-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.7k
[PT2E Quantization] Fix RecursionError when prepare_pt2e graph with concat of the same node #129567
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PT2E Quantization] Fix RecursionError when prepare_pt2e graph with concat of the same node #129567
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/129567
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 20 New Failures, 24 Cancelled JobsAs of commit 5a856ce with merge base 9ca749d ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
CANCELLED JOBS - The following jobs were cancelled. Please retry:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
0c7b4a1 to
b45e5d3
Compare
|
Hi @jerryzh168, I need your help and review on this PR. Thank you. |
|
Hi @jerryzh168, Would you be able to review this PR when you have a chance? Thank you! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry just saw this, thanks for fixing this @siahuat0727 , can you add a test in https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/test/quantization/pt2e/test_xnnpack_quantizer.py
|
@jerryzh168 Sure |
b45e5d3 to
3c3231e
Compare
|
@jerryzh168 Done. Could you help to review the test? Thanks! |
|
Hi @jerryzh168, I noticed that the checks have been triggered and have successfully passed. Would appreciate your review and any further actions that may be needed. Thanks! |
|
@jerryzh168 Hi, looking forward to your help |
|
Hi @jerryzh168, would you mind merging this? It seems that I am not authorized. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry for the delay, I haven't been looking at mentions in my notifications, thanks for the fix!
|
@pytorchbot merge |
|
Pull workflow has not been scheduled for the PR yet. It could be because author doesn't have permissions to run those or skip-checks keywords were added to PR/commits, aborting merge. Please get/give approval for the workflows and/or remove skip ci decorators before next merge attempt. If you think this is a mistake, please contact PyTorch Dev Infra. |
|
@pytorchbot rebase |
|
@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here |
|
Rebase failed due to Command Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/11473256650 |
|
@siahuat0727 could you manually rebase the PR to the latest main? |
9f5bcc5 to
f86ca90
Compare
|
Hi @jerryzh168, I've just rebased the branch onto |
I think just rebase on main would be better |
f86ca90 to
8fbdac1
Compare
|
Hi @jerryzh168, I've rebased the PR on main. |
1 similar comment
|
sorry for the delay, I think we can merge |
|
Hi @jerryzh168, there’s a failing check, but it seems unrelated to this PR. Is there anything I should do to move the merge forward? |
|
can you just run |
Hi @jerryzh168, here is the result |
|
I got some code modified by |
|
Done. @jerryzh168 |
1 similar comment
|
@pytorchbot merge |
|
PR targets viable/strict rather than main, refusing merge request |
|
@siahuat0727 it looks like you have to open a PR against main, not viable/strict |
|
Got it, sorry, I noticed that a section in Contributing.md suggested merging to viable/strict before. I opened a new PR. |
…oncat of the same node (#141651) Fixes #129038 Related PR #129567 Here is the new PR against main, thanks! @jerryzh168 Pull Request resolved: #141651 Approved by: https://github.com/jerryzh168
…oncat of the same node (pytorch#141651) Fixes pytorch#129038 Related PR pytorch#129567 Here is the new PR against main, thanks! @jerryzh168 Pull Request resolved: pytorch#141651 Approved by: https://github.com/jerryzh168
…oncat of the same node (pytorch#141651) Fixes pytorch#129038 Related PR pytorch#129567 Here is the new PR against main, thanks! @jerryzh168 Pull Request resolved: pytorch#141651 Approved by: https://github.com/jerryzh168
Fixes #129038