KEMBAR78
[dynamic shapes] unbacked-safe should_swap by pianpwk · Pull Request #160473 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@pianpwk
Copy link
Contributor

@pianpwk pianpwk commented Aug 12, 2025

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 12, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/160473

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 3 New Failures, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit 41e26b0 with merge base 582d278 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pianpwk has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this in D80569823.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Aug 19, 2025
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
unblock customers for common cases with DDE ,until @pianpwk  land the change to should_swap #160473.

Pull Request resolved: #162099
Approved by: https://github.com/aorenste
ghstack dependencies: #162084
@pianpwk pianpwk added the topic: not user facing topic category label Sep 8, 2025
@pianpwk pianpwk changed the title [WIP][dynamic shapes] should_swap [dynamic shapes] unbacked-safe should_swap Sep 10, 2025
@pianpwk pianpwk marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2025 16:41
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pianpwk has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this in D80569823.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pianpwk
Copy link
Contributor Author

pianpwk commented Sep 11, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -i

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

markc-614 pushed a commit to markc-614/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
unblock customers for common cases with DDE ,until @pianpwk  land the change to should_swap pytorch#160473.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#162099
Approved by: https://github.com/aorenste
ghstack dependencies: pytorch#162084
markc-614 pushed a commit to markc-614/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
mansiag05 pushed a commit to mansiag05/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
unblock customers for common cases with DDE ,until @pianpwk  land the change to should_swap pytorch#160473.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#162099
Approved by: https://github.com/aorenste
ghstack dependencies: pytorch#162084
mansiag05 pushed a commit to mansiag05/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
cleonard530 pushed a commit to cleonard530/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
unblock customers for common cases with DDE ,until @pianpwk  land the change to should_swap pytorch#160473.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#162099
Approved by: https://github.com/aorenste
ghstack dependencies: pytorch#162084
cleonard530 pushed a commit to cleonard530/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
dsashidh pushed a commit to dsashidh/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025
unblock customers for common cases with DDE ,until @pianpwk  land the change to should_swap pytorch#160473.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#162099
Approved by: https://github.com/aorenste
ghstack dependencies: pytorch#162084
dsashidh pushed a commit to dsashidh/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the pianpwk/unbacked_should_swap_2 branch October 12, 2025 02:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants