Explain the differences between file systems and

DBMS. What are the key advantages of using

DBMS?
Differences Between File Systems and DBMS
A file system is the operating system software responsible for managing and storing files in a
storage medium, such as a hard drive or SSD. It organizes data in files and folders, but offers
limited functionality for searching, updating, or managing complex relationships between data.
A Database Management System (DBMS) is software that provides a systematic way to create,
retrieve, update, and manage data in databases. It allows for complex querying, data integrity,
and multi-user access, handling large volumes of structured information.

Aspect File System DBMS

Data Management Simple storage; no relationships Structured storage; supports relationships

Data Retrieval Manual, file-by-file; limited search Powerful query languages (e.g., SQL)

Little to none; relies on user Enforced by constraints, transactions,

Data Integrity
discipline rules

Redundancy & Enforced consistency, reduces

High risk; no checks
Consistency redundancy

Robust concurrency control and access

Multi-user Access Difficult, prone to conflicts
rights

Backup & Recovery User-managed, error prone Automated, robust mechanisms

Security Basic (file permissions) Sophisticated user authentication, roles

Key Advantages of Using DBMS

Reduced Data Redundancy: DBMS avoids duplication by organizing data in relational
structures, saving storage and reducing errors.
Improved Data Integrity and Consistency: Rules, constraints, and transactions in DBMS
ensure reliable and accurate data at all times.
Enhanced Security: Fine-grained control over who can access or modify specific pieces of
data.
Data Abstraction and Independence: Applications are isolated from how data is physically
stored or maintained.
 Efficient Data Access: Fast, complex queries can be made using languages like SQL,
enabling efficient retrieval, joins, and analysis.
Concurrent Access and Multi-user Support: Several users can work on the data
simultaneously without conflicts through advanced locking and transaction management.
Backup and Recovery: Automated tools help prevent data loss and restore data after
failures.
Data Relationships: Native support for linking and managing related data (e.g., between
tables).
In summary, while file systems provide basic file storage, DBMS offers structured, secure, and
efficient management of complex, interrelated data, meeting the needs of modern data-driven
applications.

Describe the various levels of data abstraction in a

DBMS with suitable examples.
Levels of Data Abstraction in a DBMS
In a Database Management System (DBMS), data abstraction is the process of hiding the
complex details of how data is stored and maintained, exposing only what is relevant for the
user or application. This is achieved through three main levels of abstraction:

1. Physical (Internal) Level

Description: The lowest level of abstraction. It specifies how the data is physically stored in
the storage medium—such as the data’s location on disks, the data structures used (like
indexes or B+ trees), and the methods used for access (like sequential or random access).
Who uses it?: Database administrators and system programmers.
Example: Storing employee records as binary data blocks in hard disks. The representation
deals with details like block size, byte alignment, and actual memory addresses. End users
and even application developers are unaware of these details [1] [2] [3] .

2. Logical (Conceptual) Level

Description: The middle level of abstraction. It describes what data is stored in the
database, as well as the relationships among those data. This level is abstracted from how
the data is actually stored, instead focusing on logical structures such as tables, fields, and
relationships.
Who uses it?: Database designers and programmers.
Example: An employee table with attributes like EmployeeID, Name, and Department, and
relationships like "an employee works for a department." Here, you define the structure
(table schemas, keys, constraints) without considering how these are implemented
physically [1] [2] [3] .
3. View (External) Level
Description: The highest level of abstraction, concerned with how individual users interact
with the data. Different users, or user programs, may see the database differently
depending on their needs.
Who uses it?: End users and application interfaces.
Example: One user might see only the list of employees and their names and departments,
while a manager might see additional details like salaries. Another application might display
the same data in the form of a report or a dashboard. All of these are different “views”
derived from the same underlying logical structure [1] [2] [3] .
Level What it shows Example

Physical How & where data is stored physically Employee info as binary records on disk

Logical What data is stored & relationships Employee table, attributes, relationships

View How data is presented or queried for users Employee directory (Name, Dept), Pay stub

Summary
Data abstraction in DBMS simplifies user interaction, secures data, and provides flexibility.
By separating levels, DBMS can change internal storage or logical structures without
affecting how users or applications interact with data (data independence) [1] [2] [3] .
⁂

Describe the various levels of data abstraction in a

DBMS with suitable examples.
Certainly! Here is a detailed explanation of the various levels of data abstraction in a Database
Management System (DBMS), along with suitable examples:

Levels of Data Abstraction in a DBMS

Data abstraction in a DBMS is the process of hiding the complex details of data storage and
presenting only the necessary information to users. It helps in simplifying database interaction
by separating how data is stored from how it is viewed.
There are three main levels of data abstraction:

1. Physical (Internal) Level

What it represents:
The lowest level of abstraction, describing how data is actually stored in the storage
medium (disk, SSD, etc.). It deals with details such as data structures (e.g., indexes,
hashing), file storage formats, and access methods (sequential, random).
Users: Database administrators and system designers.
 Example:
Employee records stored as binary files on a disk, involving byte locations and blocks.
Details like how many bytes an employee record takes, how the data is physically placed on
the disk are part of the physical level.
Summary: Focuses on physical storage details.

2. Logical (Conceptual) Level

What it represents:
The middle level, which defines what data is stored and the relationships among the data.
It focuses on logical structures such as tables, fields, keys, and integrity constraints but
hides physical storage details.
Users: Database designers and programmers.
Example:
A table named Employee with fields like EmployeeID, Name, Department, and relationships
such as "Employee works in Department". Logical data models like relational schemas are
defined here.
Summary: Focuses on data organization and relationships without worrying about storage.

3. View (External) Level

What it represents:
The highest level, defining how users interact with the data. Different users or applications
may have different views tailored to their needs.
Users: End-users and application programs.
Example:
A manager's view showing employee names and salaries.
A clerk's view showing only employee names and departments.
A payroll system's view focusing on salary and tax information.
All these different “views” are derived from the same underlying logical structure but
present data differently.
Summary: Focuses on user-specific presentation of data.

Tabular Summary
Level Description Users Example

Employee records as binary data on

Physical How data is physically stored DB Administrators
disk

What data is stored & its DB Designers, Table Employee with EmployeeID,
Logical
structure Programmers Name

How data is presented to Employee list for HR, payroll data for
View End Users, Applications
end-users finance
Why Data Abstraction?
Simplifies interaction: Users can work with data at a level they understand without
worrying about storage.
Data Independence: Changes at one level (e.g., modifying storage structures) do not affect
other levels.
Security & Access Control: Different views restrict what data users can see.
If you want, I can also explain how this abstraction contributes to data independence or efficient
database management!

Explain the concept of data independence. How is

it achieved in a DBMS?
Data Independence in DBMS: Concept and Achievement
What is Data Independence?
Data independence is the capacity of a Database Management System (DBMS) to allow
changes to the database schema at one level of abstraction without requiring changes at higher
levels. In simpler terms, it means you can change how data is stored or structured in the system
without affecting how users or applications access or view that data [4] [5] [6] .
Types of Data Independence
There are two primary types:
1. Physical Data Independence
Definition: The ability to modify the physical/storage schema (such as file organization,
indexes, storage devices) without affecting the logical (conceptual) schema or end-user
applications.
Examples:
Switching to a new storage device (hard disk, SSD, or cloud storage).
Changing the database file organization for performance.
Adding new indexes for faster queries.
Benefit: Database administrators can optimize performance or migrate to new storage
hardware without disrupting how the data is seen or used by programmers and end-
users [5] [6] [7] .
2. Logical Data Independence
Definition: The ability to alter the logical (conceptual) schema—such as modifying
tables, fields, relationships—without affecting the external (user/view) schemas or
application programs.
Examples:
Adding a new column to an existing table.
 Splitting a table into two or merging tables.
Changing relationships between tables.
Benefit: Developers can evolve the data model (such as adding new functionalities or
supporting business changes) without forcing all user applications to change [4] [6] [8] .
How is Data Independence Achieved in DBMS?
Data independence is realized through the layered (three-level) architecture of DBMS:
Physical Level: Manages actual storage details.
Logical (Conceptual) Level: Describes data structure and relationships.
View (External) Level: Defines customized user or application views of the data.
The separation between these layers (and the mappings between them) ensures that changes
in one layer do not ripple up or down to others. This is accomplished by:
Storing metadata (information about the schema and mapping rules) in the DBMS.
Using schema mapping to translate between layers as needed.
Enforcing changes at the appropriate layer so the abstraction for users/applications remains
stable and unaffected [4] [5] [6] .
Summary of Benefits
Reduces maintenance and developer effort.
Enhances flexibility for business changes or scaling.
Supports smooth evolution of the database structure.
Protects application stability during optimizations or upgrades.
In essence, data independence is a foundational quality of modern DBMS systems, empowering
organizations to adapt and grow while minimizing disruption to day-to-day operations and end-
user experience [4] [6] [8] .
⁂

Illustrate the structure of a DBMS. Discuss the role

of transaction management in detail
Structure of a DBMS
A Database Management System (DBMS) is a complex suite of software components designed
to manage, store, retrieve, and manipulate data effectively. Its architecture is modular and can
be conceptually divided into key components, each with a specific role:
1. Query Processor
DML Compiler: Converts high-level queries (like SQL) into low-level instructions
understandable by the DBMS.
DDL Interpreter: Handles Data Definition Language statements and updates the metadata
(data about the data).
Query Optimizer: Analyzes and selects the most efficient way to execute each query.
Query Evaluation Engine: Actually performs the query operations as optimized and
compiled.

2. Storage Manager
Authorization Manager: Controls user privileges and manages security.
Integrity Manager: Enforces data integrity constraints, ensuring data consistency.
Transaction Manager: Oversees all transactions and maintains their ACID properties
(discussed in detail below).
File Manager: Manages the allocation of disk space and data representation on physical
storage.
Buffer Manager: Handles data transfer between main memory and secondary storage for
efficient access.

3. Disk Storage
Data Files: The actual data stored on disks.
Data Dictionary: Contains metadata, such as information on tables, columns, and access
rights.
Indices: Structures that improve the speed of data retrieval.
Statistical Data: Stores performance and operational data used by the optimizer [9] [10] [11]
[12] .

Diagram (Text Representation)

+---------------------+
| Application/Users |
+----------+----------+
|
+---------------------+
| Query Processor |
+---------------------+
|
+---------------------+
| Storage Manager |
+-----+-----+---------+
| |
+-----+ +--------------------------+
 | Disk Storage/Data | Metadata/Indices|
+-------------------+------------------+

Role of Transaction Management

Transaction management is a critical module within the Storage Manager, entrusted with
ensuring that all database operations are processed reliably and securely, even in the face of
errors or concurrent user activity.

What Is a Transaction?
A transaction is a sequence of one or more operations (like SELECT, UPDATE, DELETE) treated
as a single logical unit of work. For example, transferring funds between two bank accounts
involves reading balances, updating both accounts, and writing the new balances. All these
steps must succeed together, or fail together [13] .

ACID Properties
Transaction management revolves around the ACID principles:
1. Atomicity: All operations in a transaction happen completely or not at all. Either the entire
transaction is committed, or if anything fails, all changes are undone (rollback).
2. Consistency: Each transaction brings the database from one valid state to another,
preserving the integrity constraints.
3. Isolation: Transactions are executed as if they are the only transaction in the system;
intermediate steps are not visible to others.
4. Durability: Once a transaction is committed, its changes are permanent, even in the event
of system failures [14] [15] .

Why Is Transaction Management Important?

Data Integrity: Prevents partial updates that could corrupt data (e.g., money is deducted
from one account but not credited to another).
Concurrent Access: Allows multiple users to access and modify data safely and efficiently
without conflicts.
Error Handling and Recovery: In case of errors, failures, or interruptions, transaction
management ensures that the system can return to a consistent state by rolling back
incomplete transactions.
Security: Ensures sensitive operations are completed without interference or partial
completion.
Concurrency Control and Scheduling
Transaction Management includes advanced mechanisms for scheduling transaction execution:
Locking: Prevents multiple transactions from making conflicting changes to the same data
simultaneously.
Schedules: Serial and non-serial scheduling ensures that a set of concurrent transactions
produces the same effect as some serial order, maintaining consistency [14] .
Summary Table: Core Modules and Their Role

Component Role

Query Processor Parses, optimizes, and executes user queries

Storage Manager Handles physical data storage, including security

Transaction Manager Enforces ACID, handles concurrency and recovery

Disk Storage Physically stores data, metadata, and indices

In summary:
The DBMS structure is built around multiple specialized modules. Among them, transaction
management is central to guaranteeing the reliability, consistency, and integrity of database
operations, especially in environments where multiple users or systems need simultaneous,
secure access [9] [10] [12] [14] [13] .
⁂

Explain the components of an Entity-Relationship

(ER) diagram with examples
Components of an Entity-Relationship (ER) Diagram with Examples
An Entity-Relationship (ER) diagram is a key conceptual tool in database design that visually
represents the structure of data and the relationships within a system. Here are the principal
components of an ER diagram, along with examples and typical diagram symbols:

1. Entity
Definition: An entity is a real-world object, person, place, or event about which data can be
stored.
Representation: Rectangle.
Examples:
Student

Course

Employee

Department
2. Attributes
Definition: Properties or characteristics that describe an entity.
Representation: Oval (ellipse) connected to their entity.
Examples:
For Student: StudentID (key attribute), Name, Email, Phone
For Course: CourseCode, Title, Credits

Types of Attributes:
Key Attribute: Uniquely identifies an entity (underlined in diagram).
Example: StudentID
Composite Attribute: Can be subdivided into smaller parts.
Example: Name (First Name, Last Name)
Multivalued Attribute: Can have multiple values for a single entity.
Example: Phone Numbers (a student may have more than one)
Derived Attribute: Can be derived from other attributes.
Example: Age (derived from DOB)
Simple Attribute: Cannot be divided further.
Example: Email

3. Relationships
Definition: Associations among entities.
Representation: Diamond shape connecting the related entities.
Examples:
Enrolls (between Student and Course)
WorksIn (between Employee and Department)
Manages (between Manager and Department)

Relationship Cardinality:
One-to-One: Each instance of Entity A relates to one of Entity B.
One-to-Many: One entity in set A can be associated with many in set B.
Many-to-Many: Many entities in set A can be associated with many in set B.

4. Weak Entity
Definition: An entity that cannot be uniquely identified by its own attributes and relies on
another (strong) entity.
Representation: Double rectangle.
Example: OrderItem in relation to Order (OrderItem exists only in context of an Order).
5. Primary/Key Attribute
Definition: Attribute (or set of attributes) used to uniquely identify an entity instance.
Representation: Underlined in the diagram.
Example: EmployeeID for an Employee entity.

6. Participation & Cardinality Constraints

Total Participation: Every instance of entity participates in the relationship (shown by
double line).
Partial Participation: Some instances may not participate (single line).
Cardinality: Specifies if the relationship is one-to-one, one-to-many, or many-to-many.

Example ER Diagram—University Enrollment

[STUDENT] -------(Enrolls)------- [COURSE]

| |
(StudentID, (CourseID,
Name, Email, Title, Credits)
DOB)

Entities: STUDENT, COURSE

Relationship: Enrolls (a student can enroll in many courses; a course can have many
students)
Attributes: StudentID (key), Name, Email, DOB; CourseID (key), Title, Credits
Cardinality: Many-to-Many
Summary Table

Component Symbol Example

Entity Rectangle Student, Course

Attribute Oval Name, DOB, Credits

Key Attribute Underlined oval StudentID

Composite Attribute Linked ovals Name (First, Last)

Multivalued Attribute Double oval Phone Numbers

Derived Attribute Dotted oval Age (from DOB)

Relationship Diamond Enrolls, WorksIn

Weak Entity Double rectangle OrderItem

References for Further Exploration

E-commerce ERD and other example diagrams: orders, customers, payments, etc. [16]
Detailed attribute and relationship representations [17] [18] [19]
ER diagrams are foundational for structured database design, letting you represent, analyze,
and communicate complex data relationships with clarity.
⁂

Convert a given ER diagram to a relational

schema. Explain the process with an example
Certainly! Converting an Entity-Relationship (ER) diagram to a relational schema is a
fundamental step in database design that maps the conceptual design (ER model) into a logical
model (relational tables) for implementation in a relational DBMS.

Process of Converting an ER Diagram to a Relational Schema

The process involves transforming each ER component into one or more relational tables
(relations), keeping the integrity and semantics of the original model intact.

Step 1: Convert Entities to Tables

Each entity in the ER diagram becomes a relation (table).
The attributes of the entity become the columns of the table.
The primary key (key attribute) of the entity becomes the primary key of the table.

Step 2: Convert Weak Entities to Tables

A weak entity becomes a table.
Include the primary key of the identifying (owner) strong entity as a foreign key in the weak
entity’s table.
The weak entity’s partial key combined with this foreign key forms the primary key.

Step 3: Convert Relationships to Tables or Foreign Keys

For one-to-one (1:1) relationships:
Can be implemented by adding the primary key of one entity as a foreign key in the
other entity’s table, depending on the participation constraints.
For one-to-many (1:N) relationships:
Add the primary key of the “one” side entity as a foreign key in the “many” side entity’s
table.
For many-to-many (M:N) relationships:
Create a new relation (table) to represent the relationship.
Include the primary keys of both participating entities as foreign keys.
The combination of both foreign keys acts as the primary key of this relationship table.
If the relationship has attributes, these become columns in the relationship table.
Step 4: Convert Multivalued Attributes
Multivalued attributes are modeled as a separate table.
This table includes a foreign key referring to the entity and the attribute value.
The combination of the entity key and the multivalued attribute forms the primary key of this
table.

Step 5: Convert Generalization/Specialization (if any)

Depending on the strategy chosen (single table, multiple table, or joined table), entities are
mapped accordingly.
Since your example might not involve inheritance, we can skip details here.

Example: Converting a Simple ER Diagram to a Relational Schema

Given ER Diagram Elements:

Entities:
Student (StudentID [PK], Name, Email)
Course (CourseID [PK], Title, Credits)
Relationship:
Enrolls (Many-to-Many) between Student and Course
Relationship attribute: Grade

Conversion Steps:
1. Entities to Tables
Table Name Columns Primary Key

Student StudentID, Name, Email StudentID

Course CourseID, Title, Credits CourseID

2. Relationship (Many-to-Many) to Table

Create a new table Enrolls to represent the many-to-many relationship.
Include primary keys of both entities as foreign keys.
Include the attribute Grade.
Table Name Columns Primary Key

Enrolls StudentID (FK), CourseID (FK), Grade (StudentID, CourseID) composite key
Complete Relational Schema:
Student(StudentID, Name, Email)
Course(CourseID, Title, Credits)
Enrolls(StudentID, CourseID, Grade)

Explanation:
The Student and Course tables directly represent the entities.
The Enrolls table captures the many-to-many relationship and stores the associated
attribute (Grade).
The composite primary key of Enrolls ensures that each student can enroll in a course only
once.

Summary
ER Component Conversion to Relational Model

Entity Table with attributes as columns

Weak Entity Table with foreign key to owner entity + partial key

1:1 Relationship Foreign key in either related table

1:N Relationship Foreign key in the table on the N-side

M:N Relationship New table with foreign keys of both entities

Multivalued Attribute New table with foreign key to the original entity

Relationship Attributes Columns in relationship table (for M:N) or entity table (for 1:1, 1:N if applicable)

If you want, I can help you convert a specific ER diagram example or a more complex model.
Just share the diagram details!

Write short notes on views in SQL. How are views

created, altered, and destroyed
Short Notes on Views in SQL
A view in SQL is a virtual table composed of the result set of a SQL query. Unlike base tables, a
view does not store data physically; instead, it dynamically generates data when queried,
reflecting any changes made to the underlying tables.

Key Points about Views

Data Abstraction: Views simplify complexity, presenting users with a tailored subset or
combination of data from one or more tables.
Security: Restrict access by only exposing certain columns/rows.
 Reusability: Complex SELECT logic can be encapsulated and reused.

Creating a View
Use the CREATE VIEW statement:

CREATE VIEW view_name AS

SELECT column1, column2, ...
FROM table_name
WHERE condition;

Example:

CREATE VIEW EmployeeNames AS

SELECT EmployeeID, Name FROM Employee;

Altering a View
Use the ALTER VIEW statement to modify an existing view’s definition:

ALTER VIEW view_name AS

SELECT new_column1, new_column2, ...
FROM table_name
WHERE new_condition;

Example:

ALTER VIEW EmployeeNames AS

SELECT EmployeeID, Name, Department FROM Employee;

Alternatively, some databases require using CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW:

CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW view_name AS

SELECT ...;

Dropping (Destroying) a View

Use the DROP VIEW statement:

DROP VIEW view_name;

Example:

DROP VIEW EmployeeNames;

Summary Table
Operation Syntax Example

Create CREATE VIEW v AS SELECT ... FROM ... WHERE ...;

Alter ALTER VIEW v AS SELECT ...; (or CREATE OR REPLACE)

Drop/Destroy DROP VIEW v;

In summary:
Views are powerful tools for abstraction, security, and code reuse in SQL, and can be created,
altered, and destroyed using standard SQL statements.

Define relational algebra. Explain selection,

projection, join, and division operations with
examples.
Relational Algebra: Definition and Operations
Definition:
Relational algebra is a procedural query language used in database theory to model,
manipulate, and retrieve data stored in relational databases. It operates directly on relations
(tables) using a well-defined set of mathematical operations. These fundamental operations act
as the theoretical foundation for SQL and are essential for query optimization and expressive
database querying [20] [21] [22] .

Core Operations in Relational Algebra

1. Selection (σ)
Purpose: Retrieves rows (tuples) from a relation that satisfy a specified condition.
Notation: $ \sigma_{condition}(R) $
Explanation: Yields all tuples from relation R for which the given condition is true; this is also
known as horizontal partitioning.
Example:
Given a Student table:
Roll Name Dept Fees

1 Alice CS 25K

2 Bob EE 30K

Query: All CS students:

$ \sigma_{Dept='CS'}(Student) $
Result:
 Roll Name Dept Fees

1 Alice CS 25K

Key Points: Selection does not change the columns, only filters rows [23] [24] .

2. Projection (π)
Purpose: Selects specific columns (attributes) from a relation, eliminating duplicates.
Notation: $ \pi_{attributes}(R) $
Explanation: Returns a table with only the listed attributes (columns), i.e., vertical
partitioning.
Example:
Given the same Student table:
Roll Name Dept Fees

1 Alice CS 25K

2 Bob EE 30K

Query: List all student names and departments:

$ \pi_{Name,Dept}(Student) $
Result:
Name Dept

Alice CS

Bob EE

Key Points: Duplicate rows are eliminated in the result [25] [26] [27] .

3. Join (⋈)
Purpose: Combines tuples from two relations based on a common attribute or condition.
Types: Theta Join (condition-based), Equi Join (equality-based), Natural Join (automatic
matching on same-named attributes).
Notation: $ R \bowtie_{condition} S $
Explanation: Returns new tuples by combining rows from $ R $ and $ S $ where the join
condition holds.
Example:
Given:
Employee(EmpID, DeptID, Name)

Department(DeptID, DeptName)

Query: Employees and their department names:

$ Employee \bowtie_{Employee.DeptID = Department.DeptID} Department $
 Result:
EmpID DeptID Name DeptName

101 10 Alice Engineering

102 20 Bob Marketing

Key Points: Joins are fundamental for querying across related tables [28] [29] [30] .

4. Division (÷)
Purpose: Answers queries like "find entities related to all items of another set."
Notation: $ A \div B $
Explanation: Given A(X,Y) and B(Y), division returns all X values paired with every Y in B via
A.
Example:
Problem: Find students who have taken all offered courses.
Given:
Enrolled(Student, Course)

Course(Course)

Relational algebra:
$ Enrolled \div Course $
Result: Students who are present with every course in the Enrolled relation.
Another Example:
Find employees who work on all projects:
Let A(Employee, Project) and B(Project), $ A \div B $ yields employees working on
every project [31] [32] .

Summary Table
Operation Symbol/Notation Example Result Description

$ \sigma_{Dept='CS'} All CS students from Student

Selection Rows matching the condition
$ table

Only names and depts from

Projection $ \pi_{Name,Dept} $ Specified columns, unique rows
Student table

Employees with department Combines columns where join

Join $ R \bowtie S $
info condition is true

Values paired with all values in

Division $ A \div B $ Students who took all courses
second relation

In summary:
Relational algebra allows precise querying and data transformation in relational databases using
a small set of intuitive, mathematical operations—selection (filter rows), projection (select
columns), join (combine related rows), and division (find entities related to all items in another
relation) [20] [22] [23] [31] .
⁂

Explain the basic structure of an SQL query. How

are nested queries handled
Basic Structure of an SQL Query
An SQL query is most commonly used to retrieve and manipulate data stored in database tables.
The foundational structure follows a logical pattern using key clauses:

SELECT column1, column2, ...

FROM table_name
WHERE condition
ORDER BY columnN [ASC | DESC];

SELECT: Specifies the columns to retrieve from the table(s).

FROM: Names the table(s) from which to fetch the data.
WHERE (optional): Applies conditions to filter the rows returned.
ORDER BY (optional): Sorts the results by specified columns, ascending or descending.
Other common clauses include GROUP BY (for aggregations), HAVING (for filtering
aggregated data), JOIN (for combining tables), and LIMIT (to restrict result count).
Example:

SELECT name, salary

FROM Employees
WHERE department = 'Sales'
ORDER BY salary DESC;

This retrieves names and salaries of Sales department employees, sorting them from highest to
lowest salary.
How Nested Queries (Subqueries) Are Handled
A nested query, also called a subquery, is a query placed inside another SQL query. The result
of the inner (nested) query feeds into the outer query, allowing for more complex data retrieval.
Placement and Usage:
Subqueries are usually found in the WHERE, HAVING, or FROM clauses but can also occur in
SELECT.
Subqueries can return single values (scalar), single rows, columns, or entire tables.
Syntax Example:
 SELECT name
FROM Employees
WHERE department_id IN (
SELECT id
FROM Departments
WHERE location = 'New York'
);

Here, the inner query (SELECT id FROM Departments ...) returns department IDs in New York. The
outer query finds employee names who work in those departments.
Types of Nested Queries:
Independent (Non-correlated): The inner query executes once, results are reused by the
outer query.
Correlated: The inner query uses references from the outer query and executes repeatedly
for each row processed by the outer query. Example:
SELECT name
FROM Employees e1
WHERE salary > (
SELECT AVG(salary)
FROM Employees e2
WHERE e1.department_id = e2.department_id
);

Key Points on Subqueries:

The inner (nested) query processes first; its results are consumed by the outer query [33] [34]
[35] [36] .

Subqueries help solve complex problems in a manageable way, especially when joins or
multiple-step logic would be less clear.
Multiple levels of nesting are possible, but each must be properly parenthesized and
logically structured.
In summary: The basic SQL query structure is intuitive and modular, using SELECT–FROM–
WHERE at its core, while nesting queries allows for powerful, layered data analysis and filtering
directly within a single query statement [37] [38] [33] [34] [35] [36] .
⁂

Discuss aggregate functions in SQL with

examples. How are null values managed in SQL?
Aggregate Functions in SQL
Aggregate functions in SQL are special operators that perform a calculation on a set of values
and return a single summary result. They are commonly used with the GROUP BY clause and are
essential for statistical, analytical, and reporting tasks.

Common Aggregate Functions

COUNT()
Returns the number of rows that match the query criteria.
Example:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Employees;

This gives the total number of employees.

SUM()
Returns the sum of numeric values in a column.
Example:
SELECT SUM(Salary) FROM Employees WHERE Department = 'Sales';

This gives the total salary expense for the Sales department.
AVG()
Calculates the average (mean) of a numeric column.
Example:
SELECT AVG(Salary) FROM Employees;

This computes the average salary among all employees.

MIN()
Returns the minimum value in a column.
Example:
SELECT MIN(Salary) FROM Employees;

This gives the lowest salary in the Employees table.

MAX()
Returns the maximum value in a column.
Example:
SELECT MAX(Salary) FROM Employees WHERE Department = 'IT';

This provides the highest salary in the IT department.

How Null Values Are Managed in SQL
By default, aggregate functions in SQL ignore null values unless the function is COUNT(*), which
counts every row, regardless of nulls. This means when you use SUM(), AVG(), MIN(), or MAX(), any
rows with NULL in the target column are not included in the calculation.
Examples:
If the Employees table has some salaries as NULL:
SELECT AVG(Salary) FROM Employees; averages only the non-null salaries.
SELECT COUNT(Salary) FROM Employees; counts only rows where the Salary is not null.
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Employees; counts all rows, including those with NULL in the Salary
column.
Summary Table

Function Includes NULLs? Description

COUNT(*) Yes Counts all rows, nulls included

COUNT(col) No Counts only non-null values in the column

SUM(col) No Sums only non-null values in the column

AVG(col) No Averages only non-null values in the column

MIN(col) No Finds the smallest non-null value in the column

MAX(col) No Finds the largest non-null value in the column

In summary:
Aggregate functions help you compute totals, averages, and other statistics over sets of data in
SQL, and they automatically skip over null values (except with COUNT(*)) to ensure accurate
calculation.

What are triggers in SQL? How are they

implemented in active databases?
Triggers in SQL: Definition and Implementation in Active Databases

What Are Triggers in SQL?

A trigger in SQL is a special type of stored procedure that is automatically executed ("fired") by
the database in response to certain predefined events occurring on a particular table or view.
Triggers help automate tasks, enforce data consistency, implement business rules, and maintain
audit logs without explicit requests from applications or users [39] [40] [41] .
Key Characteristics:
Associated with specific tables or views.
Fired before or after specific events (like INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE).
Can be set to fire for each affected row (row-level) or once per statement (statement-level),
depending on the database system [42] [43] [44] .
Contain SQL statements (the "trigger body") that execute when triggered.

Example Syntax (MySQL-style):

CREATE TRIGGER trigger_name

BEFORE|AFTER INSERT|UPDATE|DELETE
ON table_name
FOR EACH ROW
trigger_body;

trigger_name: Name of the trigger.

BEFORE or AFTER: When the trigger fires relative to the event.
INSERT|UPDATE|DELETE: Event that activates the trigger.
trigger_body: SQL code to run [39] [42] [45] .

Types of Triggers
BEFORE triggers – Execute before the actual operation.
AFTER triggers – Execute after the operation.
INSTEAD OF triggers – Substitute the triggering operation (mainly for views).
Row-Level triggers – Fired for each affected row.
Statement-Level triggers – Fired once per SQL statement, regardless of affected rows [44]
[46] .

Example Use Case:

Log every change to employee salaries in an audit table by an AFTER UPDATE trigger that
appends a record when the salary is changed [46] .

Implementation in Active Databases

An active database refers to a database that reacts automatically to events via its set of
associated triggers—making the database "active" rather than "passive." Triggers in such
databases act as rules that the system enforces on its own, independent of applications [43] [47]
[46] [48] .
Structure of a Trigger in Active Databases:
1. Event: The condition or change (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, etc.) that activates the trigger.
2. Condition: An optional test (SQL expression) evaluated when the event occurs. The trigger
fires its action if the condition is true.
3. Action: The SQL statements executed when the condition holds [43] [47] [48] .

Execution Process:
When a triggering event occurs, the DBMS checks if any triggers are associated.
The DBMS evaluates the trigger’s condition.
If the condition is true, it executes the trigger’s action.
Multiple triggers can be activated by a single event, and their actions may activate further
triggers ("cascading" or "recursive" triggers) [48] .

Why Use Triggers in Active Databases?

Enforce complex business rules that constraints alone can't handle.
Maintain audit trails (e.g., logging data changes).
Automate derived or computed values.
Ensure referential/integrity constraints on data modifications.
Synchronize tables or maintain summaries automatically [47] [46] [48] .
In summary: Triggers in SQL are a core mechanism for "active" databases to automate
responses to changes in data, maintain integrity, and implement sophisticated business logic
directly in the DBMS. They are implemented using standard SQL commands for creation, with
features and syntax varying slightly across different database platforms [39] [43] [46] [48] .
⁂

What are functional dependencies? How do they

help in schema refinement
Functional Dependencies: Definition and Role in Schema Refinement

What Are Functional Dependencies?

A functional dependency (FD) is a constraint between two sets of attributes in a relation (table)
within a relational database. It formally expresses a relationship where the value of one attribute
(or a set of attributes) uniquely determines the value of another attribute (or set of attributes).
Notation:
If attribute(s) $ X $ functionally determines attribute(s) $ Y $, we write:
This reads as: "For any two tuples (rows) in a relation, if they have the same value for attributes
$ X $, they must also have the same value for $ Y $."
Example:
Consider a Student table with attributes: StudentID, Name, Department.
StudentID → Name, Department

Given a StudentID, there is only one corresponding Name and Department.

Department → DepartmentHead

Each department has only one department head.

How Do Functional Dependencies Help in Schema Refinement?

Schema refinement (also known as normalization) is the process of organizing the structure of a
relational database to reduce redundancy and improve data integrity. Functional dependencies
are the key theoretical tool for detecting and fixing problems in database schemas.

1. Identifying Redundancy and Anomalies

Functional dependencies reveal if some attributes depend on only part of a primary key
(partial dependency) or on non-key attributes (transitive dependency).
Redundancy leads to update, insertion, and deletion anomalies that make the database
inconsistent or inefficient.

2. Guiding Normalization
Normalization splits large, problematic tables into smaller, well-structured ones using a series of
normal forms (1NF, 2NF, 3NF, BCNF, etc.), each defined based on functional dependency rules:
2NF: Eliminates partial dependencies (where a non-key attribute depends on part of a
composite key).
3NF and BCNF: Eliminate transitive dependencies (non-key attributes depending on non-
key attributes) and ensure each FD conforms to strict key-based dependency rules.
Example of Schema Refinement Using FDs:
Suppose we have a table:

StudentID CourseCode Instructor Dept

1 CS101 Dr. X CS

Let the following FDs exist:

CourseCode → Instructor, Dept

StudentID, CourseCode is the primary key.

This means every course is always taught by one instructor and belongs to one department.
However, storing Instructor and Dept with each student-course pair repeats the information,
leading to redundancy.
Refinement Process:
Step 1: Identify FDs violating normal forms (Instructor and Dept depend only on
CourseCode, not the full key).
Step 2: Decompose the table:
StudentCourse(StudentID, CourseCode)
Course(CourseCode, Instructor, Dept)
Now, instructor and department info is stored only once per course, eliminating redundancy and
anomalies.

In Summary
Functional dependencies specify relationships among attributes, helping to identify
potential design flaws in database schemas.
They are used to guide the decomposition of relations during normalization, leading to
better data integrity, elimination of redundancy, and prevention of anomalies in the
database.

Explain 1NF, 2NF, 3NF, and BCNF with suitable

examples.
Explaining 1NF, 2NF, 3NF, and BCNF with Examples
Normalization is a process in relational database design used to minimize redundancy and avoid
undesirable characteristics like insertion, update, and deletion anomalies. It involves
decomposing tables according to specific rules called normal forms (NF), each based on
functional dependency concepts.

1. First Normal Form (1NF)

Rule:
A relation is in 1NF if every attribute contains only atomic (indivisible) values—no repeating
groups or arrays.
Example of a Non-1NF Table:

StudentID Name Subjects

1 Alice Math, Physics

2 Bob Chemistry

Here, the Subjects field contains multiple values.

Table in 1NF:
 StudentID Name Subject

1 Alice Math

1 Alice Physics

2 Bob Chemistry

Now, each field contains atomic values.

2. Second Normal Form (2NF)

Rule:
A relation is in 2NF if:
It is already in 1NF, and
Every non-prime attribute is fully functionally dependent on the entire primary key (covers
partial dependency issues).
Example (non-2NF):

StudentID CourseCode StudentName Instructor

1 CS101 Alice Dr. Smith

1 CS102 Alice Dr. Lee

2 CS101 Bob Dr. Smith

Assume the primary key is (StudentID, CourseCode).

StudentName depends only on StudentID (partial dependency).
Instructor depends only on CourseCode (partial dependency).
Convert to 2NF:
Student (StudentID, StudentName)
Course (CourseCode, Instructor)
Enrollment (StudentID, CourseCode)

3. Third Normal Form (3NF)

Rule:
A relation is in 3NF if:
It is in 2NF, and
All non-prime attributes are non-transitively dependent on every key (i.e., they depend
directly and only on the primary key, not via another non-key attribute).
Example (non-3NF):
 EmployeeID Name DeptID DeptName

1 Alice 10 HR

2 Bob 20 IT

Here:
DeptName is transitively
dependent on EmployeeID through DeptID (FDs: EmployeeID →
DeptID, DeptID → DeptName).
Convert to 3NF:
Employee (EmployeeID, Name, DeptID)
Department (DeptID, DeptName)

4. Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF)

Rule:
A relation is in BCNF if:
For every non-trivial functional dependency $ X \rightarrow Y $, $ X $ is a super key.
BCNF is a stricter version of 3NF and fixes certain edge cases not covered by 3NF.
Example (3NF but not BCNF):

StudentID Course Instructor

1 CS101 Dr. Lee

2 CS101 Dr. Lee

3 MA201 Dr. Green

Suppose the rule is: "Each course is taught by only one instructor, but an instructor can teach
multiple courses."
Functional dependencies:
(StudentID, Course) → Instructor (composite key)
Course → Instructor (but Course is not a super key)
This table is in 3NF but not BCNF, since Course is not a super key.
Convert to BCNF:
Courses (Course, Instructor)
Enrollment (StudentID, Course)
Summary Table
Normal
Main Rule Problem Eliminated Example Fix
Form

Atomic values (no repeating

1NF Non-atomic values Split multivalued columns
groups)

No partial dependency on Move attributes into separate

2NF Partial dependency
primary key tables

Separate tables for transitively

3NF No transitive dependency Transitive dependency
dependent

Every determinant is a super Anomalies due to FDs on Further decompose to remove

BCNF
key non-keys all violations

In summary:
1NF addresses atomic values, 2NF removes partial dependencies, 3NF eliminates transitive
dependencies, and BCNF enforces strict super key dependence for all functional dependencies
—each step promoting greater data integrity and reducing redundancy in databases.

What are the properties of decomposition in

database design? Explain with examples.
Properties of Decomposition in Database Design
Decomposition is the process of breaking a relation (table) into two or more smaller relations to
improve database design, eliminate redundancy, and avoid anomalies. For decomposition to be
effective and correct, it must satisfy certain key properties:

1. Lossless Join (Non-Additive Join) Property

Definition: A decomposition is lossless if, when we join (typically with a natural join) the
decomposed tables, we get back exactly the original relation—no data is lost or spurious
rows introduced.
Importance: Ensures that information is never lost during decomposition; the original data
can always be reconstructed from the resulting tables.
Example:
Suppose the original relation $ R(A, B, C) $:
A B C

1 X P

1 Y P

2 Z Q

Decompose R into:
$ R_1(A, B) $
 A B

1 X

1 Y

2 Z

$ R_2(A, C) $
A C

1 P

2 Q

If we perform a natural join on $ R_1 $ and $ R_2 $ on attribute A, we can reconstruct the
original table—thus, this decomposition is lossless [49] [50] [51] [52] .

2. Dependency Preservation
Definition: All functional dependencies from the original relation should be preserved in the
decomposed relations—either explicitly or so they can be enforced without the need to join
tables.
Importance: Simplifies checking and enforcing data constraints. If not preserved, enforcing
some constraints may require expensive joins, leading to potential integrity issues.
Example:
For the relation $ R(A, B, C) $ with functional dependencies $ A \rightarrow B $, $ B
\rightarrow C $:
Decomposing into:
$ R_1(A, B) $ (preserves $ A \rightarrow B $)
$ R_2(B, C) $ (preserves $ B \rightarrow C $)
All FDs of the original relation are preserved within the new smaller relations, so this property
is met [49] [50] [53] [51] [52] .

3. Attribute Preservation
Definition: All attributes from the original relation must appear in at least one of the
decomposed relations. No attribute should be lost in the process.
Importance: Ensures that the full information content of the original relation, in terms of
columns, is maintained [53] [52] [54] .
Example:
If $ R(A, B, C, D) $ is decomposed into $ R_1(A, B) $ and $ R_2(C, D) $, neither relation
contains all original attributes (and without a shared attribute for joining, information may be
lost). Good decomposition maintains all original attributes in the resulting set [53] [52] [54] .
4. Lack of Data Redundancy
Definition: Decomposition should minimize or eliminate duplicated data across tables.
Importance: Reduces storage costs, avoids update anomalies, and simplifies maintenance.
Example:
Suppose Instructor and Dept were stored with every student who took a course. If we
decompose this into separate Course and Enrollment tables, instructor and department info
is stored only once per course, not repeatedly with every student enrollment [49] [50] [51] .

Summary Table of Properties

Property Description Example Purpose

Joining decomposed tables reproduces the

Lossless Join Prevents information loss
original relation

Dependency Ensures integrity constraints remain

All FDs are preserved in decomposed tables
Preservation checkable

Attribute All original attributes appear in at least one

No loss of columns/information
Preservation decomposed table

Lack of Data Prevents anomalies and reduces

Duplicate data is minimized/eliminated
Redundancy storage

Key Takeaways
Lossless join is essential—otherwise, information can be lost or corrupted.
Dependency preservation ensures data integrity and efficient constraint enforcement.
Attribute preservation and elimination of redundancy further enhance the quality of the
schema and maintainability.
In practice, decompositions are designed carefully to uphold these properties to ensure the
resulting database is robust, efficient, and free from update, deletion, and insertion
anomalies [49] [50] [53] [51] [52] [55] .
⁂

Explain the process of normalization and discuss

its advantages and disadvantages.
Normalization: Process, Advantages, and Disadvantages

Process of Normalization
Normalization is a systematic process in database design used to organize data to minimize
redundancy and prevent undesirable anomalies (update, insertion, deletion). The process breaks
larger, poorly organized tables into smaller, well-structured tables, based on rules called normal
forms (NFs). Each higher normal form addresses specific types of redundancy and dependency
issues:

Steps in the Normalization Process:

1. Unnormalized Form (UNF):
Raw data may have repeating groups or multi-valued attributes.
2. First Normal Form (1NF):
Ensure each attribute contains only atomic (indivisible) values.
Remove repeating groups.
3. Second Normal Form (2NF):
Ensure the table is in 1NF.
Eliminate partial dependencies (non-key attributes should depend on entire primary
key).
4. Third Normal Form (3NF):
Ensure the table is in 2NF.
Eliminate transitive dependencies (non-key attributes depend only on the primary key,
not on another non-key attribute).
5. Boyce-Codd Normal Form (BCNF):
A stricter version of 3NF; for every functional dependency, the determinant must be a
super key.
6. Higher Normal Forms (4NF, 5NF, etc.):
Address more complex types of redundancy and multi-valued dependencies.
Example:
Start with a table storing student data with courses and instructors embedded in the same
row.
Step by step, decompose the table to separate Students, Courses, and Enrollments—each
storing only relevant, non-redundant information.

Advantages of Normalization
Reduces Data Redundancy:
Data is not unnecessarily duplicated, saving storage and avoiding inconsistencies.
Prevents Anomalies:
Update Anomaly: Eliminates the risk of needing to change the same data in multiple
places.
Insertion Anomaly: Allows new data to be added without requiring unrelated
information.
Deletion Anomaly: Prevents accidental loss of valuable data when removing other
data.
 Improves Data Integrity:
By enforcing proper dependencies, normalization maintains accurate and reliable data.
Simplifies Maintenance:
Smaller, focused tables are easier to update and manage.
Supports Data Consistency:
Ensures that every instance of a data item is stored only once and in only one place.

Disadvantages of Normalization
Performance Trade-offs:
High levels of normalization may lead to more tables, requiring frequent and complex joins,
which can slow query performance in large-scale or high-transaction databases.
Complex Queries:
Writing queries involving multiple normalized tables becomes more complex compared to
flatter, denormalized structures.
Over-Normalization:
If taken too far (beyond what the use-cases require), normalization can complicate both
application design and database performance.
Potential for More Joins:
Users and developers must often join multiple tables to retrieve related data, increasing the
potential for mistakes and query inefficiency.
In summary:
Normalization is a fundamental process in database design that structures tables to reduce
redundancy, maintain data integrity, and prevent anomalies, but it may introduce complexity and
potential performance issues if not balanced with practical application needs.

Define a transaction. Explain the ACID properties

in detail with examples.
Definition of a Transaction
A transaction in the context of a database management system (DBMS) is a sequence of one or
more operations (such as queries, updates, insertions, deletions) performed as a single logical
unit of work. The key requirement is that either all operations within the transaction are
successfully executed (the transaction commits), or none of them take effect (the transaction
rolls back). Transactions are essential for maintaining the integrity of databases, especially in
concurrent, multi-user environments.
ACID Properties of Transactions
The reliability and correctness of transactions are ensured by four foundational properties—
collectively known as ACID:
1. Atomicity
Definition:
Atomicity guarantees that a transaction is an indivisible unit—all its operations must be
completed; if any operation fails, the entire transaction is rolled back and the database is
left unchanged.
Example:
Suppose you are transferring ₹10,000 from Account A to Account B:
1. Deduct ₹10,000 from Account A
2. Add ₹10,000 to Account B
If the system crashes after deducting from A but before adding to B, atomicity ensures that
the deduction is rolled back (so no money "disappears" from the accounts).

2. Consistency
Definition:
Consistency ensures that a transaction brings the database from one valid state to another,
maintaining all defined rules, such as constraints, cascades, and triggers.
Example:
Continuing the bank transfer example:
If an account cannot have a negative balance, any transaction causing a negative
balance will be rejected, and the database remains in a consistent state.

3. Isolation
Definition:
Isolation ensures that the operations of a transaction are concealed from other transactions
until the transaction is completed (committed). Concurrent transactions should not affect
each other’s execution.
Example:
If two users transfer money at the same time, isolation ensures that intermediate states
of one user’s transfer are not visible to the other. Regardless of order, the resulting
balances are correct as if the transactions were executed sequentially.

4. Durability
Definition:
Durability guarantees that once a transaction is committed, its changes are permanent—
even in the event of a system crash or power failure.
Example:
If you complete an online payment and your confirmation screen appears, the system
guarantees (thanks to durability) that your payment will not be lost—even if the server
crashes immediately after the confirmation.
In summary:
A database transaction is a group of operations executed as a single unit of work, whose ACID
properties (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) ensure data correctness, system
reliability, and resilience to errors or interference from other users. These properties are
indispensable for modern database systems, especially mission-critical, multi-user applications.

What is a schedule? Distinguish between serial

and non-serial schedules
Definition of a Schedule
In database systems, a schedule is an ordered sequence representing the execution of
operations (such as read and write) from a set of transactions. The schedule indicates how the
operations of concurrent transactions are interleaved by the Database Management System
(DBMS) when multiple transactions are executed simultaneously. Schedules are vital for ensuring
data consistency and correctness during concurrent transaction execution.
Types of Schedules: Serial vs. Non-Serial

Schedule
Description Example Characteristics
Type

All operations of one transaction are No interleaving; easy to

T1 completes,
Serial completed before any operations of another reason; ensures
then T2
transaction begin. consistency

Operations from two or more transactions are

T1 and T2 Concurrent; allows
Non-Serial interleaved—so they can be mixed, as long as
alternate ops interleaving for efficiency
DBMS orders them.

Serial Schedule
Definition: A schedule is serial if the operations of each transaction are executed one after
the other, without any interleaving. The first transaction runs completely, then the second,
and so forth.
Property: Serial schedules always preserve database consistency if each individual
transaction is correct (i.e., ACID-compliant).
Example:
Schedule S1: (Serial)
T1: R(A) W(A) R(B) W(B)
T2: R(A) W(A)

In this serial schedule, T1 performs all its operations before T2 starts.

Non-Serial Schedule
Definition: A schedule is non-serial if the operations of one transaction are interleaved with
operations of other transactions. This reflects the actual way most DBMS handle multiple
transactions, for efficiency.
Property: Not all non-serial schedules are safe; only those that are serializable (i.e.,
equivalent in result to some serial order) are guaranteed to preserve consistency.
Example:
Schedule S2: (Non-Serial)
T1: R(A)
T2: R(A)
T1: W(A)
T2: W(A)

Here, operations of T1 and T2 are interleaved—their reads and writes are mixed.

Key Distinctions
Serial schedules guarantee safety and consistency but may lead to lower concurrency and
throughput.
Non-serial schedules improve efficiency and system throughput by allowing overlapping
execution, but require careful control (such as locking and isolation protocols) to avoid
conflicts and uphold correctness.
Summary:
A schedule dictates the order of operation execution from concurrent transactions. Serial
schedules perform one transaction fully before another begins, while non-serial schedules
interleave operations, enabling concurrency with the risk of potential conflicts if not managed
carefully.

Describe concurrent execution of transactions.

Why is it important?
Concurrent Execution of Transactions: Description and Importance

What Is Concurrent Execution of Transactions?

Concurrent execution means multiple transactions are carried out by the database system at
(approximately) the same time, with their operations interleaved. Rather than running
transactions one after another (serially), a database management system (DBMS) interleaves
operations—reads, writes, updates, etc.—from different transactions based on scheduling,
system resources, and user requests.
Example:
Suppose two transactions, T1 and T2:
T1: Transfer ₹1,000 from Account A to B
T2: Query the balance of Account A
In concurrent execution, the DBMS might interleave the operations from T1 and T2 so both can
progress without waiting for the other to finish entirely. For instance, T2 might read the balance
of A between T1’s debit and credit steps.

Why Is Concurrent Execution Important?

1. Improved System Throughput and Resource Utilization

Efficiency: Multiple users/applications can interact with the database simultaneously,
maximizing CPU, memory, and input/output device usage.
Higher Throughput: More transactions are completed in a given time period compared to
sequential execution.

2. Reduced Waiting Time

Responsiveness: Individual users see faster response times because their transactions
aren’t queued behind long-running operations.

3. Resource Sharing
Allows multiple transactions to share the same data and resources (tables, buffers, disk
blocks) efficiently, preventing idle time.

4. Realistic Multiuser Environment

Most real-world databases (banking, e-commerce, reservations, etc.) are used by many
people at once. Concurrent execution is necessary to support multiple users or applications
performing operations at the same time.

5. Potential for Increased Conflict—But Managed

While concurrency can cause conflicts (lost updates, dirty reads, etc.), transaction
management protocols (like locks, serializability controls, and isolation levels) are used to
resolve these and protect data integrity.

In Summary
Concurrent execution of transactions enables a DBMS to handle multiple users/operations in
parallel, greatly improving performance, responsiveness, and resource utilization. It reflects real-
world needs, making databases practical and efficient, while careful control mechanisms ensure
that data consistency and integrity are not sacrificed in the process.
Explain the concept of lock-based concurrency
control. How does it prevent inconsistencies?
Lock-Based Concurrency Control: Concept and Role in Preventing Inconsistencies
What Is Lock-Based Concurrency Control?
Lock-based concurrency control is a primary technique used in database management systems
(DBMS) to manage the concurrent execution of transactions and ensure data integrity. The
fundamental idea is to associate locks with database items (such as rows, tables, or pages). A
lock manages the access rights to the resource—when one transaction holds a lock on a data
item, certain operations by other transactions on that same item are restricted.

Types of Locks
Shared Lock (S-Lock):
Allows multiple transactions to read a data item concurrently, but prevents any from writing
to it. Also called a read lock.
Exclusive Lock (X-Lock):
Allows the transaction holding the lock to both read and write the item. Only one transaction
can have an exclusive lock on an item at a time.

How Does Locking Work?

Before reading or writing a database item, a transaction requests the appropriate lock from
the DBMS.
If the lock is granted, the transaction proceeds; if not, it must wait until the necessary lock is
available (because another transaction may be holding an incompatible lock).
Once a transaction is done with the item, it releases the lock so others can proceed.

How Does Lock-Based Concurrency Control Prevent Inconsistencies?

Inconsistencies and anomalies (such as lost updates, dirty reads, uncommitted data being
read, etc.) can occur when transactions interleave without proper coordination. Locking avoids
these issues in two main ways:
1. Mutual Exclusion:
Locking ensures that no two transactions can write (or read and write) the same data item
simultaneously in incompatible ways. For example, if Transaction A has an exclusive lock
(writing), Transaction B cannot read or write the item until A releases the lock. This avoids
scenarios where two updates overwrite each other (lost update anomaly).
2. Serializability:
By using appropriate locking protocols—such as the Two-Phase Locking (2PL) protocol—
the DBMS guarantees that the concurrent schedule of transactions is serializable, meaning
the interleaved execution is equivalent to some serial (one-at-a-time) order. This ensures
 that the final state of the database is always consistent, as if the transactions had run one
after the other.

Example Scenario
Suppose two transactions try to update the same account balance at the same time:
Without locking:
Both read the same original balance, both update it based on their operations, and one
overwrites the other's change, resulting in lost data.
With locking:
The first transaction acquires a lock on the balance, making the account unavailable for
write by others. The second must wait until the lock is released, ensuring updates are
applied correctly and no changes are lost.

Deadlocks and Concurrency

While lock-based control solves many inconsistency issues, it can introduce challenges like
deadlocks (where two transactions wait for each other's locks indefinitely), which DBMSs detect
and resolve through timeout or deadlock resolution strategies.
In summary:
Lock-based concurrency control enforces order among overlapping transactions using locks,
thus preventing unwanted interleaving and ensuring that data remains consistent and free from
anomalies, even as the database system supports high user concurrency and throughput.

Explain Two-Phase Locking (2PL) protocol. How

does it ensure serializability?
Two-Phase Locking (2PL) Protocol: Explanation and Serializability

What is Two-Phase Locking (2PL)?

The Two-Phase Locking (2PL) protocol is a fundamental locking protocol used in database
management systems to coordinate the concurrent execution of transactions. The goal is to
ensure the resulting schedule of transaction operations is serializable, meaning the database
remains consistent as if transactions were executed one after another in some order.
How 2PL Works:
2PL divides the life of each transaction into two distinct phases:
1. Growing Phase:
The transaction acquires locks (shared or exclusive) as needed.
No locks released during this phase.
2. Shrinking Phase:
The transaction releases locks.
 After releasing its first lock, it cannot acquire any more locks.
This strict separation ensures that there’s a clear "lock acquisition" phase followed by a "lock
release" phase, with no interleaving.

How 2PL Ensures Serializability

Serializability is the property that the outcome of concurrently executing transactions is the
same as if they had run serially, one after the other.
Why Does 2PL Guarantee Serializability?
Locking order and conflict prevention:
By restricting when locks can be acquired/released, 2PL prevents certain types of conflicts
and problematic interleavings.
Prevents cycles in the precedence graph:
The rules of 2PL mean that the precedence graph (which tracks which transactions must
come before others based on their locking/wait dependencies) cannot have cycles, and
thus, the execution is guaranteed to be conflict-serializable.
In other words, no transaction can see partial/uncommitted changes from others or make
changes that would violate serial order.

Example
Suppose Transaction T1 and T2 both want to update the same data item:
1. T1: Acquires lock on item A, then lock on item B (growing phase), performs operations, then
releases both locks (shrinking phase).
2. T2: If T1 still holds lock on A, T2 must wait, ensuring T2’s operations cannot interfere or
interleave unpredictably with T1’s.

Variants of 2PL
Strict 2PL: Transactions hold all their exclusive (write) locks until they commit or abort,
ensuring strict serializability (also prevents cascading aborts).
Rigorous 2PL: All locks (read and write) are held until the transaction ends.
Conservative (Static) 2PL: All locks are obtained before the transaction starts.

In Summary
2PL protocol structures when locks can be acquired/released to ensure that all resulting
schedules are serializable.
Because locks are not released until all needed have been obtained, transactions are
ordered in a way that prevents cycles and conflicting operations, guaranteeing database
consistency.
Both theory and DBMS implementations rely on 2PL (often strict 2PL variants) for safe
concurrent transaction scheduling to uphold the integrity and correctness of the system.
Discuss serializability and recoverability in the
context of concurrent transactions.
Serializability and Recoverability in Concurrent Transactions
When multiple transactions are executed concurrently in a database system, the DBMS must
ensure two crucial properties to maintain correctness and reliability: serializability and
recoverability.

1. Serializability
Definition:
Serializability is the highest standard for correctness in concurrent transaction scheduling. A
schedule (an order in which the operations of overlapping transactions are interleaved) is
serializable if its outcome is equivalent to some serial schedule—that is, one in which the
transactions are executed one after the other, without overlap.
Why is Serializability Important?
Consistency: Even with concurrent execution, the final database state is guaranteed to be
consistent, as if transactions ran serially.
Isolation: Each transaction functions as though it is the only one running, avoiding
unintended interference.
Example:
Suppose T1 transfers funds between accounts, and T2 adds interest. Regardless of their
interleaving, the result should match one of the possible serial orders: either T1 completes
before T2 or vice versa, with no "hybrid" or invalid state.
How Is Serializability Ensured?
Locking Protocols (e.g., Two-Phase Locking): Transactions obtain and release locks
according to strict rules, preventing conflicting accesses.
Timestamps: Assign timestamps to transactions to order operations and resolve conflicts.
Schedule Testing/Conflict Graphs: Use theory (conflict-serializability) to check if a
schedule can be transformed into a serial order without changing the result.

2. Recoverability
Definition:
A schedule is recoverable if, whenever a transaction Tj reads data written by another
transaction Ti, the commit of Ti precedes the commit of Tj. This means no transaction commits
unless all transactions from which it has read data have also committed.
Why is Recoverability Important?
Data Integrity in Failures: If a transaction uses (reads) data from another transaction that
later aborts, recoverability ensures that the reading transaction does not commit, because it
 could have used invalid or inconsistent data.
Prevents Cascading Aborts: If transactions commit too early, a failure in one could require
rolling back (aborting) not only itself but also others that depended on its uncommitted data.
Example:
T1 updates a record and T2 reads that updated value.
If T2 commits before T1 and later T1 is rolled back, T2 is left with "dirty" data—this is
not recoverable.
In a recoverable schedule, T2 will not commit until T1 does, allowing the system to
maintain consistency even if T1 fails.
Types of Recoverability:
Cascadeless (Avoids Cascading Aborts): Transactions only read data written by
committed transactions.
Strict Schedules: Transactions neither read nor overwrite data written by uncommitted
transactions, ensuring the highest level of recoverability.

In Practice
For safe, correct concurrent transaction management:
The DBMS enforces serializability to ensure consistency and correctness of data even
under interleaved execution.
The DBMS enforces recoverability to preserve data integrity in the presence of transaction
failures.
Without both properties, concurrent transactions could lead to inconsistent, incomplete, or
corrupted database states, defeating the reliability a DBMS is designed to provide.

Describe concurrency control techniques without

using locks. Provide suitable examples.
Concurrency Control Techniques Without Locks
In addition to traditional lock-based (pessimistic) techniques, modern databases support several
concurrency control mechanisms that do not require locking. These techniques avoid common
issues of locking such as deadlocks and reduced throughput, especially in environments with
low data contention. The major non-lock concurrency control methods are:

1. Optimistic Concurrency Control (OCC)

How it Works:
Assumes that transaction conflicts are rare.
Transactions execute freely (reading and tentatively writing) without acquiring locks.
Instead, conflict detection occurs at commit time.
 When a transaction is ready to commit, it enters a validation phase where the system
checks if any other transaction has modified the data items it accessed. If so, the
transaction is rolled back and restarted; otherwise, it is committed.
OCC divides execution into three phases: Read (read & computation), Validation (conflict
check), and Write (apply updates) [56] [57] [58] .
Example:
Two transactions T1 and T2 both read an account balance and make changes. At commit, if
T2 detects that T1 has modified data it used, T2 will abort and possibly retry, but no locks
were held during their processing [59] .
Advantages:
No deadlocks, greater throughput in read-intensive, low-contention environments.
Simplifies rollback/cascading aborts (since changes are local until commit).
Disadvantages:
If conflicts are frequent, there will be many rollbacks and considerable wasted computation.

2. Timestamp Ordering Protocol

How it Works:
Each transaction is assigned a unique timestamp at start.
All conflicting operations are ordered based on timestamps: transactions with older
timestamps (lower values) take precedence over newer ones.
For each data item, system tracks the largest read and write timestamps. When an
operation (read or write) is attempted, it is allowed only if it won’t violate the ordering. If it
would (e.g., a new transaction tries to write a value already read/written by a later
timestamp), the transaction is aborted and rolled back [60] [61] [62] .
Example:
T1 (timestamp 50) and T2 (timestamp 60) both want to write data X.
If T2 writes before T1 does, T1's subsequent write will be rejected because it would break
the logical order established by timestamps.
Advantages:
Maintains serializability without locks.
Completely avoids deadlocks.
Disadvantages:
May lead to unnecessary aborts and restarts, especially for long-running or frequently
conflicting transactions.
3. Validation-Based & Multiversion Concurrency Control (MVCC)
Validation-Based (similar to OCC):
The system validates at commit that no conflicting transactions have worked on the same
data in the interim, before making writes permanent [63] [64] [65] .
Multiversion Concurrency Control (MVCC):
Maintains multiple versions of data items. Writers don’t block readers and vice versa.
Transactions read "snapshots" representing the committed state as of their start.
Writers create new versions at commit, and outdated versions are eventually discarded.
Used widely in modern databases (like PostgreSQL, Oracle, etc.) to maximize concurrency
without classic locking [66] .

Summary Table
Method Core Idea Phases/Mechanism Practical Example

Optimistic No locks; conflict Banking system, batch

Read → Validate → Write
Concurrency check at end user updates

Timestamp Unique timestamps Operations ordered; aborts if Transaction ordering in

Ordering order ops violation detected distributed DB

Validate before Validate against concurrent

Validation-Based Large data analytics
commit commits before writing

Multiversion Multiple data Readers/writers see consistent Modern SQL DBMS (e.g.,
(MVCC) versions versions PostgreSQL)

Example Scenario (OCC):

Two users attempt to reserve the same seat on a flight.
Both read "seat is free" and proceed.
Both try to write "seat reserved" at commit.
In OCC, the first committer succeeds. The second, upon validation, detects the conflict,
aborts, and is prompted to retry [59] .
In summary:
Non-lock concurrency control techniques such as optimistic concurrency control and timestamp
ordering provide robust alternatives to locks especially for applications with many reads or low
conflict. They eliminate deadlocks and reduce wait times, though at the cost of potentially higher
transaction aborts under heavy contention [66] [56] [60] .
⁂
What is the ARIES recovery algorithm? Describe
the steps involved in ARIES.
ARIES Recovery Algorithm: Overview and Steps
The ARIES (Algorithm for Recovery and Isolation Exploiting Semantics) recovery algorithm is a
widely adopted approach in database systems for ensuring data durability and consistency
after failures. It is designed for systems utilizing the Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) protocol, and
supports a no-force, steal buffer management strategy, allowing high concurrency and efficient
recovery. ARIES is used in major DBMSs like IBM Db2 and Microsoft SQL Server [67] [68] [69] .

Core Principles of ARIES

1. Write-Ahead Logging (WAL):
All changes are logged to persistent storage before the changes are written to the
database. This ensures all actions can be undone or redone during recovery.
2. Repeating History During Redo:
On recovery, ARIES first replays (repeats) all actions up to the point of crash to restore the
database state as it was at the time of failure.
3. Logging During Undo:
Even actions performed during undo (while rolling back uncommitted changes) are logged,
allowing recovery to be repeatable in case of another crash during the process [68] [69] .

Types of Log Records in ARIES

Undo-Only Record: Logs just the data before the change.
Redo-Only Record: Logs only the data after the change.
Undo-Redo Record: Logs both prior and new data, needed for both redo and undo
operations.
Each log record gets a unique Log Sequence Number (LSN), and each database page
maintains a pageLSN, indicating the last log record affecting it [67] [69] .

Recovery Steps/Phases in ARIES

At system restart after a crash, ARIES performs recovery in three main phases:

1. Analysis Phase
Begins at the most recent checkpoint in the log.
Reconstructs two crucial tables:
Transaction Table: Tracks all active transactions at crash time.
Dirty Page Table: Tracks all pages updated in memory but not yet written to disk.
Determines which transactions were active (uncommitted) and which pages are "dirty".
Determines the starting LSN for the REDO phase [67] [69] [70] .
2. Redo Phase
Starts from the oldest update in the dirty page table.
Reapplies (repeats) all actions from the log to ensure all updates are reflected in the
database, including those made by uncommitted transactions.
Uses pageLSN to avoid unnecessary reapplication: if a page's pageLSN is more recent than
a log record's LSN, that change has already been applied and can be skipped [68] [69] [70] .

3. Undo Phase
Works backwards through the log from the crash point.
Undoes actions of any uncommitted (loser) transactions, restoring the database to a
consistent state as of the crash.
For each undone "before image," ARIES writes a special Compensation Log Record (CLR)
to the log so that if another crash occurs during undo, these steps are not repeated
unnecessarily [67] [68] [69] [70] .

Key Data Structures

Transaction Table: For tracking active transactions and their status.
Dirty Page Table: For tracking modified (dirty) pages not yet written to disk.
Checkpoints: Contain snapshots of the above tables, letting recovery start from a recent
state rather than scanning the entire log [67] [69] [71] .

Summary Table
Phase Purpose Process

Analysis Identify dirty pages and active transactions at crash Scan log forward from checkpoint

Repeat all actions since last checkpoint (apply all logged Scan log forward, reapply updates as
Redo
updates) needed

Scan log backward, log CLRs for each

Undo Roll back changes of uncommitted transactions at crash
undo

In summary:
ARIES guarantees robust, efficient, and repeatable recovery in modern DBMSs through carefully
designed log management and a systematic three-phase process: analysis, redo, and undo. It
thus ensures durable, consistent data after crashes, with minimal performance penalty during
normal operation [67] [68] [69] [70] .
⁂
Explain the role of logs in crash recovery. What is
the Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) protocol?
Role of Logs in Crash Recovery
In a database system, logs (specifically, the transaction log) are essential tools that record every
change made to the database. This log plays a central role in crash recovery, ensuring that no
committed work is lost and that the database can return to a consistent state after a failure (like
power loss, system crash, or software error).
How Logs Are Used in Recovery:
Recording Actions: Before any change is made to the database, the action is described in
detail (including old value, new value, transaction ID, and time) in the log.
Durability: If the system crashes, the database can use the log to redo committed
transactions (which might not have been fully written to disk) and undo uncommitted
transactions (which might have partially updated the database).
Analysis: Logs allow the system to identify which transactions were in progress, committed,
or not started at the time of the crash, thus informing what needs to be redone or undone.
The Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) Protocol
Definition:
The Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) protocol is a fundamental rule governing how logs are written
relative to database changes. WAL ensures reliability and recoverability by dictating the order
in which log and data writes occur.
Key Principles of WAL:
1. Log-First Rule:
Before any changes are made to the database (data page), all log records that describe
those changes must be safely written to stable storage (disk).
2. Commit Rule:
A transaction can only be considered committed after all corresponding log records,
including the commit record, have been written to disk.
Why Is WAL Important?
Protects Against Data Loss: Ensures changes are always described in the log before they
affect the database, so after a crash, the system can either redo or undo changes as
needed.
Supports Redo and Undo Operations: By guaranteeing logs are persisted first, the system
can confidently reconstruct the database to a consistent state using the log records.
Foundation for Recovery Algorithms: Protocols like ARIES depend on WAL to enforce
durable and correct writes, supporting no-force/steal buffer management strategies in
modern DBMSs.
Example:
 Suppose a transaction wants to update a customer's balance.
1. The database writes a log record describing the update (both before and after images).
2. This log record is flushed to disk.
3. Only then is the actual customer balance updated in the data file.
If a crash occurs after the log but before the data is updated, recovery will redo the change.
If the data was updated but the log wasn't, the update isn't considered valid.
In summary:
Logs record every database modification and are the backbone of crash recovery, enabling
systems to redo/undo changes after failure. The Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) protocol
enforces the correct order of log and data writes, guaranteeing that the database can always be
restored to a consistent, reliable state after a crash.

What is the purpose of checkpointing in a DBMS?

How is it implemented?
Purpose of Checkpointing in a DBMS
Checkpointing in a Database Management System (DBMS) is a crucial mechanism for improving
the efficiency and reliability of crash recovery. Its main goals are:
Reduce Recovery Time: After a system crash, recovering the entire database from the
beginning of the log would be slow and inefficient. Checkpoints allow the DBMS to limit the
amount of log that must be processed by marking a “point of known consistency,” so
recovery can start from the latest checkpoint instead of the very beginning.
Ensure Data Consistency: At each checkpoint, the DBMS ensures that all updates to the
database up to that point are safely written to disk, guaranteeing that the database is in a
consistent state as of the checkpoint.
How is Checkpointing Implemented?
Checkpointing involves several steps and strategies, generally following this process:
1. Stall/Delay New Transactions (Optional):
Some DBMSs may temporarily pause new transaction starts, but many can perform
checkpoints concurrently with running transactions.
2. Flush Log Records to Stable Storage:
All log records related to data modifications up to the checkpoint are written from main
memory (buffer) to disk, ensuring no required log records are lost on crash.
3. Flush Modified Data Pages (“Dirty” Pages) to Disk:
All database pages in main memory that have been modified (“dirty pages”) since the
last checkpoint are written back to storage. This ensures that the database reflects all
committed transactions up to the checkpoint.
4. Write a Checkpoint Record to the Log:
 The DBMS writes a special checkpoint log record, marking the log sequence number
(LSN) up to which the database and log are consistent.
This record often includes information like active transactions, dirty pages, etc.
5. Resume Normal Operations:
Transaction processing continues as usual after the checkpoint.
Types of Checkpoints:
Simple Checkpoint: All dirty pages and log records are flushed at once at intervals.
Fuzzy/Incremental Checkpoint: Flushing and logging happen in the background while
transactions continue, minimizing system pause.
Checkpointing and Recovery:
During crash recovery, the DBMS scans the log for the most recent checkpoint. The recovery
process (as discussed in ARIES) can safely ignore earlier log records, drastically reducing the
time and data needed to restore database consistency.
In summary:
Checkpointing in a DBMS establishes safe “sync points” for efficient, reliable recovery after
failures, and is implemented by systematically flushing log and data buffers, recording a
checkpoint in the log, and resuming normal operations. This keeps the recovery process both
fast and robust, while ensuring data integrity.

How does a DBMS recover from a system crash

and media failure? Discuss with steps.
DBMS Recovery from System Crash and Media Failure: Steps and Explanation
A Database Management System (DBMS) ensures data durability and consistency even after
failures, such as system crashes (e.g., power loss, OS crash) and media failures (e.g., disk
corruption). There are robust recovery processes and protocols in place, particularly leveraging
the transaction log, write-ahead logging (WAL), checkpoints, and algorithms like ARIES.

1. System Crash Recovery

A system crash refers to an abrupt halt of the DBMS where the main memory is lost, but stable
storage (disk, logs) remains intact. The DBMS recovers by:

A. Using Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) Protocol

All modifications are logged before they’re written to the database.
Log records include enough information to redo (reapply) or undo (reverse) every change.
B. Recovery Steps (ARIES/General Approach)
After reboot, the DBMS performs:
1. Analysis Phase
Scans logs from the last checkpoint to identify:
Active transactions when the crash occurred.
Dirty pages ("in-memory" changes not yet on disk).
Updates transaction and dirty page tables.
2. Redo Phase
Reapplies all changes (even those of uncommitted transactions) since the last
checkpoint to ensure the database reflects all actions up to crash time.
For each log record, the DBMS checks if the data page already includes the change—if
not, it reapplies (“repeats history”).
3. Undo Phase
Rolls back changes of transactions that were in-progress (uncommitted) at the time of
the crash, using log records in reverse order.
Logs compensation records for each undo, so if another crash happens during recovery,
recovery can resume idempotently.
Checkpointing ensures the log need not be processed from the very beginning after every
crash, speeding up recovery.

2. Media Failure Recovery

A media failure occurs when the storage medium (like disk) fails and is unreadable.

A. Backup and Restore

The DBMS restores the most recent backup (full or incremental) taken before the failure.

B. Roll-Forward Using Log Records

The DBMS applies (replays) all log records generated since the last backup (i.e., the
"archive" logs).
This brings the database back to the state it was in just before the failure.
Committed transactions are redone; uncommitted ones can be rolled back as per the log.
Steps:
1. Restore database from the latest backup to a working secondary storage.
2. Apply (replay) archived log records to bring the database up to the most recent state.
3. Process recovery as with a system crash for any transactions that were in-progress at the
time of failure.
Summary Table

Failure Type Recovery Steps

1. Analyze log/checkpoint
System Crash 2. Redo changes
3. Undo uncommitted changes

1. Restore backup
Media Failure 2. Apply archived logs (redo)
3. Standard crash recovery (undo)

In Summary:
After a system crash, the DBMS uses log-based recovery (analysis, redo, undo) to restore
consistency—no committed work is lost, no partial changes persist.
After a media failure, the DBMS restores from backup, reapplies all logs since backup, and
then follows normal crash recovery to ensure all committed changes are present and
uncommitted changes are undone.
Protocols like WAL and checkpointing are essential for fast, reliable recovery.
References:
Steps and concepts are standard in ARIES-based systems and outlined in prior explanations
about recovery algorithms, WAL protocol, and checkpointing in DBMS.
ARIES recovery algorithm steps
Role of logs and checkpointing in DBMS crash recovery

1. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/data-abstraction-and-data-independence/
2. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/what-is-data-abstraction-in-dbms/
3. https://www.scaler.com/topics/data-abstractions-in-dbms/
4. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/what-is-data-independence-in-dbms/
5. https://www.scaler.com/topics/data-independence-in-dbms/
6. https://webandcrafts.com/blog/data-independence-in-dbms
7. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/physical-and-logical-data-independence/
8. https://usemynotes.com/what-is-data-independence-in-dbms/
9. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/structure-of-database-management-system/
10. https://www.scaler.com/topics/structure-of-dbms/
11. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/structure-of-dbms/240584106
12. https://webandcrafts.com/blog/structure-of-dbms
13. https://www.du.ac.in/du/uploads/departments/Operational Research/24042020_Transaction
Management in DBMS.pdf
14. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/transaction-management/
15. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/transaction-in-dbms/
16. https://docs.mermaidchart.com/blog/posts/7-er-diagram-examples-for-database-modeling-from-mer
maid-ai
17. https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/sql-tutorial/er-diagram-in-dbms
18. https://www.studytonight.com/dbms/er-diagram.php
19. https://www.tutorialspoint.com/what-are-the-components-of-er-diagrams-in-dbms
20. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/glossary/relational-algebra/
21. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/introduction-of-relational-algebra-in-dbms/
22. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational_algebra
23. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/select-operation-in-relational-algebra/
24. https://www.educative.io/answers/what-is-the-selection-operation-in-dbms
25. https://www.educative.io/answers/what-is-projection-operation-in-dbms
26. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projection_(relational_algebra)
27. https://www.educative.io/answers/what-is-the-projection-operation-in-dbms
28. https://www.faastop.com/dbms/30.Join_Operator.html
29. https://jagiroadcollegelive.co.in/attendence/classnotes/files/1591465201.pdf
30. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/extended-operators-in-relational-algebra/
31. https://www.faastop.com/dbms/33.Division_operator.html
32. https://cs.wellesley.edu/~cs304flask/lectures/relational-algebra/division.html
33. https://www.tutorialspoint.com/nested-queries-in-sql
34. https://www.scaler.com/topics/nested-sql-query/
35. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/sql/nested-queries-in-sql/
36. https://hasura.io/learn/database/mysql/nested-queries/
37. https://www.secoda.co/learn/mastering-sql-query-structure-components-syntax-and-best-practices
38. http://www.cectl.ac.in/images/pdf_docs/studymaterial/cse/S4/pdd3.pdf
39. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/sql/sql-trigger-student-database/
40. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/sql-triggers/
41. https://www.edureka.co/blog/triggers-in-sql/
42. https://www.dbvis.com/thetable/sql-triggers-what-they-are-and-how-to-use-them/
43. https://www.tutorialspoint.com/explain-about-triggers-and-active-databases-in-dbms
44. https://airbyte.com/data-engineering-resources/database-triggers-in-sql
45. https://dev.mysql.com/doc/en/trigger-syntax.html
46. https://studyglance.in/dbms/display.php?tno=25&topic=Triggers-and-Active-data-bases-in-DBMS
47. https://www.slideshare.net/BalaMuruganSamuthira/triggers-and-active-database
48. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/sql/active-databases/
49. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/decomposition-in-dbms/
50. https://byjus.com/gate/decomposition-in-dbms/
51. https://studyglance.in/dbms/display.php?tno=27&topic=Decompositions-and-its-problems-in-DBMS
52. https://www.scribd.com/document/604600569/Properties-of-Relational-Decomposition
53. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/properties-of-relational-decomposition/
54. https://kdkce.edu.in/writereaddata/fckimagefile/Relational Decomposition.pdf
55. https://www.scaler.com/topics/dbms/decomposition-in-dbms/
56. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimistic_concurrency_control
57. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/difference-between-pessimistic-approach-and-optimistic-appro
ach-in-dbms/
58. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/nosql/database-transactions-optimistic-concurrenc
y
59. https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/how-databases-guarantee-isolation/
60. https://www.tutorialspoint.com/concurrency-control-based-on-timestamp-ordering
61. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/timestamp-based-concurrency-control/
62. https://www.scaler.com/topics/timestamp-based-protocols-in-dbms/
63. https://www.shiksha.com/online-courses/articles/concurrency-control-techniques-in-dbms/
64. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/operating-systems/concurrency-control-in-distributed-transactions/
65. https://library.fiveable.me/lists/concurrency-control-techniques
66. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-lock_concurrency_control
67. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dbms/algorithm-for-recovery-and-isolation-exploiting-semantics-arie
s/
68. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithms_for_Recovery_and_Isolation_Exploiting_Semantics
69. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/from-crash-recovery-power-aries-algorithm-manish-joshi-qetec
70. https://www.ques10.com/p/14789/describe-the-three-phases-of-the-aries-recovery--2/
71. https://dspmuranchi.ac.in/pdf/Blog/ARIES Algorithm form database recovery.pdf