walk mro for Field set type annotations #2244
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sobolevn
reviewed
Jul 2, 2024
| - case: mro_is_walked_for_field_annotations | ||
| main: | | ||
| from myapp.models import Child | ||
| Child.objects.create(dct={"hello": "world"}) # no errors |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you please add:
c: Child
reveal_type(c.dct)?
This is needed to prevent a possible regression that dct is Any.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think that's relevant / useful -- the type for dct is explicitly annotated. the bug here is strictly in the plugin parts of create
sobolevn
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2024
asottile-sentry
added a commit
to getsentry/sentry
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2024
an absolute ton of work went into enabling this -- but after this PR model types / create / update / etc. should mostly be typechecked whereas they were entirely unchecked (everything `Any`) prior to this. most of the core problem was that mypy and django-stubs did not understand our custom `BaseManager` and `BaseQuerySet` since there's a significant amount of django stuff that goes into making those classes "real" fix that involved these issues: - python/mypy#17402 (worked around) - typeddjango/django-stubs#2228 (the workaround) with that fixed, it exposed a handful issues in django-stubs itself: - typeddjango/django-stubs#2240 - typeddjango/django-stubs#2241 - typeddjango/django-stubs#2244 - typeddjango/django-stubs#2248 - typeddjango/django-stubs#2276 - typeddjango/django-stubs#2281 fixing all of those together exposed around 1k issues in sentry code itself which was fixed over a number of PRs: - #75186 - #75108 - #75149 - #75162 - #75150 - #75154 - #75158 - #75148 - #75157 - #75156 - #75152 - #75153 - #75151 - #75113 - #75112 - #75111 - #75110 - #75109 - #75013 - #74641 - #74640 - #73783 - #73787 - #73788 - #73793 - #73791 - #73786 - #73761 - #73742 - #73744 - #73602 - #73596 - #73595 - #72892 - #73589 - #73587 - #73581 - #73580 - #73213 - #73207 - #73206 - #73205 - #73202 - #73198 - #73121 - #73109 - #73073 - #73061 - getsentry/getsentry#14370 - #72965 - #72963 - #72967 - #72877 (eventually was able to remove this when upgrading to mypy 1.11) - #72948 - #72799 - #72898 - #72899 - #72896 - #72895 - #72903 - #72894 - #72897 - #72893 - #72889 - #72887 - #72888 - #72811 - #72872 - #72813 - #72815 - #72812 - #72808 - #72802 - #72807 - #72809 - #72810 - #72814 - #72816 - #72818 - #72806 - #72801 - #72797 - #72800 - #72798 - #72771 - #72718 - #72719 - #72710 - #72709 - #72706 - #72693 - #72641 - #72591 - #72635 mypy 1.11 also included some important improvements with typechecking `for model_cls in (M1, M2, M2): ...` which also exposed some problems in our code. unfortunately upgrading mypy involved fixing a lot of things as well: - #75020 - #74982 - #74976 - #74974 - #74972 - #74967 - #74954 - getsentry/getsentry#14739 - getsentry/getsentry#14734 - #74959 - #74958 - #74956 - #74953 - #74955 - #74952 - #74895 - #74892 - #74897 - #74896 - #74893 - #74880 - #74900 - #74902 - #74903 - #74904 - #74899 - #74894 - #74882 - #74881 - #74871 - #74870 - #74855 - #74856 - #74853 - #74857 - #74858 - #74807 - #74805 - #74803 - #74806 - #74798 - #74809 - #74801 - #74804 - #74800 - #74799 - #74725 - #74682 - #74677 - #74680 - #74683 - #74681 needless to say this is probably the largest stacked PR I've ever done -- and I'm pretty happy with how I was able to split this up into digestable chunks <!-- Describe your PR here. -->
roaga
pushed a commit
to getsentry/sentry
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2024
an absolute ton of work went into enabling this -- but after this PR model types / create / update / etc. should mostly be typechecked whereas they were entirely unchecked (everything `Any`) prior to this. most of the core problem was that mypy and django-stubs did not understand our custom `BaseManager` and `BaseQuerySet` since there's a significant amount of django stuff that goes into making those classes "real" fix that involved these issues: - python/mypy#17402 (worked around) - typeddjango/django-stubs#2228 (the workaround) with that fixed, it exposed a handful issues in django-stubs itself: - typeddjango/django-stubs#2240 - typeddjango/django-stubs#2241 - typeddjango/django-stubs#2244 - typeddjango/django-stubs#2248 - typeddjango/django-stubs#2276 - typeddjango/django-stubs#2281 fixing all of those together exposed around 1k issues in sentry code itself which was fixed over a number of PRs: - #75186 - #75108 - #75149 - #75162 - #75150 - #75154 - #75158 - #75148 - #75157 - #75156 - #75152 - #75153 - #75151 - #75113 - #75112 - #75111 - #75110 - #75109 - #75013 - #74641 - #74640 - #73783 - #73787 - #73788 - #73793 - #73791 - #73786 - #73761 - #73742 - #73744 - #73602 - #73596 - #73595 - #72892 - #73589 - #73587 - #73581 - #73580 - #73213 - #73207 - #73206 - #73205 - #73202 - #73198 - #73121 - #73109 - #73073 - #73061 - getsentry/getsentry#14370 - #72965 - #72963 - #72967 - #72877 (eventually was able to remove this when upgrading to mypy 1.11) - #72948 - #72799 - #72898 - #72899 - #72896 - #72895 - #72903 - #72894 - #72897 - #72893 - #72889 - #72887 - #72888 - #72811 - #72872 - #72813 - #72815 - #72812 - #72808 - #72802 - #72807 - #72809 - #72810 - #72814 - #72816 - #72818 - #72806 - #72801 - #72797 - #72800 - #72798 - #72771 - #72718 - #72719 - #72710 - #72709 - #72706 - #72693 - #72641 - #72591 - #72635 mypy 1.11 also included some important improvements with typechecking `for model_cls in (M1, M2, M2): ...` which also exposed some problems in our code. unfortunately upgrading mypy involved fixing a lot of things as well: - #75020 - #74982 - #74976 - #74974 - #74972 - #74967 - #74954 - getsentry/getsentry#14739 - getsentry/getsentry#14734 - #74959 - #74958 - #74956 - #74953 - #74955 - #74952 - #74895 - #74892 - #74897 - #74896 - #74893 - #74880 - #74900 - #74902 - #74903 - #74904 - #74899 - #74894 - #74882 - #74881 - #74871 - #74870 - #74855 - #74856 - #74853 - #74857 - #74858 - #74807 - #74805 - #74803 - #74806 - #74798 - #74809 - #74801 - #74804 - #74800 - #74799 - #74725 - #74682 - #74677 - #74680 - #74683 - #74681 needless to say this is probably the largest stacked PR I've ever done -- and I'm pretty happy with how I was able to split this up into digestable chunks <!-- Describe your PR here. -->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
test failed prior to this with:
test is a simplified example from sentry code