KEMBAR78
ChangeOver Methods | PDF | Information Technology | Systems Engineering
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views7 pages

ChangeOver Methods

Uploaded by

harkhurshudyan13
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views7 pages

ChangeOver Methods

Uploaded by

harkhurshudyan13
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Changeover

Methods
Direct Changeover

Pilot Running

Parallel Running

Phased Conversation
Direct Changeover
Overview:
Also known as the "big bang" approach.
The old system is immediately replaced by the new system.
The changeover happens on a specified date, and the old system is
completely shut down.
Advantages:
Quick implementation with minimal transition time.
No need to maintain two systems simultaneously, reducing
operational costs.
Disadvantages:
High risk due to no fallback if the new system fails.
Can disrupt operations if issues are encountered after the
switch.
Best Used When:
The new system is fully tested, and the organization can
handle potential downtime.
Parallel Running Changeover Method
Overview:
Old and new systems run together for a period. Reduced Risk
Data is processed in both systems to ensure accuracy.
Advantages:
Lower risk with the old system as a backup.
Real-Time Comparison
Allows time to fix issues in the new system.
Disadvantages: Gradual Transition
Higher costs and resource demands to run two
systems.
Increased workload for staff managing both systems. Immediate Fallback
Best Used When:
Minimizing risk is a priority, and the organization Thorough Testing
can handle the extra costs.
Pilot Running
Overview:
The new system is introduced in one department or branch.
Allows real-world testing with a smaller group before full rollout.
Advantages:
Low risk, affecting only a small part of the business initially.
Issues are identified and resolved before full implementation.
Provides valuable user feedback from live operations.
Disadvantages:
Slower implementation, progressing one group at a time.
Can cause temporary inconsistencies across the organization.
Best Used When:
The organization wants to cautiously test the new system.
Ideal for addressing issues before full deployment.
Phased Conversion
Overview:
The new system is implemented in stages or modules over time.
Each part of the organization or system is transitioned one at a time.
Advantages:
Gradual implementation reduces risk, allowing for smoother
transitions.
Issues can be addressed in smaller phases, reducing the chance of
major disruptions.

Disadvantages:
Extended changeover period can cause inconsistency in operations.
Requires careful planning and coordination to ensure seamless
integration.
Best Used When:
The system is complex, and a gradual approach allows for thorough
testing and adjustments at each stage.
Thanks for your attention!

You might also like