Downloaded 17 times
![Credits
bluekdesign (BY-NC-SA) [1]
thefost (BY-NC-ND) [1]
MonsieurLui (BY-SA) [1]
'PixelPlacebo' (BY-NC) [1]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/bsvssk-120429002437-phpapp01/85/Bootstrap-vs-Skeleton-9-320.jpg)
![Credits
bluekdesign (BY-NC-SA) [1]
thefost (BY-NC-ND) [1]
MonsieurLui (BY-SA) [1]
'PixelPlacebo' (BY-NC) [1]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/bsvssk-120429002437-phpapp01/75/Bootstrap-vs-Skeleton-9-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byJuho Vepsäläinen
Bootstrap vs. Skeleton
The document compares two responsive frameworks, Skeleton and Bootstrap, highlighting their commonalities such as a 12-column grid system and basic styling. It notes that Skeleton is lean and suitable for small projects, while Bootstrap is more complex with numerous JavaScript plugins and better for larger projects. Additionally, it mentions other frameworks like Zurb Foundation as alternatives.
Bootstrap vs. Skeleton
- 1.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6. Commonalities ● Grid system(12 columns) ● Sensible basic style (typography etc.) ● Responsive
- 7. Comparison Skeleton ● Lean ● NoJS Bootstrap ● Fat (trimmable) ● Too many JS plugins to mention ● Customization using LESS ● Themes
- 8. Lessons Learned ● Smallproject -> Skeleton ● Complex project -> Bootstrap ● Skeleton/Bootstrap > vanilla CSS ● See also ZURB Foundation, 320 and Up, ...
- 9. Credits bluekdesign (BY-NC-SA) [1] thefost(BY-NC-ND) [1] MonsieurLui (BY-SA) [1] 'PixelPlacebo' (BY-NC) [1]