✅ 1.
Opinion Essay
Typical Question: To what extent do you agree or disagree?
✳️Useful Phrases with Examples:
● In my opinion, governments should invest more in public transport.
● I firmly believe that education is the most powerful tool for change.
● There is no doubt that climate change is a global threat.
✳️Vocabulary with Examples:
● Beneficial: Banning plastic bags is beneficial for the environment.
● Detrimental: social media can be detrimental to mental health.
● Advocate: I advocate for a more inclusive education system.
✳️Grammar Patterns:
● Although X, Y: Although fast food is convenient, it is often unhealthy.
● Conditionals: If more people used public transport, traffic congestion would decrease.
✅ 2. Discussion Essay
Typical Question: Discuss both views and give your opinion.
✳️Useful Phrases with Examples:
● Some people argue that children should study abroad, while others believe it is better to stay local.
● On the one hand, studying abroad offers cultural exposure.
● From my perspective, a balance of both is ideal.
✳️Vocabulary with Examples:
● Standpoint: From an economic standpoint, investing in tourism makes sense.
● Merit: Both arguments have merit and deserve consideration.
✳️Grammar Patterns:
● Passive Voice: It is widely believed that technology has improved education.
● Relative Clauses: People who support homeschooling argue that it offers personalized learning.
✅ 3. Problem–Solution Essay
Typical Question: What are the problems and how can they be solved?
✳️Useful Phrases with Examples:
● One major issue is that cities are becoming overcrowded.
● To tackle this problem, governments could encourage rural development.
● A potential solution would be to impose stricter environmental regulations.
✳️Vocabulary with Examples:
● Mitigate: Green spaces help mitigate the effects of urban heat.
● Alleviate: Public funding can alleviate poverty.
● Root cause: The root cause of crime is often inequality.
✳️Grammar Patterns:
● Modal Verbs: Governments should increase spending on healthcare.
● Cause and Effect: Due to a lack of infrastructure, rural areas are underdeveloped.
✅ 4. Advantages and Disadvantages Essay
Typical Question: What are the advantages and disadvantages?
✳️Useful Phrases with Examples:
● One clear advantage is that online learning is flexible.
● On the downside, it can reduce face-to-face interaction.
● Despite these benefits, online learning may not suit everyone.
✳️Vocabulary with Examples:
● Upside: The upside of remote work is increased flexibility.
● Trade-off: There's a trade-off between accessibility and quality.
● Drawback: A drawback of technology is overdependence.
✳️Grammar Patterns:
● Comparative Structures: Online education is more affordable than traditional methods.
● Concessive Clauses: Even though it saves time, it may reduce productivity.
✅ 5. Double Question Essay
Typical Question: Why is this happening? Is it positive or negative?
✳️Useful Phrases with Examples:
● This trend can be attributed to technological advances.
● One possible reason is that urban areas offer better jobs.
● This is a largely positive development, as it increases access to services.
✳️Vocabulary with Examples:
● Phenomenon: This urban migration phenomenon has reshaped society.
● Implication: One implication is a growing gap between rural and urban life.
● Trigger: High housing costs often trigger relocation.
✳️Grammar Patterns:
● Infinitive Clauses: To understand this trend, we must examine social factors.
● Balanced Sentences: Not only does it boost the economy, but it also improves quality of life.
✅ Summary Table (Quick Reference)
Essay Type Structure Highlight Key Phrase Example Grammar Example
Intro + Your Opinion +
Opinion Essay "I firmly believe that..." "Although X, Y..."
Support
Discussion
Intro + Both Views + Opinion "On the one hand..." "It is argued that..."
Essay
Problem– "Due to X, Y
Intro + Problems + Solutions "To tackle this problem..."
Solution happens..."
Adv/ Intro + Pros + Cons (+ "Even though..., it
"One clear advantage is that..."
Disadvantage Opinion) can..."
Intro + Q1 Answer + Q2 "This trend can be attributed "Not only..., but
Double Question
Answer to..." also..."
It is important for everyone, including young people, to
save money for their future.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this
statement?
There is a saying, "Money is the second god," which is believed by
many people, including not only adults but also teenagers. There
is no doubt that money plays a vital role in our lives, and it is hard
to imagine life without it. I strongly agree that both adults and
adolescents should save money for the future. In this essay, I will
explain why saving is essential to cover basic needs, education,
and emergencies.
Firstly, saving money is important for accessing better educational
opportunities. As the world continues to develop, more advanced
learning and job prospects are becoming available, especially for
young people. For example, in Myanmar, IGCSE education was not
widely recognized before 2020, and government high schools were
the main choice for students. Nowadays, many parents are willing
to invest in international education, and ambitious students are
also saving money to pursue university degrees in countries like
the UK, Australia, and the USA. Without savings, such
opportunities may not be affordable.
Secondly, having savings is crucial in case of future emergencies,
especially health-related ones. As people grow older, they may not
have someone to take care of them, and hiring a caregiver or
nurse might become necessary. In such situations, medical
expenses and hospital bills can be overwhelming without financial
preparation. Saving money early in life ensures security and peace
of mind later on.
In conclusion, without proper savings, individuals may struggle to
meet their basic needs or face challenges in accessing education
and healthcare. Therefore, starting to save from a young age is a
wise decision that will bring comfort, opportunity, and a more
stable future.
In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a
supermarket and buy food produced all over the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In this day and age, it has become easier for us to purchase a wide
variety of foods from different parts of the world. As global
transportation and commercial networks have improved,
international food products are now distributed more efficiently to
shopping centers. I strongly believe that this has a positive impact
on our daily lives. This essay will highlight the reasons why this
development allows us not only to taste food from different
cultures but also to learn about those cultures through their
cuisine.
First of all, people can try different international foods and save on
shipping costs if there is a nearby supermarket that offers a
sufficient variety of global products. What I mean is, no additional
transport fees are required since consumers can directly purchase
these foods without needing to order from online platforms like
Amazon or Lazada. For example, an Asian student studying in
Canada might otherwise have to wait several days to receive a
signature food from their home country, as it may not be easily
available in local European supermarkets.
Another positive aspect of having foreign foods available in local
supermarkets is that people can explore different cultures without
leaving their home country. Many people believe that culture can
only be learned by traveling to a specific place. However, I would
argue that if we truly want to understand a country's traditions
and values, trying its food is a great first step. For instance,
foreigners who try Mohinga, a traditional and nutritious Burmese
breakfast, are likely to understand why it plays such an important
role in Burmese culture.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that modern shopping centers help
us explore and exchange cultures more easily. They make it more
convenient to enjoy delicious global foods without incurring extra
costs.
Some people think that competition at work, at school, and
in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should
try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each
other. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, many people believe that competing with others helps
us become more capable and reach our goals, while others argue
that cooperation is more important for creating a better society.
This essay will discuss both perspectives and explain why I believe
cooperation leads to more meaningful outcomes.
On one hand, competition can be a strong motivator. From an
early age, children are encouraged to perform well in school and
surpass their classmates. For example, students in primary
schools often work hard to receive stars or stickers from their
teachers, which not only boosts their confidence but also makes
their parents proud. In the workplace, competition among
employees often results in increased productivity and better
performance, as individuals strive for promotions and recognition.
Many people believe that success achieved through competition is
more rewarding and builds personal growth.
On the other hand, many argue that cooperation is the key to
lasting success. Intense competition can sometimes create stress,
jealousy, or resentment. When people fail to meet their goals and
see others succeed, they may lose motivation or feel discouraged.
In contrast, teamwork allows people to share knowledge, support
one another, and achieve common goals more efficiently.
Cooperation also builds stronger relationships and creates a more
positive and inclusive environment.
In conclusion, while competition can encourage hard work and
achievement, I believe that cooperation is more beneficial overall.
By working together, we can build a more supportive and balanced
society, where success is shared and everyone can grow together.
Nowadays, a growing number of people with health
problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments
instead of visiting their usual doctor.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
In recent years, an increasing number of individuals have begun
relying on alternative forms of medicine rather than seeking
professional medical advice from licensed doctors. I believe this is
a negative development, as it can result in serious health risks and
the spread of misinformation.
One major reason people choose alternative treatments is the
rising cost of healthcare. In countries such as Myanmar, many
people cannot afford regular hospital visits. As a result, they turn
to self-medication, often using over-the-counter drugs like
painkillers. For example, a person suffering from the flu may
continue taking paracetamol without consulting a doctor. Although
this might relieve symptoms temporarily, it does not address the
underlying illness and may worsen the condition or cause long-
term damage to internal organs.
Moreover, the widespread availability of health information on the
internet and social media has made it easier for people to follow
unverified medical advice. Many individuals become impatient
with slow treatment results or are discouraged by high medical
costs, so they turn to traditional or homemade remedies. For
instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, some residents in my
neighborhood believed that inhaling steam infused with certain
herbal leaves could boost their oxygen levels. Instead of
consulting a doctor or going to the hospital, they relied on this
method. Unfortunately, not only was it ineffective, but it also
delayed proper treatment and put their health at greater risk.
In conclusion, although alternative treatments may seem
convenient or affordable, they can be harmful when used without
professional guidance. Health is not something to take lightly, and
even minor symptoms should be addressed by a qualified medical
expert to prevent serious consequences.
In many countries, people are now living longer than ever
before. Some people say an ageing population creates
problems for governments. Other people think there are
benefits if society has more elderly people.
To what extent do the advantages of having an ageing
population outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, it is evident that the number of elderly people
living meaningful lives in society has significantly increased. Some
people argue that an ageing population creates challenges for
governments, while others believe that elderly individuals
contribute positively to society. This essay will explain why I
believe the advantages of having an ageing population far
outweigh the disadvantages, particularly because of the valuable
experiences and wisdom older people offer.
One of the major benefits of having elderly individuals around is
the opportunity to learn from their knowledge and life
experiences. They can share how they overcame challenges and
achieved success during difficult times, offering practical guidance
and inspiration to younger generations. Another advantage is the
role they play in promoting moral and cultural values. For
example, in Myanmar, it is a tradition for young people to perform
good deeds during the New Year, such as washing the hair or
trimming the nails of the elderly as a way to gain merit. Such
interactions strengthen social bonds and respect between
generations.
However, some elderly people are abandoned by their families for
various reasons and end up in nursing homes. As the ageing
population grows, this may place a financial strain on the
government, requiring more investment in elderly care facilities.
Moreover, meeting their needs, such as food, healthcare, and
medicine can become costly. To cover these expenses,
governments might need to increase taxes or reduce other public
services, which could negatively affect economic growth.
In conclusion, although an ageing population presents certain
economic and social challenges, I firmly believe the benefits they
bring, especially in terms of wisdom and cultural continuity, are far
more valuable. With proper planning, governments can mitigate
the disadvantages while embracing the strengths of an older
society.
Some children spend hours every day on their
smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a
negative development?
In today's digital era, it is evident that many children spend excessive
hours on their smartphones. This is largely due to the widespread
availability of digital devices and the addictive nature of online
content. With smartphones now present in almost every household,
children have easy access to them, often treating these devices as
digital toys. In my view, this is a negative development that can have
harmful effects on children's health and social skills.
Firstly, excessive screen time can seriously damage children's physical
and mental health, particularly their eyesight and sleep patterns.
Prolonged exposure to screen light can strain their eyes and negatively
impact the nervous system. As a result, many children may suffer from
frequent headaches, poor concentration, and even insomnia, all of
which can disrupt their overall lifestyle and academic performance.
Secondly, the overuse of smartphones often leads to social isolation.
Instead of engaging in outdoor activities or playing traditional games
with peers, many youngsters spend hours scrolling through social
media. This not only reduces face-to-face interaction but also weakens
their communication skills, making it harder for them to form real-life
relationships and develop emotional intelligence.
Another serious concern is the exposure to inappropriate content.
Many social media platforms and websites contain violent, sexual, or
otherwise harmful material that is easily accessible to children.
Without proper supervision or content filters, children may encounter
disturbing or misleading information that can negatively shape their
behavior and values. In extreme cases, repeated exposure to such
content could influence aggressive or inappropriate actions among
adolescents.
In conclusion, although smartphones can offer educational benefits
when used responsibly, most children lack the maturity to make
informed decisions about their usage. As a result, prolonged
smartphone use often leads to a range of negative consequences,
including health issues, social withdrawal, and exposure to harmful
content. Therefore, I strongly believe that this trend is detrimental to
children's development and should be carefully managed by parents
and educators.
It is important for people to take risks, both in their
professional lives and their personal lives.
Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the
disadvantages?
In today’s competitive world, many believe that taking risks in
both personal and professional life is essential. While risk-taking
can sometimes lead to great rewards, I believe the disadvantages
often outweigh the advantages if risks are taken without careful
thought and preparation. This essay will explain the reasons with
examples.
On the one hand, calculated risks can lead to personal growth and
professional success. For example, Jack Ma, the founder of
Alibaba, faced numerous failures before building a global business
empire. His willingness to take risks, combined with persistence
and planning, helped him overcome obstacles and achieve
success. This shows that when risk is accompanied by vision and
strategy, it can result in life-changing opportunities.
However, not all risks lead to positive outcomes, especially when
taken impulsively. For instance, some individuals attempt extreme
sports or dangerous challenges they see trending on social media
without proper training or consideration of their health conditions.
A person with a heart condition, for example, might suffer serious
consequences, including trauma or hospitalization, simply by
engaging in something unsuitable. Moreover, in professional life,
taking a job or investment risk without research could lead to
financial loss and emotional stress.
In conclusion, while taking risks can sometimes open doors to
success and self-discovery, it is important to evaluate the situation
carefully and plan accordingly. Reckless decisions can lead to
physical, emotional, and financial harm. Therefore, I believe that
although risk-taking has its advantages, the potential
disadvantages often outweigh the benefits unless approached with
caution and preparation.
The most important aim of science should be to improve
people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with this statement?
Science has brought many changes to our world, and I
strongly believe that its main purpose should be to improve
people’s lives. Although some people argue that science
should focus only on gaining knowledge for its own sake, I
think its most important goal is to make life better, safer, and
more comfortable for everyone in society.
One of the most important ways science helps people is
through healthcare. Scientific research has led to the
discovery of vaccines, medicines, and advanced treatments
that save lives and improve overall health. For example, the
COVID-19 vaccine was developed through years of scientific
study and helped protect millions of people during the global
pandemic. New treatments for serious diseases like cancer
and heart conditions also give patients more chances to
recover and live longer, healthier lives.
Science has also made daily life easier and more convenient in
many ways. Inventions such as electricity, the internet,
smartphones, and public transport are all results of scientific
progress. These innovations help us work more efficiently,
communicate quickly, and enjoy a better quality of life.
Furthermore, science plays a key role in protecting the
environment. For instance, scientists are now developing clean
energy sources like solar and wind power to reduce air
pollution and slow down climate change. These contributions
are essential not only for improving current living conditions
but also for ensuring a livable planet for future generations.
In conclusion, while gaining knowledge is one part of science,
its main purpose should be to help people live better lives.
Science improves health, brings useful technology, and
protects the environment. Therefore, I believe that improving
people’s lives should always remain the top goal of science.
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors
and engineers, should be required to work in the country
where they did their training. Others believe they should
be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people hold the view that professionals like doctors and
engineers should be required to work in the country where they
studied. On the other hand, there is a belief that they should be
free to work in any country they want. While both ideas have good
reasons, I agree with the second view that professionals should be
allowed to choose where to work.
Those who support the idea of professionals working in their home
country say that training these people costs a lot of money and
effort. Many countries, especially poorer ones, spend a lot on
education and expect these skilled workers to contribute to local
development. If doctors or engineers leave right after their
training, their country loses valuable talent, which can harm
important services like healthcare and construction. Therefore,
some argue that requiring professionals to work locally for a
certain period helps address these challenges.
However, I believe professionals should have the freedom to work
where they want. Many move to other countries for better pay,
better working conditions, or more chances to develop their skills.
If they are forced to stay, they may feel unhappy or less
motivated, which can affect the quality of their work. Also, when
professionals move to different countries, they share their
knowledge and help improve services globally. For example,
doctors trained in one country can help patients in another, and
engineers can work on important projects worldwide.
In conclusion, while it is important for countries to keep their
trained professionals for some time, people should also have the
right to decide where to work. This respects their rights and helps
both the individuals and the global community in the long run.
The working week should be shorter and workers should
have a longer weekend.
Do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that the working week should be shorter and
workers should have longer weekends. I fully agree with this idea
because it would improve workers’ well-being, increase
productivity, and benefit society as a whole.
Firstly, having a shorter working week would greatly improve
work-life balance. When people have more time off, they can
spend more quality time with family and friends, pursue hobbies,
or simply relax. This helps reduce stress and burnout, which are
common problems in today’s busy work environment. With more
rest, employees are likely to feel happier and more motivated.
Secondly, reducing working hours can actually increase
productivity. Well-rested workers tend to be more focused and
efficient during their working hours. Studies have shown that
employees who work fewer hours can produce the same or even
better results compared to those working longer weeks. This
means that companies could benefit from improved work quality
without losing output.
Finally, longer weekends would have positive effects beyond the
workplace. People would have more time to engage in community
activities, volunteer, or enjoy leisure and entertainment. This can
boost the local economy as people spend more on travel,
shopping, and dining out. Additionally, fewer working days mean
less commuting, which can reduce traffic congestion and pollution,
helping the environment.
In conclusion, shortening the working week and extending
weekends has many advantages. It improves workers’ mental and
physical health, increases productivity, and benefits society and
the environment. Therefore, I believe that governments and
companies should seriously consider adopting this change.
In many countries around the world, rural people are
moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is
decreasing.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
In many countries, rural people are moving to cities, causing
the population in the countryside to decline. I believe this is a
negative development because it leads to the loss of rural
communities, puts pressure on urban areas, and harms
agricultural productivity.
Firstly, the movement of people from villages to cities results
in the decline of rural communities. Many traditional customs
and ways of life are disappearing as younger generations
leave. This causes an aging population to remain in rural
areas, which weakens social bonds and leads to a loss of
cultural heritage. Some villages even risk becoming
abandoned, which affects the identity of the country as a
whole.
Secondly, rural depopulation puts enormous pressure on
cities. Rapid urban growth often leads to overcrowding, traffic
congestion, housing shortages, and pollution. Urban
infrastructure such as schools, hospitals, and public transport
struggle to keep up with the increasing demand. Additionally,
many migrants end up living in poor conditions or slums,
which can cause social problems and lower the quality of life.
Finally, the decrease in rural population harms agricultural
productivity. With fewer young people willing to work in
farming, food production may decline. Moreover, traditional
farming skills may be lost if no one is there to pass them on.
In conclusion, although people move to cities for better
opportunities, the negative effects on rural communities,
urban centers, and agriculture outweigh these benefits. To
address this issue, governments should focus on improving
living conditions and job opportunities in rural areas to balance
population distribution.
Many manufactured food and drink products contain high
levels of sugar, which causes many health problems.
Sugary products should be made more expensive to
encourage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree?
Many foods and drinks today contain too much sugar, which can
lead to serious health problems such as obesity, diabetes, and
heart disease. Because of this, some people believe that sugary
products should be made more expensive to reduce how much
people buy them. I agree with this idea and believe it can help
improve public health.
When prices go up, people are less likely to buy unhealthy items. If
soft drinks, chocolate, and other sugary snacks become more
expensive, people might think twice before purchasing them. This
is especially true for young people and low-income families who
are more careful with money. They may choose healthier options
like water or fruit instead. Over time, this can lead to better eating
habits and fewer health problems in society.
Also, the extra money collected from higher prices could be used
to help people. For example, governments can use the money to
run health education campaigns, improve hospitals, or offer
programs that teach people how to eat healthy. This way, not only
will people eat less sugar, but they will also get support to make
better choices in the future.
In conclusion, making sugary food and drink products more
expensive is a smart way to reduce their consumption and
improve health. It can help people make better choices and also
provide money for useful public health projects. I strongly believe
that this is a fair and effective way to deal with modern health
problems caused by sugar.
In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually
emphasize that their products are new in some way.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative
development?
In modern advertising, companies often highlight that their
product is new or improved. This has become a common
marketing strategy, and it happens for a few key reasons. I believe
this trend has both positive and negative effects on consumers
and businesses.
The main reason is competition. Many markets are full of similar
products, so companies must find ways to stand out. By saying
that their product has a new feature, they hope to get more
attention and increase sales. Also, many customers enjoy trying
new things. Even if the product has only a small change, calling it
“new” makes it sound more exciting and attractive.
However, this can also be a problem. Sometimes the “new”
features are not important or even real. Companies may use this
idea to trick customers into buying something that is not much
different from the older version. This can lead to waste,
overconsumption, and disappointment. People might spend money
on things they don’t really need, just because the advertisement
was convincing.
In conclusion, advertising new features helps businesses grow and
gives customers more choices. But at the same time, it can be
misleading if the claims are not true. I believe this trend can be
positive if companies are honest, but if they exaggerate, it can be
harmful. Customers should always think carefully before buying
something just because it is advertised as new.
---
In some countries, more and more people are becoming
interested in finding out about the history of the house or
building they live in.
What are the reasons for this? How can people research
this?
In some countries, more people are becoming interested in the
history of the house or building they live in. This is a growing
trend, and there are several reasons for it. People are also finding
more ways to research the past of their homes.
One reason is curiosity. Some people want to know about the
people who lived there before them, or if anything interesting or
unusual happened in their house. This is especially common for
old houses, which may have a long and rich history. Another
reason is safety or investment. Some buyers want to know if the
house had damage, legal problems, or major repairs before
deciding to buy or renovate it. In some cases, people want to know
if their house has cultural or historical value.
There are many ways to find this information. People can visit
local government offices or archives where property records, old
maps, and building permits are stored. These can show who
owned the house in the past and what changes were made. The
internet is also very helpful, with many websites offering access to
historical records. In some areas, historical societies or museums
can also give useful details. Talking to long-time residents or
neighbours can also help people learn about the area’s history.
In conclusion, people want to know the history of their homes for
personal, safety, or cultural reasons. With easier access to public
records and online tools, it has become simpler for people to find
the information they want. This growing interest shows that people
care more about the stories behind the places they live.
Some people say that advertising is extremely
successful at persuading us to buy things. Other
people think that advertising is so common that we
no longer pay attention to it.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Advertising plays a crucial role in business, as marketing is
a key strategy for success. From traditional print ads to
modern digital campaigns, advertising is designed to
influence potential buyers. While some believe it
effectively persuades people to purchase products, others
argue that it has become so widespread that it is often
ignored. This essay will discuss both views and explain why
I agree with the second part of the argument.
On one hand, businesses often invest heavily in creative
and appealing advertisements to attract buyers. Many
companies use celebrities to promote their products,
believing that familiar faces build trust and interest. For
example, an accessory featured by Rosé from BlackPink
would likely sell out quickly due to her strong influence and
fan base. People often assume that products endorsed by
famous individuals are of higher quality.
On the other hand, the sheer volume of advertisements
today can be overwhelming. In shopping centers or
festivals, marketers frequently hand out flyers or promote
their products aggressively, which many people find
irritating. Online advertisements often disrupt browsing
experiences, especially on social media. These constant
interruptions lead many to ignore or block ads entirely.
In conclusion, while advertising can still be effective in
some cases, its overexposure has made many people less
responsive to it. From a business standpoint, it may help
attract some buyers, but for the general public, it has
become more of a nuisance than a persuasive tool.
Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather
than to work for a company or organisation.
Why might this be the case?
What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed?
In recent years, a growing number of people have chosen to work
independently rather than be employed by a company or
organisation. This shift is largely due to dissatisfaction with
traditional jobs and the desire for greater autonomy. However,
self-employment also comes with notable disadvantages,
particularly concerning financial stability and social isolation.
One key reason many individuals pursue self-employment is to
escape the stress and limitations of working under someone else.
Traditional employment often involves strict schedules, excessive
workloads, and limited flexibility, which can negatively affect work-
life balance. Moreover, salaries in many conventional jobs,
especially in government sectors, are relatively low and may not
reflect the amount of effort required. As a result, some people
prefer to start their own businesses, believing it offers more
freedom and the potential for higher income without waiting for
fixed paydays.
Despite these advantages, working independently is not without
risks. A major drawback is the lack of financial security. Self-
employed individuals may struggle to maintain consistent income,
especially if their business fails or they face a lack of clients. For
instance, freelancers often rely on occasional projects and may go
weeks without payment. Additionally, working alone can lead to
feelings of isolation and decreased productivity due to the
absence of teamwork or professional guidance.
In conclusion, while self-employment offers greater independence
and income potential, it also involves challenges such as financial
uncertainty and lack of social interaction, which should be
carefully considered before making such a career move.
