KEMBAR78
[ao][docs] Clarify operator support for quantization by raghuramank100 · Pull Request #63270 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@raghuramank100
Copy link
Contributor

@raghuramank100 raghuramank100 commented Aug 14, 2021

Stack from ghstack:

Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: D30658654

Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Aug 14, 2021

🔗 Helpful links

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 0caad43 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
raghuramank100 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2021
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: ae646e8
Pull Request resolved: #63270
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
raghuramank100 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2021
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: 182a903
Pull Request resolved: #63270
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
raghuramank100 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2021
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: 308ebc1
Pull Request resolved: #63270
|nn.Conv1d/2d/3d | Y | N |
+-----------------+-------------------+-------------------+
|nn.LSTM | N | Y |
|nn.GRU | | |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: specify for each line, to stay consistent with L170:L171?

Comment on lines 177 to 178
|nn.GRUCell | | |
|nn.LSTMCell | | |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same

+-----------------+-------------------+-------------------+
|nn.Embedding | Y | N |
+-----------------+-------------------+-------------------+
|nn.MHA |* Supported via | |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: can we spell out the name (not everyone will know what MHA means), and should we consider not saying this is supported yet until there is a clear long term strategy and clear documentation?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, will change that.

Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
raghuramank100 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2021
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: 322a7c1
Pull Request resolved: #63270
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
raghuramank100 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2021
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: 5ad9377
Pull Request resolved: #63270
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
raghuramank100 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2021
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: 4058af5
Pull Request resolved: #63270
@raghuramank100
Copy link
Contributor Author

@raghuramank100 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D30658654](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D30658654)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D30658654](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D30658654)

[ghstack-poisoned]
raghuramank100 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2021
Pull Request resolved: #63270



Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.
ghstack-source-id: 137049017

Differential Revision: [D30658654](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D30658654/)
Summary:
Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D30658654](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D30658654)

[ghstack-poisoned]
raghuramank100 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2021
Pull Request resolved: #63270



Add table to quantization main page showing supported modules
for static and dynamic quantization.
ghstack-source-id: 137087204

Differential Revision: [D30658654](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D30658654/)
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in 347ef69.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/raghuramank100/51/head branch September 4, 2021 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants