MODULE1_CLASSICALENCRYPTIONTECHNIQUES.pptx

CRYPTOGRAPHY
Course Code: 18CS744

Course Outcomes
Define cryptography and its principles
Explain Cryptography algorithms
Illustrate Public and Private key cryptography
Explain Key management, distribution and certification
Explain authentication protocols

SYLLABUS
MODULE 1
Classical Encryption Techniques: Symmetric Cipher Model, Cryptography,
Cryptanalysis and Brute-Force Attack, Substitution Techniques, Caesar Cipher,
Monoalphabetic Cipher, Playfair Cipher, Hill Cipher, Polyalphabetic Cipher,
One Time Pad. Block Ciphers and the data encryption standard: Traditional
block Cipher structure, stream Ciphers and block Ciphers, Motivation for the
feistel Cipher structure, the feistel Cipher, The data encryption standard, DES
encryption, DES decryption, A DES example, results, the avalanche effect, the
strength of DES, the use of 56-Bit Keys, the nature of the DES algorithm,
timing attacks, Block cipher

SYMMETRIC CIPHER MODEL
A symmetric encryption scheme has five ingredients
Plaintext: This is the original intelligible message or data that is
fed into the algorithm as input.
Encryption algorithm: The encryption algorithm performs various
substitutions and transformations on the plaintext.
Secret key: The secret key is also input to the encryption
algorithm. The key is a value independent of the plaintext and of
the algorithm. The algorithm will produce a different output
depending on the specific key being used at the time. The exact
substitutions and transformations performed by the algorithm
depend on the key.

Ciphertext: This is the scrambled message produced as output. It
depends on the plaintext and the secret key. For a given message,
two different keys will produce two different ciphertexts. The
ciphertext is an apparently random stream of data and, as it
stands, is unintelligible.
Decryption algorithm: This is essentially the encryption algorithm
run in reverse. It takes the ciphertext and the secret key and
produces the original plaintext.

Figure: Simplified Model of Symmetric Encryption

There are two requirements for secure use of conventional
encryption:
1. We need a strong encryption algorithm. At a minimum, we
would like the algorithm to be such that an opponent who knows
the algorithm and has access to one or more ciphertexts would
be unable to decipher the ciphertext or figure out the key.
2. Sender and receiver must have obtained copies of the secret
key in a secure fashion and must keep the key secure.

Figure: Model of Symmetric Cryptosystem

A source produces a message in plaintext, X = [X1, X2, .., XM]The M
elements of X are letters in some finite alphabet.
For encryption, a key of the form K = [K1, K2, .., KJ] is generated.
If the key is generated at the message source, then it must also
be provided to the destination by means of some secure
channel.
Alternatively, a third party could generate the key and securely
deliver it to both source and destination.

 With the message X and the encryption key K as input, the
encryption algorithm forms the ciphertext Y = [Y1, Y2, …, YN].
 We can write this as
 Y = E(K, X)
 This notation indicates that Y is produced by using encryption
algorithm E as a function of the plaintext X, with the specific
function determined by the value of the key K.
 The intended receiver, in possession of the key, is able to invert the
transformation:
X = D(K, Y)

Cryptography
Cryptographic systems are characterized along three independent
dimensions:
1. The type of operations used for transforming plaintext to
ciphertext. All encryption algorithms are based on two general
principles: substitution, in which each element in the plaintext
(bit, letter, group of bits or letters) is mapped into another
element, and transposition, in which elements in the plaintext are
rearranged.

2. The number of keys used. If both sender and receiver use the
same key, the system is referred to as symmetric, single-key,
secret-key, or conventional encryption. If the sender and receiver
use different keys, the system is referred to as asymmetric, two-
key, or public-key encryption.
3. The way in which the plaintext is processed. A block cipher
processes the input one block of elements at a time, producing
an output block for each input block. A stream cipher processes
the input elements continuously, producing output one element
at a time, as it goes along.

Cryptanalysis and Brute-Force
Attack
There are two general approaches to attacking a conventional
encryption scheme:
Cryptanalysis: Cryptanalytic attacks rely on the nature of the
algorithm plus perhaps some knowledge of the general
characteristics of the plaintext or even some sample plaintext–
ciphertext pairs. This type of attack exploits the characteristics of
the algorithm to attempt to deduce a specific plaintext or to
deduce the key being used.
Brute-force attack: The attacker tries every possible key on a
piece of ciphertext until an intelligible translation into plaintext is
obtained. On average, half of all possible keys must be tried to
achieve success.

Table: Types of Attacks on Encrypted Messages

An encryption scheme is unconditionally secure if the ciphertext
generated by the scheme does not contain enough information to
determine uniquely the corresponding plaintext, no matter how
much ciphertext is available.
There is no encryption algorithm that is unconditionally secure.
Therefore, all that the users of an encryption algorithm can strive for
is an algorithm that meets one or both of the following criteria:
• The cost of breaking the cipher exceeds the value of the
encrypted information.
• The time required to break the cipher exceeds the useful lifetime
of the information.

An encryption scheme is said to be computationally secure if
either of the foregoing two criteria are met.
A brute-force attack involves trying every possible key until an
intelligible translation of the ciphertext into plaintext is obtained.

SUBSTITUTION TECHNIQUES
 The two basic building blocks of all encryption techniques are
substitution and transposition.
 A substitution technique is one in which the letters of plaintext
are replaced by other letters or by numbers or symbols.
 If the plaintext is viewed as a sequence of bits, then substitution
involves replacing plaintext bit patterns with ciphertext bit
patterns.

Caesar Cipher
 The earliest known, and the simplest, use of a substitution cipher was
by Julius Caesar.
 The Caesar cipher involves replacing each letter of the alphabet with
the letter standing three places further down the alphabet.
 For example,
plain: meet me after the toga party
cipher: PHHW PH DIWHU WKH WRJD SDUWB

 Note that the alphabet is wrapped around, so that the letter
following Z is A.
 We can define the transformation by listing all possibilities, as
follows:
plain: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
cipher: D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A B C

 Let us assign a numerical equivalent to each letter:
Then the algorithm can be expressed as follows.
For each plaintext letter p, substitute the ciphertext letter C:
C = E(3, p) = (p + 3) mod 26

 A shift may be of any amount, so that the general Caesar
algorithm is
C = E(k, p) = (p + k) mod 26 (2.1)
where k takes on a value in the range 1 to 25.
 The decryption algorithm is simply
p = D(k, C) = (C - k) mod 26

 Three important characteristics of this problem enables us to use
a bruteforce cryptanalysis:
1. The encryption and decryption algorithms are known.
2. There are only 25 keys to try.
3. The language of the plaintext is known and easily
recognizable.

Monoalphabetic Ciphers
 A permutation of a finite set of elements S is an ordered
sequence of all the elements of S, with each element appearing
exactly once.
 For example, if S = {a, b, c}, there are six permutations of S:
abc, acb, bac, bca, cab, cba
 In general, there are n! permutations of a set of n elements.
If the “cipher” line can be any permutation of the 26 alphabetic
characters, then there are 26! or greater than 4 * 1026 possible
keys.

 Such an approach is referred to as a monoalphabetic substitution
cipher, because a single cipher alphabet (mapping from plain alphabet
to cipher alphabet) is used per message.

Playfair Cipher
 The best-known multiple-letter encryption cipher is the Playfair,
which treats digrams(frequency of two-letter combinations) in
the plaintext as single units and translates these units into
ciphertext digrams.
 The Playfair algorithm is based on the use of a 5 * 5 matrix of
letters constructed using a keyword.
Here is an example,

 In this case, the keyword is monarchy.
 The matrix is constructed by filling in the letters of the keyword
(minus duplicates) from left to right and from top to bottom, and
then filling in the remainder of the matrix with the remaining
letters in alphabetic order.
 The letters I and J count as one letter.

 Plaintext is encrypted two letters at a time, according to the
following rules:
1. Repeating plaintext letters that are in the same pair are
separated with a filler letter, such as x, so that balloon would be
treated as ba lx lo on.
2. Two plaintext letters that fall in the same row of the matrix are
each replaced by the letter to the right, with the first element of
the row circularly following the last. For example, ar is encrypted as
RM.
3. Two plaintext letters that fall in the same column are each
replaced by the letter beneath, with the top element of the column
circularly following the last. For example, mu is encrypted as CM.

4. Otherwise, each plaintext letter in a pair is replaced by the
letter that lies in its own row and the column occupied by the
other plaintext letter. Thus, hs becomes BP and ea becomes IM
(or JM, as the encipherer wishes).

Hill Cipher
CONCEPTS FROM LINEAR ALGEBRA
 We define the inverse M-1
of a square matrix M by the
equation M(M-1
) = M-1
M = I, where I is the identity
matrix.
 I is a square matrix that is all zeros except for ones
along the main diagonal from upper left to lower right.
 The inverse of a matrix does not always exist, but when
it does, it satisfies the preceding equation.


 For any square matrix (m * m), the determinant equals the sum
of all the products that can be formed by taking exactly one
element from each row and exactly one element from each
column, with certain of the product terms preceded by a minus
sign.
For a 2 * 2 matrix,
the determinant is k11k22 - k12k21.
 For a 3 * 3 matrix, the value of the determinant is k11k22k33 + k21k32k13
+ k31k12k23 - k31k22k13 - k21k12k33 - k11k32k23.

If a square matrix A has a nonzero determinant, then the inverse
of the matrix is computed as [A-1
]ij = (det A)-1
(-1)i+j
(D ji), where (D ji)
is the subdeterminant formed by deleting the jth row and the ith
column of A, det(A) is the determinant of A, and (det A)-1
is the
multiplicative inverse of (det A) mod 26.

 We can show that 9-1
mod 26 = 3, because 9 * 3 = 27 mod 26 = 1

THE HILL ALGORITHM
This encryption algorithm takes m successive plaintext letters and
substitutes for them m ciphertext letters.
The substitution is determined by m linear equations in which each
character is assigned a numerical value (a = 0, b = 1, …, z = 25).
For m = 3, the system can be described as
c1 = (k11p1 + k21p2 + k31p3) mod 26
c2 = (k12p1 + k22p2 + k32p3) mod 26
c1 = (k13p1 + k22p2 + k33p3) mod 26

 This can be expressed in terms of row vectors and matrices:
Or
C=PK mod 26
where C and P are row vectors of length 3 representing the plaintext
and ciphertext, and K is a 3 * 3 matrix representing the encryption
key.
Operations are performed mod 26.

 For example, consider the plaintext “paymoremoney” and use
the encryption key
The first three letters of the plaintext are represented by the
vector (15 0 24).
Then(15 0 24)K = (303 303 531) mod 26 = (17 17 11) = RRL.
Continuing in this fashion, the ciphertext for the entire plaintext
is RRLMWBKASPDH.

Decryption requires using the inverse of the matrix K.
We can compute det K = 23, and therefore, (det K)-1
mod 26 = 17.
We can then compute the inverse as
This is demonstrated as

 It is easily seen that if the matrix K-1
is applied to the ciphertext, then
the plaintext is recovered.
In general terms, the Hill system can be expressed as
C = E(K, P) = PK mod 26
P = D(K, C) = CK-1
mod 26 = PKK-1
= P

Polyalphabetic Ciphers
 Another way to improve on the simple monoalphabetic
technique is to use different monoalphabetic substitutions as one
proceeds through the plaintext message.
The general name for this approach is polyalphabetic substitution
cipher.
All these techniques have the following features in common:
1. A set of related monoalphabetic substitution rules is used.
2. A key determines which particular rule is chosen for a given
transformation.

VIGENÈRE CIPHER
The best known, and one of the simplest, polyalphabetic ciphers
is the Vigenère cipher.
In this scheme, the set of related monoalphabetic substitution
rules consists of the 26 Caesar ciphers with shifts of 0 through 25.
Each cipher is denoted by a key letter, which is the ciphertext
letter that substitutes for the plaintext letter a.
Thus, a Caesar cipher with a shift of 3 is denoted by the key value
3.

 We can express the Vigenère cipher in the following manner.
Assume a sequence of plaintext letters P = p0, p1, p2, .., pn-1 and a key
consisting of the sequence of letters K = k0, k1, k2,.., km-1, where typically
m < n.
The sequence of ciphertext letters C = C0, C1, C2, .., Cn-1 is calculated as
follows:

Thus, the first letter of the key is added to the first letter of the
plaintext, mod 26, the second letters are added, and so on
through the first m letters of the plaintext.
For the next m letters of the plaintext, the key letters are
repeated.
This process continues until all of the plaintext sequence is
encrypted.
A general equation of the encryption process is
Ci = (pi + ki mod m) mod 26

 A general equation of the decryption process is
pi = (Ci - ki mod m) mod 26
 To encrypt a message, a key is needed that is as long as the
message.
Usually, the key is a repeating keyword.

For example, if the keyword is deceptive, the message “we are
discovered save yourself” is encrypted as

Expressed numerically, we have the following result.

 The strength of this cipher is that there are multiple ciphertext letters
for each plaintext letter, one for each unique letter of the keyword.
Thus, the letter frequency information is obscured.

VERNAM CIPHER
 The ultimate defense against such a cryptanalysis is to choose a
keyword that is as long as the plaintext and has no statistical
relationship to it.
 This system works on binary data (bits) rather than letters.
The system can be expressed succinctly as follows

where
pi = ith binary digit of plaintext
ki = ith binary digit of key
ci = ith binary digit of ciphertext
= exclusive-or (XOR) operation
 the ciphertext is generated by performing the bitwise XOR of
the plaintext and the key.
 Because of the properties of the XOR, decryption simply
involves the same bitwise operation:

ONE-TIME PAD
 One-time pad uses a random key that is as long as the message,
so that the key need not be repeated.
In addition, the key is to be used to encrypt and decrypt a single
message, and then is discarded.
Each new message requires a new key of the same length as the
new message.

 Such a scheme, known as a one-time pad, is unbreakable.
 It produces random output that bears no statistical relationship
to the plaintext.
 Because the ciphertext contains no information whatsoever
about the plaintext, there is simply no way to break the code.
 Suppose that we are using a Vigenère scheme with 27 characters
in which the twenty-seventh character is the space character, but
with a one-time key that is as long as the message.

 Consider the ciphertext
We now show two different decryptions using two different keys:

Suppose that a cryptanalyst had managed to find these two keys.
Two plausible plaintexts are produced.
How is the cryptanalyst to decide which is the correct decryption
(i.e., which is the correct key)?
If the actual key were produced in a truly random fashion, then
the cryptanalyst cannot say that one of these two keys is more
likely than the other.

 Thus, there is no way to decide which key is correct and
therefore which plaintext is correct.
 The security of the one-time pad is entirely due to the
randomness of the key.
 If the stream of characters that constitute the key is truly
random, then the stream of characters that constitute the
ciphertext will be truly random.
 In theory, we need look no further for a cipher.

 The one-time pad offers complete security but, in practice, has
two fundamental difficulties:
1. There is the practical problem of making large quantities of
random keys.
Supplying truly random characters in this volume is a significant
task.
2. Even more daunting is the problem of key distribution and
protection. For every message to be sent, a key of equal length
is needed by both sender and receiver.

TRANSPOSITION TECHNIQUES
 Transposition cipher performs some sort of permutation on the
plaintext letters.
 The simplest such cipher is the rail fence technique, in which the
plaintext is written down as a sequence of diagonals and then
read off as a sequence of rows.
For example, to encipher the message “meet me after the toga
party” with a rail fence of depth 2, we write the following:

 The encrypted message is
 A more complex scheme is to write the message in a rectangle,
row by row, and read the message off, column by column, but
permute the order of the columns.
The order of the columns then becomes the key to the algorithm.

 Thus, in this example, the key is 4312567.
To encrypt, start with the column that is labeled 1, in this case
column 3.
Write down all the letters in that column.
 Proceed to column 4, which is labeled 2, then column 2, then
column 1, then columns 5, 6, and 7.
 A pure transposition cipher is easily recognized, cryptanalysis is
fairly straightforward and involves laying out the ciphertext in a
matrix and playing around with column positions.

 The transposition cipher can be made significantly more secure by
performing more than one stage of transposition.
Thus, if the foregoing message is reencrypted using the same algorithm,

 To visualize the result of this double transposition, designate the
letters in the original plaintext message by the numbers
designating their position.
Thus, with 28 letters in the message, the original sequence of
letters is
 After the first transposition, we have

But after the second transposition, we have
 This is a much less structured permutation and is much more difficult
to cryptanalyze.

TRADITIONAL BLOCK CIPHER STRUCTURE
Stream Ciphers and Block Ciphers
 A stream cipher is one that encrypts a digital data stream one bit
or one byte at a time.
Examples of classical stream ciphers are the autokeyed Vigenère
cipher and the Vernam cipher.
In the ideal case, a one-time pad version of the Vernam cipher
would be used , in which the keystream (ki) is as long as the
plaintext bit stream (pi).

 If the cryptographic keystream is random, then this cipher is
unbreakable by any means other than acquiring the keystream.
However, the keystream must be provided to both users in
advance via some independent and secure channel.
 The bit-stream generator must be implemented as an
algorithmic procedure, so that the cryptographic bit stream can
be produced by both users.
In this approach(figure a), the bit-stream generator is a key-
controlled algorithm and must produce a bit stream that is
cryptographically strong.

 That is, it must be computationally impractical to predict future
portions of the bit stream based on previous portions of the bit
stream.
 The two users need only share the generating key, and each can
produce the keystream.

Figure (a) Stream cipher using algorithmic bit-stream generator

 A block cipher is one in which a block of plaintext is treated as a
whole and used to produce a ciphertext block of equal length.
Typically, a block size of 64 or 128 bits is used.
As with a stream cipher, the two users share a symmetric
encryption key (Figure b).
Using some of the modes of operation, a block cipher can be
used to achieve the same effect as a stream cipher.

Motivation for the Feistel Cipher Structure
 A block cipher operates on a plaintext block of n bits to produce
a ciphertext block of n bits.
 There are 2n possible different plaintext blocks and, for the
encryption to be reversible (i.e., for decryption to be possible),
each must produce a unique ciphertext block.
 Such a transformation is called reversible, or nonsingular.
 The following examples illustrate nonsingular and singular
transformations for n = 2.

 In the latter case, a ciphertext of 01 could have been produced by
one of two plaintext blocks.
 So if we limit ourselves to reversible mappings, the number of
different transformations is 2n
!2

Figure: General n-bit-n-bit Block Substitution (shown with n = 4)

 A 4-bit input produces one of 16 possible input states, which is
mapped by the substitution cipher into a unique one of 16
possible output states, each of which is represented by 4
ciphertext bits.
The encryption and decryption mappings can be defined by a
tabulation.

The Feistel Cipher
 Feistel proposed that we can approximate the ideal block cipher
by utilizing the concept of a product cipher, which is the
execution of two or more simple ciphers in sequence.
The essence of the approach is to develop a block cipher with a
key length of k bits and a block length of n bits, allowing a total of
2k possible transformations, rather than the 2n
! transformations
available with the ideal block cipher.

 Feistel proposed the use of a cipher that alternates substitutions
and permutations:
Substitution: Each plaintext element or group of elements is
uniquely replaced by a corresponding ciphertext element or
group of elements.
Permutation: A sequence of plaintext elements is replaced by a
permutation of that sequence. That is, no elements are added
or deleted or replaced in the sequence, rather the order in
which the elements appear in the sequence is changed.

Feistel Cipher Structure
 The left-hand side of Figure depicts the structure proposed by
Feistel.
 The inputs to the encryption algorithm are a plaintext block of
length 2w bits and a key K.
 The plaintext block is divided into two halves, L0 and R0.
 The two halves of the data pass through n rounds of processing
and then combine to produce the ciphertext block.
 Each round i has as inputs Li-1 and Ri-1 derived from the previous
round, as well as a subkey Ki derived from the overall K.

 In general, the subkeys Ki are different from K and from each
other.
 In figure, 16 rounds are used, although any number of rounds
could be implemented.
 All rounds have the same structure.
 A substitution is performed on the left half of the data.
This is done by applying a round function F to the right half of the
data and then taking the exclusive-OR of the output of that
function and the left half of the data.

 The round function has the same general structure for each
round but is parameterized by the round subkey Ki.
 Another way to express this is to say that F is a function of right-
half block of w bits and a subkey of y bits, which produces an
output value of length w bits: F(REi, Ki+1).
 Following this substitution, a permutation is performed that
consists of the interchange of the two halves of the data.

 The exact realization of a Feistel network depends on the choice
of the following parameters and design features:
Block size: Larger block sizes mean greater security but reduced
encryption/decryption speed for a given algorithm. A block size
of 64 bits has been considered a reasonable
Key size: Larger key size means greater security but may
decrease encryption/ decryption speed. Key sizes of 128 bits
has become a common size.
Number of rounds: The essence of the Feistel cipher is that a
single round offers inadequate security but that multiple rounds
offer increasing security. A typical size is 16 rounds.

Number of rounds: The essence of the Feistel cipher is that a
single round offers inadequate security but that multiple rounds
offer increasing security. A typical size is 16 rounds.
Subkey generation algorithm: Greater complexity in this
algorithm should lead to greater difficulty of cryptanalysis.
Round function F: Again, greater complexity generally means
greater resistance to cryptanalysis.

Feistel Decryption Algorithm
 The process of decryption with a Feistel cipher is essentially the same
as the encryption process.
 Use the ciphertext as input to the algorithm, but use the subkeys Ki in
reverse order.
 That is, use Kn in the first round, Kn-1 in the second round, and so on,
until K1 is used in the last round.

The Data Encryption Standard
 For the Data Encryption Algorithm (DEA), data are encrypted in
64-bit blocks using a 56-bit key.
The algorithm transforms 64-bit input in a series of steps into a
64-bit output.
 The same steps, with the same key, are used to reverse the
encryption.

DES Encryption
 There are two inputs to the encryption function: the plaintext to
be encrypted and the key.
 In this case, the plaintext must be 64 bits in length and the key is
56 bits in length.
 The processing of the plaintext proceeds in three phases.
 First, the 64-bit plaintext passes through an initial permutation
(IP) that rearranges the bits to produce the permuted input.
This is followed by a phase consisting of sixteen rounds of the
same function, which involves both permutation and substitution
functions.

 The output of the last (sixteenth) round consists of 64 bits that
are a function of the input plaintext and the key.
 The left and right halves of the output are swapped to produce
the preoutput.
 Finally, the preoutput is passed through a permutation [IP -1
] that
is the inverse of the initial permutation function, to produce the
64-bit ciphertext.
 The right-hand portion of Figure 3.5 shows the way in which the
56-bit key is used.

Initially, the key is passed through a permutation function.
 Then, for each of the sixteen rounds, a subkey (Ki) is produced by
the combination of a left circular shift and a permutation.
 The permutation function is the same for each round, but a
different subkey is produced because of the repeated shifts of the
key bits.

DES Decryption
 Decryption uses the same algorithm as encryption, except that
the application of the subkeys is reversed.
Additionally, the initial and final permutations are reversed.

The Avalanche Effect
 A desirable property of any encryption algorithm is that a small
change in either the plaintext or the key should produce a
significant change in the ciphertext.
 In particular, a change in one bit of the plaintext or one bit of the
key should produce a change in many bits of the ciphertext.
 This is referred to as the avalanche effect.
 If the change were small, this might provide a way to reduce the
size of the plaintext or key space to be searched.

THE STRENGTH OF DES
The Use of 56-Bit Keys
 With a key length of 56 bits, there are 256 possible keys, which is
approximately 7.2 * 1016 keys.
Thus, on the face of it, a brute-force attack appears impractical.
Assuming that, on average, half the key space has to be searched,
a single machine performing one DES encryption per microsecond
would take more than a thousand years to break the cipher.
 Key sizes of 128 bits or greater are effectively unbreakable using
simply a bruteforce approach.

The Nature of the DES Algorithm
 Another concern is the possibility that cryptanalysis is possible
by exploiting the characteristics of the DES algorithm.
The focus of concern has been on the eight substitution tables, or
S-boxes, that are used in each iteration.
 Because the design criteria for these boxes, and indeed for the
entire algorithm, were not made public, there is a suspicion that
the boxes were constructed in such a way that cryptanalysis is
possible for an opponent who knows the weaknesses in the S-
boxes.

Timing Attacks
 A timing attack is one in which information about the key or the
plaintext is obtained by observing how long it takes a given
implementation to perform decryptions on various ciphertexts.
 A timing attack exploits the fact that an encryption or decryption
algorithm often takes slightly different amounts of time on
different inputs.
This is a long way from knowing the actual key, but it is an
intriguing first step.

BLOCK CIPHER DESIGN PRINCIPLES
Number of Rounds
 The greater the number of rounds, the more difficult it is to
perform cryptanalysis, even for a relatively weak F.
 In general, the criterion should be that the number of rounds is
chosen so that known cryptanalytic efforts require greater effort
than a simple brute-force key search attack.
 This criterion was certainly used in the design of DES.

Design of Function F
 The heart of a Feistel block cipher is the function F, which
provides the element of confusion in a Feistel cipher.
 Thus, it must be difficult to “unscramble” the substitution
performed by F.
 One criterion is that F be nonlinear
 Other criteria is algorithm to have good avalanche properties
this means that a change in one bit of the input should produce a
change in many bits of the output.

 A more stringent version of this is the strict avalanche criterion
(SAC), which states that any output bit j of an S-box should
change with probability 1/2 when any single input bit i is inverted
for all i, j.
 Another criterion proposed is the bit independence criterion
(BIC), which states that output bits j and k should change
independently when any single input bit i is inverted for all i, j,
and k.

MODULE1_CLASSICALENCRYPTIONTECHNIQUES.pptx

More Related Content

Similar to MODULE1_CLASSICALENCRYPTIONTECHNIQUES.pptx

More from Shivakumar M

Recently uploaded

MODULE1_CLASSICALENCRYPTIONTECHNIQUES.pptx