KEMBAR78
Criteria For Performance | PDF
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views2 pages

Criteria For Performance

Uploaded by

Pia Espanillo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views2 pages

Criteria For Performance

Uploaded by

Pia Espanillo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Student Name: Date: Criteria 12 34 5-6 78 ‘Appearance | Overall appearance is | Appearance Overall neat Overall appearance is, untidy somewhat untidy appearance very neat (** This should relatetothe | Choice in clothing is Choice in clothingis | Choice in clothing is | Choice in clothing is core inappropriate for any job | inappropriate (shirt | acceptable forthe —_| appropriate for any job ‘concentration | interview (torn, unclean, | un-tucked, tee-shirt, | type of interview interview area and may | wrinkled) too much jewelry, ete.) be industry Well groomes (i Very well roomed ‘specific) | Poor grooming Grooming attempt is | shirt tucked in, (hair, make-up, clothes evident iewelry blends with | pressed, etc.) clothing, minimal wrinkles) Overall appearance is businesslike Greeting ‘Unacceptable behavior | Used typical behavior | Acceptable behavior, | Professional behavior and language and language-did | well mannered, and language modify behavior to fit | professionalism (handshake, “hello”,” Unfriendly and not the interview somewhat lacking | thank you “, ete.) courteous ‘Attempts to be Courteous toll Friendly and courteous courteous toall in involved in interview | toall involved in interview setting interview ‘Communication | Speaking is unciear-very | Speakingis unclear— | Speakingis clear with | Speaks clearly and dificult to understand | lapses in sentence | minimal mistakes in| distinctly with no lapse ‘message of what is being | structure and grammar | sentence structure | insentence structure said (i.e, mumbiing) and grammar and grammar usage; ‘Volume is uneven speaks concisely with Volume is inappropriate | (varied) Volume is appropriate | correct pronunciation for interview (ie. spoke ‘co loudly, too softly) Volume conveys business tone Body Language | Fidgeted-(ie..constant | Fidgeted-( Minimal fidgeting | No fidgeting: movement of hands and | movement of hands | (ie., occasionally consistently used feet); none or very poor | and feetfrequentiy); | shifting); average use | physical gestures, facial use of physical gestures, | minimal use of of physical gestures, | expressions and body facial expressions and _| physical gestures, facial expressions and. | movements in @ body movements facial expressions and | body movements ina | manner which detracted from the body movements ina | manner which enhanced the interview interview process ‘manner which enhanced the process enhanced the interview process interview process Postureand Eye | Doesnot lookat persons | Sits up straight; Sits up straight, good | Sits up straight, Contact involved in the interview | average posture; posture; establishes | excellent posture; looks process; keeps head establishes eve contact | eye contact with relaxed and confident; down; minimal eye “with interviewers Interviewers during | establishes eye contact, ‘contact; does not have | during the interview | the interview 80-90% | with interviewers good posture; souching | 70-80% of thetime | of the time during the interview 90-100% of the time ‘Several times, the student | Student interrupted or | Studentinterrupted — | Student never interrupted or hurried the | hurried the ‘or hurried the interrupted or hurried person doing the interviewer 35 times | interviewer 1-2 times | the interviewer and interviewing; forgotto | during the course of | during the course of | thanked them after the thank persons) the interview, thanked | the interview, interview the person afterthe | thanked the person interview after the interview General lack f interest and Somewhat interested | Shows basic interest | Appropriately Attitude enthusiasm about the | in the interview; shows | inthe interview; interested and interview;passive and | littleenthusiasm shows some enthusiastic about the indifferent enthusiasm interview process Responsesto | Answers with “yes’or | Giveswelt-constructed | Gives well- ‘Gives well-constructed, Questions “no” and fas to elaborate | responses, butsounds | constructed confident responses or explain; talks negatively | rehearsed or unsure | responses, does not | that are genuine about past employers sound rehearsed, student somewhat hesitant or unsure Candidate Responses are Responses are Responses are Responses are all Integrity, inconsistent or somewhat inconsistent | generally consistent | consistent or contradictory ‘concrete or specific Concrete and specific | Concrete and specific examples used Concrete and specific | examples often used | examples are used examples occasionally Candidate providedno | used Candidate provides | Candidate provides verifiable information for verifiable information | verifiable information claims, and/or claims may | Candidate provides | for most claims for all daims be exaggerated or even | some verifiable appear manufactured information for claims. ‘Overall Demonstration of poor | Demonstratedlimited | Demonstrated Highly proficient; Demonstration | interview skilswithlittle | proficiency; limited | average proficiency; | appropriately utilzed oflinterview | confidence displayed demonstration of | average. interview ski in an sills competent interview | demonstration of | enthusiastic, motivating Skillsin a generally | competent interview | and engaging manner confident manner skills in a generally confident manner

You might also like