Module 2
Module 2
The IGI Global defines community as “A social unit based on commonality – for example common
values, beliefs, interests, roles.” https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/community/4696
The University of Minnesota Extension Program defines community as "Community, in its most
basic definition, can be defined as individuals who share a common interest, background or
purpose that gives them a sense of cohesion."
1. Traditional Definition
2. Modern Definition
The modern definition of community, on the other hand, is more nuanced and recognizes the
complexities and diversity of modern societies. It acknowledges that communities are not
always homogeneous and that differences in culture, identity, and interests can be valuable
assets. This definition emphasizes the importance of inclusivity, diversity, and social justice,
recognizing that communities must be open to change, difference, and the needs of all
members.
3. Key Differences
▪ Homogeneity vs. Diversity: Traditional definitions often assume a homogeneous
community, whereas modern definitions acknowledge and celebrate diversity.
▪ Collective Action vs. Individual Agency: Traditional definitions emphasize collective
action and shared goals, whereas modern definitions recognize the importance of
individual agency and the need for inclusive decision-making processes.
The traditional definition of community often leads to a focus on building strong social bonds
and fostering collective action. This approach can be effective in small, homogeneous
communities where shared values and goals are clear. However, in modern, diverse societies,
this approach can be limiting and even exclusionary.
In contrast, the modern definition of community emphasizes inclusivity, diversity, and social
justice. This approach recognizes that communities are complex and dynamic, and that
individual agency and diverse perspectives are essential for effective community development.
This perspective encourages community development practitioners to engage with diverse
stakeholders, foster inclusive decision-making processes, and prioritize the needs of all
community members.
Conclusion
The traditional and modern definitions of community in the context of community development
reflect different understandings of the concept and its implications for community development
practices. While the traditional definition emphasizes shared values and collective action, the
modern definition acknowledges diversity and prioritizes inclusivity, social justice, and
individual agency. Understanding these differences is crucial for effective community
development that respects and values the diversity of modern societies.
References:
[1] https://assets.cambridge.org/97805217/11081/excerpt/9780521711081_excerpt.pdf
[2] https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2019/6/14/traditional-development
[3]
https://www.ourcommunity.com.au/files/ourconsumerplace/CDANDMENTALHEALTHBOOK.pd
f
[4] https://typeset.io/pdf/a-comparative-analysis-of-the-role-of-traditional-and-modern-
d0ok7ra21p.pdf
C. Types of Community
The concept of community encompasses various forms and categories, each with distinct
characteristics. Here are some of the main types of communities:
Location-Based Communities
Identity-Based Communities
1. Ethnic Communities: Based on shared ethnicity, culture, or language [2].
2. Religious Communities: United by shared religious beliefs and practices [2].
3. Multicultural Communities: Comprising people from diverse ethnic, cultural, and
religious backgrounds [2].
Organization-Based Communities
1. Informal Communities: Organized around family or network-based guilds and
associations [2].
2. Formal Communities: Incorporated associations, political decision-making structures,
economic enterprises, or professional associations [2].
Intentional Communities
1. Ecovillages: Residential communities with a common social or spiritual purpose, focusing
on sustainability and environmentalism [2].
2. Housing Cooperatives: Residential communities where members own and manage their
homes collectively [2].
Purpose-Based Communities
1. Interest-Based Communities: United by shared interests or passions[3].
2. Action-Based Communities: Comprising people trying to bring about change[3].
3. Place-Based Communities: Brought together by geographic boundaries[3].
4. Practice-Based Communities: Comprising people in the same profession or undertaking
the same activities[3].
5. Circumstance-Based Communities: Formed by external events or situations[3].
These categories help to understand the diverse forms and purposes that communities can
take, reflecting the complexities and nuances of human social organization.
D. Elements of a Community
1. Nature of a Community
▪ A community is a sociological construct
The concept of community is not only a “construct” (model); it is a sociological
construct or a set of interactions or human behaviors that have meaning and
expectation between its members
▪ A community has fuzzy boundaries
It is the nature where the boundary of the community I no longer that precise.
▪ A community can exist within a larger community
It is a community inside a larger community, including districts, regions or other
interactions that link the communities of a nation together.
▪ A community may move
When technology is not based on local horticulture, the community residents may
be physically mobile.
2. Power of a Community
▪ It is the capacity to influence decision-making and distribution processes, to bring
about change and get things done.
Bases of Local
Description
Community Power
It is the capacity to create linkages and develop helpful
Connections relationships with powerful individuals, family, and
organizations
It is the base, back-up, and support of the people in the
Power in Number
community.
It is the ability to provide awards, promotions, money, and
Rewards gifts that are useful to meet individual or organizational
goals.
Personal Traits/ It is the capacity to foster respect and loyalty based on
Expertise charm, talents, and skills.
It is the leadership title or higher organizational or
Legitimate Power
institutional position.
Information It is the ability to share good information.
Coercion It is influenced through manipulation and coercion.
3. Structure of a Community
Community structure refers to the organization of a community into distinct groups or sub-
systems that are interconnected and interdependent. This concept is relevant in various
contexts, including ecology, sociology, community development and network science.
i. Ecological Context
Conclusion
Community structure is a fundamental concept that helps us understand the organization
and dynamics of communities across different disciplines. It is essential to recognize the
interconnectedness and interdependence of different sub-systems within a community to
effectively analyze and address various issues.
References:
[1] https://ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in/aep05/chapter/understanding-the-concept-of-
community/
[2] https://evol-eco.blogspot.com/2013/11/community-structure-what-are-we-
missing.html
[3] https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and-
resources/describe-the-community/main
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_structure
[5] https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/community-structurespdf/255550843
ii. Locality: A community is defined by a specific geographic area or territory where the
group of people reside.
iii. Community Sentiment: There is a strong sense of belonging, shared identity, and
emotional connection among the members of the community.
iv. Naturality: Communities are naturally formed, not artificially created, and people
become members through birth or residence.
vi. Similarity: Members of a community share similarities in aspects like language, culture,
customs, traditions, and way of life.
vii. Organized Social Life: A community encompasses all aspects of social life and functions
as a miniature society.
viii. Particular Name: Each community has a distinct name by which it is identified.
ix. No Legal Status: Communities do not have any formal legal status or rights and duties
defined by law.
x. Size: Communities can vary in size from small villages to large nations, with smaller
communities often being part of larger ones.
These elements collectively define the concept of community and distinguish it from other
types of social groups and associations. The presence and interplay of these factors shape the
nature and dynamics of a community.
References:
[1] https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/elements-of-community/239553484
[2] https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/society/13-most-important-characteristics-or-elements-
of-community/6231
[3] https://www.lawrist.com/community-meaning-definitions-and-elements
[4] https://www.barrycf.org/about/7-elements-of-a-healthy-community/
[5] https://brainly.ph/question/3616546
E. Dimension of Culture/Community
Many of us work routinely with people from other cultures and backgrounds.
Often this goes well, and the cultural differences are interesting and enriching. However,
sometimes things go wrong, for reasons that we may not understand.
This is where it's important to understand the differences between cultures, so that we can work
Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner's Seven Dimensions of Culture help us do this. We'll look at
the seven dimensions in this article, and we'll explore how you can apply the model in your own
situation.
They found that people from different cultures aren't just randomly different from one
another; they differ in very specific, even predictable, ways. This is because each culture has its
own way of thinking, its own values and beliefs, and different preferences placed on a variety of
different factors.
Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner concluded that what distinguishes people from one culture
compared with another is where these preferences fall in one of the following seven
dimensions:
You can use the model to better understand people from different cultural backgrounds so that
you can prevent misunderstandings and enjoy a better working relationship with them. This is
especially useful if you do business with people from around the world, or if you manage a
diverse group of people.
The model also highlights that one culture is not necessarily better or worse than another;
people from different cultural backgrounds simply make different choices.
However, the model doesn't tell you how to measure people's preferences on each
dimension. Therefore, it's best to use it as a general guide when dealing with people from
different cultures.
Let's look at each of the dimensions in detail and explore some of the strategies that you can
use with people who fit the characteristics highlighted in each dimension.
Tip 1:
Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions is another model that can help you to understand different
cultures. The advantage of Hofstede's model is that his research included only employees from
one organization – IBM – so his findings are unlikely to be affected by differences in company
culture. The disadvantage is that the culture of this company may skew more general results.
Tip 2:
To learn more about managing and working with people from specific countries and cultures, see
the Managing Around the World articles in our Team Management section, and listen to our
Expert Interviews with Terri Morrison and Michael Schell .
Key Points
The Seven Dimensions of Culture model was created by Fons Trompenaars and Charles
Hampden-Turner, and was published in their book, "Riding the Waves of Culture." The model
says that what distinguishes people from one culture compared with another is where their
preferences fall on each of the following seven dimensions:
You can use the model to better understand people from different cultural backgrounds so that you can
work with them more effectively and prevent misunderstandings. Be sensible in how you apply the
model. Treat people as individuals and remember that many factors will have a bearing on how you
communicate and interact with other people.
Reference: https://www.mindtools.com/a5ce21r/the-seven-dimensions-of-culture
F. Community Capitals
One of the challenges that local leaders and citizens constantly face is finding a coherent way to address
the variety of challenges facing their communities – be they urban, suburban, or rural in nature. In many
respects, most community and economic development initiatives intend to advance an area’s “quality of
life.” But what does “quality of life” mean and how is it measured? Is it the presence of a strong local
economy, sound local leadership, quality government services, top-notch public-supported schools,
great health care services, or other indicators? The simple answer is yes. In many respects, all of these
represent traits that would be associated with a community deemed to have a high quality of life.
As such, the issue at hand is to find a framework that captures the multi-dimensional nature of
community life. Most importantly, it must have been vetted in peer-reviewed scholarly journals and,
because of this process, found to be both scientifically and conceptually sound. Moreover, the
With these important pre-conditions in mind, the perspective that one may find
appealing is the Community Capitals Framework (CCF), a perspective developed
and fine-tuned over a span of several years by Cornelia Butler Flora and Jan L. Flora
from Iowa State University (2008). The Floras suggest that the lifeblood of any
community can be linked to the presence and strength of seven community
capitals, resources that can be invested or tapped to promote the long-term well-
being of communities (Jacobs, 2011a).
The seven community capitals are natural, cultural, human, social, political,
financial, and built. Strong and resilient communities strive for balanced
investments in these seven capitals. If communities place too much emphasis on
one or two of the capitals, they can end up suppressing the growth of the other
community capitals, a condition that can damage the overall health of the
community. For example, places that invest aggressively in-built capital (through
the pursuit of bricks and mortar type of facilities) may contribute to the decline of
the community’s natural and cultural capital, especially if such facilities are
constructed in pristine areas or on lands that are part of the rich history of that
locality.
1 Natural Capital
Natural capital refers to “the landscape, air, water, soil, and biodiversity of both plants and
animals” (Flora and Flora, 2008) – in other words, our environment. It is also referred to in the
literature as “natural amenities” (McGranahan, 1999) – assets that are linked to a particular place,
such as weather, geographic location, natural resources, and natural beauty (Emery and Flora
2006). Since people and the communities of which they are a part are embedded in the
environment, one could argue that natural capital undergirds several of the other capitals. A
healthy and functioning environment provides valuable ecosystem services, such as food,
timber, wildlife habitat, flood control, and recreational opportunities, which are essential for
human life. Moreover, people and their communities are unable to thrive in areas where natural
capital is neglected and depleted.
2 Cultural Capital
The concept of culture provides a frame of reference for understanding the fabric of community
life. This fabric is often connected by a common language, symbols, gestures, beliefs, values, and
resources. In a classic textbook definition, culture consists of the material and nonmaterial
aspects of a way of life, which are shared and transmitted among members of a society (Rogers
et al., 1988). Culture is viewed as a “tool kit of symbols, stories, rituals, even the world-view that
shapes individuals” (Swidler,1986) It includes the values and symbols reflected in clothing,
music, industry, art, language, and customs. It also encompasses events, materials (paintings,
3 Human Capital
In its simplest form, human capital reflects the investments that people make in their education,
onthe-job training, or health. Such activities translate into improved knowledge, skills, and health
status for individuals – factors that increase their human capital stock. As stocks improve,
productivity levels increase, resulting in higher earnings for these workers. Human capital also
refers to efforts by individuals to enhance their interpersonal and leadership skills in hopes of
strengthening their ability to become active contributing members to the civic health of their
communities (Flora and Flora, 2008).
The benefits of human capital investments are not accrued solely to individuals. Communities
with good shares of educated, healthy, and skilled workers also benefit, especially in their
capacity to remain resilient during periods of economic uncertainty. Places with a good base of
creative/knowledge-based workers, for example, tend to experience economic growth or
stability. Why is that the case? Simply put, creative/knowledge-based workers serve as engines
of innovation and entrepreneurial activities, actions that help create a good number of high
paying jobs in communities and regions (Henderson and Abraham, 2005; Metcalfe and
Ramlogan, 2005; Munnich and Schrock, 2003). Similarly, the expanding interest in STEM-related
occupations (those associated with science, technology, engineering and mathematics) is due,
in no small measure, to the fact that STEM-related jobs have outpaced non-STEM jobs by a factor
of 3 to 1 in the U.S. over the span of the last decade (Langdon et al., 2011). But, communities that
want to gain ground in terms of expanding their creative/knowledge or STEM-related sectors will
be unable do to so without the presence of a sizable pool of workers with strong human capital
credentials.
4 Social Capital
Social capital represents the “glue” that holds a community together and whose presence can
spur the type of economic growth that brings benefits to the entire community. In communities
where good things are happening across the spectrum – in education, in job creation, in health
care, in community services – a broad-based corps of civicminded people and organizations is
often in place to undergird these important activities. Social capital consists of “bonding” and
“bridging” activities that occur within the local community setting, as well as “linkages” that tie
community members to organizations and resources located outside the community (what is
sometimes referred to as vertical connections). Bonding represents the strong interactions and
ties that people have with family, friends, neighbors, and close work associates. Bridging reflects
the linkages that individuals have with people and groups within the community with whom they
The third element, vertical linkages, offers an avenue for local people, organizations and
communities to gain access to valuable resources and ideas from outside the community that
can be used to support and guide local initiatives. According to Woolcock (2001), the presence
of various combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital can have positive impacts
on the range of social and economic outcomes that are possible in communities
5 Political Capital
There are several dimensions associated with the concept of political capital. The first relates to
individuals who are in positions of power and influence in the community. As Flora and Flora
(2008:145) note, it is “the ability to affect the distribution of both public and private resources
within the community.” A second dimension has to do with the ability to gain access to individuals
and organizations – the so-called power brokers or movers and shakers -- with the resources to
influence important decisions (Flora et al., 2004). A third aspect of political capital refers to
efforts that are made to develop new leadership in the community, and/or expand the
engagement of citizens in discussions of important community matters through the use of
various strategies, such as deliberation forums. By focusing on these various aspects of political
capital, we can gain a better understanding of what people and groups are calling the shots in a
community, and what groups are having little influence or role in shaping local decisions (Flora
and Flora, 2008).
How can you determine the nature of political capital in your community? A good bit of it requires
careful monitoring of how and by whom decisions are made in a community. For example,
drawing upon a rich literature on community power, we know that when key decisions are made
by only a handful of people, you tend to have an elite leadership structure in place in the
community. On the other hand, if decisions tend to be dispersed across a variety of people and
groups, depending on the issue being discussed or debated, then you may have the presence of
a more pluralistic leadership structure (Aiken and Mott, 1970). Other hints of whether influence
is shared or held tightly by a small group of elites is when you see (or fail to see) the launching of
local leadership development programs, community/town-hall meetings, or public deliberation
sessions, features of a community that suggest that local leaders are open to the involvement of
a larger group of people weighing in, and actively taking part, in tackling important local issues.
6 Financial Capital
Financial capital represents resources needed to fund the provision, construction, and
implementation of a variety of programs, projects, and assets that advance the community’s
economic, social, and infrastructure development. A stable and vibrant community life depends
The availability of financial capital can contribute to wealth creation and community economic
development activities, especially in low- to moderate-income households or communities.
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs), for example, can provide a wide range of
financial products and services for people and communities that are often bypassed by
traditional financial institutions. So too, can grantmaking foundations whose activities are
intended to address a wide array of local needs and opportunities.
7 Built Capital
Built capital (also referred to as the built environment) is the man-made infrastructure that
supports human society – our roads, bridges, airports, water treatment facilities, buildings
(factories, schools, offices, stores), communication technologies, and public places. The built
environment also includes design factors and land uses, i.e., how our neighborhoods,
communities, and cities are laid out. The built environment can have a significant impact on an
individual’s physical and mental well-being and on community life.
Most communities would find it very challenging to pursue simultaneous investments in the seven
capitals. So, the question is this: “Is there a subset of community capitals that should be given priority
attention over the other capitals?” The answer depends on the unique strengths and needs of each
community. In other words, there is no one-size-fits-all when it comes to which of the capitals should be
given precedence over others in any community. What we do know from community studies is that
pursuing positive change in one type of capital can create opportunities for improvements in other
community capitals (Emery and Flora, 2006). Assume for a moment that local leaders in a community
have reached out to a diversity of people in the community, seeking their input on a new strategic
blueprint for the community. The effort to touch base with more people has strengthened
communications and dialogue between local leaders and residents. Local leaders have decided to meet
every three months with various neighborhood groups to continue to secure input and feedback from
local people. This activity has brought about positive changes in two capitals – political and social. Let’s
further assume that citizens urged local leaders to help retain and expand local businesses and to invest
in new entrepreneurial ventures so that exciting innovations could be seeded in the community. So, the
local leaders ended up launching a new business retention/expansion program, focusing on improving
the skill levels of business owners who were at risk of losing their businesses, an effort to improve the
human capital skills of these individuals. Working with local banks and the community foundation, the
local leaders were able to establish a small loan program designed to invest in new entrepreneurial
In most communities, efforts to develop and sustain a strong, vibrant community are a long-term
process. The community capital framework offers local leaders, organizations, and residents a deeper
understanding of the multi-pronged approach that is needed if communities hope to create the
foundation necessary for them to survive and thrive over the long term. While it may appear
overwhelming to give attention to all seven community capitals, the reality is that communities should
start by focusing on a smaller set of community capitals, and then give attention to the other capitals
over time. Before you know it, the spiraling effect noted earlier in this document will begin to take hold,
resulting in visible improvements in the community.
Reference: https://pcrd.purdue.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Community-Capitals-Framework-
Writeup-Oct-2014.pdf
Emotional Support
▪ Communities offer emotional support during challenging times, which can reduce
stress and anxiety and improve mental well-being [2].
▪ A strong support network can help individuals build resilience and develop a more
positive outlook on life [2].
Learning and Skill Development
▪ Communities provide opportunities for continuous learning and skill development
through shared knowledge and expertise [2].
▪ Engaging with like-minded individuals can facilitate knowledge exchange and foster a
sense of belonging [2].
Building Confidence
▪ Being part of a supportive community can boost self-confidence and self-esteem
through positive reinforcement and encouragement [2].
▪ Participating in community activities can help individuals develop a more positive self-
image [2].
Expanding Perspectives
▪ Communities expose individuals to diverse perspectives, cultures, and beliefs, fostering
empathy and open-mindedness [2].
▪ Diverse communities promote creativity and innovative thinking by bringing unique
viewpoints to problem-solving [2].
Accountability and Goal Achievement
Conclusion
▪ Communities are essential for individual growth and development, providing emotional
support, learning opportunities, and a sense of belonging [1][2][3].
▪ They help individuals recognize their identity and build confidence, while also fostering a
sense of purpose and joy [1][3].
▪ The importance of community development lies in creating environments that promote
mutual trust, respect, and communication[3].
References:
[1] https://www.123helpme.com/essay/The-Role-of-Community-in-Society-131318
[2] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/role-community-personal-growth-development-
heygrowzilla
[3] https://www.betterup.com/blog/importance-of-community
[4] https://www.masterclass.com/articles/importance-of-community
[5] https://japansociology.com/2011/12/28/role-of-community-in-society/
Understanding community is vital for community development workers and practitioners due to
the multifaceted roles they play in fostering social cohesion, personal well-being, and
professional growth within communities. Their work is deeply embedded in the fabric of
community dynamics, making their understanding of the community crucial for several reasons.
First and foremost, community development workers and practitioners are key agents of social
change. They help mobilize collective action and craft shared narratives that drive positive
transformations within the community. This involves engaging with residents to understand their
needs, aspirations, and the challenges they face, ensuring that any social change initiatives are
rooted in the lived experiences and stories of the community members.
Personal well-being is another critical area where community development practitioners make a
significant impact. By fostering strong support networks, they help individuals feel a sense of
belonging, purpose, and fulfillment. This sense of community is essential for improving mental
Volunteerism is another area where community development practitioners excel. They organize
and support volunteer initiatives that bring people together around shared causes, fostering
social connections and personal growth. By promoting volunteerism, practitioners help build a
sense of community spirit and collective responsibility.