeated in future, there is no logic to go for a Fund that
has been an underperformer, because that fund manager could not prove himself / herself efficient
over the period under consideration. The outperformer has something going for himself / herself.
Hence, let us look at past performance also as a hygiene factor.
What should be avoided is,
• looking at past performance over a short period of time
• looking at returns only till a particular date and comparing the numbers.
• basing a decision on a ranking system, ranked only by returns till a particular date.
Let us now understand why the above practices should be avoided.
A short period of time is not adequate to judge the performance of a fund manager, just like the runs
scored or wickets taken by a cricketer in 5 matches is not enough to judge his class - at best it shows
his current form. Similarly, if a bond fund is outperforming the peer group over a period of say 1 or
2 months, it may be that the calls (investment decisions) taken by the fund manager over 1 or 2
months have proved better than other fund managers and that’s it. Fund managers who have proven
herself over a long period of time should be preferred.
As discussed earlier, a Fund may have done well over say a 1-year period which makes it eligible
for ‘5 stars’ (performance ranking done by some agencies / websites) as against another Fund which
is say ‘4 stars’ or ‘3 stars’ and you take the decision to invest in the 5-star rated Fund, it may not be
an entirely correct decision. Nothing wrong about a fund doing well, more so if the performance-
based ranking is over an adequate period and it is done on a ‘Risk-Adjusted Basis’ i.e., adjusted for
volatility in returns.
The point is, there are certain ‘hygiene factors’ which should be considered. Lay investors would be
attracted by the ‘5 stars’ and would not be aware that a 5-star rated Fund may be low on the hygiene
factors. For example, a Fund with a corpus of `1,000 crore from a leading AMC / sponsor with 4-
star performance should be preferred over a 5-star rated Fund with a corpus of `20 crore which is
from an AMC that ranks among the bottom 5 in terms of corpus / their sponsor is not so well known
or if the credit quality of the Fund is relatively poor.
If Expenses are expressed per unit, then Expense Ratio = Expenses incurred per unit /
Average Net Value of Assets.
For example, a mutual fund has paid annual expenses of Rs. 20 lakhs. The assets under
management in the beginning and at the end of year were Rs. 200 lakhs and Rs. 400 lakhs
respectively.
Rs.20 lakhs
Expense Ratio = x100 = 6.67%
(Rs.200 + Rs. 400 lakhs) / 2
The Expense Ratio relates to the extent of assets used to run the Mutual Fund. It is inclusive of
travel costs, management consultancy and advisory fees. It, however, excludes brokerage expenses
for trading as purchase is recorded with brokerage while sales are recorded without brokerage.
• Rolling return of weekly frequency: Measure the return from the start date to next week,
from next week to next-to-next week and so on and take the average of all these observations.
Performance of an Equity / Bond Fund over a 3-year period:
• Point-to-point: Simply measure the performance of the growth option NAV from the start
date to today’s date, annualized on a compounded basis.
• Rolling return of monthly frequency: Measure the return from the start date to one-month-
later date, from next month to next-to-next month and so on and take the average of all these
observations.
• Rolling return of quarterly frequency: Measure the return from the start date to three-
month-later date, from next quarter to next-to-next quarter and so on and take the average of
all these observations.
The superiority of rolling return as a performance measurement over simple point-to-point return is
that it irons out the various smaller pockets of outperformance and underperformance against the
peer group and throws up a more dependable (smoothened out) data.
Rolling Returns explained
The objective is to find the fund's 2-year rolling return. So, let us start in 2015 to do this.
Firstly, calculate the return between the NAV on January 2, 2015, and the NAV on January 2, 2013,
which is two years ago. Secondly, shift the date by one day, i.e., between January 3, 2015, and
January 3, 2013, and then compute the return between these dates using the NAV for these two
dates. Once again change the date to January 4th, 2013, or 2015, and compute the return.
So, the purpose is to keep on going in this manner until a time series with a 2-year return is arrived
at.
Let's figure out the initial rolling return:
NAV as of January 2nd, 2013, was 100.54.
Since the period is two years, we use CAGR: [172.95/100.54] ^ (1/2)-1 = 31.16%.
NAV on January 3, 2013, would be the second rolling return in this series, at 101.75.
NAV on January 3, 2015, was 173.65; So, the CAGR in this situation = [173.65/101.75] ^ (1/2)-1 =
30.64.
Next, it will be calculated from January 4, 2013, to January 4, 2015, and so on.
Sharpe ratio
(Risk-free rate = 2%) 7.9% - 2.0% 6.9% - 2.0% 7.5% - 2.0%
rP - rF 5.5% 3.2% 4.5%
SR =
σP = 1.07 = 1.53 = 1.22
SR = Sharpe Ratio
As we see in the table above, though the return of portfolio A (7.9%) is higher than portfolio B (6.9%)
and Benchmark (7.5%), variability also is higher. The Sharpe Ratio of portfolio A (1.07) is much
lower than portfolio B (1.53) and lower than benchmark portfolio (1.22).
The higher the Sharpe ratio, the better because the portfolio has given that much higher return to
compensate for the higher variability. The Sharpe ratio is a very popular method for measuring risk-
adjusted return.
rP - rF
Treynor Ratio (TR) =
βP
The Treynor ratio measures excess return generated per unit of risk in the portfolio i.e. excess return
earned above the risk-free investment. Treasury bills are usually taken as the proxy for risk-free
return as it is issued by the Government and duration is not very long. Risk refers to the portfolio
beta i.e. the extent to which the portfolio performance varies along with the relevant market.
Let's consider the following example to understand Treynor Ratio:
Risk-Free Rate: 6%
In this example, the portfolio generated a Treynor Ratio of 3.33%, which shows its performance in
comparison to its exposure to systematic risk.
Using Portfolio A, the expected return = 0 .09 + 0.7 (0.12 - 0.09) = 0.09 + 0.021 = 0.111
Jensen Alpha = Return of Portfolio- Expected Return= 0.12 - 0.111 = 0.009
If “apples are compared to apples”- in other words a computer sector fund A is compared with
computer sector fund B - it is a viable number. But if taken out of context, it loses meaning. Alphas
are found in many rating services but are not always developed the same way- so you can’t compare
an alpha from one service to another. However, we have usually found that their relative position in
the rating service is to be viable. Short-term alphas are not valid. A minimum time frame of one to
three years is preferable.
rP - rF
SR =
σD
Here,
σD is the standard deviation on the downside i.e., not just the entire deviations in the portfolio but
the downside deviations only.
Sortino ratio penalizes only returns below a specified rate. Sharpe and Sortino measure risk-
adjusted return, but they are different. Sortino ratio differentiates negative volatility from entire
volatility by taking the standard deviation of negative returns, called downside, rather than total
standard deviation.
For example, assume Mutual Fund A has an annualized return of 14% and a downside deviation of
10%. Mutual Fund B has an annualized return of 12% and a downside deviation of 7%. The risk-free
rate is 5.5%. The Sortino ratios for both funds would be calculated as:
14% - 5.5%
Mutual Fund A Sortino = 10% = 0.85
12% - 5.5%
Mutual Fund B Sortino = 7% = 0.93
Even though Mutual Fund A is returning 2% more on an annualized basis, it is not earning that return
as efficiently as Mutual Fund B, given their downside deviations. Based on this metric, Mutual Fund
B is the better investment choice.
8.2.6 Benchmarking
For any performance evaluation, benchmarking is very important. However, the question is, what is
the correct benchmark? In most literature on mutual funds and on communications from AMCs, the
standard / official benchmark is mentioned. For example, for a large cap equity fund, the Nifty 50
Index can be used or if it is a Short-Term Bond Fund, the CRISIL index for Short Term Bond Funds
(STBex) would be mentioned.
(ii) Risk Diversification — Buying shares in a mutual fund is an easy way to diversify your
investments across many securities and asset categories such as equity, debt, and gold,
which helps in spreading the risk - so you won't have all your eggs in one basket. This proves
to be beneficial when the underlying security of a given mutual fund scheme experiences
market headwinds.
With diversification, the risk associated with one asset class is countered by the others. Even
if one investment in the portfolio decreases in value, other investments may not be impacted
and may even increase in value. In other words, you don’t lose out on the entire value of your
investment if a particular component of your portfolio goes through a turbulent period. Thus,
risk diversification is one of the most prominent advantages of investing in mutual funds.
(iii) Operational / Transaction ease: The process of buying and selling an instrument in the
secondary market is quite cumbersome as compared to the process of investing / redeeming
in MFs. For a similar / comparable return, the investor would rather settle for an easier
process.
(iv) Affordability & Convenience (Invest Small Amounts) — For many investors, it could be
more costly to directly purchase all the individual securities held by a single mutual fund. By
contrast, the minimum initial investments for most mutual funds are more affordable.
(v) Accessibility: Mutual Funds are easy to access, through distributors, online, acceptance
centers etc.
(vi) Ticket Size: All ticket sizes are available, from as small as `5000 to multiples of crores.
(vii) Liquidity: In mutual funds, liquidity is just a redemption away. Nowadays, it can be done
online, and the money gets credited to your bank account. The time for getting the credit
depends on the nature and terms of the fund; it may be T+1 day to T+3 days.
(viii) Option of multiple funds: There are multiple categories of funds discussed earlier, there is
one to suit your requirement, managed by professionals. That is not the case with direct
investment in equity stocks / bonds.
(ix) Well-Regulated: Mutual Funds are regulated by the capital markets regulator, Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) under SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996. SEBI has
laid down stringent rules and regulations keeping investor protection, transparency with
appropriate risk mitigation framework and fair valuation principles.
(x) Tax Benefits: Investment in ELSS upto `1,50,000 qualifies for tax benefit under section 80C
of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Mutual Fund investments when held for a longer term are tax
efficient.
(ii) In developed markets like the USA, there is a shift towards passively managed funds i.e., ETFs
(discussed below) as there is not much alpha generated over the broad market. ETFs run at a
much lower cost than actively managed funds. While ETFs also are mutual funds, the point is, the
alpha is missing in developed markets due to better information and efficiency in markets.
Example:
(3) Size of Fund– Managing a small sized fund and managing a large sized fund is not the same
as it is not dependent on the product of numbers. Purchasing through large sized fund may
by itself push prices up while sale may push prices down, as large funds get squeezed both
ways. So, it is better to remain with medium-sized funds.
(4) Age of Fund– Longevity of the fund in business needs to be determined and its performance
in rising, falling and steady markets must be checked. Pedigree does not always matter as
also success strategies in foreign markets.
(5) Largest Holding – It is important to note where the largest holdings in mutual fund have been
invested.
(6) Fund Manager– One should have an idea of the person handling the fund management. A
person of repute gives confidence to the investors.
(7) Expense Ratio– SEBI has laid down the upper ceiling for Expense Ratio. A lower Expense
Ratio will give a higher return which is better for an investor.
(8) PE Ratio– The ratio indicates the weighted average PE Ratio of the stocks that constitute the
fund portfolio with weights being given to the market value of holdings. It helps to identify the
risk levels in which the mutual fund operates.
(9) Portfolio Turnover – The fund manager decides as to when he should enter or quit the
market. A very low portfolio turnover indicates that he is neither entering nor quitting the
market very frequently. A high ratio, on the other hand, may suggest that excessively frequent
moves have led the fund manager to miss out on the next big wave of investments. A simple
average of the portfolio turnover ratio of peer group updated by mutual fund tracking agencies
may serve as a benchmark.
(2) When the mutual fund consistently under performs its peer group instead of it being at the top. In
such a case, the investor would have to pay to get out of the scheme and then invest in the winning
schemes.
(3) When the mutual fund changes its objectives e.g., instead of providing a regular income to
the investor, the composition of the portfolio has changed to a growth fund mode which is not
in tune with the investor’s risk preferences.
(4) When the investor changes his objective of investing in a mutual fund which no longer is
beneficial to him.
(5) When the fund manager, handling the mutual fund schemes, has been replaced by a new
entrant whose image is not known.
“Pursuant to the regulatory amendment, MF distributors whose registered name has terms such as
adviser / advisor / financial adviser/ investment adviser/ wealth adviser/wealth manager etc., are
required get their registered name changed,” AMFI said in a circular.
AMFI issued a non-exhaustive list of names that are permitted and prohibited for distributors.
“The name of an MF distributor should reflect the registration held by the entity and should not in
any way create an impression of performing a role for which the entity is not registered. Thus, every
MF distributor, while dealing in distribution of securities, should clearly specify that he /she is acting
as an MF distributor,” AMFI has said.
The industry body also prescribed font size for MF distributors to be used in all forms of
communication such as websites, mobile apps, business cards and signboards.
• ETFs offer intra-day purchase and sale on the Exchange, which suits active traders. This is
not possible with conventional funds.
• Close-ended funds have a fixed corpus. ETFs also have a given corpus, but that may change
as per demand. Authorized Participants can create new units or redeem existing units with
the AMC. This makes the ETF price realistic i.e., it moves with the movement in the underlying
market.
Risky bets can be separated from safer and more liquid investments with the use of side pocketing
so that they are not affected by changes in the risky assets' credit profiles. Here, attempts are taken
to maintain the scheme's net asset value so that small investors' ability to redeem their investment
won't be harmed by any abrupt withdrawals by large investors.
Additionally, side pocketing makes sure that investors who held the investment at the time of the
write-off will benefit if the bond is ever recovered. As allotment and redemption are carried out on
liquid assets, the side pocketing process assures that investors owning units of the core plan do not
experience a liquidity crunch.
New Development
Debt mutual funds are now able to use the "side pocket" idea, thanks to the market regulator
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). In the past, the regulator opposed side-pocketing
and prohibited mutual fund companies from segregating their problematic investments.
The Association of Mutual Funds of India (AMFI) approached SEBI in 2016 to request the creation
of regulations governing side-pockets when the market experiences a credit event after JP Morgan
Asset Management (India investments)'s in Amtek Auto defaulted and the fund house turned to the
side pocket. SEBI, however, turned down the suggestion at the time.
The NAV of numerous debt schemes fell precipitously in 2018. Following these schemes, credit
ratings were lowered for investments in Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Ltd (IL&FS) and
certain of its subsidiaries. The rule on debt funds was changed because of this catastrophe.
Will side-pocketing entice investment firms to take on more credit risk?
Ajay Tyagi, Chairman of SEBI, was quoted as saying, "SEBI would take sufficient measures and
implement safeguards to guarantee that this provision is not abused. These protections will be
included in the final guidelines. Segregated or hazardous investments will be closed to new
subscriptions after the investment segregation process is complete. Investors can still subscribe to
the portion made up of liquid assets or safer assets, nevertheless.
Institutional investors typically have the first right of redemption in times of crises. Retail investors
become trapped in hazardous or segregated assets because of this process. Because other holdings
are unaffected, side-pocketing is implemented in this situation to help fund companies manage
redemption pressures better. Let's use an example to better understand the procedure now:
Example
Let's say a fund has a corpus of ` 5000 crores. Of this, a firm that is in default on its debt holds `
250 crores. An institutional investor wishes to redeem the entire investment in this scenario. To pay
substantial investors, this redemption pushes the fund manager to sell good bonds. Toxic assets
that are still present at the end of the accounting year account for a significant amount of the corpus.
Thus, the process influences retail investors. Side pocketing will be used to protect each investor;
250 crores will be set aside, and 4750 crores will serve as the safer corpus. Following that, units will
be distributed to investors (both institutional and retail).
Are there drawbacks to side pocketing?
Side pocketing is a technique that needs to be applied with caution. Illiquid investment value is also
a sensitive topic. The illiquid asset's NAV will therefore continue to be of concern. Investors will also
find it challenging to track two NAVs—one for each of the liquid and illiquid assets. Finally, the
availability of side pockets will provide fund houses more leverage. Therefore, it is the fund
manager's responsibility to apply the method carefully and logically.
TD is usually negative because of the total expense ratio (TER) and other costs. Avoid any fund with
a greater TD that is either positive or negative. Higher TD may indicate less effective fund
management. The fact that TD examines point-to-point data to assess the effectiveness of fund
management is one of its shortcomings.
TE is used to observe how the fund is run during the period. Higher TE is brought on by continuous
movements in the daily monitoring difference over time. It is the daily tracking difference's variability
(or volatility), which can be called as the tracking difference’s standard deviation. If an investor wants
to compare index funds that track the same index without using technical terms, he can use the
following rule of thumb: the lower the TE, the more well a fund tracks the index. When we mix TD
and TE, things become fascinating. Both should ideally be lower and considered together when
assessing the fund’s performance.
Investors should choose the fund with the lowest tracking error and tracking difference after
comparing the performance of various schemes tracking the same index. It's crucial to keep in mind,
though, that a fund may have a high tracking error and still beat its peers. Investors should evaluate
both characteristics to make an informed decision when choosing an efficiently managed fund rather
than relying primarily on one when making their decision. A fund with a higher tracking error doesn't
necessarily suggest inefficient index tracking, and vice versa, therefore concentrating solely on
tracking error or tracking difference can be deceptive.
16.2 Reasons for Deviation Between a Scheme’s Return and the Benchmark
(Index) Return
What causes the fund to depart from benchmark returns, though? The same returns as the index
are essentially impossible for a fund manager to attain. A fund manager encounters several real-
world obstacles that cause the scheme return to differ from the benchmark return, which are follows:
(i) Total Expense Ratio (TER): It is charged by passive funds to cover management and
operating costs related to running the fund. The returns on the funds are directly impacted by
a higher or lower TER.
(ii) Cash holdings: To honor investor redemptions, passive funds also keep a specific portion
of their Assets Under Management (AUM) in cash and cash equivalents, which are often
liquid securities. Since this money isn't invested, rising or falling markets may cause it to add
to or detract from the fund's returns.
(iii) Securities lending: In addition to receiving returns from the index, passive funds may also
generate income. For a fee, they can lend securities they own to other market players for a
short time. The increased income aids in cost-cutting and betters tracking accuracy.
(iv) Timing of execution: Several stocks are added or withdrawn when the index is rebalanced.
Although the index calculates returns using closing day prices, in practice fund managers
might not be able to execute trades precisely at the closing prices. Due to this, the execution
price has a minor discrepancy, which results in tracking difference. This also applies to
managing the cash flow of investors daily.
(v) Dividend receipt is delayed, which could increase the tracking difference. When a fund gets
dividends from the underlying securities, there is a timing gap between when the payout is
made and when the benchmark index takes those payments into account.
(vi) Other costs: Passive funds also incur other expenses like goods and services tax on
management fees, brokerage fees for buy and sell transactions, exit load expenses, etc.,
which also impact fund returns. Apart from these, several factors such as corporate actions
(stock splits, mergers and acquisitions, spinoffs, etc.) also cause tracking differences.
∑ (d - d )
2
TE =
n-1
d = Return of Portfolio
d = Return of Benchmark
n = No. of observation
Example
The following data is available for the yearly returns for both Fund PQR and the Nifty:
Year Fund PQR Nifty
2022 15.54% 20.73%
2021 13.34% 10.96
2020 3.50% 1.38%
2019 10.00% 12.79%
2018 34.69% 31.49%
Calculate the tracking error. Also suggest the course of action for the investor.
Tracking Error =
(n -1)
= (15.54% - 20.73) + (13.34% -10.96) + (3.50% -1.38%) + (10.00% -12.79%) + (34.69% - 31.49%)
2 2 2 2 2
(5 -1)
= 0.037
The small tracking error in the question shows that Fund PQR does not considerably exceed the
benchmark. As a result, the investor can think about taking his money out of the fund and investing
it in a different, more promising investment options. Alternatively, he can be content with the fact
that his portfolio is gaining ground on the market.
Holdco and the underlying SPV and other safeguards including the following:
b. Holdco to distribute 100% cash flows realized from underlying SPVs and at least 90% of the
remaining cash flows.
Mandatory sponsor holding shall not less than 25% of the total units of the REIT after initial offer on
a post-issue basis (the minimum sponsor holding specified in this clause shall be held for a period
of at least three years from the date of listing of such units). The sponsor shall always hold not less
than 15% of the outstanding units of the listed REIT. In the case of InvIT, mandatory sponsor holding
is 15%. There is no limit on the number of sponsors both in the case of REIT and InvIT. REITs can
invest up to 20% in under-construction assets, while InvITs (through public issue) can invest up to
10% in under-construction assets.
Investment trusts shall hold controlling interest and not less than 50% equity share capital or interest
in the SPVs (except in the case of public private partnership projects where such holding is
disallowed by the government or regulatory provisions).
Furthur, SPVs shall hold not less than 80% of assets (90% in case of InvITs) directly in properties
(infrastructure projects for InvITs) and not invest in other SPVs.
Lastly, SPVs should not engage in any activity other than those pertaining and incidental to the
underlying projects.
Unitholders (including
Sponsors and Sponsor
Group)
Units Distributions
Manager Trustee
REIT Management FEE Embassy Trustee Fee
REIT
Property Management
Property Management
Fee
Linked Instruments
Assets
SPVs
InvITs are set up as a trust and registered with SEBI. An InvIT involves four entities: Trustee,
Sponsor, Investment Manager and Project Manager. The trustee, who oversees the role of an
InvIT, is a SEBI registered debenture trustee and he cannot be an associate of the Sponsor or
Manager. ‘Sponsor’ means promoters and refers to any company or body corporate with a net worth
of ` 100 crore which sets up the InvIT and is designated as such while applying to SEBI. Promoters
or Sponsors, collectively, must hold at least 15% in the InvIT for a minimum of 3 years. The value of
the assets owned/proposed to be owned by InvIT shall be at least `500 crore. The minimum issue
size for an initial offer is ` 250 crore. InvITs are allowed to add projects in the same vehicle in future
so that investors can benefit from diversification as well as growth in their portfolio.
Given the challenging phase of infrastructure in the country today, InvITs may provide an alternate
source of funds. Several existing infrastructure projects which are under development in India are
delayed and ‘stressed’ on account of varied reasons like increasing debt finance costs, lack of
international finance flowing to Indian infrastructure projects, project implementation delays caused
by various factors like global economic slowdown, cost overruns, etc. InvITs may offer a source of
long-term re-finance for existing infrastructure projects. InvITs may help in attracting international
finance into Indian infrastructure sector. These would also enable the investors to hold a diversified
portfolio of infrastructure assets. Among Asian markets, Singapore is a success story for listed
Trusts. In Singapore, there are 39 listings with a market capitalization of approx $70 billion, but the
bias is on REITs than on InvITs.
There is a debate on whether an InvIT, by nature of investment, is equity or debt as it has features
of both. It is somewhere in between; loosely, debt-plus or equity-minus in terms of risk return profile.
It has equity-like features such as the units are listed, can change hands like equity stocks, there is
periodic valuation of the projects akin to periodic results of companies and economic factors like
higher GDP growth or higher inflation would lead to expectation of higher revenue and hence higher
price of the units at the Exchange. Its debt-like features are - there is periodic pay-out of the earnings
of the InvIT from the underlying SPVs, which is not exactly like contractual coupon pay-out on bonds
but somewhat comparable as the valuation gives a perspective on how much to expect. It is a hybrid
instrument with a somewhat predictable cash flow yield (akin to debt) and potential appreciation with
growth of the economy (akin to equity).
Taxation wise, an InvITs is a pass-through vehicle. There is a mandate to distribute at least 90% of
net-distributable cash flows. Interest component of income distributed by trust to the unit holders
would attract withholding tax @ 10% for resident unit holders. Interest income is taxable in the hands
of the unit holder. Dividend income is exempt in the hands of the unit holder and there is no dividend
distribution tax.
At this point of time, InvIT is not a retail product, the minimum primary application amount being
` 10 lakh and the minimum secondary transaction amount being ` 5 lakh. The restriction is imposed
because there is no track record and lack of awareness. There is a liquidity risk as well, in the
secondary market, the units may not be traded every day as the investor base is not wide at this
point of time. May be over a period, with the development of this market, SEBI would look to ease
the threshold amount for REITs and InvITs. As of now, investors should keep it on the radar and
participate through the mutual fund route who have a better understanding of the risk factors and
can handle secondary market liquidity issues.
The regulator has come up with detailed guidelines on conditions for issuance of units, pricing,
timelines, and allotments. SEBI said InvITs can make a rights issue of units provided it fulfil the
conditions, including none of the respective promoters or partners or directors of the sponsor or
investment manager or trustee is a fugitive economic offender, nor are they barred from the
accessing the securities market.
If the InvIT wants to have the issue underwritten, it can appoint underwriters, SEBI said.
The regulator said the minimum allotment to any investor will be Rs 1 crore. Besides, the rights issue
should open within three months from the record date and kept open for at least three working days
but not more than 15 days.
The InvIT shall not make any further issue of units in any manner during the period between the date
of filing the letter of offer with the Board and the allotment of the units offered through the letter of
offer. The InvIT shall file an allotment report with the Board providing details of the allottees and
allotment made within 15 days of the issue closing date,” SEBI said in a circular.
(c) ` 12
(d) ` 15
4. Which type of fund is more volatile?
(a) Large-cap funds
(b) Mid-cap funds
(b) Measure the return from the start date to next date, from next date to next-to-next date
and so on and take the average of all these observations.
(c) measure the return from the start date to next week, from next week to next-to-next
week and so on and take the average of all these observations.
(d) All of the above
10. The CEO, Sumesh Kumar Nahta wants to know from the CFO, CA Aakash Mehta that if the
equity fund is redeemed at ` 20 and the exit load is 2.50%, what will be the NAV of the equity
fund?
(a) 19.50
(b) 20.50
(c) 19.975
(d) 20.00
11. Front end load is also called ………...
(a) Entry Load
Theoretical Questions
1. Briefly describe the organization of Mutual Funds.
2. Explain Mutual Funds based on Classification of Portfolio Management.
3. What is a Net Assets Value? Explain with the help of an example.
4. As a performance measurement, what is the difference between Point-to-Point Returns and
Rolling Returns?
5. Explain the significance of Side Pocketing in protecting mutual fund investors. What effect
does side pocketing have on NAV? Are there any drawbacks to side pocketing?
Practical Questions
1. Mr. Shreyas wants to invest in Ready Mutual Fund Scheme for which the following information
is available:
Calculate the month end net asset value of the mutual fund scheme.
2. An investor purchased 400 units of a Mutual Fund at ` 12.25 per unit on 31st December 2021.
As on 31st December 2022 he has received ` 1.50 as dividend and ` 1.00 as capital gains
distribution per unit.
Required:
(i) The return on the investment if the NAV as of 31st December 2022 is ` 13.25.
(ii) The return on the investment as on 31st December 2022 if all dividends and capital
gains distributions are reinvested into additional units of the fund at ` 12.50 per unit.
ANSWERS/SOLUTIONS
Answers to the MCQ based Questions.
1. (d) 2. (c) 3. (c) 4. (c) 5. (a)
6. (b) 7. (c) 8. (c) 9 (d) 10 (b)
11. (a)
0.0125 =
( Closing NAV − ` 80 ) + ` 0.80 + ` 0.60
` 80
1 = Closing NAV - `78.60
Price paid for 400 units as on 31/12/2021 = 400 units x ` 12.25 = ` 4900
6360 - 4900
Return = x100 = 29.80%
4900