Slide 5; LEGAL CASE; Planned Parenthood v.
Casey (1992)
The Supreme Court case in 1992, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, was the primary challenge to
Roe v. Wade. Although reaffirming women's right to an abortion, the Court replaced the "undue
burden" test for the trimester framework of Roe. By using this test, states were granted
permission to use regulations on abortions as long as those regulations were not imposing an
undue burden and a significant hindrance to having an abortion. The Court reaffirmed some
Pennsylvania laws, such as a waiting period of 24 hours and parental notification (with a judicial
bypass option) for minors, holding they did not impose an undue burden. It struck down a
spousal notification provision, however. Casey was a change in the law, allowing more state
control over abortion yet reaffirming the fundamental right established in Roe. This "undue
burden" criterion was the focal point of dispute in subsequent abortion legislation and court
proceedings for decades.
Slide 10 Social Media: #MyBodyMyChoice
A popular and widely used hashtag on social media platforms, #MyBodyMyChoice is used to
advocate for autonomy in the body and reproductive rights. For the communities and individuals
battling for control over their bodies and healthcare, especially access to birth control, abortion,
and women's health, it has served as a rallying cry. The hashtag unites those who are certain of
the inalienable right to self-determination in reproductive matters, spanning cultural and
geographic divides. Its popularity causes news to travel fast, individual accounts to be magnified,
and internet movements to be correctly mobilized, demonstrating support for reproductive liberty
on a worldwide scale. It is the virtual shout-out, emphasizing how special and fundamental these
rights are.
Slide 14: Argentina's Abortion Legalization (2020) - The Power of Digital Pressure
Argentina's historic victory to legalize abortion in the final month of 2020 was greatly
influenced by the Green Wave movement's effective social media campaign. For years, activists
have used Instagram and Twitter to spread their message, share inspiring personal tales, and
organize massive street protests. Abortion rights became an immense political force due to
persistent digital pressure that kept them in the news. The vibrant green scarf established a visual
icon of the uprising after being widely shared on social media. The combination of persistent
grassroots activity and digital organization generated a force that lawmakers could no longer
ignore, leading to a historical decision in favor of legal and secure access to abortion.
SLIDE 16: Case Studies of Social Media Impact: Texas Abortion Ban Protests (2021)
Senate Bill 8, which was passed into law on September 1st, essentially outlaws’ abortions at
roughly six weeks after the woman's last period finishes, which is before many women even
realize they are pregnant. Abortion providers and others who assist someone in getting an
abortion are subject to legal action from private persons. Protests against the Texas Heartbeat Act
(SB 8), which forbade abortion, were mostly organized and disseminated through social media.
Facebook and TikTok served as both informational and activist mobilization hubs, enabling
coordinated action and widespread distribution of news and opinions. Thus, in response to
Texas's anti-abortion laws, online solidarity groups rallied quickly into protests, shared legal
knowledge, and spread awareness. Social media was a powerful platform for resistance, with
communities organizing action, raising voices, and challenging restrictive policies in real-time.
.