KEMBAR78
CCL and Database in Korea | KEY
Korean Copyright Act in 2003

 “Database” : a collection that arranges or composes subject
 matters systematically so that one can individually access or
 search such subject matters

 “Database producers” : the persons who make a substantial
 investment in human or material resources for production,
 renewal, verification, or supplementation of a database.
 “Rights” : to the reproduction, distribution, broadcasting, or
 interactive transmission of all or a substantial part of the
 appropriate database

 “Substantial part” : if such reproduction, etc. is done repetitively
 or systematically for a specific purpose in such a manner that
 conflicts with the normal use of the database or unreasonably
 prejudices the database producer’s interests.
collection
                 collective works            sui generis database
  subject     copyrightable and/or       copyrightable and/or
  matter      non-copyrightable          non-copyrightable

            creativity in selection and systematic arrangement of
requirement arrangement of subject      subject matters for individual
            matters                     access and search
              the creativity of an       qualitatively and/or quantitatively
 protection
              author                     substantial investment

   rights     exclusive rights           exclusive rights

   term       50 years                   5 Years, but actually perpetual
key points
 (1) the producer of database can be a different
 entity from the copyright holders of the subject
 matter
  (2) the subject matters can be either copyrightable
  or not

 (3) the license applied to the subject matter does
 not extend to the database itself.
Case (1)

   The Government is trying to allow people to use PSI
   through the open license

   A large part of PSI is not copyrightable, so the license of
   the database is a more important matter.

   The Government is now considering to make its own
   license addressing the database right as well as the
   copyright instead of adopting CCL
Case (2)

  A company which runs an archiving site of its own
  contents is considering adopting CCL to them

  But it is afraid that the rival company would copy all or
  the substantial part of the contents and use them for its
  business

  Keeping the database right could be an useful way for him
  to protect his interest
Case (3)

   Someone who runs an UGC website is considering
   adopting CCL as a default copyright policy for the
   contents users upload.

  But he is afraid that some companies would copy all or
  the substantial part of the database and build another
  similar UGC website easily.

  So it wants to license the database with the non-
  commercial use requirement like such as CC-BY-NC
Case (1)   CCL with the waver clause of the
           database right
           or CCL with the same license
           clause for the database right
           or New license only for the
           database right

Case (2)   No additional clause needed


Case (3)   CCL with the same license clause
           for the database right
           or New license only for the
           database right
CC+d
for the database producer

CCL and Database in Korea

  • 1.
    Korean Copyright Actin 2003 “Database” : a collection that arranges or composes subject matters systematically so that one can individually access or search such subject matters “Database producers” : the persons who make a substantial investment in human or material resources for production, renewal, verification, or supplementation of a database. “Rights” : to the reproduction, distribution, broadcasting, or interactive transmission of all or a substantial part of the appropriate database “Substantial part” : if such reproduction, etc. is done repetitively or systematically for a specific purpose in such a manner that conflicts with the normal use of the database or unreasonably prejudices the database producer’s interests.
  • 2.
    collection collective works sui generis database subject copyrightable and/or copyrightable and/or matter non-copyrightable non-copyrightable creativity in selection and systematic arrangement of requirement arrangement of subject subject matters for individual matters access and search the creativity of an qualitatively and/or quantitatively protection author substantial investment rights exclusive rights exclusive rights term 50 years 5 Years, but actually perpetual
  • 3.
    key points (1)the producer of database can be a different entity from the copyright holders of the subject matter (2) the subject matters can be either copyrightable or not (3) the license applied to the subject matter does not extend to the database itself.
  • 4.
    Case (1) The Government is trying to allow people to use PSI through the open license A large part of PSI is not copyrightable, so the license of the database is a more important matter. The Government is now considering to make its own license addressing the database right as well as the copyright instead of adopting CCL
  • 5.
    Case (2) A company which runs an archiving site of its own contents is considering adopting CCL to them But it is afraid that the rival company would copy all or the substantial part of the contents and use them for its business Keeping the database right could be an useful way for him to protect his interest
  • 6.
    Case (3) Someone who runs an UGC website is considering adopting CCL as a default copyright policy for the contents users upload. But he is afraid that some companies would copy all or the substantial part of the database and build another similar UGC website easily. So it wants to license the database with the non- commercial use requirement like such as CC-BY-NC
  • 7.
    Case (1) CCL with the waver clause of the database right or CCL with the same license clause for the database right or New license only for the database right Case (2) No additional clause needed Case (3) CCL with the same license clause for the database right or New license only for the database right
  • 8.

Editor's Notes