KEMBAR78
Teacher Performance Review | PDF | Teachers | Academic Degree
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
95 views11 pages

Teacher Performance Review

This document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) evaluating the performance of teacher Ranie M. Madronero for the period of May 2016 to April 2017. It assesses her performance on four Key Result Areas (KRAs): 1) teaching and learning process; 2) pupil outcomes; 3) community involvement; and 4) professional growth and development. Overall, Ms. Madronero received a final rating of "Very Satisfactory" based on achieving her objectives within the planned timelines and attaining high scores across quality, efficiency, and timeliness indicators.

Uploaded by

jemar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
95 views11 pages

Teacher Performance Review

This document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) evaluating the performance of teacher Ranie M. Madronero for the period of May 2016 to April 2017. It assesses her performance on four Key Result Areas (KRAs): 1) teaching and learning process; 2) pupil outcomes; 3) community involvement; and 4) professional growth and development. Overall, Ms. Madronero received a final rating of "Very Satisfactory" based on achieving her objectives within the planned timelines and attaining high scores across quality, efficiency, and timeliness indicators.

Uploaded by

jemar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Division of South Cotabato
Tboli West District
DATAL DLANAG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Employee: RANIE M. MADRONERO Name of Rater: JOSE P. GALVEZ
Position: TEACHER I Position: ES PRINCIPAL II
Review Period: MAY 2016- APRIL 2017 Date of Review: APRIL 2017
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
PART I. ACCOMPLISHMENT OF KRAs AND OBJECTIVES
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
KRA’S EXPECTED OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE RATING SCORE
OUTPUT PER KRA INDICATORS QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS AVERAGE
(Quality,
Efficiency,
Timeliness)
Please see
attached sheet
KRA 1 KRA 1-30%
TEACHING- Daily Lesson 1.1 Prepared 180 daily lesson June 2016- 10% 3 5 4 4.000 0.400
LEARNING Plan/Log logs and appropriate IM’s for the March 2017
learners in a school year by
PROCESS using CG, TG and LM to serve
as guide in improving the
teaching-learning process.

School June 2016- 4 3 3 3.333 0.333


1.2 Implemented safe and 10%
Form 1, 2 motivating environment for
March 2017
and 4 learners by monitoring and
maintaining 90% attendance rate
of pupils every month.
Learning 1. 3 Facilitated 4 engaging June 2016- 10% 4 4 4 4.000 0.400
Materials/ lessons for learners with the March 2017
Visual Aids/ help of creative visual aids
every quarter to improve the
teaching-learning process.

KRA 2 KRA 2: 25%


PUPILS Compiled 2.1 Administered standardized August 2016, 10% 3 4 4 3.667 0.367
OUTCOMES Test Papers tests set by the Region/ November
Division/ District/School through 2016
summative and periodical test to January
evaluate pupils’ progress from
2017,
June 2016-April 2017.
March 2017

2.2 Participated in co-curricular July, August, 10% 5 5 5 5.000 0.500


Certificate of
activities such as Athletics, October,
Participation,
Nutrition Month Celebration,
Programs and
Math Olympics, Science
Pictorials
Activities, Buwan ng Wika and
GSP/BSP Camporal once a year.

Graduation 2. 3 Conducted pupil’s closing March- April 5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.250


Program exercises and recognition 2017
and program by last week of March.
pictorials
KRA 3 KRA 3: 20%
COMMUNITY Minutes of 3.1 Conducted regular General June 2016 5% 3 3 4 3.333 0.167
INVOVELMEN the assemblies to improve September
T parents’ participation in
Meeting, 2016
Attendance school activities. January
Sheet 2017
March 2017
Letter of 3. 2 Initiated and implemented June 2016- 10% 5 5 5 5.000 0.500
Communica programs, activities and March 2017
tion/Pictorial projects with external funding
s of events/ like outreach program, Feeding,
activities/ SWM, HRPTA Projects,
initiated/ Barangay Activities etc. to
improve community
undertaken
involvement.

Certificate 3.3 Participated in Barangay June 2016 – 5% 5 4 5 4.667 0.233


of and Municipal Activities for March 2017
Appearanc social obligations.
e/Pictorials

KRA 4 KRA 4: 20%


Deped 4.1 Participated/Attended 5 June 2016- 10% 5 5 4 4.667 0.467
PROFESSI Memo, trainings/seminars for March 2017
ONAL Certificate teachers and school heads.
GROWTH of
AND Participatio
DEVELOP n and
MENT authority to
travel

4 5 5 4.667 0.467
Pictorials, 4. 2 Upgrade Educational June 2016- 10%
Enrolment achievement though enrolling in March 2017
Form/Grade Master’s Degree.
s

Plus Factor Pictorials Performed tasks as school 5% 5 4 4 4.333 0.217


Accomplish head, attended
ment seminars/trainings/workshops
Reports for school heads and provided
supervisory and technical
assistance to teachers to help
improve their performance.
FINAL RATING 4.301

ADJECTIVAL RATING Very


Satisfactory

ADJECTIVAL RATING LEGEND


RANGE RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

Ratee: Rater: Approving Authority:

RANIE M. MADRONERO JOSE P. GALVEZ MARIO M. MADRERO, CESE


TEACHER I ES Principal II/Cluster Head ASST. SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
IPCRF ATTACHED SHEET
Name of Employee: RANIE M. MADRONERO Name of Rater: JOSE P. GALVEZ
Position: T-I Position: ES PRINCIPAL II
Review Period: MAY 2016-APRIL 2017 Date of Review: April 2017
Bureau/ Center /Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
KRAs OBJECTIVES PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
1 QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
5- Prepared 180 days lesson 5- 100% of DLL have complete parts 5- 100% of DLL completed and
1.1 Prepared 180 daily plan/DLL updated everyday
lesson logs and appropriate
Teaching- Learning IM’s for the learners in a 4- Prepared 170 to 179 days lesson 4- 95% of DLL have complete parts 4- 95% of DLL completed and
Process school year by using CG, plan/DLL updated everyday
TG and LM to serve as
guide in improving the 3- Prepared 160- 169 days DLL 3- 90% of DLL have complete parts 3- 90% of DLL completed and
teaching-learning process. updated
2- Prepared 150- 159 days DLL 2- 85% of DLL have complete parts 2- 85% of DLL completed and
updated
1- Prepared 149 and below days 1- 80% and below of DLL have 1- 80% of DLL completed and
DLL complete parts updated
5- Prepared 100% school forms and 5- 100% of school of school forms and 5- 100% of school forms and reports
1.2 Implemented safe and reports. reports were prepared correctly were submitted on time
motivating environment for 4- Prepared 95% school forms and 4- 95% of school forms and reports 4- 95% of school forms and reports
learners by monitoring and reports were prepared correctly were submitted on time
maintaining 90% 3- Prepared 90% school forms and 3- 90% of school forms and reports 3- 90% of school forms and reports
attendance rate of pupils reports. were prepared correctly were submitted on time
every month. 2- Prepared 85% school forms and 2- 85% of school forms and reports 2- 85% of school forms and reports
reports were prepared correctly were submitted on time
1- 1- Prepared 80% school forms and 1- 80% and below of school forms and 1- 80% and below of school forms and
reports reports were prepared correctly reports were submitted on time
1.3 Facilitated 4 engaging 5- Utilized 100% of instructional 5- Utilized appropriate, engaging, 5- 100% were utilized within schedule.
lessons for learners with the materials. congruent and updated instructional
help of creative visual aids materials.
every quarter to improve the 4- Utilized 95% of instructional 4- Utilized appropriate, engaging and 4- 95% were utilized within schedule.
teaching-learning process. materials. congruent instructional materials.
3- Utilized 90% of instructional 3- Utilized appropriate and engaging 3- 90% were utilized within schedule.
materials. instructional materials.
2- Utilized 85% of instructional 2- Utilized appropriate instructional 2- 85% were utilized within schedule.
materials. materials.
1- Utilized 80% of instructional 1- No instructional materials facilitated. 1- 80% were utilized within schedule.
materials.

KRA 2
2.1. Administered 5- Evidences showed that the teacher 5-Exam Papers, Activity Sheets, Class 5- Computed 100% of pupils’ grades
Pupils Outcome standardized tests set by the was able to monitor, evaluate and record/E Class Record, Form 137 and on time every grading period
Region/ Division/ maintain 100% pupil’s progress 138 showed pupils progress
District/School through quarterly throughout the school year.
summative and periodical
4- Evidences showed that the teacher 4- Met 4 out of 5 evidences 4- Computed 95% of pupils’ grades on
test to evaluate pupils’
progress from June 2016-
was able to monitor, evaluate and time every grading period
April 2017. maintain 95% pupil’s progress
quarterly
3- Evidences showed that the teacher 3- Met 3 out of 5 evidences 3- Computed 90% of pupils grades on
was able to monitor, evaluate and time every grading period
maintain 90% pupil’s progress
quarterly
2- Evidences showed that the teacher 2- Met 2 out of 5 evidences 2- Computed 85% of pupils grades on
was able to monitor, evaluate and time every grading period
maintain 85% pupil’s progress
quarterly
1- Evidences showed that the teacher 1-No evidence 1- Computed 80% of pupils grades on
was able to monitor, evaluate and time every grading period
maintain 80% pupil’s progress
quarterly
2.2 Participated in co- 5- Participated in 5 or more school 5-Particpated in different activities as
curricular activities such as and district/school and division shown in their Certificate of
Athletics, Nutrition Month activities Participation, Awards, Programs and
Celebration, Math Olympics, Pictorials
Science Activities, Buwan
ng Wika and GSP/BSP
Camporal once a year.
4-Participated in 4 school and district 4- met 4 out of 5 indicators
activities
3- Participated in 3 school and 3- met 3 out of 5 indicators
district activities
2- Participated in 2 school and 2- met 2 out of 5 indicators
district activities
1- Participated in 1 school and 1-met 1 out of 5 indicators
district activity
2.3 Conducted pupil’s 5-Evidences showed that the teacher 5- Conducted recognition program and 5- Conducted the activity on time
closing exercises and was able to conduct 100% of the closing exercises as evident in the
recognition program by last recognition and closing rites. programs, certificates and pictorials.
week of March or first week 4-Evidences showed that the teacher 4-Lacking 1 indicator 4-Conducted the activity 10 minutes
of April. was able to conduct 95% of the late
recognition and closing rites.
3-Evidences showed that the teacher 3- Lacking 2 indicators 3-Conducted the activity 20 minutes
was able to conduct 90% of the late
recognition and closing rites.
2-Evidences showed that the teacher 2-Lacking 3 indicators 2-Conducted the activity 30 minutes
was able to conduct 85% of the late
recognition and closing rites.
1-Evidences showed that the teacher 1-No evidence presented 1-Conducted the activity an hour late
was able to conduct 80% of the
recognition and closing rites.
KRA 3
3.1 Conducted regular 5- Conducted 4 regular meetings with 5- Conducted 4 regular meetings with 5- Conducted the activity on time
Community General PTA meeting per parents to discuss learners progress. parents with the following evidences
Involvement quarter to discuss pupils such as Agenda and Minutes of
learning development. Meeting, Attendance Sheets, List of
HRPTA Officers and Pictorials.
4- Conducted 3 meetings with 4- Met 3 out of 4 evidences 4-Conducted the activity 10 minutes
parents to discuss learners progress, late
3- Conducted 2 meetings with 3- Met 2 out of 4 evidences 3-Conducted the activity 20 minutes
parents to discuss learners progress, late
2- Conducted 1 meeting with 2- Met 1 out of 4 evidences 2-Conducted the activity 30 minutes
parents to discuss learners progress, late
1-No meeting conducted with 1-Did not met any of evidences 1-Conducted the activity an hour late
parents.
3. 3 Initiated and 5-Implemented and initiated 5 or 5-Involvement of stakeholders in 5- Conducted the activity on time
implemented programs, more programs with external funding different school activities with
activities and projects with evidences such as letter of
external funding like communication, attendance, pictorials
outreach program, Feeding, and certificates
SWM, HRPTA Projects, 4-Implemented and initiated 4 4- Met 3 out of 4 evidences 4-Conducted the activity 10 minutes
Barangay Activities etc. to programs with external funding late
improve community 3-Implemented and initiated 3 3- Met 2 out 4 evidences 3-Conducted the activity 20 minutes
involvement. programs with external funding late
2-Implemented and initiated 2 2- Met 1 out of evidences 2-Conducted the activity 30 minutes
programs with external funding late
1-Implemented and initiated 1 1- Did not met any of evidences 1-Conducted the activity an hour late
program with external funding
3.4 Participated in 5 – 100% participation in barangay 5 – Participation in barangay and 5- Attended the activity on time
Barangay and Municipal and municipal fiesta for social municipal fiesta for social obligations
Activities. obligations. with evidences such as program,
declaration , certificate of participation
and pictorials.
4 – 95% participation in barangay 4 – Met 3 out of 4 evidences 4-Attended the activity 10 minutes late
and municipal fiesta for social
obligations.
3 – 90% participation in barangay 3 – Met 2 out of 4 evidences 3-Attended the activity 20 minutes late
and municipal fiesta for social
obligations.
2 – 85% participation in barangay 2 – Met 1 out of 4 evidences 2-Attended the activity 30 minutes late
and municipal fiesta for social
obligations.
1 – 80% participation in barangay 1-No evidence shown 1-Attended the activity an hour late
and municipal fiesta for social
obligations.
KRA 4
Professional 4.1 Participated/Attended 5 5-Participated in 5 or more trainings 5 – Participation in seminars and 5- Attended the seminar/training on
Growth and trainings/seminars for and seminars. trainings with evidences such as time
Development teachers and school heads. program, declaration , certificate of
participation and pictorials.
4- Participated in 4 trainings and 4 – Met 3 out of 4 evidences 4-Attended the seminar/training 10
seminars. minutes late
3-Participated in 3 trainings and 3 – Met 2 out of 4 evidences 3-Attended the seminar/training 20
seminars. minutes late
2-Participated in 2 trainings and 2 – Met 1 out of 4 evidences 2-Attended the seminar/training 30
seminars. minutes late
1-Participated in 1 training and 1-No evidence shown 1-Attended the seminar/training an
seminars. hour late
4.2 Upgrade Educational 5-Evidence showed that the teacher 5 – Evidences shows that the teacher
achievement though finished a master or doctorate enrolled in post0graduate studies and
enrolling in Master’s Degree degree program. is evident through report cards,
pictorials, enrolment form, certificates
4-Incomplte CAR and Thesis 4 – Met 3 out of 4 evidences
3-Acquired at least 36-27 units 3 – Met 2 out of 4 evidences
2-Acquired at least 18-24 units 2 – Met 1 out of 4 evidences
1-Acquired 9-17 units 1-No evidence shown
5.1 Performed tasks as 5 – 90-100% implementation 5 – Performed tasks as school head 5-Passed reports on time
Plus Factor school head and provided with action plan, accomplishment
supervisory and technical reports and pictorials.
assistance to teachers to 4 – 85-89% implementation 4 –Met 3 out of 4 indicator 4 – Passed reports a day late
help improve their
performance
3 – 80-84% implementation 3 – Met 2 out of 4 indicator 3 – Passed reports 2 days late

2 – 75-79% implementation 2 – Met 1 out of 4 indicator 2 – Passed reports 3 days late


1 – 60% and below were 1 – Did not meet any indicator 1 – Passed reports a week late
implemented
PART III. SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

51.667 4.301 VERY SATISFACTORY

Rater-Ratee Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance
rating.

Name of Employee: Name of Superior:


RANIE M. MADRONERO JOSE P. GALVEZ
Signature: Signature:

Date: April 2017 Date: April 2017


PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Strengths Developmental Needs Action Plan Timeline Resources Needed


(Recommended Developmental
Intervention)

Promotes collaboration Needs improvement in Hands-on Training in computer April 2017- May School with ICT
and removes barriers to using computer applications. 2017 Courses
teamwork and goal applications. ICT Seminars
accomplishment across
the organization.

JOSE P. GALVEZ RANIE M. MADRONERO MARIO M. MADRERO, CESE


ES Principal II/Rater TEACHER I/Ratee Asst. Schools Division Superintendent/Approving Authority

You might also like