KEMBAR78
Case Study | PDF | Pet | Privacy
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views4 pages

Case Study

disease case study

Uploaded by

mutuallyraila
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views4 pages

Case Study

disease case study

Uploaded by

mutuallyraila
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Case Study #1

The Transforming Power of Information Technology

Information technology plays a revolutionary role in the case study, fundamentally

altering the methods used for pet identification, tracking, and health monitoring. The system that

Joe and Jennifer created successfully disrupts the current quo by using microchips to improve pet

management, which is what IT does. This inserted microchip of Joe's was a more traditional

method of pet identification, even holding the vital details required to identify an animal: the

owner and medical history of the pet. This helps reunite lost pets with their owners or

streamlines pet owners' communications with veterinarians. Joe's technique was originally more

appealing since it was simpler, satisfied a need without much discussion, complied with local

laws, and encouraged ethical pet care. Her programmable, external microchip adds dynamic,

real-time location monitoring and configurable data access to the original idea, while also

offering password security and GPS tracking. Insurance firms looking to reduce risks find this

useful since it not only helps find missing dogs but also helps track their health more thoroughly.

Jennifer's invention shows how layers of data analytics, customization, and interaction can

transform even seemingly simple operations like pet identification using IT.

It might be challenging to see the transformative potential of IT since doing so means

looking beyond the applications of today and envisioning the future of technology. The

implantation microchip quickly gains popularity among veterinarians and animal owners, but Joe

is unable to keep up with demand as he cannot manufacture and market the device on his own

(Brown, et al., 2013). Joe, for example, didn't understand how adding data accessibility,

security, and GPS capabilities would advance the technology; instead, he was more concerned

with the short-term advantages of his microchip. This draws attention to a prevalent issue: a lot
of entrepreneurs concentrate on finding solutions for immediate issues rather than thoroughly

investigating how their technology may fit into larger systems or evolve to meet new demands.

Sometimes the technology's gradual nature and early emphasis on specific applications mask its

transformational potential. Joe's microchip, for instance, may not be immediately evident, but it

has wider implications for pet care and the possibility for future improvements. Joe's microchip

was designed to be used only for identification at first. The rapid pace of technological

advancement, which makes it impossible to predict how current technologies may alter or be

replaced by more inventive ones, is another factor contributing to undervaluation.

Legal and Ethical Issues of Electronic Information

The carrying of electronic data in pet microchips is a consequence of considerable legal

and ethical effects. In regard to ownership rights, security, and data privacy, enormous ethical

and legal questions surround the case of electronic data. Since Joe and Jennifer's products collect

sensitive information such as owner contact details and medical records on animals, this must be

protected against abuse or illegal access. Even more critical will be its GPS monitoring

capabilities and even the potential to change the information stored in the microchip that is to be

implanted inside Jennifer, not to speak of the serious privacy concerns that such a feature

introduces. The ability to track the whereabouts of a pet raises considerations about the bounds

of personal privacy as well as the possibility of abuse of that information. Put differently, while it

really does help find lost dogs, it opens up avenues that might be unwanted for tracking or

surveillance, thus raising a number of major ethical questions about consent and the protection of

data.

Ownership and control of data provide significant moral and legal challenges. The

intricacy of concerns surrounding who owns and has management authority over digital data is
the root cause of many legal disputes that occur between people, corporations, and nations.

Security is a crucial area that involves ethical and legal considerations ( Krotov and Johnson

2023). It is important to remember that, according to the law, businesses must safeguard client

information against intrusions and alert the appropriate persons in the event that one occurs.

Since Jennifer's product allows for data monetization and GPS location monitoring, it further

complicates things. Questioning permission and the extent to which a pet owner's personal

information, even that which is only loosely connected, can be shared or sold are ethical

concerns raised by the practice of tracking a pet's whereabouts. The monetization of private

details without express owner approval, for instance, presents ethical concerns, as demonstrated

by Jennifer's thought of selling pet data to marketers. This issue reflects current discussions

about data privacy and rights of customers, and it is consistent with larger problems in IT where

user data can be used for commercial advantage.

Pet insurance firms face ethical and legal issues when they utilize microchip data to set

policy premiums and coverage limitations. Privacy rules and regulations must be followed while

collecting and using sensitive data, such as health information. Additionally, there's a chance the

data will be sold to outside parties, raising questions around data security and the monetization of

private data. In addition, there are legal issues with classifying the microchip as ownership proof

for Jennifer's merchandise (Brown et. al. 2013).. In the event that the chip's unique number is

accepted as proof of ownership, disagreements over who is actually the pet's owner may surface

in court, making custody proceedings more difficult. Her involvement with privacy regulations

also demonstrates a proactive attitude to negotiating the changing legal environment of data

rights, which is essential to preserving the integrity of technology and customer confidence.
References

Brown, G.D., et. al. (2013). Health Informatics: A Systems Perspective. Chicago: Health

Administration Press.

Krotov, V., & Johnson, L. (2023). Big web data: Challenges related to data, technology, legality,

and ethics. Business Horizons, 66(4), 481-491.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0007681322001252

You might also like