THE SCHOOL OF LEGAL ILLUMINATI (SLI)

PLOT NO7-JAGBANI BUILDING ,SECTOR25D,CHANDIGARH

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,1908 (RJS-1)

Q1-MARK THE CORRECT STATEMENT:

A-THE CIVIL CODE OF INDIA DOES NOT EXEMPT FOREIGNERS FROM ITS OPERATION.

B-THE CIVIL CODE PROVIDES FOR PUNISHMENTS AND PENALTIES.

C-THE CODE IS NOT EXHAUSTIVE ON THE MATTERS SPECIFICALLY DEALT WITH BY IT.

D-ALL ARE CORRECT.

Q2-MARK THE INCORRECT STATEMENT

A-SECTIONS OF THE CODE LAY DOWN THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND CREATE JURISDICTION, WHILE
THE ORDERS CONTAIN PROVISIONS WHICH RELATE TO PROCEDURE AND INDICATE THE MODE IN
WHICH JURISDICTION CREATED BY SECTIONS HAS TO BE EXERCISED.
B-IF THE RULES(ORDERS) ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE SECTIONS,THE FORMER WILL PREVAIL.
C-SECTIONS CANNOT BE AMENDED EXCEPT BY THE LEGISLATURE
D- RULES CAN BE AMENDED BY THE HIGH COURTS

Q3. A PRELIMINARY DECREE:

A- DETERMINES THE RIGHTS OF THE PARTIES WITH REGARD TO SOME OR ONE OF THE MATTERS IN
CONTROVERSY IN THE SUIT BUT DOES NOT COMPLETELY DISPOSE OF THE SUIT.
B- IS A STAGE IN WORKING OUT THE RIGHTS OF THE PARTIES WHICH ARE TO BE FINALLY
ADJUDICATED BY A FINAL DECREE.
C-BOTH (A) AND (B).
D-ONLY (A).

Q4-WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS NOT A LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE?

A-EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS.*

B-HINDU COPARCENERS AND MARRIED DAUGHTERS.
C-CREDITORS.
D-INTERMEDDLER.

Q5-WHO SAID IN RELATION TO THE DOCTRINE OF RES JUDICATA: "THE RIGHT OF AN INDIVIDUAL IS
TO BE PROTECTED FROM MULTIPLICATION OF SUITS AND PROSECUTION AT THE INSTANCE OF AN
OPPONENT WHOSE SUPERIOR RESOURCES AND POWER UNLESS CURBED, MAY RENDER FUTILE
JUDICIALLY DECLARED RIGHT AND INNOCENCE"?

A-LORD DENNING.
B-LLYOD
C-SPENCES BOWER.
D-DIAS.
Q6-THE RULE OF SUB JUDICE IMPLIES:

A-WHERE THE SAME SUBJECT MATTER IS PENDING IN A COURT OF LAW FOR ADJUDICATION
BETWEEN THE SAME PARTIES, THE OTHER COURT IS BARRED TO ENTERTAIN THE CASE SO LONG AS
THE FIRST SUIT GOES ON.
B-WHERE THE SAME SUBJECT MATTER IS PENDING IN A COURT OF LAW FOR ADJUDICATION
BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT PARTIES, THE OTHER COURT IS BARRED TO ENTERTAIN THE CASE SO LONG
AS THE FIRST SUIT GOES ON.
C-WHERE THE DIFFERENT SUBJECT MATTER IS PENDING IN A COURT OF LAW FOR ADJUDICATION
BETWEEN THE SAME PARTIES, THE OTHER COURT IS BARRED TO ENTERTAIN THE CASE SO LONG AS
THE FIRST SUIT GOES ON.
D- NONE OF THE ABOVE.

Q7-WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING SUITS IS NOT A CIVIL NATURE-

A- SUITS RELATING TO RIGHT TO PROPERTY

B- SUITS RELATING TO RIGHT TO WORSHIP / TO SHARE IN OFFERINGS
C- SUITS RELATING TO TAKING OUT OF RELIGIOUS PROCESSION
D- SUITS FOR RECOVERY OF VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS OR OFFERINGS

Q8-IF TWO OR MORE COURTS HAVE JURISDICTION TO TRY THE SUIT, IT IS OPEN TO THE PARTIES TO
SELECT A PARTICULAR FORUM.SUCH AN AGREEMENT WOULD BE LEGAL, VALID AND
ENFORCEABLE.IN WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CASES IT WAS HELD SO;-

A-MATHURA PRASSD V DOSSIBAI.

B-RAM KUMAR V STATE OF HARYANA.
C-HAKAM SINGH V GAMMON (INDIA) LTD.
D-M. S. HASNUDDIN V STATE OF MAHARASHTRA.

Q9-IN WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CASES, THE PRINCIPLE OF RES JUDICATA WILL APPLY?

A-A FILES A SUIT AGAINST B FOR DECLARATION THAT HE IS ENTITLED FOR CERTAIN LANDS AS HEIR
OF C. THE SUIT IS DISMISSED. IN A SUBSEQUENT SUIT HE CLAIMS THE SAME PROPERTY ON THE
GROUND OF ADVERSE POSSESSION.
B-A SUES B FOR POSSESSION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON THE BASIS OF A SALE DEED IN HIS
FAVOUR. B IMPUGNS THE DEED AS FICTITIOUS. THE PLEA IS UPHELD AND SUIT IS DISMISSED. A
SUBSEQUENT SUIT IS FILED FOR SOME OTHER PROPERTIES ON THE BASIS OF THE SAME SALE DEED.
C-A FILES AN EVICTION PETITION AGAINST B, THE TENANT, ON THE GROUND OF MISUSE OF THE
TENANTED PREMISES. DURING THE EVICTION PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE RENT CONTROLLER A AND
B ENTER INTO A COMPROMISE ON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT B SHALL NOT MISUSE THE PREMISES
AND A SHALL WITHDRAW THE SUIT, ON THE BASIS OF WHICH THE COURT GRANTED A COMPROMISE
DECREE. SUBSEQUENTLY A FILES ANOTHER EVICTION PETITION AGAINST B ON THE GROUND OF
BONA FIDE REQUIREMENT.
D- NONE OF THE ABOVE.
Q10-. A JUDGMENT OF A FOREIGN COURT TO BE CONCLUSIVE BETWEEN THE PARTIES MUST BE A
JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED BY A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION.IN AN ACTION IN PERSONAM
IN RESPECT OF ANY CAUSE OF ACTION, THE COURTS OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY HAVE JURISDICTION
IN WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CASES:

A-WHERE THE DEFENDANT IS PERSONALLY WITHIN THE JURISDICTION (VIZ. A NATIONAL, A DOMICILE,
OR, A RESIDENT).
B-WHERE THE DEFENDANT SUBMITS TO THE JURISDICTION.
C-WHERE THE DEFENDANT THOUGH OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION MAY BE REACHED BY AN ORDER
OF THE COURT.
D- ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q11-. A SUIT WHICH OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN INSTITUTED IN A MUNSIFS COURT IS FILED IN THE
COURT OF A HIGHER GRADE, AND SUCH COURT, INSTEAD OF RETURNING THE PLAINT TO BE FILED IN
THE PROPER COURT, TRIES THE SUIT, NOTWITHSTANDING THE DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS, AND A
DECREE IS PASSED AGAINST THE DEFENDANT.

A-THE DECREE WOULD BE A NULLITY.

B-THE DECREE WOULD NOT BE A NULLITY.
C-THE DECREE WOULD NOT BE A NULLITY BECAUSE THE HIGHER COURT DOES HAVE THE
JURISDICTION TO TRY THE SUIT.
D-NONE OF THE ABOVE.

Q12-UNDER ORDER 1, RULE 1, ALL PERSONS MAY BE JOINED IN ONE SUIT AS PLAINTIFFS WHERE:

A-ANY RIGHT TO RELIEF ARISES OUT OF THE SAME ACT IN FAVOUR OF SUCH PERSORES.
B-ANY COMMON QUESTION OF LAW OR FACT IS INVOLVED
C-ALL PERSONS HAVE A COMMON CAUSE OF ACTION
D- ALL ARE CORRECT.

Q13-. MARK THE CORRECT STATEMENT:

A-WHERE A PERSON WHO IS A NECESSARY PARTY TO A SUIT HAS NOT BEEN JOINED AS A PARTY TO
THE SUIT, THE SUIT IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED.
B-WHERE A PERSON WHO IS A PROPER PARTY TO A SUIT HAS NOT BEEN JOINED AS A PARTY TO
THE SUIT, THE SUIT IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED.
C-BOTH (A)AND (B).
D-ONLY(B)

Q14. MIS-JOINDER OF PARTIÉS AND CAUSES OF ACTION IN A SUIT IS CALLED:

A-MULTIFARIOUSNESS IN A SUIT.
B-DOUBLE MIS-JOINDER.
C-BOTH (A) AND (B)
D- ONLY (B).
Q15-WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS NOT A NECESSARY CONDITION FOR THE FILING OF A
REPRESENTATIVE SUIT

A-NUMEROUS PARTIES.
B-SAME INTEREST IN THE SUIT.
C-LEAVE OF THE COURT.
D-WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THOSE WHO ARE BEING REPRESENTED.

Q16-A REPRESENTATIVE SUIT:

A-IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO PLAINTIFFS.

B-IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO DEFENDANTS.
C-BOTH (A) AND (B).
D-IS APPLICABLE ONLY TO MINORS.

Q17-A LETS A HOUSE TO B AT A YEARLY RENT OF RS. 500. THE RENT FOR THE WHOLE OF THE
YEARS 1905 TO 1907 IS DUE AND UNPAID. A SUES B IN 1908 ONLY FOR THE RENT DUE FOR 1906:

A-A CAN AFTERWARDS SUE B ONLY FOR THE RENT DUE FOR 1905.
B-A CAN AFTERWARDS SUE B ONLY FOR THE RENT DUE FOR 1907.
C-A CAN AFTERWARDS SUE B ONLY FOR THE RENT DUE FOR 1905 AND 1907 BOTH.
D-A CANNOT AFTERWARDS SUE B FOR THE RENT DUE FOR 1905 OR 1907.

Q18. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CONSTITUTES ONLY ONE CAUSE OF ACTION:

A-OBLIGATION AND COLLATERAL SECURITY FOR ITS PERFORMANCE.

B-SUCCESSIVE CLAIMS ARISING UNDER THE SAME OBLIGATION.
C-BOTH (A) AND (B).
D- ONLY (B).

Q19. THE OBJECT BEHIND THE AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS IS:

A-TO ENABLE THE REAL QUESTION IN ISSUE BETWEEN THE PARTIES TO BE RAISED ON THE
PLEADINGS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES.
B-TO DECIDE THE RIGHT OF THE PARTIES AND NOT TO PUNISH THEM FOR THE MISTAKE THEY MAKE
IN THE CONDUCT OF THEIR CASES.
C-TO PREVENT MULTIPLICITY OF SUITS AND SHORTEN LITIGATION.
D-ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q20-IN WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CASES, AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS COULD NOT BE ALLOWED:

A-WHERE THE PARTIES IN THE PLAINT ARE WRONGLY DESCRIBED.

B-A BONA FIDE OMISSION IN MAKING THE NECESSARY AVERMENTS IN THE PLAINT.
C-A SUIT IS BROUGHT UNDER A WRONG ACT.
D-WHERE A SUIT IS BROUGHT AGAINST A PERSON WHO IS FOUND TO HAVE DIED BEFORE ITS
INSTITUTION, THE PLAINT AMENDED BY BRINGING HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE ON THE RECORD; THE
SUIT WAS FILED IN IGNORANCE OF HIS DEATH.
Q21-IN WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CASES, A PLAINT IS LIABLE TO BE RETURNED?

(A)PLAINT FILED IN A COURT HAVING NO JURISDICTION.

(B)RELIEF UNDERVALUED IN THE PLAINT.
(C)PLAINT NOT FILED IN DUPLICATE.
(D) PLAINT ON AN INSUFFICIENTLY STAMPED PAPER.

Q22-. IF A PLAINTIFF SUES UPON A DOCUMENT IN HIS POSSESSION OR POWER, HE MUST PRODUCE
IT ALONG WITH THE PLAINT OTHERWISE IT CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO BE RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE ON
PLAINTIFF'S BEHALF. THE ABOVE PROVISION DOES NOT APPLY TO:

A-A DOCUMENT WHICH IS PRODUCED FOR THE CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE PLAINTIF'S WITNESS.
B-A DOCUMENT HANDED OVER TO A WITNESS MERELY TO REFRESH HIS MEMORY.
C-BOTH (A) AND (B).
D-ONLY (A)

Q23-A SUMMONS SHOULD BE SERVED WITHIN HOW MANY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE
INSTITUTION OF THE PLAINT?

A-20 DAYS
B-30 DAYS
C-40 DAYS
D-60 DAYS

Q24-UNDER O. 5, R.1, AFTER THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS, THE DEFENDANT IS REQUIRED TO

ANSWER THE CLAIM AND TO FILE THE WRITTEN STATEMENT WITHIN:

A-30 DAYS OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS, BUT SUCH DATE CAN BE EXTENDED UP TO 90 DAYS BY THE
COURT.
B-60 DAYS OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS, BUT SUCH DATE CAN BE EXTENDED UP TO 90 DAYS BY THE
COURT.
C-90 DAYS OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS, BUT SUCH DATE CAN BE EXTENDED UP TO 120DAYS BY THE
COURT.
D-120 DAYS OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS, AND SUCH DATE CANNOT BE EXTENDED.

Q25-. WHICH RULE OF THE ORDER 5 LAYS DOWN PROVISIONS REGARDING DASTI SUMMONS I.E.
PERSONAL DELIVERY OF THE SUMMONS BY THE PLAINTIFF TO THE DEFENDANT?

A- RULE 9.
B-RULE 9-A.
C-RULE 10.
D- RULE 11.
Q26-IF THE POST CONTAINING THE SUMMONS HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED TO THE COURT FOR
THIRTY DAYS, IT IMPLIES THAT:

(A) THE SUMMONS HAD NOT BEEN DULY SERVED ON THE DEFENDANT.
(B)THE SUMMONS HAD BEEN DULY SERVED ON THE DEFENDANT.
(C)THE SUMMONS HAD NOT BEEN DULY SERVED BY THE PLAINTIFF.
(D) NONE OF THE ABOVE.

Q27-. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING PERSONS CANNOT BE SUMMONED?

A- PERSONS EXEMPTED BY THE STATE.

B- PARDANASHIN LADIES.
C- PHYSICALLY INFIRM PERSONS.
D- ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q28-DATE APPOINTED BY ANY COURT FOR PRESENTING LIST OF WITNESSES BY THE PARTIES TO
OBTAIN SUMMONS TO THEM FOR THEIR ATTENDANCE IN COURT, SHALL NOT BE LATER THAN:

A-10 DAYS.
B-15 DAYS.
C-18 DAYS.
D-30 DAYS.

Q29-UNDER ORDER 16, RULE 10, IF A PERSON, WITHOUT LAWFUL EXCUSE, FAILED TO ATTEND OR
PRODUCE THE DOCUMENT OR HAS INTENTIONALLY AVOIDED SERVICE OF SUMMONS, THE COURT
MAY:
A. ISSUE A PROCLAMATION REQUIRING HIM TO GIVE EVIDENCE OR PRODUCE THE DOCUMENT.
B. ISSUE A WARRANT FOR HIS ARREST.
C. PASS AN ORDER FOR THE ATTACHMENT OF HIS PROPERTY.
D. ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q30-IF THE DEFENDANT HAS NOT FILED A PLEADING AT ALL:-

A-THE COURT CAN PRONOUNCE A JUDGEMENT ON THE BASIS OF FACT IN THE PLAINT OF THE
PLAINTIFF
B-THE COURT CAN PRONOUNCE A JUDGEMENT ON THE BASIS OF FACTS IN THE PLAINT EXCEPT
AGAINST A PERSON UNDER DISABILITY
C-THE COURT CAN PRONOUNCE A JUDGEMENT ON THE BASIS OF FACTS IN THE PLAINT IN THE
PLAINTIFFS FAVOUR EXCEPT AGAINST A PERSON UNDER DISABILITY
D-THE COURT CANNOT PRONOUNCE A JUDGMENT

Q31-. IN WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CASES, A SET-OFF CAN BE CLAIMED

A- A OWES THE PARTNERSHIP FIRM OF B AND C RS. 1000. B DIES LEAVING C SURVIVING.
A SUES C FOR A DEBT OF RS. 1500 DUE IN HIS SEPARATE CHARACTER. C WANTS TO
SET- OFF THE DEBT OF RS. 1000.
B-A SUES B FOR RS. 20,000. B WANTS TO SET-OFF THE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF
CONTRACT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.
C- BOTH (A) AND (B).
D- ONLY (A)
Q32-MARK THE INCORRECT PROPOSITION:
I-SET-OFF IS A STATUTORY DEFENCE TO A PLAINTIFF'S ACTION, WHEREAS A COUNTER-CLAIM IS A
CROSS-ACTION.
II.SET-OFF AND COUNTER-CLAIM ARISES OUT OF THE SAME TRANSACTION.
III. SET-OFF SHOULD NOT BE BARRED ON THE DATE OF THE SUIT WHILE COUNTERCLAIM SHOULD
NOT BE BARRED ON THE DATE OF FILING OF WRITTEN STATEMENT.
IV. CLAIM FOR SET-OFF CANNOT EXCEED PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM, WHEREAS COUNTER-.CLAIM CAN
EXCEED THE PLAINTIFFS CLAIM.
V-BOTH SET-OFF AND COUNTER-CLAIM CANNOT EXCEED THE PECUNIARY JURISDICTION OF THE
COURT.

CODES:
A- I ONLV.
B- IL ONLY.
C- III AND V.
D- IV ONLY.

Q33-. OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES COULD BE MADE BY A PARTY IF IS:

A- SCANDALOUS
B- IRRELEVANT OR NOT BONA FIDE.
C- PRIVILEGED.
D-ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q34-THE 'PREMATURE DISCOVERY' UNDER RULE 20 OF THE ORDER 11 IMPLIES:

A- THE COURT MAY ORDER THE DISCOVERY OF DOCUMENTS, DESPITE THE OBJECTION OF A PARTY
AND BEFORE APPLYING ITS MIND AS TO OBJECTION, TO DETERMINE ANY ISSUE OR QUESTION IN
DISPUTE.
B- THE COURT MAY NOT ORDER THE DISCOVERY OF DOCUMENTS.
C- A PARTY PRODUCES A DOCUMENT FOR THE INSPECTION OF THE OTHER PARTY BEFORE THE
SETTLEMENT OF THE ISSUES.
D-A PARTY PRODUCES A DOCUMENT FOR THE INSPECTION OF THE OTHER PARTY DESPITE NOT
BEING GIVEN A NOTICE TO PRODUCE IT.

Q35-. THE IMPOUNDING OF DOCUMENTS BY THE COURT IS PROVIDED UNDER:

A- 013, R. 3.
B- 013, R. 6.
C-013, R. 7.
D- 013, R. 8.

Q36-THE TIME TO BE GIVEN TO A PARTY TO ADMIT ANY FACT, WHEN CALLED UPON BY THE OTHER
PARTY IS
A- 6 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE SERVICE OF THE NOTICE.
B- 8 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE SERVICE OF THE NOTICE.
C- 9 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE SERVICE OF THE NOTICE.
D-10 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE SERVICE OF THE NOTICE.
Q37. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING PERSONS MAY ADMINISTER THE OATH TO THE DEPONENT:
A. ANY COURT OR MAGISTRATE.
B. ANY NOTARY.
C. ANY OFFICER/OTHER PERSON APPOINTED BY HIGH COURT IN THIS BEHALF.
D. ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q38-WHERE THE SUIT IS DISMISSED UNDER RR.2 OR 3 OF O. 9, THE PLAINTIFF:

A. MAY BRING A FRESH SUIT SUBJECT TO LAW OF LIMITATION.
B. CANNOT BRING A FRESH SUIT.
C. MAY BRING A FRESH SUIT WITH THE LEAVE OF THE HIGH COURT.
D. MAY BRING A FRESH SUIT WITH THE LEAVE OF THE DISTRICT JUDGE.

Q39-IN WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CASES, THE SUPREME COURT OBSERVED: "OUR PROCEDURES
ARE GROUNDED ON A PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE WHICH REQUIRES THAT MEN SHOULD NOT BE
CONDEMNED UNHEARD; THAT DECISIONS SHOULD NOT BE REACHED BEHIND THEIR BACKS, THAT
THE PROCEEDINGS THAT AFFECT THEIR LIVES AND PROPERTY SHOULD NOT CONTINUE IN THEIR
ABSENCE AND THAT THEY SHOULD NOT BE PRECLUDED FROM PARTICIPATING IN THEM."

A-SANGRAM SINGH V ELECTION TRIBUNAL, KOTAH.

B-ARJUN SINGH V MOHINDRA.
C-RUPCHAND V RAGHUVANSHI (P) LTD
D-M/S. MECHALEC ENGINEERS V M/S. BASIC EQUIPMENTS CORPN.

Q40-. À SUES B AND C ON A PROMISSORY NOTE. AN EX PARTE DECREE IS PASSED AGAINST BOTH.
B ALONE APPLIES TO SET ASIDE THE DECREE AND SHOWS SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR HIS ABSENCE.
A. THE DECREE MUST BE SET ASIDE AGAINST C ALSO.
B. THE DECREE CANNOT BE SET ASIDE AGAINST C.
C. DEPENDS ON THE COURT'S DISCRETION.
D. THE DECREE CAN BE SET ASIDE AGAINST C ALSO IF HE SHOWS SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR HIS
ABSENCE.

Q41-ISSUES MUST BE CONFINED TO:

A-FACTA PROBANDA.
B-FACTA PROBANTIA.
C-BOTH (A) AND (B).
D-ONLY (A).

Q42-. ADDITIONAL ISSUES MAY BE FRAMED UNDER:

A-O. 14, R. 3.
B-0. 14,R4.
C-0. 14,R. 5.
D-0. 14, R. 6.
Q43-. WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS NOT A SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR GRANTING ADJOURNMENT?
(A) SICKNESS OF A PARTY, HIS WITNESS OR HIS COUNSEL.
(B)NON-SERVICE OF SUMMONS.
(C)REASONABLE TIME FOR PREPARATION OF A CASE.
(D) NON-EXAMINATION OF A WITNESS PRESENT IN THE COURT.

Q44-. EXAMINATION DE BENE ESSE, UNDER O. 18, R.16, IMPLIES:

A. EXAMINATION OF A WITNESS BEFORE THE HEARING.
B. EXAMINATION OF A WITNESS AFTER THE HEARING.
C. WHERE A JUDGE IS PREVENTED BY DEATH, TRANSFER OR OTHER CAUSE FROM CONDUCTING
THE TRIAL OF A SUIT, HIS SUCCESSOR MAY PROCEED WITH THE SUIT.
D. THE COURT MAY AT ANY STAGE OF A SUIT MAKE LOCAL INSPECTION AND MAKE A
MEMORANDUM OF ANY RELEVANT FACT.

Q45-A COMMISSION IN RESPECT OF LOCAL INVESTIGATION CAN BE ISSUED FOR THE PURPOSE OF:
A-ELUCIDATING ANY MATTER IN DISPUTE.
B-ASCERTAINING THE MARKET VALUE OF ANY PROPERTY OR THE AMOUNT OF MENSE PROFITS OR
DAMAGES OR ANNUAL NET PROFITS.
C-BOTH (A) AND (B).
D-ONLY (B).

Q46-ON WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS, THE COURT WILL ALLOW A PLAINTIFF TO WITHDRAW
A SUIT AND FILE A FRESH SUIT?
A-MIS-JOINDER OF PARTIES.
B-AN ERRONEOUS VALUATION OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF A SUIT.
C-BOTH (A) AND (B).
D-ONLY (A).

Q47 THE COURT CAN GRANT INTEREST:

A. FROM THE DATE OF THE SUIT TILL THE DATE OF THE DECREE.
B. FROM THE DATE OF THE DECREE TILL REALIZATION I.E. DATE OF PAYMENT.
C. PRIOR TO THE INSTITUTION OF THE SUIT.
D. ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q48-HOW DOES THE COURT AWARD INTEREST PRIOR TO THE INSTITUTION OF THE SUIT?
A. AS ACCORDING TO STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES.
B. THE COURT WILL FIX IT AT 12% PER ANNUM.
C. THE COURT WILL FIX IT AT 6% PER ANNUM.
D. NONE OF THE ABOVE.

Q49-COMPENSATORY COSTS CAN BE IMPOSED:

A. IF THE CLAIM (OR DEFENCE) IS FALSE OR VEXATIOUS AND SUBSEQUENTLY DISALLOWED OR
WITHDRAWN.
B. IF OBJECTION TO THE FALSE OR VEXATIOUS CLAIM OR DEFENCE HAS BEEN TAKEN BY THE
PARTY AT THE EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY.
C. BOTH (A) AND (B) ARE CORRECT.
D. BOTH (A) AND (B) ARE INCORRECT.
Q50-MARK THE INCORRECT STATEMENT:
A. THE DECREE-HOLDER HAS VESTED OR SUBSTANTIVE RIGHT TO GET THE DECREE TRANSFERRED.
B. THE TRANSFEREE COURT SHOULD HAVE JURISDICTION TO TRY THE SUIT IN WHICH DECREE WAS
PASSED, AT THE TIME OF MAKING OF AN APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER.
C. THE COURT WHICH PASSED A DECREE CANNOT EXECUTE SUCH DECREE AGAINST ANY PERSON
OR PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE LOCAL LIMITS OF ITS JURISDICTION.
D. WHERE A DECREE IS SENT FOR EXECUTION IN ANOTHER STATE, THE RULES OF THAT STATE WILL
APPLY

Q51-. A OBTAINS A DECREE AGAINST B FOR RS. 5,000. SUBSEQUENTLY, A AGREES TO ACCEPT
RS. 3,000 IN FULL SATISFACTION OF THE DECREE, AND B PAYS RS. 3,000 OUT OF COURT, BUT
NEITHER THE PAYMENT NOR THE ADJUSTMENT IS CERTIFIED TO THE COURT. A APPLIES FOR
EXECUTION OF THE FULL AMOUNT OF THE DECREE, NOTWITHSTANDING RECEIPT BY HIM OF
RS.3,000; B OBJECTS TO THAT.

A- THE PAYMENT CANNOT BE RECOGNIZED BY THE COURT EXECUTING THE DECREE. THE ONLY
REMEDY OPEN TO B IS TO FILE A SUIT AGAINST A FOR THE RECOVERY OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH
OF CONTRACT REPRESENTED BY ADJUSTMENT.

B-B CAN FILE A SEPARATE SUIT FOR STAY OF EXECUTION.

C-BOTH (A) AND (B).

D-ONLY (A).

Q52-IF THE IMMOVABLE PROPERTY IS IN THE POSSESSION OF JUDGMENT-DEBTOR, WHAT KIND OF

POSSESSION MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE DECREE-HOLDER UNDER 0. 21, R.35:
A. KHAS POSSESSION.
B. SYMBOLICAL POSSESSION.
C. FORMAL POSSESSION.
D. ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q53-. MAXIMUM PERIOD OF DETENTION WHERE THE DECREE IS FOR A SUM EXCEEDING
RS. 5,000:
(A) SIX WEEKS.
(B)TWO MONTHS.
(C)THREE MONTHS.
(D) SIX MONTHS.

Q54-ATTACHMENT OF A PROPERTY IMPLIES:

A. THE ATTACHED PROPERTY CANNOT BE ALIENATED WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE DECREE-
HOLDER.
B. THE ATTACHED PROPERTY CANNOT BE ALIENATED WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE COURT.
C. THE ATTACHED PROPERTY CAN BE ALIENATED WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE DECREE-HOLDER.
D. THE ATTACHED PROPERTY CAN BE ALIENATED WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE HIGH COURT
ONLY.
Q55-IN EXECUTION OF A DECREE FOR THE MAINTENANCE, SALARY OF A PERSON CAN BE ATTACHED
TO THE EXTENT OF:
A. ONE-THIRD.
B. ONE-HALF.
C. ONE-FOURTH.
D. CANNOT BE ATTACHED.

Q56-SEC. 64 ENACTS THAT A PRIVATE ALIENATION OF PROPERTY AFTER ATTACHMENT IS:

A. VOIDABLE.
B. VOID
C. IRREGULAR.
D. DEPENDS ON THE COURT'S DISCRETION.

Q57-. A GARNISHEE ORDER IS AN ORDER:

A- PROHIBITING THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR'S DEBTOR FROM MAKING ANY PAYMENT TO THE
JUDGMENT DEBTOR.

B-PROHIBITING THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR'S DEBTOR FROM MAKING ANY PAYMENT TO THE DECREE-
HOLDER.

C—PROHIBITING THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR'S DEBTOR FROM MAKING ANY PAYMENT TO THE
AUCTION-PURCHASER.

D-PROHIBITING THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR'S DEBTOR FROM ALIENATING THE MORTGAGED PROPERTY.

Q58-O. 22 IS NOT APPLICABLE TO:

I-SUITS.
II. APPEALS.
III. EXECUTION PROCEEDINGS.
IV. WRITS.
CODES:
A-II AND III.
B-III AND IV.
C-I AND IV.
D-I AND II.

Q59-THE MAXIMUM PERIOD OF DETENTION IN CASE OF ARREST BEFORE JUDGMENT IS:

A-SIX WEEKS, IF THE AMOUNT/VALUE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE SUIT DOES NOT EXCEED RS.
50.
B-SIX MONTHS, IF THE AMOUNT/VALUE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE SUIT EXCEED RS. 50.
C-FOUR WEEKS IN ANY CASE.
D-BOTH (A) AND (B).
Q60-WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS NOT AN ESSENTIAL CONDITION TO BE SATISFIED BY A PLAINTIFF
FOR THE GRANT OF INTERIM INJUNCTION:
A. A PRIMA FACIE CASE IN HIS FAVOUR.
B. BALANCE OF CONVENIENCE IN HIS FAVOUR.
C. IRREPARABLE INJURY LIKELY TO BE CAUSED TO HIM WHICH CANNOT BE COMPENSATED FOR IN
TERMS OF MONEY.
D. UNFAIR CONDUCT ON THE DEFENDANT'S PART.

Q61-ACCORDING TO 0. 39, R.2-A, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE

BREACH OF INJUNCTION:
A. ATTACHMENT OF THE PROPERTY.
B. DETENTION OF THE PERSON IN CIVIL PRISON UP TO 3 MONTHS.
C. SALE OF ATTACHED PROPERTY AFTER ONE YEAR.
D. ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q62-. AN INTERLOCUTORY ORDER IS:

A. AN ORDER GIVEN ON AN INTERIM INJUNCTION.
B. AN ORDER GIVEN IN A SUIT WHICH IS NOT FINAL.
C. AN ORDER PASSED BY A COURT DURING THE PENDENCY OF A SUIT.
D. BOTH (B) AND (C).

Q63-COMPENSATION COULD BE AWARDED AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF, UNDER SEC. 95, IF THE COURT
IS SATISFIED THAT AN ARREST, ATTACHMENT OR INJUNCTION WAS APPLIED FOR ON INSUFFICIENT
GROUNDS BY THE PLAINTIFF. THE DEFENDANT COULD GET UP TO:
(A) RS. 10,000.
(B)RS. 30,000.
(C)RS. 50,000.
(D) RS. 1000.

Q64-UNDER O. 32, R.6, A NEXT FRIEND/GUARDIAN SHALL NOT, WITHOUT THE LEAVE OF THE
COURT RECEIVE ANY MONEY OR OTHER MOVABLE PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF
A. BY WAY OF COMPROMISE BEFORE DECREE OR ORDER.
B. UNDER A DECREE OR ORDER IN FAVOUR OF THE MINOR.
C. BOTH (A) AND (B).
D. ONLY (A).

Q65-ON ATTAINING THE AGE OF MAJORITY, A MINOR PLAINTIFF MAY ADOPT WHICH OF THE
FOLLOWING COURSES:
A. HE SHALL APPLY FOR AN ORDER DISCHARGING THE NEXT FRIEND AND FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED
IN HIS OWN NAME.
B. HE MAY ABANDON THE SUIT AND APPLY FOR ITS DISMISSAL.
C. HE MAY REPUDIATE THE SUIT AND MAY APPLY TO HAVE HIS NAME STRUCK OFF AS CO-
PLAINTIFF.
D. ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q66-IN AN INTERPLEADER SUIT:

A. THERE ARE SEVERAL CLAIMANTS OF THE SAME PROPERTY CLAIMING IT ADVERSE TO ONE
ANOTHER.
B. -THE PLAINTIFF ALSO HAS AN INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE SUIT.
C. BOTH (A) AND (B) ARE CORRECT.
D. ONLY (A) IS CORRECT.
Q67-IN THE CASE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE, A SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION MAY BE
INSTITUTED BY:
A. TWO PERSONS WITH THE LEAVE OF THE COURT.
B. TWO PERSONS HAVING OBTAINED ORAL CONSENT OF THE ADVOCATE-GENERAL.
C. TWO PERSONS HAVING OBTAINED WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ADVOCATE-GENERAL.
D. TWO PERSONS TO WHOM NO SPECIAL DAMAGE HAS BEEN CAUSED BY REASON OF SUCH
PUBLIC NUISANCE.

Q68-RIGHT TO APPEAL IS:

A. SUBSTANTIVE RIGHT.
B. VESTED RIGHT.
C. STATUTORY RIGHT.
D. ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q69-. NO APPEAL SHALL LIE, EXCEPT ON A QUESTION OF LAW FROM A DECREE IN ANY SUIT OF THE
NATURE COGNIZABLE BY COURTS OF SMALL CAUSES, WHEN THE AMOUNT OR VALUE OF THE
SUBJECT-MATTER OF THE ORIGINAL SUIT DOES NOT EXCEED:
A. RS. 3000.
B. RS. 5000.
C. RS. 10,000.
D. RS. 12,000.

Q70-UNDER O. 41, R.22, A RESPONDENT TO THE APPEAL CAN FILE:

A. CROSS-APPEAL.
B. CROSS-OBJECTIONS.
C. BOTH (A) AND (B).
D. ONLY (A).

Q71-NO SECOND APPEAL SHALL LIE FROM ANY DECREE:

A. EXCEPT ON THE GROUNDS MENTIONED IN SEC. 100.
B. WHEN THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE ORIGINAL SUIT IS FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY NOT
EXCEEDING RS. 25, 000.
C. WHERE ANY SECTION OF THE CODE HAS DECLARED THAT ANY DECISION SHALL BE FINAL.
D. ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q72-WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS NOT A QUESTION OF FACT:

A. A FINDING ON A QUESTION OF BENAMI.
B. A FINDING ON A QUESTION OF BONA FIDES.
C. A FINDING ON A QUESTION OF NEGLIGENCE.
D. A FINDING AS TO INTERPRETATION OF DOCUMENTS.

Q73-REFERENCE UNDER SEC. 113 IMPLIES:

A. THE SUBORDINATE COURT REFERS THE CASE TO THE HIGH COURT FOR THE LATTER'S
OPINION ON A QUESTION OF LAW.
B. THE SUBORDINATE COURT REFERS THE CASE TO THE HIGH COURT FOR THE LATTER'S
OPINION ON A QUESTION OF EVIDENCE.
C. THE SUBORDINATE COURT REFERS THE CASE TO THE HIGH COURT FOR THE LATTER'S OPINION
ON A QUESTION OF FACT.
D. THE SUBORDINATE COURT REFERS THE CASE TO THE HIGH COURT FOR THE LATTER'S OPINION
ON A QUESTION OF COURT PROCEDURE.
Q74-WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CONSTITUTES AN EXCEPTION TO THE GENERAL RULE THAT ONCE
THE JUDGMENT IS SIGNED AND PRONOUNCED BY THE COURT IT BECOMES JUNCTUS OFFICIO AND
HAS NO JURISDICTION TO ALTER IT?
A. REFERENCE.
B. REVIEW.
C. REVISION.
D. NONE OF THE ABOVE.

Q75-INHERENT POWERS ARE:

A. INHERENT IN THE COURT ITSELF AND HAVE NOT BEEN CONFERRED BY THE CODE.
B. INDEPENDENT OF AND IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER POWERS THAT THE COURT MAY EXERCISE
UNDER THE CODE.
C. BOTH (A) AND (B).
D. ONLY (A).

Q76-UNDER SEC. 148, THE CIVIL COURT HAS POWER TO ENLARGE TIME:
A. NOT EXCEEDING 30 DAYS IN TOTAL.
B. NOT EXCEEDING 60 DAYS IN TOTAL.
C. NOT EXCEEDING 90 DAYS IN TOTAL.
D. NOT EXCEEDING 120 DAYS IN TOTAL.

Q77-RESTITUTION MEANS:
A. AN ACT OF RESTORING A THING TO ITS PROPER OWNER.
B. THE ACT OF REVERSAL OF AN ORDER OF SETTING ASIDE OF A DECREE.
C. BOTH (A) AND (B).
D. ONLY (A).

Q78- A CAVEAT:
A. IS A CAUTION OR WARNING GIVING NOTICE TO THE COURT NOT TO TAKE ANY STEP WITHOUT
NOTICE BEING GIVEN TO THE PARTY LODGING THE CAVEAT.
B. PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY TO THE OPPOSITE PARTY TO BE HEARD BEFORE AN EX PARTE
ORDER IS PASSED
C. AVOIDS MULTIPLICITY OF PROCEEDINGS.
D. ALL OF THE ABOVE.

Q79-MESNE PROFITS OF PROPERTY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2(12) OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE,

1908 MEANS:
A. THOSE PROFITS WHICH THE PERSON IN WRONGFUL POSSESSION OF SUCH PROPERTY
ACTUALLY RECEIVED OR MIGHT WITH ORDINARY DILIGENCE HAVE RECEIVED TOGETHER WITH
INTEREST OF SUCH PROFITS
B. THOSE PROFITS WHICH THE PERSON IN WRONGFUL POSSESSION OF SUCH PROPERTY
ACTUALLY RECEIVED INCLUDING PROFITS DUE TO IMPROVEMENTS MADE BY SUCH PERSON
C. THOSE PROFITS WHICH THE PERSON IN WRONGFUL POSSESSION OF SUCH PROPERTY
ACTUALLY RECEIVED OR MIGHT HAVE RECEIVED BUT WITHOUT ANY INTEREST ON SUCH PROFITS
D. THOSE PROFITS WHICH THE PERSON IN WRONGFUL POSSESSION OF SUCH PROPERTY
ACTUALLY RECEIVED
Q80-UNDER CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS ARE TRUE
REGARDING A DECREE ?
A. CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINES THE RIGHTS OF PARTIES WITH REGARD TO ALL OR ANY OF THE
MATTERS IN CONTROVERSY IN THE SUIT
B. DECREE CAN BE PARTLY PRELIMINARY AND PARTLY FINAL
C. THIS WOULD NOT INCLUDE ANY ADJUDICATION FROM WHICH AN APPEAL LIES AS AN APPEAL
FROM AN ORDER
D. ALL OF THEM

Q81-. PROVISIONS OF SECTION 10 OF CPC ARE:

A. DIRECTORY
B. MANDATORY
C. NON-MANDATORY
D. DISCRETIONARY

Q82-THE PRINCIPLE OF RES JUDICATA DOES NOT APPLY IN CASE OF WRIT OF:
A. HABEAS CORPUS
B. MANDAMUS
C. QUO WARRANTO
D. PROHIBITION

Q83-THE 'RULE OF DAMDUPAT IS

A. A RULE RELATING TO COSTS
B. A RULE RELATING TO INTEREST
C. A RULE OF RES JUDICATA
D. A RULE OF EVIDENCE

Q84-‘RES JUDICATA' DOES NOT APPLY TO:

A. BETWEEN CO-PLAINTIFFS
B. BETWEEN CO-DEFENDANTS
C. PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION
D. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Q85-SUIT RELATING TO IMMOVABLE PROPERTY CAN BE FILED UNDER SECTION 16 OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE CODE IN SUCH A COURT WITHIN WHOSE LOCAL JURISDICTION:
A. THE DEFENDANT RESIDES
B. THE DEFENDANT CARRIES ON BUSINESS
C. THE PROPERTY IS SITUATED
D. THE PLAINTIFF RESIDES OR CARRIES ON BUSINESS

Q86-SECTION 18 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE PROVIDES FOR

A. PLACE OF INSTITUTION OF SUIT IN RESPECT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY WHERE THE
PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN THE JURISDICTION OF ONE COURT
B. PLACE OF INSTRUCTION OF SUIT IN RESPECT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY WHERE THE
PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN THE JURISDICTION OF DIFFERENT COURTS
C. PLACE OF INSTITUTION OF SUITS IN RESPECT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY WHERE THE LOCAL
LIMITS OF JURISDICTION OF COURTS ARE UNCERTAIN
D. ALL THE ABOVE
Q87-WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS NOT A CASE ON RES-JUDICATA?
A. DUCHE'S OF KINGTON CASE
B. CHHAJJU RAM V. NEKI
C. MUNNI BIBI V. TRILOK NATH
D. BYRAM PESTONJI KARIWALA V. UNION OF INDIA

Q88-WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES ARE LIABLE TO ATTACHMENT AND SALE IN EXECUTION
OF A DECREE UNDER SECTION 60 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE?
A. BANK NOTES, CHEQUES AND BILL OF EXCHANGE
B. COOKING VESSELS, BEDS & WEARING APPARELS
C. BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS
D. STIPENDS AND GRATUITY

Q89-UNDER WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IS THE
REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORY NOTICE BEFORE FILING SUIT AGAINST GOVERNMENT LAID DOWN?
A. SECTION 75
B. SECTION 80
C. SECTION 14
D. SECTION 115

Q90-FOR INSTITUTING A SUIT AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT OR AGAINST A PUBLIC OFFICER IN

OFFICIAL CAPACITY, THE NOTICE PERIOD UNDER SECTION 80 OF CIC IS
A. 3 MONTHS
B. 2 MONTHS
C. 1 MONTH
D. 15 DAYS

Q91-GENERAL POWER TO AMEND ANY ERROR OR DEFECT IN ANY PROCEEDINGS IN A SUIT VESTS IN
THE COURT BY VIRTUE OF
A. SECTION 152, CPC
B. SECTION 153, CPC
C. SECTION 153A, CPC
D. SECTION 153B, CPC

Q92-AFFIDAVITS TO BE FILED IN A COURT CAN BE

A. AUTHENTICATED BY A MINISTER OF STATE
B. CANNOT BE AUTHENTICATED EXCEPT BY THE JUDGE PRESIDING
C. AUTHENTICATED BY A JUDGE, A MAGISTRATE OR A NOTARY
D. AUTHENTICATED BY AN ADVOCATE
Q93-. ON DISMISSAL OF THE SUIT FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH AN ORDER FOR DISCOVERY UNDER
ORDERXI, RULE 21 OF CPC
A. THE PLAINTIFF CAN BRING A FRESH SUIT ON THE SAME CAUSE OF ACTION AS A MATTER OF
RIGHT
B. THE PLAINTIFF CAN BRING A FRESH SUIT ON THE SAME CAUSE OF ACTION ONLY WITH THE
LEAVE OF THE COURT.
C. THE PLAINTIFF IS PRECLUDED FROM BRINGING ANY FRESH SUIT ON THE SAME CAUSE OF
ACTION.
D. THE PLAINTIFF CAN BRING A FRESH SUIT ON THE SAME CAUSE OF ACTION ONLY IF THE
COURT DISMISSING THE SUIT HAS GRANTED LIBERTY TO FILE A FRESH SUIT

Q94-NON-SUBSTITUTION OF LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF EITHER PARTY TO THE SUIT WHO DIES,

BETWEEN THE CONCLUSION OF HEARING AND PRONOUNCEMENT OF THE JUDGMENT:
A. RENDERS THE JUDGMENT A NULLITY.
B. RENDERS THE JUDGMENT LIABLE TO BE SET ASIDE IN APPEAL.
C. RENDERS THE JUDGMENT NULLITY ONLY AT THE OPTION OF OTHER PARTY.
D. HAS NO CONSEQUENCES.

Q95-AN AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO OR COMPROMISE ON BEHALF OF A MINOR WITHOUT THE LEAVE
OF THE COURT, UNDER ORDER 32, RULE 7 OF C.P.C. IS
A. VALID
B. VOID
C. VOIDABLE AGAINST ALL THE PARTIES OTHER THAN THE MINOR
D. NONE OF THE ABOVE

Q96-UNDER WHICH PROVISION OF CPC AMBASSADOR CAN BE SUED:-

A-SECTION 86
B-SECTION 88
C-SECTION 88A
D-HE CANNOT BE SUED

Q97-AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, THE TERM ‘RULES’
MEANS
(A) RULES MADE UNDER SECTION 123
(B) RULES MADE UNDER SECTION 126
(C) RULES AND FORMS CONTAINED IN FIRST SCHEDULE
(D) ALL OF THE ABOVE

Q98-WHO AMONG THE FOLLOWING DOES NOT GET THE PROTECTION OF SECTION 133 OF
THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
(A) THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF PEOPLE
(B) MINISTER OF STATES
(C) ADMINISTRATORS OF UTS
(D) DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Q99-. RECENTLY THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT HELD THAT RES-JUDICATA IS NOT A
GROUND TO REJECT A PLAINT UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 (D) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE, 1908, IN
(A) SRIHARI HANUMANDAS TOTALA V HEMANT VITHAL KAMAT
(B) SUMAN CHADHA V CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
(C) NEEHARIKA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. V STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
(D) SATBIR SINGH V STATE OF HARYANA

Q100-WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING PROVISION OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908,

IS MANIFESTATION OF ‘DOCTRINE OF NON-TRAVERSE’
(A) ORDER VIII RULE 5
(B) ORDER VII RULE 11
(C) ORDER VI RULE 17
(D) ORDER VIII RULE 1 A