Download to read offline
![( CC0
)
⊛ “2. Waiver. To the greatest extent permitted by, but
not in contravention of, applicable law, Affirmer
hereby overtly, fully, permanently, irrevocably and
unconditionally waives, abandons, and surrenders
all of Affirmer's Copyright and Related Rights and
associated claims and causes of action, whether
now known or unknown (including existing as well
as future claims and causes of action), in the Work
[...]”](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/wipo-cc-111014092319-phpapp01/85/Creative-Commons-Enabling-Access-to-Knowledge-20-320.jpg)
![( CC0
)
⊛ “2. Waiver. To the greatest extent permitted by, but
not in contravention of, applicable law, Affirmer
hereby overtly, fully, permanently, irrevocably and
unconditionally waives, abandons, and surrenders
all of Affirmer's Copyright and Related Rights and
associated claims and causes of action, whether
now known or unknown (including existing as well
as future claims and causes of action), in the Work
[...]”](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/wipo-cc-111014092319-phpapp01/75/Creative-Commons-Enabling-Access-to-Knowledge-20-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byAndres Guadamuz
Creative Commons: Enabling Access to Knowledge
This document discusses Creative Commons (CC) licenses and their role in enabling access to knowledge. It provides an overview of the different CC licenses, their core elements like attribution and options for non-commercial use or modifications. It also discusses barriers to access like copyright and orphan works. CC aims to address these issues through open content licensing standards to empower authors while allowing reuse and modifications of content. Challenges to adoption include complexity, incompatibility between standards and having too many standards.
More Related Content
Similar to Creative Commons: Enabling Access to Knowledge
![UiPath Automation Suite Installation (Hands-On) [2/3]](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/automationsuitecommunitysession2-251015095633-a6d862f1-thumbnail.jpg?width=600ounds&width=560&fit=bounds)
Creative Commons: Enabling Access to Knowledge
- 1. ( Enabling access to knowledge Andrés Guadamuz )
- 2. ( Apologies Löki http://www.flickr.com/photos/tyltu/4041895378/ )
- 3. ( CC in brief )
- 4. ( Spectrum of rights )
- 5. ( Core elements Attribution: Every CC licences allows the world to ) copy and distribute a work provided that the licensee credits the creator/licensor. The author may include these other elements: NonCommercial: licensees can use the work for non-commercial purposes. No Derivatives: the work cannot be modified. ShareAlike: the work can be copied, modified and distributed if the author releases the derivative under the same licence.
- 6. ( BY Licences Attribution ) BY-NC Attribution - Non Commercial BY-SA Attribution - Share Alike BY-ND Attribution - No Derivatives BY-NC-SA Attribution - Non Commercial - Share Alike BY-NC-ND Attribution - Non Commercial - No Derivatives
- 7. Human-Readable Lawyer-Readable Machine-Readable Commons Deed Legal Code Digital Code ( <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/ 3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" ) src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- sa/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/ 3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License</a>.
- 8. ( Barriers to access in GLAM and education )
- 9. ( Copyright as barrier? Opensourceway: http://www.flickr.com/photos/opensourceway/4371001458/ )
- 10. ( Barriers to access ) ⊛ TPMs ⊛ Lack of clarity with exceptions and limitations ⊛ Institutional fear (often justified) ⊛ Lack of data / metadata ⊛ Standard issues ⊛ Orphan works
- 11. ( Orphan works curiousart http://www.flickr.com/photos/curiousart/2815049829/ )
- 12. ( Trouble with orphan works ) ⊛ Google Books Settlement brought issue to the forefront. ⊛ Legislating on the topic has been difficult. ⊛ Canadian approach seems to be the best legislative solution so far. ⊛ U.S. proposals have met political opposition, orphan work provisions removed from UK’s Digital Economy Act. ⊛ Technological solutions?
- 13. ( CC solutions )
- 14. ( Empowering authors through licensing Nina Pailey http://www.sitasingstheblues.com )
- 15. ( Licensing standard for open content )
- 16. ( Adoption growth 2003 - 2010 )
- 17. ( Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (LRMI) ) ⊛ LRMI is a project co-led by the Association of Educational Publishers and Creative Commons to build a common metadata vocabulary for educational resources. ⊛ The learning resources framework will be designed to work with schema.org ⊛ Interoperability with other metadata technologies is a priority.
- 18. ( Some examples of metadata ⊛ intendedEndUserRole ⊛ typicalAgeRange ) ⊛ teachesCompetencies ⊛ educationLevel ⊛ conformsTo ⊛ interactivityLevel ⊛ requiresCompetencies ⊛ learningResourceType ⊛ assessCompetencies ⊛ topic ⊛ educationalUse ⊛ subject ⊛ instructionalMethod ⊛ license ⊛ timeRequired ⊛ created
- 19. ( Public domain mark )
- 20. ( CC0 ) ⊛ “2. Waiver. To the greatest extent permitted by, but not in contravention of, applicable law, Affirmer hereby overtly, fully, permanently, irrevocably and unconditionally waives, abandons, and surrenders all of Affirmer's Copyright and Related Rights and associated claims and causes of action, whether now known or unknown (including existing as well as future claims and causes of action), in the Work [...]”
- 21. ( Challenges )
- 22. ( Institutional adoption ) PLoS http://www.plos.org
- 23. ( Complexity )
- 24. ( Incompatibility Alexandre Dulaunoy http://www.flickr.com/photos/adulau/3011878917/ )
- 25. ( Too many standards? )
- 26. ( Concluding... )
- 27. http://xkcd.com/365/ http://xkcd.com/365/ ( ) http://creativecommons.org alguadamuz@innovatechnology.net Thank you @technollama on Twitter CC Attribution-ShareAlike
Editor's Notes
- #2 \n
- #3 \n
- #4 \n
- #5 \n
- #6 \n
- #7 \n
- #8 \n
- #9 \n
- #10 \n
- #11 \n
- #12 \n
- #13 \n
- #14 \n
- #15 \n
- #16 \n
- #17 \n
- #18 \n
- #19 \n
- #20 \n
- #21 \n
- #22 \n
- #23 \n
- #24 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #25 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #26 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #27 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #28 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #29 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #30 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #31 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #32 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #33 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #34 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #35 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #36 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #37 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #38 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #39 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #40 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #41 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #42 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #43 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #44 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #45 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #46 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #47 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #48 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #49 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #50 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #51 I always start with an apology, I&#x2019;m a lapsed Catholic who lived almost 9 years in Scotland, so I always feel happy. I have to start apologising that I will give a brief introduction to CC. I&#x2019;m sure in this knowledgeable audience this is superfluous. I am here representing CC, but I am not an employee, so any mistakes or omissions are my own. \n
- #52 \n
- #53 \n
- #54 \n
- #55 \n
- #56 \n
- #57 \n
- #58 \n
- #59 \n
- #60 \n
- #61 \n
- #62 \n
- #63 \n
- #64 \n
- #65 \n
- #66 \n
- #67 \n
- #68 \n
- #69 \n
- #70 \n
- #71 \n
- #72 \n
- #73 \n
- #74 \n
- #75 \n
- #76 \n
- #77 \n
- #78 \n
- #79 \n
- #80 \n
- #81 \n
- #82 \n
- #83 \n
- #84 \n
- #85 \n
- #86 \n
- #87 \n
- #88 \n
- #89 \n
- #90 \n
- #91 \n
- #92 \n
- #93 \n
- #94 \n
- #95 \n
- #96 \n
- #97 \n
- #98 \n
- #99 \n
- #100 \n
- #101 \n
- #102 \n
- #103 \n
- #104 \n
- #105 \n
- #106 \n
- #107 \n
- #108 \n
- #109 \n
- #110 \n
- #111 \n
- #112 \n
- #113 \n
- #114 \n
- #115 \n
- #116 \n
- #117 \n
- #118 \n
- #119 \n
- #120 \n
- #121 \n
- #122 \n
- #123 \n
- #124 \n
- #125 \n
- #126 \n
- #127 \n
- #128 \n
- #129 \n
- #130 \n
- #131 \n
- #132 \n
- #133 \n
- #134 \n
- #135 \n
- #136 \n
- #137 \n
- #138 \n
- #139 \n
- #140 \n
- #141 \n
- #142 \n
- #143 \n
- #144 \n
- #145 \n
- #146 \n
- #147 \n
- #148 \n
- #149 \n
- #150 \n
- #151 \n
- #152 \n
- #153 \n
- #154 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #155 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #156 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #157 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #158 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #159 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #160 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #161 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #162 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #163 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #164 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #165 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #166 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #167 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #168 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #169 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #170 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #171 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #172 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #173 Although there are lots of other areas of interest in creativity, I&#x2019;d like to concentrate in educational areas and memory institutions. This is because the public environment is one of the areas where access matters most, and where public funding has been pushing towards greater access. \n
- #174 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #175 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #176 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #177 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #178 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #179 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #180 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #181 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #182 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #183 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #184 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #185 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #186 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #187 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #188 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #189 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #190 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #191 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #192 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #193 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #194 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #195 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #196 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #197 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #198 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #199 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #200 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #201 acknowledge and illustrate that copyright is a barrier to access (don't dwell, everyone knows, yawn) but especially curation and preservation; technical infrastructure is useless without adequate freedom (ie good policy) for people to use infrastructure\n
- #202 \n
- #203 \n
- #204 \n
- #205 \n
- #206 \n
- #207 \n
- #208 \n
- #209 \n
- #210 \n
- #211 \n
- #212 \n
- #213 \n
- #214 \n
- #215 \n
- #216 \n
- #217 \n
- #218 \n
- #219 \n
- #220 \n
- #221 \n
- #222 \n
- #223 \n
- #224 \n
- #225 \n
- #226 \n
- #227 \n
- #228 \n
- #229 \n
- #230 \n
- #231 \n
- #232 \n
- #233 \n
- #234 \n
- #235 \n
- #236 \n
- #237 \n
- #238 \n
- #239 \n
- #240 \n
- #241 \n
- #242 \n
- #243 \n
- #244 \n
- #245 \n
- #246 \n
- #247 \n
- #248 \n
- #249 \n
- #250 \n
- #251 \n
- #252 \n
- #253 \n
- #254 \n
- #255 \n
- #256 \n
- #257 \n
- #258 \n
- #259 \n
- #260 \n
- #261 \n
- #262 \n
- #263 \n
- #264 \n
- #265 \n
- #266 \n
- #267 \n
- #268 \n
- #269 \n
- #270 \n
- #271 \n
- #272 \n
- #273 \n
- #274 \n
- #275 \n
- #276 \n
- #277 \n
- #278 \n
- #279 \n
- #280 \n
- #281 \n
- #282 \n
- #283 \n
- #284 \n
- #285 \n
- #286 \n
- #287 \n
- #288 \n
- #289 \n
- #290 \n
- #291 \n
- #292 \n
- #293 \n
- #294 \n
- #295 \n
- #296 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #297 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #298 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #299 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #300 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #301 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #302 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #303 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #304 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #305 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #306 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #307 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #308 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #309 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #310 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #311 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #312 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #313 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #314 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #315 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #316 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #317 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #318 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #319 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #320 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #321 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #322 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #323 We strongly believe that CC is a way to empower authors through copyright. Personally, I strongly believe that by giving users a user-friendly licensing tool, the public becomes more familiar with copyright, and they respect it better. Copyright is not something that happens to nameless corproations and zillionaire artists, it&#x2019;s something that happens to them. \n
- #324 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #325 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #326 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #327 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #328 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #329 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #330 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #331 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #332 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #333 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #334 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #335 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #336 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #337 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #338 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #339 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #340 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #341 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #342 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #343 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #344 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #345 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #346 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #347 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #348 CC is becoming a standard for sharing open content. \n
- #349 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #350 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #351 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #352 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #353 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #354 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #355 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #356 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #357 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #358 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #359 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #360 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #361 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #362 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #363 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #364 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #365 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #366 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #367 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #368 These figures are not 100% accurate as often granularity is hard to measure. E.g. the University of Costa Rica has just released thousands of journal articles under CC licences, but there is only one linkback to the licences\n
- #369 \n
- #370 \n
- #371 \n
- #372 \n
- #373 \n
- #374 \n
- #375 \n
- #376 \n
- #377 \n
- #378 \n
- #379 \n
- #380 \n
- #381 \n
- #382 \n
- #383 \n
- #384 \n
- #385 \n
- #386 \n
- #387 \n
- #388 \n
- #389 \n
- #390 \n
- #391 \n
- #392 \n
- #393 \n
- #394 \n
- #395 \n
- #396 \n
- #397 \n
- #398 \n
- #399 \n
- #400 \n
- #401 \n
- #402 \n
- #403 \n
- #404 \n
- #405 \n
- #406 \n
- #407 \n
- #408 \n
- #409 \n
- #410 \n
- #411 \n
- #412 \n
- #413 \n
- #414 \n
- #415 \n
- #416 \n
- #417 \n
- #418 \n
- #419 \n
- #420 \n
- #421 \n
- #422 \n
- #423 \n
- #424 \n
- #425 \n
- #426 \n
- #427 \n
- #428 \n
- #429 \n
- #430 \n
- #431 \n
- #432 \n
- #433 \n
- #434 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #435 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #436 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #437 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #438 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #439 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #440 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #441 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #442 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #443 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #444 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #445 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #446 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #447 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #448 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #449 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #450 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #451 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #452 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #453 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #454 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #455 Using CC0, you can waive all copyrights and related or neighboring rights that you have over your work, such as your moral rights (to the extent waivable), your publicity or privacy rights, rights you have protecting against unfair competition, and database rights and rights protecting the extraction, dissemination and reuse of data.\n
- #456 \n
- #457 \n
- #458 \n
- #459 \n
- #460 \n
- #461 \n
- #462 \n
- #463 \n
- #464 \n
- #465 \n
- #466 \n
- #467 \n
- #468 \n
- #469 \n
- #470 \n
- #471 \n
- #472 \n
- #473 \n
- #474 \n
- #475 \n
- #476 \n
- #477 \n
- #478 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #479 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #480 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #481 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #482 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #483 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #484 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #485 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #486 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #487 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #488 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #489 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #490 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #491 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #492 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #493 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #494 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #495 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #496 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #497 This is a very big priority for Creative Commons. We would love governments and international institutions such as WIPO, World Bank, UNESCO, WHO to release public materials and data under CC licences, and we are willing to engage with institutional stakeholders to make this happen. We firmly believe that releasing reports such as the excellent WIPO documents under a permissive licence then its dissemination would be enhanced. \n
- #498 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #499 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #500 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #501 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #502 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #503 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #504 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #505 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #506 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #507 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #508 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #509 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #510 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #511 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #512 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #513 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #514 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #515 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #516 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #517 There are problems about licence complexity, particularly in works that have long chains of distribution, such as software. Our own research tends to indicated that works in creative industries only get remixed twice, but there is scope for improving the way in which works are shared. \n
- #518 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #519 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #520 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #521 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #522 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #523 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #524 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #525 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #526 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #527 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #528 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #529 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #530 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #531 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #532 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #533 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #534 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #535 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #536 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #537 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #538 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #539 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #540 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #541 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #542 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #543 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #544 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #545 This is a big concern for us, as the more licences we have, the more likely there will be incompatibilities between licences. CC is aware of this, and we are working to reduce the number of licences used by the public. \n
- #546 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #547 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #548 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #549 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #550 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #551 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #552 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #553 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #554 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #555 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #556 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #557 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #558 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #559 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #560 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #561 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #562 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #563 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #564 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #565 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #566 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #567 Another concern. Creating new standards is well and good, but incompatible standards are problematic. \n
- #568 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #569 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #570 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #571 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #572 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #573 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #574 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #575 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #576 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #577 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #578 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #579 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #580 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #581 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #582 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #583 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #584 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #585 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #586 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #587 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #588 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #589 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #590 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #591 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #592 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #593 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #594 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #595 I have been heartened by some of the talk in the panels I have managed to attend. There seems to be recognition that different approaches are needed. Creative industries, pubic sector and international institutions should not wait to be dragged down screaming to change. CC suggests that other avenues are open, not as competition, but to complement existing models. \n
- #596 \n
- #597 \n
- #598 \n
- #599 \n
- #600 \n
- #601 \n
- #602 \n
- #603 \n
- #604 \n
- #605 \n
- #606 \n
- #607 \n
- #608 \n
- #609 \n
- #610 \n
- #611 \n
- #612 \n
- #613 \n
- #614 \n
- #615 \n
- #616 \n
- #617 \n
- #618 \n
- #619 \n
- #620 \n
- #621 \n
- #622 \n
- #623 \n
- #624 \n
- #625 \n