Download as PDF, PPTX
Uploaded byVictor Porof
Processing.js vs. three.js
Processing.js and Three.js are popular JavaScript game engines that reduce the time needed to build complex interactive 2D or 3D content for the HTML5 canvas element. Processing.js is best suited for 2D applications like data visualizations and digital art, while Three.js is optimized for 3D graphics and rendering compelling 3D scenes in web applications using JavaScript.
More Related Content
Similar to Processing.js vs. three.js
Processing.js vs. three.js
- 1. Processing.js vs. Three.js A comparison
- 2. HTML5 <canvas> rich interactive 2D or 3D content JavaScript engines are better now "2d" and "webgl" contexts hardware-accelerated graphics
- 3. Game engines reduce the necessary time to build a complex game rendering, physics, collision detection, sound, scripting, animation, artificial intelligence, networking etc. We’ll compare two popular engines: Processing.js and Three.js
- 4. Processing.js sister project of the Processing visual programming language used by artists, designers and researchers for learning and prototyping procedural art or experimenting with new forms of user interaction Used for: data visualizations, digital art, interactive animations, educational graphs
- 5.
- 7. Three.js lightweight 3D engine a scene-graph API and abstracting objects which directly define concepts used by graphics programming professionals (like complex materials or other properties) Used for: render compelling 3D scenes using JavaScript
- 8.
- 10.