-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.7k
remove UsageError in favor of ValueError #61031
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 8c22506 (more details on the Dr. CI page and at hud.pytorch.org/pr/61031):
🕵️ 1 new failure recognized by patternsThe following CI failures do not appear to be due to upstream breakages:
|
| Job | Step | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Install Visual Studio 2019 toolchain | 🔁 rerun |
Preview docs built from this PR
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).
Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks a lot!
See #58916 (comment). [ghstack-poisoned]
See #58916 (comment). [ghstack-poisoned]
See #58916 (comment). [ghstack-poisoned]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice simplification.
Thanks for helping us review assert_close, @NicolasHug
|
@mruberry has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
See #58916 (comment). Differential Revision: [D29626810](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D29626810) [ghstack-poisoned]
|
@mruberry has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Stack from ghstack:
See #58916 (comment).
Differential Revision: D29626810