KEMBAR78
[BE] Improve torch.inference_mode docs and error message by soulitzer · Pull Request #161164 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

[BE] Improve torch.inference_mode docs and error message #161164

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

[BE] Improve torch.inference_mode docs and error message #161164

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@soulitzer
Copy link
Contributor

@soulitzer soulitzer commented Aug 21, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@soulitzer soulitzer requested a review from albanD as a code owner August 21, 2025 14:35
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 21, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/161164

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 4 New Failures, 1 Pending, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit 1e7f890 with merge base d5d14ee (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

soulitzer added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2025
@soulitzer
[BE] Improve torch.inference_mode docs and error message
9d259c5 
ghstack-source-id: eb4bc6f
Pull Request resolved: #161164
@soulitzer soulitzer added the release notes: autograd release notes category label Aug 21, 2025
stas00
stas00 reviewed Aug 21, 2025
View reviewed changes
@soulitzer soulitzer mentioned this pull request Aug 21, 2025
Closed
sfc-gh-sbekman
sfc-gh-sbekman approved these changes Aug 21, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@sfc-gh-sbekman sfc-gh-sbekman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good now, thank you, Jeffrey

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Aug 26, 2025
@soulitzer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -i

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged while ignoring the following 6 checks: Check mergeability of ghstack PR / ghstack-mergeability-check, Check Labels / Check labels, pull / linux-jammy-py3-clang12-mobile-build / build, pull / linux-jammy-py3_9-clang9-xla / test (xla, 1, 1, lf.linux.12xlarge, unstable), pull / linux-jammy-py3.9-clang12 / test (default, 1, 5, lf.linux.4xlarge), pull / linux-jammy-py3.9-gcc11 / test (default, 4, 5, lf.linux.2xlarge)

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

markc-614 pushed a commit to markc-614/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
@soulitzer @markc-614
[BE] Improve torch.inference_mode docs and error message (pytorch#161164
b6a4cb9 
)

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#161164
Approved by: https://github.com/sfc-gh-sbekman, https://github.com/janeyx99
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/soulitzer/376/head branch September 26, 2025 02:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@janeyx99 janeyx99 janeyx99 approved these changes

@albanD albanD Awaiting requested review from albanD

+2 more reviewers

@stas00 stas00 stas00 left review comments

@sfc-gh-sbekman sfc-gh-sbekman sfc-gh-sbekman approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged release notes: autograd release notes category

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@soulitzer @pytorchmergebot @stas00 @janeyx99 @sfc-gh-sbekman