A greedy algorithms

2
A short list of categories
 Algorithm types we will consider include:
 Simple recursive algorithms
 Backtracking algorithms
 Divide and conquer algorithms
 Dynamic programming algorithms
 Greedy algorithms
 Branch and bound algorithms
 Brute force algorithms
 Randomized algorithms

3
Optimization problems
 An optimization problem is one in which you want
to find, not just a solution, but the best solution
 A “greedy algorithm” sometimes works well for
optimization problems
 A greedy algorithm works in phases. At each
phase:
 You take the best you can get right now, without regard
for future consequences
 You hope that by choosing a local optimum at each
step, you will end up at a global optimum

4
Example: Counting money
 Suppose you want to count out a certain amount of
money, using the fewest possible bills and coins
 A greedy algorithm would do this would be:
At each step, take the largest possible bill or coin
that does not overshoot
 Example: To make $6.39, you can choose:
 a $5 bill
 a $1 bill, to make $6
 a 25¢ coin, to make $6.25
 A 10¢ coin, to make $6.35
 four 1¢ coins, to make $6.39
 For US money, the greedy algorithm always gives
the optimum solution

5
A failure of the greedy algorithm
 In some (fictional) monetary system, “krons” come
in 1 kron, 7 kron, and 10 kron coins
 Using a greedy algorithm to count out 15 krons,
you would get
 A 10 kron piece
 Five 1 kron pieces, for a total of 15 krons
 This requires six coins
 A better solution would be to use two 7 kron pieces
and one 1 kron piece
 This only requires three coins
 The greedy algorithm results in a solution, but not
in an optimal solution

6
A scheduling problem
 You have to run nine jobs, with running times of 3, 5, 6, 10, 11,
14, 15, 18, and 20 minutes
 You have three processors on which you can run these jobs
 You decide to do the longest-running jobs first, on whatever
processor is available
20
18
15 14
11
10
6
5
3P1
P2
P3
 Time to completion: 18 + 11 + 6 = 35 minutes
 This solution isn’t bad, but we might be able to do better

7
Another approach
 What would be the result if you ran the shortest job first?
 Again, the running times are 3, 5, 6, 10, 11, 14, 15, 18, and 20
minutes
 That wasn’t such a good idea; time to completion is now
6 + 14 + 20 = 40 minutes
 Note, however, that the greedy algorithm itself is fast
 All we had to do at each stage was pick the minimum or maximum
20
18
15
14
11
10
6
5
3P1
P2
P3

8
An optimum solution
 This solution is clearly optimal (why?)
 Clearly, there are other optimal solutions (why?)
 How do we find such a solution?
 One way: Try all possible assignments of jobs to processors
 Unfortunately, this approach can take exponential time
 Better solutions do exist:
20
18
15
14
11
10 6
5
3
P1
P2
P3

9
Huffman encoding
 The Huffman encoding algorithm is a greedy algorithm
 You always pick the two smallest numbers to combine
 Average bits/char:
0.22*2 + 0.12*3 +
0.24*2 + 0.06*4 +
0.27*2 + 0.09*4
= 2.42
 The Huffman
algorithm finds an
optimal solution
22 12 24 6 27 9
A B C D E F
15
27
46
54
100
A=00
B=100
C=01
D=1010
E=11
F=1011

10
Minimum spanning tree
 A minimum spanning tree is a least-cost subset of the edges of a
graph that connects all the nodes
 Start by picking any node and adding it to the tree
 Repeatedly: Pick any least-cost edge from a node in the tree to a
node not in the tree, and add the edge and new node to the tree
 Stop when all nodes have been added to the tree
 The result is a least-cost
(3+3+2+2+2=12) spanning tree
 If you think some other edge should be
in the spanning tree:
 Try adding that edge
 Note that the edge is part of a cycle
 To break the cycle, you must remove
the edge with the greatest cost
 This will be the edge you just added
1
2
3
4
5
6
3 3
3
3
2
2
2
4
4
4

11
Traveling salesman
 A salesman must visit every city (starting from city A), and wants
to cover the least possible distance
 He can revisit a city (and reuse a road) if necessary
 He does this by using a greedy algorithm: He goes to the next
nearest city from wherever he is
 From A he goes to B
 From B he goes to D
 This is not going to result in a
shortest path!
 The best result he can get now
will be ABDBCE, at a cost of 16
 An actual least-cost path from A
is ADBCE, at a cost of 14
E
A B C
D
2
3 3
4
4 4

12
Analysis
 A greedy algorithm typically makes (approximately) n choices
for a problem of size n
 (The first or last choice may be forced)
 Hence the expected running time is:
O(n * O(choice(n))), where choice(n) is making a choice
among n objects
 Counting: Must find largest useable coin from among k sizes of coin (k is
a constant), an O(k)=O(1) operation;
 Therefore, coin counting is (n)
 Huffman: Must sort n values before making n choices
 Therefore, Huffman is O(n log n) + O(n) = O(n log n)
 Minimum spanning tree: At each new node, must include new edges and
keep them sorted, which is O(n log n) overall
 Therefore, MST is O(n log n) + O(n) = O(n log n)

13
Other greedy algorithms
 Dijkstra’s algorithm for finding the shortest path in a
graph
 Always takes the shortest edge connecting a known node to an
unknown node
 Kruskal’s algorithm for finding a minimum-cost
spanning tree
 Always tries the lowest-cost remaining edge
 Prim’s algorithm for finding a minimum-cost spanning
tree
 Always takes the lowest-cost edge between nodes in the
spanning tree and nodes not yet in the spanning tree

14
Dijkstra’s shortest-path algorithm
 Dijkstra’s algorithm finds the shortest paths from a given node to
all other nodes in a graph
 Initially,
 Mark the given node as known (path length is zero)
 For each out-edge, set the distance in each neighboring node equal to the cost
(length) of the out-edge, and set its predecessor to the initially given node
 Repeatedly (until all nodes are known),
 Find an unknown node containing the smallest distance
 Mark the new node as known
 For each node adjacent to the new node, examine its neighbors to see whether
their estimated distance can be reduced (distance to known node plus cost of
out-edge)
 If so, also reset the predecessor of the new node

15
Analysis of Dijkstra’s algorithm I
 Assume that the average out-degree of a node is some
constant k
 Initially,
 Mark the given node as known (path length is zero)
 This takes O(1) (constant) time
 For each out-edge, set the distance in each neighboring node equal to
the cost (length) of the out-edge, and set its predecessor to the initially
given node
 If each node refers to a list of k adjacent node/edge pairs, this
takes O(k) = O(1) time, that is, constant time
 Notice that this operation takes longer if we have to extract a list
of names from a hash table

16
Analysis of Dijkstra’s algorithm II
 Repeatedly (until all nodes are known), (n times)
 Find an unknown node containing the smallest distance
 Probably the best way to do this is to put the unknown nodes into a
priority queue; this takes k * O(log n) time each time a new node is
marked “known” (and this happens n times)
 Mark the new node as known -- O(1) time
 For each node adjacent to the new node, examine its neighbors to
see whether their estimated distance can be reduced (distance to
known node plus cost of out-edge)
 If so, also reset the predecessor of the new node
 There are k adjacent nodes (on average), operation requires constant
time at each, therefore O(k) (constant) time
 Combining all the parts, we get:
O(1) + n*(k*O(log n)+O(k)), that is, O(nk log n) time

17
Connecting wires
 There are n white dots and n black dots, equally spaced, in a line
 You want to connect each white dot with some one black dot,
with a minimum total length of “wire”
 Example:
 Total wire length above is 1 + 1 + 1 + 5 = 8
 Do you see a greedy algorithm for doing this?
 Does the algorithm guarantee an optimal solution?
 Can you prove it?
 Can you find a counterexample?

18
Collecting coins
 A checkerboard has a certain number of coins on it
 A robot starts in the upper-left corner, and walks to the
bottom left-hand corner
 The robot can only move in two directions: right and down
 The robot collects coins as it goes
 You want to collect all the coins using the minimum
number of robots
 Example:
 Do you see a greedy algorithm for
doing this?
 Does the algorithm guarantee an
optimal solution?
 Can you prove it?
 Can you find a counterexample?

A greedy algorithms

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to A greedy algorithms

More from Amit Kumar Rathi

Recently uploaded

In this document

A greedy algorithms