Q3e LS3 AudioScript
Q3e LS3 AudioScript
UNIT 1
Unit 1, Sociology, The Q Classroom
Page 3
Teacher: OK everyone, let’s start. Every unit in Q begins with a question. As we go
through the unit, we will continue to discuss this question. Our answers may
change as we explore the topic, or they may stay the same. The Unit Question
for Unit 1 is “Are first impressions accurate?” So let’s think about our first
impressions of people in this class. Look around the room at your classmates.
Who made a good first impression on you? Yuna?
Yuna: Sophy.
Teacher: Why did she make a good first impression on you?
Yuna: Well, she’s always smiling. She looks friendly.
Teacher: And is she friendly?
Yuna: Yes, she is!
Teacher: So that’s an accurate first impression. Do you think first impressions are
always that accurate? Marcus, what do you think?
Marcus: No, I don’t think so. Sometimes you might think someone is unfriendly, but
they’re just in a bad mood that day.
Teacher: Good point. Maybe someone can give you the wrong impression because they
are having a bad day. What else might cause the wrong first impression?
Sophy?
Sophy: Mmm. A person might be dressed differently than they usually dress. If
someone met me on the way home from the gym, they wouldn’t know that
I’m usually very formal.
Teacher: OK, so your mood and the way you are dressed can lead to wrong first
impressions. What do you think about this, Felix? Are first impressions
usually accurate?
Felix: I think most of the time they are right in some way. I can usually tell right
away if someone is friendly or quiet or if they’re smart or funny. But I can’t
tell other things about a person, like if they’re honest or what kinds of things
they believe in.
Teacher: Interesting.
1
counter: noun a long flat surface like a table in a kitchen, restaurant, store, etc.
example of his poor behavior, his rudeness1, and you assumed he had other
negative traits. You thought “This is not a nice person.”
OK, so if our first impression of someone is positive, we think the person is
always that way, and we think that all of her traits are positive. We think that
small sample of behavior shows us her true personality. But we don’t think
that way about our own behavior. Let me explain what I mean. When we see
someone else acting in a negative way, we think it is because he is a negative
person. But when we act in a negative way, we say it is because of the
situation.
Let’s go back to the coffee shop again. If I am rude to the person taking my
coffee order, I will find reasons for my bad behavior—the service is too slow,
my mother is very sick, or my boss just yelled1 at me. In other words, when I
act badly, I think it’s because of the situation, not because I am a bad person.
But if another customer is rude, I don’t look for reasons—I think it is his
personality. In other words, he acted badly because he is not a nice person.
First impressions can tell us a lot. They help us make sense of new
information, and form relationships with new people. But, as you can see, we
can make errors, so sometimes we need to take a second look.
from the person standing above you on the ladder. This kind of thinking is
based on associations between ideas that we have learned. For instance, if
we hear the words slow and gray, we might think old because older people
are slower and have gray hair.
Host: Sounds like our past experience helps us think fast. What does the second
system do?
Nadia: System 2 is the slow thinking we use when we solve difficult math problems.
We need to concentrate, and this takes work and energy. System 2 thinking
controls and checks System 1. When we are tired or have too many things to
think about, it doesn’t work as well. Food and sleep help us do our best slow
thinking.
Host: Is one system more important than the other in forming first impressions?
Nadia: I think Kahneman is saying that we use System 1, or fast thinking, to form
first impressions, but we need System 2 to help us with accuracy. According
to Kahneman, there are a number of problems with fast thinking. We often
think that what we see is all there is. So if we see one example of good
behavior, we think that person is always good. Also, people tend to think that
we can trust0 something just because it seems familiar. If a phrase is
repeated enough times, we think it is true, even if it’s obviously false.
Something as simple as font and color can affect our judgment too. For
example, people are more likely to trust a message in bold font or the color
blue than print that is hard to read and gray or yellow. So we often need slow
thinking to correct problems caused with fast thinking.
Host: Are some people better at fast thinking than others?
Nadia: Both Kahneman and Gladwell discuss the intuitive0 thinking of experts. An
expert is someone who has a great deal of experience, usually at least 10,000
hours of practice with something like playing chess or baseball or even
fighting fires. Because of this experience, such experts are often able to form
accurate first impressions about their area of expertise very quickly.
Host: So practice can improve our fast thinking?
Nadia: Well, at least sometimes. But we still need slower thinking to help us avoid
mistakes.
A: What’s it cost?
B: Where’d you go?
A: Why’d he arrive so late?
UNIT 2
Unit 2, Nutritional Science, The Q Classroom
Page 27
Teacher: The question for Unit 2 is “Why do we change the foods we eat?” Sophy, have
you made any changes to what you eat lately?
Sophy: Yes, I have. I eat much less meat now because I learned that producing meat
puts stress on the natural environment.
Felix: I’ve been running a lot lately. I changed my diet to improve my athletic
performance.
Teacher: That’s great, Felix, but how about general health? Has anyone changed eating
habits just to be healthier? Marcus?
Marcus: Sure. That’s the main reason why I’ve started eating more fresh fruit and
vegetables.
Teacher: Did you want to add something, Yuna?
Yuna: Yes. Think about cultural influences. When I was back in my home country,
the food around me was really different. My diet was typical for that culture.
A lot of my favorite foods I don’t eat anymore, just because I can’t get them
very easily here.
0
tang: noun a strong, sharp taste
Reporter: The air is thick with exotic aromas 0at the McCormick Spice Company outside
Baltimore. The factory runs 24 hours a day and for good reason. McCormick
estimates in the fifties, the average American spice drawer had 10 spices.
Today, the number’s grown to 40.
Speaker 4: People consume almost a billion pounds of spices a year. That’s . . .
Reporter: A billion with a b?
Speaker 4: A billion pounds of spices a year.
Reporter: Twenty-five years ago, it was half that. Spice experts say it’s the “melting pot”
0
that’s producing spicier meals. As the country becomes more diverse0,
people crave0 different tastes.
Speaker 5: The cayennes, the habanero sauces and spices, the things that really burn
your mouth.
Reporter: Ginger has grown more than 50 percent while paprika use doubled in the
same five-year period. Meals that used to be seasoned with salt and pepper
now include everything from allspice . . .
Speaker 6: Yeah. I love spicy food.
Reporter: . . . to za’atar. It’s a lot to keep track of.
Speaker 7: It’s a little bit more.
Reporter: In scientifically controlled conditions, including special lighting that disguises
the color of the samples, professional tasters at the McCormick testing center
make sure everything tastes just right. Keeping track of changing tastes is a
full-time job, so the spice people keep an eye on ordinary people at the
testing center through a one-way mirror. On this day, they were testing chili,
but nobody’s expecting any surprises.
Speaker 4: People are craving spicier, bolder foods, and I don’t see the tables turning0.
Reporter: Americans are taking the old saying to heart, and if variety is the spice of life,
a larger variety of spices apparently makes life livelier. Richard Schlesinger,
CBS News, Hunt Valley, Maryland.
Female 1: All of them, actually. They aren’t really all that unusual. Except za’atar, I
guess.
Female 2: It’s all about your family’s culture, right? My ancestors came from all over the
place. Our family eats burgers, pizza, chicken, spaghetti, tacos, chili . . . I’d call
it normal local food, but I know some is from other countries.
Teacher: Good point, Brenna. It’s hard to draw a little box around a few dishes and say,
“This is local food,” since the meaning of that term keeps changing. The video
hinted at that. Just out of curiosity, Brenna, what spices were in your family’s
food?
Female 1: OK.
Male 2: Sure.
Female 2: OK.
Teacher: Let’s say that every spice is “old,” “new,” or “strange.” Only those three
categories. By “old,” I mean used for a long time in local cooking. By “new,” I
mean not traditional here but becoming more common. And by “strange,” I
mean really rare—or you’ve never even heard of it. I’m going to name a few
spices. For each one, raise an open hand if you consider it “old,” hold up one
finger for “new,” or raise a closed fist0 for “strange.” Got it? OK. First one . . .
salt. Right. All open hands. Of course, we’d all call salt “old.” Next . . . uh . . .
wattle seed.
Teacher: Wattle seed. OK, everyone is showing a fist. I’m not surprised. It’s a
somewhat rare Australian spice, so it’s not familiar to anyone in this room.
OK, turmeric
0
fist: noun a hand with the fingers closed together tightly
Teacher: Yes. A lot of people pronounce it that way, but it’s pronounced “turmeric” as
well. OK. A few closed fists, but mostly one finger. I see no open hands. So
turmeric is a “new” spice?
Male 2: Well, actually my family has used it for a long time to make curry, but I don’t
think it’s old around here—I mean, in this country.
Female 1: Yeah, I’d agree that it’s new. It’s becoming a lot more popular because people
here are eating more South Asian food.
Teacher: Well, with respect to those health claims, they might or might not be true.
But anyway, we’ve identified some key factors in spice usage. Can anyone
help summarize?
Male 2: Of course, a family’s home culture is a factor. Maybe, like with my family, that
could relate to ethnic background.
Female 2: Or just generally what’s part of the overall culture also impacts what spices
we eat. Like you don’t have to be Italian to eat pizza or spaghetti. With
oregano and basil.
Teacher: And a third factor: Health—or at least what some people think is healthy. If
some people believe a spice is healthy, they might use it more often. That
could be enough to make it a “new” spice.
We usually eat at home since it’s so expensive to eat out these days.
Knowing people from other countries leads to a familiarity with new spices.
1. Since Judith Marcus was shopping for interesting spices, the reporter in the
video talked to her.
2. Many people try to use less salt in their food because of possible salt-related
health problems.
3. Because the student’s family cooks Lebanese food, he is familiar with za’atar
4. I like a lot of variety in my food, so I am interested in trying some new spices.
Teacher: Health experts commonly claim that some cultures have exceptionally
healthy diets. They point especially to the Mediterranean diet of southern
Italy and Greece, the traditional Japanese diet (without Western fast food),
and a few others. Following a “super-diet” leads to a much greater chance of
living a long, healthy life. Evidence certainly does show correlations
between, say, the Mediterranean diet, or the Japanese diet, and a long life.
The Mediterranean diet illustrates some good features shared by healthy
diets. Seasonings like oregano and thyme often replace salt, so a person may
be less likely to have high blood pressure. Oils in fresh fish cause a reduction
in inflammation0 and may reduce cancer risks. Then there are the fresh
vegetables, whole grains, and plenty of legumes 0like lentils and nuts.
Because they consume olive oil instead of animal fats, someone with a
Mediterranean diet probably has lower levels of “bad” cholesterol0, called
LDLs. Followers of this diet probably have better heart health since they
avoid LDLs. The European Society of Cardiology estimates that a person
eating a Mediterranean diet has a 30 percent lower risk of a heart attack than
a similar person with a typical “Western diet.”
The overall effect of diet on lifespan is hard to determine since many other
factors may be involved. Still, the BBC mentions research showing that
Italians have a life expectancy about 1.5 years longer than the British. It’s not
unreasonable to think diet is a factor.
Japan has one of the world’s highest overall life expectancies—84.1 years in
2018. The traditional diet of Japan may be one reason why. Fish is a major
part of the Japanese food landscape, and it’s known for being low in “bad
cholesterol” and high in “good cholesterol,”. And the kinds of fish commonly
eaten in Japan have a great deal of Omega-3 fatty acids, which are chemicals
known to reduce the risk of heart problems. In addition, Japanese people
typically eat smaller portions0 of food than Americans do—a dietary feature
that can help with weight control and minimize obesity-related diseases like
type-two diabetes.
Icelanders have approximately the same life expectancy as Italians, so their
diet has also attracted increased attention in recent years. As in Japan, fish is
a dietary staple in Iceland, but since Iceland is so far north and their farming
area is limited, there are some distinctive differences. For cooking oil,
Icelanders typically use canola oil, also called rapeseed oil--a good substitute
for olive oil. Sheep outnumber people by more than two to one in Iceland, so
0
inflammation: noun a condition in which part of the body becomes swollen because of
illness
0
legume: noun any plant that has seeds in long pods
0
cholesterol: noun a substance that is found in the bodies of people and animals and that
helps to carry fats
0
portion: noun an amount of food that is large enough for one person
lamb meat, which is low in fat and high in iron, provides a lot of protein for
Icelanders.
The attention given to super-diets seems to have caused people around the
world to change what they eat. For example, the amount of olive oil
consumed in the United States went up by about 300 percent in the last 20
years. Broccoli? Up approximately 940 percent. This wasn’t because of more
people. The population during this time increased by only about 14 percent,
nowhere near enough to account for these trends. Clearly, there have been
societal changes—and this is a worldwide trend. The consumption of olive oil
in Saudi Arabia increased by about 150 percent between 2000 and 2012
(before then declining somewhat). Olive oil consumption is rising in Turkey
and Brazil as well. No one can know the degree to which these dietary
changes were due to an attraction to the Mediterranean diet. It is hard to
believe, however, that news about this diet had no effect.
But we have to be careful. The fact that two things occur together does not
mean that one causes the other. A long, healthy life is probably a function of
many factors, not diet alone. For one thing, exercise probably plays a role in
the health of these fortunate populations. Most people eating these well-
known diets walk more than an hour each day through fields and over hills
and do some light lifting, so they stay fit. Because they enjoy close ties to
others in a village or a neighborhood, they have lower psychological stress.
All these factors together combine to favor good health and a long life. If we
want these benefits, we should probably change not just our diets but other
aspects of how we live as well.
UNIT 3
Unit 3, Psychology, The Q Classroom
Page 53
Teacher: The Unit 3 question is “In what ways is change good or bad?” So what are
some of the big changes you’ve made in your life recently? Marcus?
Marcus: Uh, I moved here and started college.
Teacher: Has that been a good change or a bad change for you?
Marcus: A good change. I’m more independent now.
Teacher: What about change in general? Have the changes in your life been good for
you or bad for you? Yuna?
Yuna: Good. I lost my job and was very sad. But now I am here, going to school full-
time and happy.
Teacher: So sometimes a change that seems bad at first turns out to be a good thing.
What do you think, Sophy? Is change usually a good thing?
Sophy: Well, changes in my life have usually been good, like moving or starting a
new school. But sometimes changes in society aren’t good, like when the
crime rate goes up or the environment becomes polluted.
Teacher: OK, let’s talk about changes in society. The world has changed a lot since your
parents were your age. Have most of those changes been good or bad? What
makes some changes good and some not so good? Felix?
Felix: Well, changes in communication might be bad if they reduce face-to-face
contact. That’s what my mom would say about social media. But one thing
that makes those changes good is that I can stay in touch with my friends all
over the world.
Sophy: Yeah, that makes the changes good. But in some other ways they’re not good.
One kid I went to school with got bullied on social media. It’s too easy for
strangers to insult you, and you can’t even tell who they are.
Teacher: So, there are really two ways to look at changes.
Lecturer: Hello everyone. Today I’m going to talk about one of the most important
people you’ve never heard of—Jeffrey Skoll. Everyone calls him Jeff. In
pictures, he looks like just an ordinary guy. You would never guess that his
personal wealth is several billion dollars or that he is one of the world’s most
important promoters of change.
Change has shaped Jeff’s life. He grew up as a typical middle-class kid in
Canada. But one day when he was 14, his whole world turned upside down.
He learned that his father had cancer. The terrifying0 news prompted Jeff’s
father to have a talk with his son. He didn’t really fear death, Jeff’s father said,
but he felt bad about not doing the things in life that he really wanted. After a
long time, Jeff’s father finally got better and was free of cancer. But the
difficult times taught Jeff a lesson—as Jeff puts it, “One never knows how
much time one really has.”
Jeff grew up wanting to be a writer. On camping vacations with his family, he
used to read a lot. By the time he was 13, he had read authors like George
Orwell 0and Ayn Rand0. Their stories predicted scary changes like
overpopulation, wars, and diseases. Jeff wanted to use his writing to promote
a more hopeful future. But he was very practical and aware that writing
didn’t pay very much. He changed his approach to a career. He got an
engineering degree at the University of Toronto and started a couple of
computer-related businesses. His goal was to retire someday and start
writing stories.
Although his companies were making some money, Jeff felt he needed to
learn more about business. He went to business school at Stanford University
in Palo Alto, California. He graduated in 1995 and went to work for a news-
reporting company. This seemed to be a step toward becoming a writer. In
fact, it was just a short side trip before he became a billionaire0.
At Stanford, Jeff had become friends with another student, Pierre Omidyar.
Pierre was a whiz at writing computer code. He developed a website for
0
terrifying: adjective very frightening
0
George Orwell (1903–1950): English novelist, essayist, journalist, and critic
0
Ayn Rand (1905–1982): Russian-American novelist, playwright, screenwriter and
philosopher
0
billionaire: noun a person who has a billion dollars
selling things by auction0, and he and Jeff spent part of their time running the
site. Eventually, Jeff quit his journalism job to become the first president of
the company that he and Pierre had put together—the tremendously
successful eBay. Two years later, he and Pierre made eBay a public company.
They became instant billionaires when the price of eBay shares soared0.
In a TED Talk, Jeff said, “For me personally, it was a real change. I went from
living in a house with five guys in Palo Alto, and living off their leftovers0, to
all of a sudden having all kinds of resources. And I wanted to figure out how
I could take the blessing0 of these resources and share it with the world.”
He often advises his audiences that everybody has the opportunity to make
change in their own way. Jeff sensed that his best tools for making change
would not be stories or newspaper articles. They would be donations and
funding arrangements. He would become a philanthropist0. He may be most
famous for a movie and TV company he founded in 2004 called Participant
Productions (now called Participant Media). Jeff had come back to his
childhood dream of telling stories. As opposed to the main goal of most film
studios, which is to make money, Participant’s aim is to tell stories that
inspire social change. They had great success with the films Syriana in 2005,
An Inconvenient Truth in 2006, and Charlie Wilson’s War in 2008—all of
which won Academy Awards.
But actually, Jeff’s first achievement as a philanthropist was to set up a
charity group called the Skoll Foundation, way back in 1999. Right after
setting it up, he hired someone who shared his views, Sally Osberg, to
manage it. Since then, the foundation has been directing money to others
who work to help the poor, fight disease, protect the natural environment,
and otherwise address social and global problems.
Jeff Skoll’s efforts are still shaping our world. He has personally changed with
time, but in many ways he is still the thoughtful Canadian kid trying to avoid
a scary future. He is using his great wealth and influence not just to manage
change but to encourage it. He has said, “There’s never one right way to make
change. One can do it as a tech person or a finance person or a nonprofit
person or an entertainment person.” Jeff has been able to promote change in
each of those ways, and more.
0
auction: noun a public sale at which items are sold to the person who offers the most
money
0
soared: verb rose very fast
0
leftovers: noun food that has not been eaten when a meal has finished
0
blessing: (n.) something that is good or helpful
0
philanthropist: noun a person who helps the poor or those in need, especially by giving
money
Interviewer: So, Barbara. Welcome to Life and Times. It’s great to have you here.
B. Ehrenreich: Great to be here, Jack. Thanks for inviting me.
Interviewer: Now, you’re famous as a journalist, and of course, you’ve written several
books based on your research. We’ll get to those in a minute, but could
you start by telling our listeners some of the reasons why you go
“undercover” for your research?
BE: Sure. Well, interviews are fine, but sometimes you need to experience
something firsthand to understand it. So I guess what I’m saying is that
being an undercover reporter is a good way to find out what’s really going
on. By putting yourself in the situation you’re investigating, you can then
write about your experience from a more informed point of view.
0
undercover: adjective working or happening secretly
0
financially: adverb connected with money
Interviewer: Mm-hm. And of course, Nickel and Dimed went on to be a very popular book.
It was a New York Times best seller.
BE: Yes. I was really surprised at all the interest. I think it really opened people’s
eyes, a firsthand account like that. You know, people in low-paid jobs like
those aren’t lazy. They work long, hard hours just to survive.
Interviewer: Did you change your name when you went undercover?
BE: For Nickel and Dimed I didn’t change my name, but I did for my next project,
Bait and Switch. I wanted to see how easy it was for people with pretty good
jobs who became unemployed to find another job at the same level. So, I
went undercover as a white-collar 0public relations executive0 looking for
work. I tried really hard, with a great résumé that told everyone that I had
lots of experience and all that, but I couldn’t find any work. It really
highlighted to me how hard life can be for people at all levels . . . from
unskilled manual0 workers to white-collar management.
Interviewer: Mm-hm. So, I guess in both cases, for Nickel and Dimed and Bait and Switch,
you were pleased that the changes you made weren’t permanent? I mean,
you didn’t ever want to carry on in one of those jobs.
BE: No way. I just got a brief look at people’s lives there, and by the time I
finished, I realized how lucky I was. I was so relieved not to be in that kind of
situation long-term.
Interviewer: Mm-hm. Well, listeners, we’re going to take a short break, but if you have a
question for Barbara, now’s the time, so get on the phone and call . . .
0
white-collar: adjective connected with people who work in offices, not in factories
0
executive: noun a person who has an important position as a manager of a business or
organization
0
manual: adjective using your hands
on. By putting yourself in the situation you’re investigating, you can then
write about your experience from a more informed point of view.
Interviewer: I see. So, for Nickel and Dimed, where did you go undercover?
BE: Well, the aim was to see if I could support myself in low-paid jobs, so I
worked as a waitress, a hotel housekeeper, a maid, a nursing home assistant,
and a supermarket clerk. I spent a month in each job, working in Florida,
Maine, and Minnesota.
Interviewer: Wow. That’s a lot of different jobs and places! I guess your life changed
completely during that period, right?
BE: It sure did . . . and boy, I learned a lot! It was amazing.
Interviewer: Really? What exactly did you find out?
BE: Well, first, that it was very difficult indeed to cope, you know, financially, on
such low wages. The rents were very high and the wages were so low. You
know, these people really struggle. Also, you have to be a hard worker! I
mean, some of the jobs I was doing left me feeling physically exhausted—
especially when I had to work two jobs in a day. Interviewing people is one
thing, but actually doing the job day to day shows you exactly how hard these
people’s lives are.
Interviewer: Mm-hm. And of course, Nickel and Dimed went on to be a very popular book.
It was a New York Times best seller.
BE: Yes. I was really surprised at all the interest. I think it really opened people’s
eyes, a firsthand account like that. You know, people in low-paid jobs like
those aren’t lazy. They work long, hard hours just to survive.
Interviewer: Did you change your name when you went undercover?
BE: For Nickel and Dimed I didn’t change my name, but I did for my next project,
Bait and Switch. I wanted to see how easy it was for people with pretty good
jobs who became unemployed to find another job at the same level. So, I
went undercover as a white-collar public relations executive looking for
work. I tried really hard, with a great résumé that told everyone that I had
lots of experience and all that, but I couldn’t find any work. It really
highlighted to me how hard life can be for people at all levels . . . from
unskilled manual workers to white-collar management.
Interviewer: Mm-hm. So, I guess in both cases, for Nickel and Dimed and Bait and Switch,
you were pleased that the changes you made weren’t permanent? I mean,
you didn’t ever want to carry on in one of those jobs.
BE: No way. I just got a brief look at people’s lives there, and by the time I
finished, I realized how lucky I was. I was so relieved not to be in that kind of
situation long-term.
Interviewer: Mm-hm. Well, listeners, we’re going to take a short break, but if you have a
question for Barbara, now’s the time, so get on the phone and call . . .
UNIT 4
Unit 4, Marketing, The Q Classroom
Page 77
Teacher: The Unit Question for Unit 4 is, “How does advertising affect our behavior?”
So, let’s talk about how ads have affected our behavior. Yuna, have you ever
bought something because you saw an ad for it?
Yuna: I don’t think so. I don’t pay attention to ads.
Teacher: Sophy, how about you?
Sophy: Well, maybe if I’d seen ads for something and friends have liked it? I don’t
think I’ve bought anything just because of the ad.
Teacher: If we don’t always buy things because of ads, why do advertisers make them?
Are the advertisers wasting their money?
Marcus: No. A lot of ads are effective even if you don’t buy something right away.
Sophy: Yeah. They create images.
Marcus: And maybe an image stays in your mind. Later on, you see the product in a
store and you buy it because it seems familiar.
Teacher: Do you agree with that, Felix? Can advertising affect your behavior without
you noticing it?
Felix: Sure. You hear the name of a company over and over, and you start to feel
that that name is famous and trustworthy. For example, maybe I’m looking
for an insurance company, and I’m nervous about choosing some place I’ve
never heard of. But if I’ve heard the name a lot, I think, “This is a well-known
company. I can trust them.” And ads can also make you want things you
never wanted before. Maybe your old phone works fine, but then you see an
ad for a new one that can do different things, and you think, “Oh! I need that!”
Reporter: Let’s turn first to Dr. Ann Fanton, Professor of Child Psychology at Bakewell
University. Why is there a problem with using popular cartoon characters in
advertising? It doesn’t seem harmful to me.
Ann Fanton: It’s a tricky way of turning these characters into salespeople. Like it or not,
children develop attachments to characters like Star Butterfly or Elmo or My
Little Pony. Basically, advertisers are using kids’ cartoon friends as sales
channels.
Reporter: I’ll put this to James Burney, Director of the Fairness for Children Foundation.
Isn’t that the same as having a celebrity, like a sports star, in an ad for adults?
James Burney: Not really. Children, especially those under age eight, can’t evaluate0 an ad
critically. Adults may not be careful enough about the advertisements they
choose to watch, but they are able to think critically about them if they want
to. Making a young kid watch ads like that is just not fair.
Reporter: Dr. Fanton, is it really all that unfair?
Ann Fanton: Yes. It exploits kids. But I’d like to mention that it’s unfair to the families of
those kids too. You might say, “Well, why don’t the parents just step in? Why
don’t they regulate their kids’ exposure to ads?” That puts an unrealistic
expectation on parents. The average mom or dad cannot possibly monitor all
the advertisements that their kids see, especially in today’s media-saturated0
environment.
James Burney: If I can just jump in here . . . Don’t forget that advertisers also make ads that
specifically tell kids to put pressure on their parents.
Reporter: Such as the familiar scenario0 in a grocery store, with kids demanding a
certain cereal or yogurt or whatever until the parent just gives in?
James Burney: Yes, but more than that. And it’s even more than purchases of clothes, toys,
games, and so on. Some larger purchase decisions can be heavily influenced
by kids, such as where to go out for a meal or even where to go on vacation.
Reporter: I’ve heard it has reached the point where car advertisers are targeting
children. Is that true?
0
evaluate: verb to form an opinion of the value or quality of something
0
media-saturated: adjective phrase filled with advertising so that no more can be held
0
scenario: noun a description of how things might happen
Ann Fanton: I hesitate to say that, but there are no real limits here. After all, Honda did
have an ad campaign0 based on stories written by children.
James Burney: Like Ann, I want to be careful. Let’s concentrate on the real central issues,
like the fact that ads targeted to children encourage unhealthy diets. Plenty of
studies have shown that. And I think most of us want our kids to be kids,
exploring their interests and developing as well-rounded human beings
without constant manipulation0 by ads.
Female 2: The worst effect is that advertisers use kids to talk their parents into buying
things.
Teacher: You mean that part about kids influencing restaurant and vacation decisions?
And maybe car-buying?
Female 2: Yeah.
Teacher: Let’s evaluate that claim. Do you think it’s true? I have two kids in middle
school, and I can tell you for sure that they will not tell me what car to buy
next!
Female 1: But maybe you take them into account without even knowing it. They plant
positive images about a car in your head, and when you go to buy . . .
Male 2: I thought the scariest thing was about the characters kids see on TV: Dora,
Elmo, and I remember Po from the Teletubbies.
Teacher: Right. I bet a lot of you do.
Male 2: The point is these characters are like friends to kids. Then companies just use
that. They put Harry Potter on a . . . a . . . a water bottle or something, and kids
want it.
Female 1: And the parents might give in because it’s Harry Potter, a character the
parents like.
0
campaign: noun activities that are intended to achieve a particular social or commercial
aim
0
manipulation: noun the skillful control or use of something
Teacher: Here’s a fact you probably don’t know: If you look at the worldwide sales of
things with characters on them, Harry Potter is maybe about number 10 on
the list, or something like that. Since the character was introduced in 1997,
total worldwide sales of Harry Potter products have been about $20 billion.
Male 2: Just the backpacks and stuff with the characters on it, right? Not the books or
movies?
Teacher: Right. I’m only talking about money from merchandise. Can you guess which
characters were at the top of the list?
Female 2: Pokémon!
Teacher: Correct. By a mile0. Something near $60 billion. The radio show’s point is
about characters that kids get to love in entertainment first. Then the
advertising uses that good feeling to sell things.
Female 2: I know. But now I’m starting to rethink this. I LOVED my Elmo pillow when I
was a kid. What’s wrong with that?
0
by a mile: adverb phrase a lot; to a great degree
UNIT 5
Unit 5, Behavioral Science, The Q Classroom
Teacher: Here we are at Unit 5. “Does taking risks change our lives?” is our question.
So what are some risks that people take that might change our lives? Felix?
Felix: Well, there are social risks—for example, introducing yourself to new people.
Teacher: Definitely risky! Is it good to take social risks? Marcus, what do you think?
Marcus: Yes, it’s good. You need to take those risks to meet new people. If you don’t,
you might not make any new friends. It might take a few tries, but that’s OK.
You can learn from your mistakes.
Teacher: What other kinds of risks are there? What kinds of risks do people take with
their jobs? Yuna?
Yuna: Um, getting a new job?
Teacher: Sure. Changing jobs or careers can be a big risk. Could it change your life?
Sophy?
Sophy: I think so. You might lose money or cause problems for your family. But if the
new job or career makes you happy in the long run, it could be a good risk to
take. You need to think carefully before you take that kind of risk, though.
You shouldn’t just jump into it. Because for good or for bad, it might change
your life.
Teacher: OK, so you believe in being careful about taking risks. I can understand that.
Jake: And we’re both graduate students interested in all things related to our
brains and our behavior.
Hannah: Today, we’re talking about risk-taking over your lifetime0, including some
pretty interesting recent research that sheds some light on who takes more
risks.
Jake: Hannah, your area of expertise is developmental psychology. What can you
tell our listeners about the risks we take as children and teenagers?
Hannah: Well, we usually think of adolescence0 as the time when people have the
tendency to take the most risks. However, even little children take risks.
Taking risks is a way we explore the world and discover what we can do.
We’d never learn to walk if we didn’t risk falling down. Younger children also
take impulsive0 risks. This means they act without thinking. For example,
they might run into the street to get a ball, risking an accident.
As children become adolescents, they are less likely to take those impulsive
risks, but they are even more likely to want to discover what they can do.
0
neuroscience: noun science that deals with the nervous system and the brain
0
lifetime: noun the period of time someone is alive
0
adolescence: noun the period of a person’s life between being a child and becoming an
adult, between the ages of about 13 and 17
0
impulsive: adjective likely to act suddenly and without thinking, done without careful
thought
When we’re teenagers, we look for experiences that are new to us—we’re
basically exploring the world of adulthood. Taking risks at this time prepares
us to face challenges as adults. We’re preparing to leave the safety of our
home and family, which is a risk in itself. Positive risk-taking, like playing a
sport or meeting new people, has clear benefits because we develop skills
and friendships.
Jake: And brain research suggests that our adolescent brains are changing in a way
that makes taking risks more likely. Teenaged brains are more sensitive to
interactions with peers or other teenagers. When friends exclude0 us, our
brains have a strong negative reaction. This means we will do almost
anything to be accepted. Also, a part of the brain called the prefrontal cortex
is still developing. This is the part of the brain that controls behavior, that
helps us use good judgment. This is why so many teenagers drive so fast.
Their brains have trouble judging the danger, and they get the excitement
they want.
Hannah: And another factor is survival bias. I read somewhere that if we see the
survival of people who have done something risky, like driving fast, we think
nothing bad will happen to us either.
Jake: Teen brains are going through a lot of growth, but their hormones and
emotional development take over in some situations. And some of the risks
they take to feel something exciting or explore something new actually
encourages their brains to form more connections.
Hannah: So, in a way, they have to take some risks in order to help their brains
develop, and once developed, they’ll know enough to stop taking those risks.
Jake: Poor teenagers! It’s an endless cycle. Like when I exercise to lose weight but
then need to eat more.
Hannah: OK, so once these kids are young adults, what happens to their risk-taking?
Researchers have long thought that risk-taking declines with age, especially
taking financial risks. One study at the University of Bonn of 20,000 people
found that older people are much less likely to take risks with their money. In
the same study, men took more risks than women, and tall people took more
risks than short ones. And a second study looked at 528 participants aged 18
to 93. It found that overall risk-taking decreases as we get older, but it differs
depending on the type of risk. For example, men become much less likely to
take financial risks as they enter old age, while women are less likely to take
0
exclude: verb to leave someone or something out
social risks. And risk-taking in recreation, like skydiving 0or bungee jumping,
declines sharply as people move from young adulthood into middle age.
Hannah: Right. In countries such as Pakistan, Mali, and Nigeria, both men and women
generally take more risks than people in countries like Germany and Russia,
and they continue to take risks throughout their lifetimes. In places where
there are more challenges, including economic difficulties, people are more
willing to take risks. For example, they might decide to move to a new city or
country to find a better life.
Jake: So if our lives are difficult, we may take risks that other people wouldn’t?
Hannah: Exactly. No matter what our age, taking risks can offer new opportunities and
help us grow.
0
skydiving: noun a sport in which you jump from a plane and fall through the air before
opening your parachute
Hannah: Right. In countries such as Pakistan, Mali, and Nigeria, both men and women
generally take more risks than people in countries like Germany and Russia,
and they continue to take risks throughout their lifetimes. In places where
there are more challenges, including economic difficulties, people are more
willing to take risks. For example, they might decide to move to a new city or
country to find a better life.
Jake: So if our lives are difficult, we may take risks that other people wouldn’t?
Hannah: Exactly. No matter what our age, taking risks can offer new opportunities and
help us grow.
previous trip in 2005, he and his crew tracked Hurricane Katrina for five
nights before she made landfall0. After seeing the damage Katrina caused
firsthand, and after knowing his crew’s efforts played a big role in getting
over one million people out of harm’s way, he never again questioned why he
takes these risks. Every time he flies, the data collected helps researchers
better understand these storms. He says if he and his crew didn’t accept any
risks in the air, the public would have more risks on the ground. One way
hurricane hunters lower their level of risk is by identifying risks, and rating
them according to how serious they are and how likely they are to happen. If
a mission is too risky, they find another way to get the information. One new
invention that may help is the drone. A drone is a plane that flies itself. It can
fly longer than planes with crews, and this can help in studying storms.
Another scientist used to taking risks is Tina Neal, a volcanologist 0with the
US Geological Survey who is based in Alaska. Most people assume that the
greatest risk to volcanologists is in working around active volcanoes. Neal
says that while that is dangerous at times, she has always erred on the side of
caution0. They spend a lot of time thinking about their safety working around
an active volcano, even making maps that locate areas where they can go
and where they can land the helicopter. She thinks the greater risks have to
do with the environment and their mode of transportation. Especially in
Alaska, they face difficult and dangerous weather and bears, and they use
helicopters, small airplanes, and sometimes boats to get to the volcanoes. On
a trip-by-trip basis, these are greater risks.
According to Neal, volcanology, especially the field part of the science, has
more risks than other types of science that are done in office or most lab
settings. Taking risks is essential at times to getting the job done. Her career
in volcanology has been very rewarding. She thinks any job that allows her to
discover, travel, and help make the world a safer place is worth doing.
So science and risk-taking often go hand in hand. Many scientists continue to
do research even after they retire, often taking on new challenges. So even as
they get older, scientists prove they can still take risks.
0
landfall: noun the place where a hurricane comes onto land from the ocean
0
volcanologist: noun a person who studies volcanos
0
err on the side of caution: verb phrase to be too careful rather than not careful enough
UNIT 6
Unit 6, Neurology, The Q Classroom
Page 127
Teacher: The Unit Question for Unit 6 is, “Will artificial intelligence ever be as smart as
humans?” What do we mean by artificial intelligence, or “AI” for short?
Marcus?
Marcus: It’s technology that can process complex information really well, like our
brains do.
Sophy: People used to ask, “Will computers be that smart?” But AI devices don’t
really look like computers anymore.
Teacher: They sure don’t. What are some examples of what they do look like? Yuna?
Yuna: Well, like almost anything. Refrigerators, door openers, little round speakers
that you can talk to.
Teacher: Yeah. It’s pretty amazing.
Yuna: I actually assume now that almost any electronic thing I buy has AI in it.
Teacher: Do you all assume that too?
Marcus: Yeah, I guess, mostly, unless it’s something like a five-dollar flashlight.
Teacher: I know exactly what you mean.
Felix: But isn’t it getting a little crazy? I mean I’m not sure I can justify putting AI
into a . . . a rice cooker or something, just so I can turn it on with my phone.
I’m wondering whether we depend too much on this. Phones die. Storms
knock down cell phone towers. I’m OK with just plugging something in and
flipping a switch.
Sophy: Especially if having AI costs a lot more. I’d rather just have simple things.
Teacher: But it’s all very complicated. Of course, the real issues about AI don’t involve
little household appliances. They are about machines that seem to think like
humans. Some of them almost look like humans too.
0
go out on a limb: verb phrase do something that could be dangerous
0
gazillions: noun an unspecified very large number
0
point taken: noun phrase an expression that means I understand what you mean
lot of jobs. Most jobs are largely routine0. You have a certain set of tasks and
certain procedures for performing them.
Chesney: But writing a novel? Surgery?
Dr. Vandyke:You’d be surprised at how routine even those tasks can be. Remember that
most laser eye surgery now is automated. When those surgeries first
appeared 30 years ago, people thought, “What? Risk my eyes in automated
surgery? No way.” Well, here we are. Of course, very powerful machines with
enough information can do things that even seem creative to us. Those
automated novels of the future may not be just boring, predictable junk.
Still, I know what you mean about surgeries. Some are full of surprises and a
human will probably have to be standing by. It can be high-risk, of course.
Chesney: Well, what about having highways full of automated trucks? Talk about risk.
Dr. Ngoma: I have to tell you, Bob, I am a very careful person. But I think AI is completely
smart enough for driving trucks—or it soon will be. Ninety percent of truck
driving is on long, predictable highways. It’s the first mile and the last one
that are the problems. Humans still have to do those bits.
Chesney: Why? Aren’t the AI systems clever enough for the first and last mile?
Dr. Ngoma: Well, not yet anyway. Too many unpredictable things happen on city streets.
Chesney: Anna, I thought AI learned really fast. Why can’t it learn to drive a truck for
one or two difficult miles, as Joseph brought up?
Dr. Vandyke:Well, let’s remember how a robot 0like an AI truck knows where to go. It uses
two main layers of information. The first layer comes from a GPS system—a
set of stored maps and a signal that locates the vehicle on those maps. The
second layer comes from a set of sensors—little devices kind of like cameras
that “read” the details of its environment. Problems mostly involve the
sensors. They pick up too many unfamiliar things in their environment. They
can get confused by weird lighting and shadows, coatings of ice, blowing
dust, or people or animals behaving in unexpected ways—countless other
things. Humans are still way better at responding to messy surroundings.
Chesney Switching topics a bit, I think a lot of people are afraid that hackers 0can take
over AI systems. And not just that someone might take over a truck’s
controls. Think of everything else that is under AI control—our electric
power system, the city water systems, the banking system, air traffic—wow!
0
routine: adjective made up of actions that are done over and over in a regular way
0
robot: noun a machine that can do some of the tasks humans usually do
0
hacker: noun a person who uses a computer to look at and/or change information on
another computer without permission
Dr. Ngoma: I won’t say those worries are silly, Bob. If bad guys did take over one of those
systems, we could have serious trouble. But the good news is that many very
smart AI experts specialize in security, and they are dedicated professionals.
Chesney: Again, it comes down to having smart humans, doesn’t it?
3.
Man: You’ve got to see this coffee maker. So I set it up here, and I type this number
into my phone, and . . . it turns on.
Woman: Hmmm. That’s nice.
Man: It’s more than nice. I can call the coffee maker in the morning and turn it on!
Woman: I’m sure you’ll like it.
Female 2: So the goal is for them to seem human, and be pleasant, for a short time.
Teacher: True. The AI-to-human comparison is important in this case. OK, next
picture.
Male 2: One of those robots that explore Mars. A rover.
Teacher: Yes, this is the Mars rover called “Curiosity.” It is exploring a rocky
landscape on Mars. It looks like a metal insect of some type. No one has tried
to make this one look human.
Male 2: There’s no reason for it to look human. It never deals with humans. It collects
samples all alone on Mars and sends data to computers on Earth.
Teacher: So, which is smarter, Curiosity or Sophia?
Male 1: I thought we weren’t supposed to ask that!
Male 2: Well, Sophia is just for show. She, or it, or whatever, just smiles and talks. The
rover can do more real work.
Female 2: But Sophia has conversations, right? It’s hard to program a robot to do that.
Teacher: I’m not taking sides here. Just a few facts. Curiosity landed on Mars in 2012.
NASA scientists said that it had less computing power than the average cell
phone of that year. So they don’t consider it a genius—no super-smart,
chess-playing computer—but to them that’s OK. To NASA, Curiosity needs
toughness more than smarts. It traveled 350 million miles, landed on Mars,
and has spent years out in the open, through extreme temperatures and
space radiation and sandstorms, collecting samples and analyzing them.
Male 2: What about Sophia? I’m assuming she’s smarter than a cell phone.
Teacher: Yes. Katya was right. Conversation requires a lot of intelligence. The voice
feature on your phone, something like Siri or Alexa, only has to handle
speech. A totally successful social robot would have to keep up with a fast
stream of complicated information—speech, facial expressions, gestures—
even just to make small talk0. It’s not surprising that Sophia makes a lot of
mistakes.
Male1: Oh, yeah. I heard she said she wants to destroy humans.
Teacher: Yes. Her maker, David Hanson, was joking around in an interview and asked,
“Do you want to destroy humans? Please say no,” but before he could finish,
Sophia said, “OK. I will destroy humans.”
Female 2: So Sophia hasn’t been trained well enough, or can’t learn fast enough, or
something. But maybe future versions will be smarter. That is getting close to
one kind of human intelligence.
0
make small talk: verb phrase to have a short conversation about unimportant topics
Male 2: A couple of weeks ago, we talked about the Turing Test. Could Sophia pass
the Turing Test?
Teacher: It’s important to remember that the Turing Test was developed because Alan
Turing considered it impossible to answer the question “Can machines
think?” Like us in this class, he found the question too muddled up by
different definitions of words. So he developed more narrow criteria: Can an
AI device convince a human communicating with it that it is human? The
human can’t see it or hear it. They communicate by written messages. Unless
Sophia goes through an actual Turing Test, we cannot know whether it would
pass. But what are your guesses?
Female 2: No.
Male1: No.
Male 2: No. They tried to make Sophia look and sound sort of human, but that doesn’t
matter in a Turing Test. It’s all about the content of communication. It sounds
like she gets the content messed up. Oops, I said “she.”
Teacher: I agree with you guys. No for Sophia. And Curiosity doesn’t communicate at
all, except in digital code. But it’s interesting to note what question Turing
chose to ask about intelligence: Does the machine seem human? Hmmm.
Something to think about.
UNIT 7
Unit 7, Economics, The Q Classroom
Page 151
Teacher: Unit 7’s question is, “Can money buy happiness?” What do you think, Marcus?
Would you be happier with more money?
Marcus: Yes. If I had lots of money, I wouldn’t have to worry about getting a job. I
could just do the things I like to do all day, so of course I would be happy.
Teacher: What about you, Yuna? Would you be happy with more money?
Yuna: Yes, I would.
Teacher: Why?
Yuna: I could help my family.
Teacher: So Yuna and Marcus want more money. Does this mean money can buy
happiness?
Felix: No, it doesn’t. Money can’t buy health. And being healthy is the first step to
being happy. No matter how rich you are, you won’t be happy if you’re sick.
And money can’t buy friends and family, either, and you can’t be happy
without good relationships in your life.
Teacher: What do you think, Sophy?
Sophy: Well, I couldn’t be happy with no money, but being rich doesn’t mean you
will be happy. There are lots of rich people who are unhappy. I think some
people are just unhappy no matter what they have, and some people are just
happy.
0
fortune: noun a very large amount of money
0
handle: verb to deal with or to control someone or something
as fear, shame0, guilt0, and anxiety. These feelings can lead to making bad
decisions. How you get the money can also contribute 0to negative feelings. If
someone dies and leaves you a fortune, the relationship you had with that
person can make things more complicated. If you loved him, you may feel
sadness. If you never visited her, you may feel guilt. If you didn’t get along,
you may feel uncomfortable. And none of these feelings will make you happy.
So if sudden wealth buys just as much stress as it does happiness, what good
is it? Probably not much, unless you are very sick and it buys you needed
health care. Or you are very poor and it provides you with food and shelter0.
For most of the rest of us, people who are getting along OK without it, sudden
wealth is often more trouble than it’s worth.
0
experimental: adjective connected with experiments or new ideas
SL: The evidence, for example, demonstrates0 that people who have jobs with
independence and some variety—and who show creativity and
productivity0—are significantly happier than those who don’t. And, of course,
the income that a job provides is also associated with happiness. However,
we all know that money has more of an impact when we don’t have very
much.
Host: OK, so work—at least some kinds of work—can make us happy. Why?
SL: Because work provides us a sense of identity, structure to our days, and
important goals in life. Perhaps even more importantly, it provides us with
close colleagues, friends, and even marriage partners.
But that’s not all. Studies reveal that the relationship between happiness and
work goes both ways. Not only do creativity and productivity at work make
people happy, but happier people are better workers. And they are less likely
to take sick days, to quit, or to burn out.
The most persuasive data regarding the effects of happiness on positive
work outcomes come from scientific studies that follow the same people
over a long period of time. These studies are great. For example, people who
report that they are happy at age 18 have better jobs by age 26. And the
happier a person is, the more likely she will get a job offer, keep her job, and
get a new job if she ever loses it. The same people who are happy at age 18
have more financial independence later in life also.
Host: Could you tell us more about the financial side of happiness?
SL: Well, not only does greater wealth make people somewhat happy, but happy
people appear more likely to acquire greater wealth in life. For example,
research has demonstrated that the happier a person is at one point in his
life, the higher income he will earn at a later point. In one of my favorite
studies, researchers showed that those who were happy at age 21 had higher
incomes 16 years later, when they were about 37! But before we find yet
another reason to wish we were very happy, consider what the research on
happiness and work suggests. The more successful we are at our jobs, the
higher income we make, and the better work environment we have, the
happier we will be. This increased happiness will contribute to greater
success, more money, and an improved work environment, which will lead to
greater happiness, and so on, and so on.
Host: So what you’re saying, Sonja, is that if we are happy, we are more likely to get
a job we like, and if we have a job we like, we are likely to make more money.
I wonder if our listeners find that to be true in their own lives? Let’s go to our
first caller this evening and find out: Joanna in Chicago. Joanna, welcome to
Pause for Thought.
0
demonstrate: verb to show clearly that something exists or is true
0
productivity: noun the rate at which a worker, a company, or a country produces goods
2.
Monica: I think raising the average income in countries around the world is the best
way to increase the level of happiness.
Patricia: I don’t feel the same way. More money might make the very poor happier,
but not everyone.
Monica: I disagree. I think everyone except perhaps the very wealthy will benefit
from a higher income.
Patricia: Well, I can see we’ll just have to agree to disagree.
UNIT 8
Unit 8, Behavioral Science, The Q Classroom
Page 175
Teacher: Unit 8’s question is, “What can we learn from success and failure?” Let’s start
by talking about ways that people can be successful. Sophy, what are some
types of success?
Sophy: People can be financially successful, or successful in school, or they can have
a good family life.
Teacher: OK, let’s take success in school. Yuna, what can we learn from success in
school?
Yuna: We learn which habits are important. We study hard and pass the test. This
teaches us to keep studying. If we don’t study and we fail, we learn the same
thing.
Teacher: True! Success and failure can teach the same kinds of lessons. How about
success or failure in our personal lives? What can we learn from that? Felix?
Felix: Well, you can learn from your relationships with people. If I have a good
friendship with someone, it teaches me about what I value in a friendship,
like honesty. If I lose a friend because I lied to him, it teaches me not to lie to
my friends in the future.
Teacher: What do you think we can learn from success and failure, Marcus?
Marcus: I think we learn more from failure. When I fail at something, I know I need to
learn a lesson, so I really pay attention. If I’m successful, I might not think
about why I am successful.
Teacher: Good point.
0
syndrome: noun a group of signs that are typical of an illness
0
bait: noun food or something that looks like food used to attract and catch an animal
Nelson: Well, partly, but it’s more than that. The main lesson is, “Don’t let failure
blind0 you.” In other words, don’t let it keep you from seeing clearly what to
do next. That’s hard to do, because failure can be very painful. You cannot
easily see past it. Twelve publishers rejected Harry Potter. Does that mean
Rowling’s writing was a failure? No. Her writing—as we now know—was
fine. She and her agent just failed in twelve attempts to sell it.
Masters: Another person who had to deal with rejection0 is the filmmaker Ang Lee,
famous for Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, the adaptation of the novel Life of
Pi, and other big films. When he was young, he experienced failure after
failure. For example, he failed the university entrance exams in Taiwan—
twice. For Ang, this was not just a setback or a disappointment. The Ministry
of Education—the government—was saying to him, twice, “You have failed.”
And the consequences were serious. He could not attend university in
Taiwan.
Nelson: I’ve always felt that Lee has a remarkable ability to look at failure and adjust
his plans.
Masters: Right. He has used failure as a kind of road sign to point away from bad
choices and toward his strengths. In Taiwan, he went to art school instead of
the university. Following that, Ang entered the University of Illinois, in the
US, in 1979 to study acting. Then he took a hard look at his English abilities.
He decided his speaking skills would never be what a professional actor
needs. So he went into directing instead. Now he’s got several Oscars0 for
Best Director.
Moderator: Another question from the audience.
Audience Member 2: How about outside the arts? Are there any people in politics,
science, technology, or business who learned from failure?
Nelson: Absolutely. Winston Churchill, Albert Einstein, Gandhi. But I’d like to
highlight Thomas Edison as an example. He achieved a lot—inventing the
phonograph0, movie projectors, electric batteries, X-ray machines, and of
course, electric light bulbs0—but he knew failure, too. Each invention
involved several failed designs first.
Moderator: Didn’t he go through hundreds of light bulb materials before finding one
that worked?
Nelson: Well, working electric light bulbs already existed. Edison’s goal was to design
one that would last a long time. I’m not sure how many materials his team
0
blind: verb to make someone unable to see
0
rejection: noun a refusal to accept someone or something
0
Oscar: noun an Academy Award, a high-level prize for achievement in making movies
0
phonograph: noun a machine for playing sounds recorded on disks or rolls; a record
player
0
light bulb: noun the glass part of an electric lamp that gives out light
tried between 1878 and 1880. He famously said, “I have not failed. I’ve just
found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” Edison was very thorough and claims to
have tried 6,000 types of plant material alone. In the end, the winner was a
piece of carbonized—that is, slightly burned—bamboo0. It could give off light
for about 1,200 hours before burning out. The real lesson from Edison was,
“If something can’t work, move on to something else.”
Masters: Edison was a bit of a showman. He told the public that he was working on
light bulbs, and he built up this general suspense: “Would Edison succeed?”
His statements about failure were part of the show. There’s no reason to
think he wasn’t being sincere. He really DID learn a lot from failure, but I
think that all along he expected to succeed.
Moderator: Well, we’re almost out of time. Can anyone give us one final Edison quote?
Nelson: Sure. “Many of life’s failures are people who didn’t realize how close they
were to success when they gave up.”
Moderator: Great! Thanks, panelists. Thank you to our audience as well.
0
bamboo: noun a tall tropical plant of the grass family
Interviewer: Hello, Mohannad. You’re well known today in Saudi Arabia and
internationally as a “blind inventor.”
Mohannad: Yes, I guess that’s how many people think of me.
Interviewer: I read that you lost your sight and your right leg in a car crash when you
were 20.
Mohannad: That’s correct. Just two weeks after my wedding and two years after
enrolling0 in college.
Interviewer: Yet, incredibly, that didn’t hold you back.
Mohannad: No, it didn’t. I finished my degree in industrial engineering and continued
from there.
Interviewer: Could you tell me a little about the challenges you’ve faced on the road to
success?
Mohannad: Well, even before losing my eyesight and leg, I faced many challenges. I didn’t
have an instructor or anyone to guide me. Also, my classmates and teachers
would often discourage me. I used to spend a lot of time alone, too, working
on my inventions. After the accident, my life became even more challenging.
Daily activities for someone who has lost his sight and leg become tricky. I
had to abandon some of my hobbies and spend less time with my friends in
order to concentrate on learning everything that might help me to achieve
my dreams.
Interviewer: So inventing is something that you were always interested in?
Mohannad: Yes. I started inventing in my childhood. I liked to redesign my toys, and to
try and repair household items. Looking back, I wasn’t especially successful,
but I was determined. I guess that’s been the key. I firmly believe there’s no
convincing reason for giving up on your dreams.
0
enroll: verb to become a member of a club, school, etc.
0
handicapped: adjective living with a mental or physical disability
0
submarine: noun a type of boat that can travel under the water as well as on the surface
0
trial and error: idiom trying different ways of doing something until you find the best one
hard, then you would always succeed. Later, I was convinced that careful
planning would lead to success with less effort. Now, I believe that having an
ideal0 team around me will help me to achieve even more than I could ever
dream of.
Interviewer: Well, I wish you every success going forward, Mohannad. Great talking with
you.
Mohannad: Thank you.
Mohannad: Lots of things, including many disability aids to help handicapped people,
even before my accident. But perhaps I’m most famous for the Saqr Al
Orubah, a submarine that can dive to 6,525 meters. People thought it was
impossible to dive so deep. I received an award from King Abdullah for it.
Interviewer: And which of your achievements are you most proud of?
Mohannad: The first award I won for invention, when I was 12 years old. That simple
award was a huge boost to my self-esteem. From that moment on, I felt I was
born to be an inventor. I’m also very proud of my book Guidance for Leading
Invention, which was the first detailed, step-by-step pocket-size book for
inventors.
Interviewer: What things have helped you on the road to success?
Mohannad: Oh, many things. My wife, family, and friends have been very supportive. On
an individual level, I drew inspiration from the stories of famous
hardworking people I had read about. I used to imagine my life story as
similar to theirs, but one that hadn’t been written yet.
Interviewer: And what are you working on at the moment?
Mohannad: These days I focus completely on training and managing projects related to
invention through the Isterlab Training Center. So far we’ve delivered
lectures and workshops on invention skills to more than 30,000 people
across the Arab world. At the moment, I’m preparing a series of online videos
to teach young people—in a simple and interesting way—how to invent and
innovate. My goal is to inspire one million inventors across the Arab world!
Interviewer: Wow. That’s a big target! But what about the flip side of success—failure? Do
you think failure can be a positive thing? I mean, have you learned anything
from your failures?
Mohannad: I see failure as a friend who teaches you how to become successful. I always
say life is like a messy library. You need to open many drawers before you
find what you’re looking for. The best way to make progress in life lies in trial
and error. I have personally learned more from my failure than my success.
Interviewer: Has your view of success changed over time?
Mohannad: Yes, of course it has. My understanding of success changes almost every day.
When I was a child, I used to think that if you put a lot of effort in, and tried
hard, then you would always succeed. Later, I was convinced that careful
planning would lead to success with less effort. Now, I believe that having an
ideal team around me will help me to achieve even more than I could ever
dream of.
Interviewer: Well, I wish you every success going forward, Mohannad. Great talking with
you.
Mohannad: Thank you.