KEMBAR78
[RFC] Somewhat BC breaking: make checkpoint_wrapper default to NO_REENTRANT by rohan-varma · Pull Request #108435 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@rohan-varma
Copy link
Contributor

@rohan-varma rohan-varma commented Sep 1, 2023

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

We should use no_reentrant. There are a lot of users of this API, but
it is in a prototype state so should be fine to change.

Differential Revision: D48898148

…NTRANT

We should use no_reentrant. There are a lot of users of this API, but
it is in a prototype state so should be fine to change.

Differential Revision: [D48898148](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D48898148/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 1, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/108435

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Merge Blocking SEVs

There is 1 active merge blocking SEVs. Please view them below:

If you must merge, use @pytorchbot merge -f.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 81a493e with merge base a20fac8 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

rohan-varma added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2023
…NTRANT

We should use no_reentrant. There are a lot of users of this API, but
it is in a prototype state so should be fine to change.

Differential Revision: [D48898148](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D48898148/)

ghstack-source-id: 199491501
Pull Request resolved: #108435
…t to NO_REENTRANT"

We should use no_reentrant. There are a lot of users of this API, but
it is in a prototype state so should be fine to change.

Differential Revision: [D48898148](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D48898148/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
…t to NO_REENTRANT"

We should use no_reentrant. There are a lot of users of this API, but
it is in a prototype state so should be fine to change.

Differential Revision: [D48898148](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D48898148/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
rohan-varma added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2023
…NTRANT

Pull Request resolved: #108435

We should use no_reentrant. There are a lot of users of this API, but
it is in a prototype state so should be fine to change.
ghstack-source-id: 199693434
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D48898148](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D48898148/)
@rohan-varma
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -f "CI done, bottom diff is flaky"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@carmocca
Copy link
Contributor

carmocca commented Sep 5, 2023

Is this going to be included in 2.1?

@rohan-varma
Copy link
Contributor Author

@carmocca I believe branch cut was Fri so it did not make it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants