KEMBAR78
a brief history copyright (and why it is broken) | PDF
a brief history of copyright
          (and why it is broken)



          26 june 2011 | Paul Keller | Knowledgeland
30.000 B.C.E



                         no copyright

1706
               golden age of copyright
1991
                             broken?
1706 Statute of Anne (UK): first
copyright act, establishes the right of authors
to control what happens to their works

1787 Copyright clause of the US
Constitution: ‘to promote the Progress of
Science and useful Arts, by securing for
limited Times to Authors the exclusive Right
to their Writings.’ Implemented in 1790 in the
US copyright act
1886 Berne Convention for the
Protection of Literary and Artistic
Works: requires signatories to recognize
the copyright of works of authors from other
signatory countries, establishes minimum
standards for copyright law.
Copyright is the exclusive right of the author
of a literary, scientific or artistic work or his
  successors in title to communicate that
   work to the public and to reproduce it,
 subject to the limitations laid down by law.




           Article 1 of the dutch copyright code, translation by IvIR
original works of authorship
temporary
limitations laid down by the law
limitations laid down by the law
            (fair use)
communication to the public &
      reproduction
(moral rights)
insanely complex
Information Management: A Proposal, Tim Berners-Lee, CERN(1998)
1996 WIPO Copyright Treaty:
additions to the existing copyright treaty
framework in the light of advances of
information technology. Implemented
through the Copyright Directive (EU) and the
DMCA (US)
???? ACTA: would establish international
standards on intellectual property rights
enforcement
broken?
Reccomendation 1. Evidence: Government should
 ensure that development of the IP System is driven as
   far as possible by objective evidence. Policy should
balance measurable economic objectives against social
 goals and potential benefits for rights holders against
    impacts on consumers and other interests. These
 concerns will be of particular importance in assessing
     future claims to extend rights or in determining
                 desirable limits to rights.



                     Hargreaves Review of Intellectual Property and Growth p.94
‘Copyright Reform’ by Nina Paley (CC-BY-SA)
      http://mimiandeunice.com/2011/05/23/copyright-reform/

a brief history copyright (and why it is broken)

  • 1.
    a brief historyof copyright (and why it is broken) 26 june 2011 | Paul Keller | Knowledgeland
  • 2.
    30.000 B.C.E no copyright 1706 golden age of copyright 1991 broken?
  • 3.
    1706 Statute ofAnne (UK): first copyright act, establishes the right of authors to control what happens to their works 1787 Copyright clause of the US Constitution: ‘to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors the exclusive Right to their Writings.’ Implemented in 1790 in the US copyright act
  • 4.
    1886 Berne Conventionfor the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works: requires signatories to recognize the copyright of works of authors from other signatory countries, establishes minimum standards for copyright law.
  • 5.
    Copyright is theexclusive right of the author of a literary, scientific or artistic work or his successors in title to communicate that work to the public and to reproduce it, subject to the limitations laid down by law. Article 1 of the dutch copyright code, translation by IvIR
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
    limitations laid downby the law (fair use)
  • 10.
    communication to thepublic & reproduction
  • 11.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Information Management: AProposal, Tim Berners-Lee, CERN(1998)
  • 16.
    1996 WIPO CopyrightTreaty: additions to the existing copyright treaty framework in the light of advances of information technology. Implemented through the Copyright Directive (EU) and the DMCA (US)
  • 17.
    ???? ACTA: wouldestablish international standards on intellectual property rights enforcement
  • 18.
  • 19.
    Reccomendation 1. Evidence:Government should ensure that development of the IP System is driven as far as possible by objective evidence. Policy should balance measurable economic objectives against social goals and potential benefits for rights holders against impacts on consumers and other interests. These concerns will be of particular importance in assessing future claims to extend rights or in determining desirable limits to rights. Hargreaves Review of Intellectual Property and Growth p.94
  • 20.
    ‘Copyright Reform’ byNina Paley (CC-BY-SA) http://mimiandeunice.com/2011/05/23/copyright-reform/