Download as PDF, PPTX
Uploaded byNaresh Jain
Agile Mobile Testing Workshop
The document discusses the importance of agile mobile testing and offers methods for improving testability in software design, emphasizing timely feedback and effective use of resources. It highlights the need for continuous integration and the separation of concerns in code for maintainability, alongside alternatives to traditional testing like crowd sourcing and analytics. Key considerations include balancing development costs with maintenance and leveraging analytics for better understanding software performance and user feedback.
More Related Content
Similar to Agile Mobile Testing Workshop
Agile Mobile Testing Workshop
- 1. AGILE MOBILE TESTING WORKSHOP PUNE AGILE CONFERENCE JULIAN HARTY Creative Commons License How to design your mobile apps by Julian Harty is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en_US Contact me: Rev: 22 Nov 2014 julianharty@gmail.com
- 2.
- 3.
- 4. TIME TO USEFULFEEDBACK TTUF Information is more valuable when it is timely
- 5. CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION (FORMOBILE APPS) Raw Ingredients • Code • Code Repository (git, svn, …) • Triggers • Build tools • Automated tests • Run time environment(s) • Emulators • Simulators • Devices
- 6. WORKSHOP WHERE ARE THE LATENCIES
- 7. WHERE ARE THE LATENCIES? • Build times • Affects end-to-end Unit Test runtime • Commissioning run-time environment • Automated tests • Deployment • Installing the app so it can be tested • App Store Approval • Feedback from the market • Feedback from the field • App Qualities • Failures & Defects in use
- 8.
- 9. TBS T BS T = Testing B = Bug reporting S = Setup We want to maximize T and minimize B & S
- 10. MINIMIZE SETUP Emailor SMS URLs to phone Have a configuration workstation with all the drivers installed Create apps on your build server and make them available
- 11. MINIMIZE BUG INVESTIGATION • Screenshot utilities • Learn how to access, filter and store device logs • Good quality camera for close-up screenshots • Write a bug report that will still be valuable when the bug will actually be investigated
- 12. MAXIMIZE TESTING Usetesting heuristics • I SLICED UP FUN (Jonathan Kohl) • COP FLUNG GUN (Moolya)
- 13. ANTIFRAGILE TESTING HEURISTICS& MNEMONICS
- 14.
- 15. WiFi Password: FW4WFAAA TEST THIS Kiwix USING THIS GUIDE http://moolya.com/blogs/
- 16.
- 17.
- 18. SPENDING MONEY WISELY TESTABILITY
- 19. WHAT IS TESTABILITY? The concept of designing & implementing software so it is easier to test • Testing can be automated • Testing can be interactive
- 20. SCALES OF TESTABILITY easy interfacing transparency challenging transparent opaque There are at least 2 dimensions of Testability: • ease of interfacing • transparency into the state & behaviour of the software being tested.
- 21. DESIGNING FOR TESTABILITY:HOOKS Programmatic Hooks To connect test automation easily Consider whether to leave them in situ
- 22. DESIGNING FOR TESTABILITY:VISIBILITY “Eyes into the Soul of the machine...” Expose internal data and state • Makes some checks easier to confirm • e.g. Error recovery mechanisms cleaned up the app’s internal state Beware: • Non-test code might start using the data • If so, consider formalising the access in an API
- 23. TESTABILITY: LAYERING OFCODE Already covered some aspects in the Segmented Design topic Ideal to be able to automate the testing of each layer or component independently Then testing of the composite software can focus on testing the composite aspects Beware of emergent behaviour • Test the qualities: non-functional-testing (NFT)
- 24. TESTABILITY: SEPARATION OFCONCERNS Separate generic and platform-specific code Generic code: • Application logic: What the app does, functionality Platform-specific code: • User Interface • Threading • Calls to platform-specific APIs
- 25. TESTABILITY: ISOLATE COMPLEXCODE Try encapsulating & isolating complex code • Provide an interface* • Have excellent automated tests exercise it • Warn casual developers (and testers) not to tamper with it • Now the rest of our code is easier to understand & manage In parallel consider ways to replace complex code with simpler code * e.g. See the Facade design pattern
- 26. BIG PICTURE BACKTO “VALUE”
- 27. SPENDING WISELY? FULL LIFECYCLE COSTS
- 28. FULL LIFECYCLE COSTS The initial development effort may be dwarfed by maintenance work There are trade-offs between reducing the cost of initial development and the cost of maintenance work Code that costs more to modify is undesirable. Well designed code & good automated tests can reduce the risk and cost of maintenance work. Beware of premature aging of your app’s codebase!
- 29. WHERE AND WHENTO SPEND MONEY ON TESTING?
- 30. NOVODA Costs 60%more to ‘add’ test automation to Android projects Who’s willing to sign off on it? Where and when does the ROI start?
- 31. THINGS TO CONSIDER How long do your code bases ‘last’? Who pays for ‘maintenance’? Where is the expertise to maintain the code? Active apps need ongoing nurture & investments even if you’re not changing the functionality
- 32. ALTERNATIVES TO TESTING Testing is not the only way to obtain useful feedback. Sometimes it’s not the best way either.
- 33. COMPLEMENTING TESTING WITHOTHER INFORMATION SOURCES • Crowd Sourcing • Log Analysis & Crash Dumps • Analytics • In-app feedback
- 34. VISUALIZATION TOOLS UiAutomationViewer(for Android) Using visualisation tools to help define the test automation interface
- 35. SECTION 7 USING MOBILE ANALYTICS
- 36. USING MOBILE ANALYTICS An overview of Mobile Analytics How they can help augment our testing
- 37. TOPOLOGY Data Collector Database Filter(s) Analytics WebServer Overview of Mobile Analytics Each step may be delayed Business view Mobile Apps sending Analytics data
- 38. TYPES OF EVENTS Mobile app Analytics Library Analytics Collector 1:1 App-initiated event m:1 App-initiated event Library-initiated event E1 E … E4 E Ea L E Ea Analytics L Database Internet connection
- 39. ANALYTICAL QUESTIONS EngineeringActivity, Benchmarking, Testing Trends, Defect Reports Extrapolation Software quality models, bottleneck analysis Specification refinement, asset reallocation Failure prediction models What’s Happened? (Reporting) What’s Happened? (Alerts) What will Happen? (Forecasting) How and why did it happen? (Factor analysis) What is the next best action? (Recommendation) What’s the best / worst that can happen? (Modeling / Simulation) Information Insight Past Present Future
- 40.