Database Performance Monitoring and Analysis Tools
Database Performance Monitoring and Analysis Tools
Received Date: June 24, 2025 Accepted Date: July 26, 2025 Published Date: August 06, 2025
2. CLASSIFICATION OF DATABASE
ABSTRACT PERFORMANCE MONITORING TOOLS
This article examines database performance monitoring and Specialized tools are utilized to perform effective database
analysis tools, including their classification, data collection performance monitoring. These tools can be divided into
methods, and analysis techniques. It analyzes built-in solutions groups according to origin, functionality, methods of data
provided by DBMS developers as well as third-party collection, and scope of application [1].
platforms that offer greater versatility and advanced Built-in monitoring tools are developed by DBMS providers
functionalities. The importance of such tools is emphasized in and are designed to work exclusively within a specific
the context of system stability, efficiency of resources, and platform. These solutions are deeply integrated with the
overall performance. The future technology trends of AI DBMS core, providing access to internal metrics and database
integration, automation, and multi-cloud support are also processes. They have the advantage of being native: they are
addressed in the paper. Special attention is given to the more tightly coupled with the DBMS, data granularity is fine,
integration monitoring of other IT systems and process and there is no need for extra setup. These tools can be
automation so that the requirements of modern business somewhat limiting when it comes to functionality and
scenarios could be met. scalability, especially in multi-platform setups.
Third-party monitoring tools are developed independently and
Key words : monitoring, performance analysis, databases,
include universal solutions applicable to different DBMS
monitoring tools, automation, optimization.
platforms. They are designed around maximum functionality:
data visualization, trend analysis, and integration with DevOps
1. INTRODUCTION
systems. Third-party solutions, as a general rule, are flexible
In the context of the rapid growth of data volumes and and can operate on different platforms, what is particularly
increasing application complexity, the need for reliable tools relevant in the case of heterogeneous IT infrastructures. These
to assess database performance is becoming increasingly tools may take considerable time for deployment and
significant. The quality of such monitoring directly touches configuration.
not only stability but also possible problems that may manifest Monitoring tools can differ in their data collection approaches:
as performance degradation and can lead to failure. Databases the choice of a specific method depends on the monitoring
today, whether on-premise or cloud, need some modern and objectives, available resources, and required data granularity
innovative methods with specialized toolkits that promise very (table 1).
high performance while reducing their time to market or
recovery in the event of an outage. Table 1: Data collection approaches in database monitoring tools
[2, 3]
This paper aims to perform an analysis of the performance
Data Description Examples and
monitoring tools and methods of analysis that exist for
collection details
databases, classify them, and point out the advantages and
approach
limitations of these. The investigation covered the built-in
Agent-based Uses software agents New Relic,
tools of database management system (DBMS) and third-party
collection installed on the DataDog –
products, their function of detection and solution of
database server to provide
performance issues, and their ability for integration into other
collect performance high-level detail
systems.
metrics. but increase
server load.
Agentless Data is collected via Built-in API
collection built-in APIs or system solutions,
logs. This approach PostgreSQL logs
185
Anatolii Bobunov, International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 14(4), July – August 2025, 185 - 189
reduces server load but – reduce server expand their infrastructure in advance to cater to the rising
may be less detailed. load but provide demands. With databases continuing to handle volumes of
less detail. data in increasing order of magnitude, leveraging these metrics
Real-time Continuous Datadog, in concert with automated monitoring and artificial
monitoring observation of Prometheus – intelligence (AI) driven analytics will hold the key to optimal
database processes, provide real-time performance and reliability.
allowing immediate metrics, useful It should also be noted that database performance monitoring
issue detection and for high-load and analysis tools are widely used in software testing
resolution. systems. processes [4]. They provide both regression and load testing
Historical Stores and processes Datadog, Zabbix along with real-time monitoring of such critical parameters as
data analysis data over a defined – allow trend the response time of queries, CPU and memory usage, and
period for trend analysis, useful open transactions. This allows for instant identification of
analysis and for strategic performance hot spots, slow query profiling, and examination
forecasting. planning. of the impact of changes in data structure or DBMS
parameters on total performance. Therefore, the tools
It provides an excellent classification of the benefits and represent a crucial part of quality assurance (QA) practice and
shortcomings of each approach and helps to choose the best fit DevOps process, ensuring system reliability through all stages
for a particular system or organization. Current trends are in the software life cycle.
toward using hybrid and cloud-based monitoring tools due to
their flexibility and ease in handling distributed 4. APPLICATION OF MONITORING TOOLS IN
infrastructures. DIFFERENT DBMS
186
Anatolii Bobunov, International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 14(4), July – August 2025, 185 - 189
187
Anatolii Bobunov, International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 14(4), July – August 2025, 185 - 189
provides end-to-end full-stack monitoring for databases, the identification of long-term trends, such as increased query
servers, and networks through centralized dashboards for response times or a growing number of connections. Based on
real-time system health monitoring. Prometheus provides this data, database optimization can be done, including
optimized time-series data gathering and, along with Grafana, indexing slow queries, reallocation of resources, or
provides decent database performance visualization. Datadog modification of configuration settings.
and New Relic utilize AI and machine learning in order to Thus, the successful implementation of database monitoring
identify anomalies, foresee issues, and root out performance systems involves an overall approach: tool selection, proper
bottlenecks. All of these tools are particularly handy in hybrid configuration, integration with IT systems, and automation.
and multi-cloud environments, with the promise of providing This would lead to a definite improvement in performance and
seamless database performance. They are adaptable, reliability, less downtime, and lower administration costs for
automated, and built into DevOps, making them vital for the databases.
active monitoring, rapid problem discovery, and continuous
optimization. 6. PROSPECTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
MONITORING TOOLS
5. PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF IMPLEMENTING
MONITORING SYSTEMS Database monitoring systems continue to evolve, adapting to
growing data volumes, advancements in cloud technologies,
Implementation of database monitoring systems is complex and increasing demand for automation [9]. The key directions
and complicating work that ensures stability, performance, and in their evolution include the integration of AI, process
predictability of information systems. Effective deployment automation, and multi-cloud environment support.
necessitates attention to several crucial factors, beginning with Moving down, machine learning for predictive analytics,
the choice and setup of a tool to its incorporation with the further down the line, will allow us to see overloads and
current infrastructure and automation. failures far in advance and provide an automatic solution.
One of the first actions is selecting the suitable monitoring Systems like Datadog, AWS CloudWatch, and New Relic
tool, dependent on system needs, the type of DBMS being apply AI algorithms today to detect anomalies and predict
utilized, and available resources. After selection, it has to be problems. In years to come, databases will self-optimize
installed and configured; installation will differ based on the queries, workloads dynamically redistribute their workloads,
environment it will be deployed in. In case of on-premises and bottlenecks get avoided with minimal administrator's
DBMS, it will be about performance parameters tuning, intervention.
enabling the necessary modules, and integrating with Another is observability, which is a growing demand and
visualization tools. For instance, MySQL Performance involves monitoring, query tracing, and logging with real-time
Schema requires enabling metric collection, while in SQL analytics and stream processing technologies like Apache
Server Extended Events, special sessions need to be created Kafka and Spark Streaming. All these will help to analyze
that will monitor the activity. Monitoring set up in cloud workload fluctuations and transaction delays instantly,
environments involves connecting to cloud services, creating keeping the system stable. Therefore, database monitoring of
dashboards, and setting up automated alerts. As an example, the future would be about automation, cloud integration, and
AWS CloudWatch provides a possibility to configure metrics AI-driven solutions for the creation of more autonomous and
and set up notification triggers for critical thresholds. intelligent systems.
To improve monitoring effectiveness, it ought to be connected
with logging systems and DevOps platforms for cohesive data 7. CONCLUSION
gathering, thereby facilitating automated problem Database performance monitoring and analysis tools are an
identification. Instruments such as Grafana facilitate the essential attribute of contemporary IT infrastructure, which
development of real-time dashboards, whereas Zabbix and ensures stability, efficiency, and predictability of a system.
Datadog enable automated alerts to be generated when a From the built-in tool to the third-party platform, it can be
decline in performance is identified. adapted for a wide range of solutions for different tasks and
Another important feature is monitoring automation, which environments, whether for on-premises or cloud
enables prompt reaction in case of a potential failure and infrastructures.
reduces human involvement. This involves setting threshold Modern monitoring technologies keep on developing, offering
values for critical metrics; for instance, automatic notification increasingly intelligent, automated, and integrated
in case of CPU usage exceeding 80%. In addition, predictive approaches. Successful implementation will also reduce
analytics mechanisms will analyze past trends to predict issues administration costs while contributing to the development of
such as increased execution time of queries or increased load more resilient and flexible information systems that are better
on the system. able to meet the challenges presented by continuous growth in
data volume and more and more complex business processes.
Once monitoring is implemented, continuous analysis and
adaptation are necessary. Regular review of reports allows for
188
Anatolii Bobunov, International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 14(4), July – August 2025, 185 - 189
REFERENCES
1. R. Altaher. Transparency Levels in Distributed
Database Management System DDBMS. 2024.
2. A. Dudak. Virtualization and rendering of large data
lists, Cold Science, no. 9, pp. 17-25, 2024.
3. K. Zekhnini, B. A. Chaouni, A. Cherrafi. A multi-agent
based big data analytics system for viable supplier
selection, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 35,
no. 8, pp. 3753-3773, 2024.
4. A. Bobunov. Approaches to monitoring and logging in
automated testing of financial applications, Sciences of
Europe, no. 142, pp. 62-66, 2024.
5. G. I. Arb. Oracle Database Performance
Improvement: Using Trustworthy Automatic
Database Diagnostic Monitor Technology, Computer
Science, Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 881-892, 2024.
6. T. V. Kumar. A Comparison of SQL and NO-SQL
Database Management Systems for Unstructured
Data. 2024.
7. A. R. Ravshanovich. Database structure: postgresql
database, Psixologiya va sotsiologiya ilmiy jurnali, Vol.
2, no. 7, pp. 50-55, 2024.
8. Y. V. Kumar, A. K. Samayam, N. K. Miryala. MySQL
Enterprise Monitor, Mastering MySQL
Administration: High Availability, Security,
Performance, and Efficiency, Berkeley, CA: Apress, pp.
627-659, 2024.
9. R. Garifullin. Development and implementation of
high-speed frontend architectures for complex
enterprise systems, Cold Science, no. 12, pp. 56-63,
2024.
189