KEMBAR78
Hacking Cisco | PPT
Hacking Cisco Networks and Countermeasures
Overview Reconnaissance Attacks Passive Sniffing Ping Sweeps Port Scans (tcp&udp) Active Attacks Password attacks Trust exploitation Port redirection External Attacks IP Spoofing DoS, DDoS Attacks Internal Attacks DHCP and ARP Attacks
Reconnaissance Attacks Reconnaissance refers to the overall act of learning information about a target network by using readily available information and applications. Reconnaissance attacks include these attacks: Packet sniffers Port scans Ping sweeps Internet information queries
Packet Sniffers A packet sniffer is a software application that uses a network adapter card in promiscuous mode to capture all network packets. There are packet sniffer features: Packet sniffers exploit information passed in clear text. Protocols that pass information in clear text  are Telnet, FTP, SNMP, Post Office Protocol (POP), and HTTP. Packet sniffers must be on the same collision domain as the machine that they are targeting. Packet sniffers can be used legitimately or can be designed specifically for attack. Host A Host B Router A  Router B
Passive Sniffing
Packet Sniffer Attack Mitigation  Here are some packet sniffer mitigation techniques and tools: Authentication Switched infrastructure Antisniffer tools  Cryptography Host A Host B Router A  Router B
Port Scans and Ping Sweeps  Port scan and ping sweep attacks: Identify all services on the network Identify all hosts and devices on the network Identify the operating systems on the network Identify vulnerabilities on the network
Ping Sweep with NMAP
Ping Sweep (cont.)
Blocking Ping Sweeps access-list 102 deny  icmp any any echo access-list 102 permit ip any any interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 10.1.1.254 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 102 in
Seems like it worked but ???
We give out too much information…
To block messages originating from the blocking router… access-list 103 permit icmp any any unreachable class-map match-all STOPSHARING   match access-group 103! policy-map STOPSHARING class STOPSHARING drop class class-default control-plane   service-policy output STOPSHARING
Same result…
But this time we don’t share info…
Simple UDP Port Scan
Destination Unreachable (Port)
How to block… access-list 101 deny  icmp any any unreachable access-list 101 permit ip any any interface FastEthernet0/0   ip address 10.1.1.254 255.255.255.0   ip access-group 101 out
We don’t send any unreachable messages…
After Blocking everything seems open, some obscurity for scanner…
Port scans and ping sweeps cannot be prevented without compromising network capabilities. Port Scan and Ping Sweep Attack Mitigation However, damage can be mitigated using IPS at the network and host levels. Workstation with HIPS Laptop with HIPS Scan Port Shared Connection IDS and IPS
Internet Information Queries Sample IP address query Attackers can use Internet tools such as whois as a weapon.
Access Attacks Intruders use access attacks on networks or systems for the these reasons: Retrieve data Gain access Escalate their access privileges Access attacks include: Password attacks Trust exploitation Port redirection
Password Attacks Hackers implement password attacks using: Brute-force attacks Trojan horse programs IP spoofing Packet sniffers
Password Attack Example The bgp_md5crack tool is used for cracking a secret used for RFC2385 based packet signing and authentication. It is designed for offline cracking, means to work on a sniffed, correct signed packet. This packet can either be directly sniffed of the wire or be provided in a pcap file.
For Routing Protocols…
Simple Cracking with Cain…
Trust Exploitation A hacker leverages existing trust relationships. Several trust models exist: Microsoft Windows: Domains Active directory Linux and UNIX: NIS NIS+ System A User = psmith; Pat Smith System B is compromised  by a hacker. User = psmith; Pat Smith Hacker User = psmith; Pat Smithson   A hacker gains access to System A  . Trust relationships: System A trusts System B. System B trusts everyone. System A trusts everyone.
Port Redirection Host B Attacker Source: A Destination: B Port: 23 Compromised Host A Source: Attacker Destination: A Port: 22 Source: Attacker Destination: B Port: 23
Port Redirection Configuration On HOSTA we create a named pipe using the mkfifo commands: #pipe will be the name of our named pipe mkfifo pipe  We then create our two way tunnel using Netcat on HOSTA: nc -lvp 25 <pipe | nc -t 10.1.2.253 23 >pipe  Then telnet from Attacker machine  telnet 10.1.2.1 80
Here we are connected to the internal switch…
IP Spoofing IP spoofing occurs when a hacker inside or outside a network impersonates a trusted source. IP spoofing uses trusted internal IP addresses or  trusted external IP addresses. Attackers use IP spoofing for many reasons: To gain root access To inject malicious data or commands into an existing data stream  To divert network packets to the hacker who can then reply as a trusted user by changing the routing tables To crash servers by overloading memory (DoS) As a step in a larger attack
IP Spoofing—Types of Attack IP spoofing attacks are either: Nonblind spoofing The attacker sniffs sequence numbers  (i.e., from inside the subnet of the victim). Blind spoofing  The attacker calculates sequence numbers. IP spoofing can lead to these types of attacks: Man-in-the-middle attack DoS attack Distributed DoS (DDoS) attack
Let’s see in action
Here we drive router to reply to the other host..
Man-in-the-Middle Attacks A man-in-the-middle attack requires that the hacker has access to network packets that come across a network. A man-in-the-middle attack is implemented using the following: Network packet sniffers (nonblind attack) Routing and transport protocols (blind attack) Host A Host B Router A  Router B  Data in Clear Text
IP Spoofing Attack Mitigation The threat of IP spoofing can be reduced, but not eliminated, using these measures: Strong access control at the router ACLs on outbound interface ACLs on inbound interface Data encryption Additional authentication requirements  Host A Host B Router A  ISP  Router B  IPSec tunnel
DoS Attacks A DoS attack damages or corrupts your computer system or denies you and others access to your networks, systems, or services. DoS attack techniques almost always use IP spoofing.
TCP SYN Flooding DoS Attack  AttackerTCP Client ------------- Client Ports 1024 – 65535 Victim TCP Server ------------- Service Ports 1–1024 80 ? SYN Packet with Spoofed Source Address TCP Client ------------- Client Ports 1024–65535 TCP Three-Way Handshake 1 SYN 2 SYN and ACK TCP Server ------------- Service Ports 1 – 1024 80 1 SYN 3 ACK 2 SYN and ACK
DDoS Attacks DoS Attack DoS and DDoS attacks have these characteristics:  They are not generally targeted to gain access. They aim at making a service unavailable.  They require very little effort to execute. They are difficult to eliminate. DDoS Attack Attacker Victim Attack Control Mechanism Victim Zombie Zombie Zombie
DDoS Example Handler Systems Client System The client  issues commands  to handlers  that control agents in a mass attack. The cracker looks for targets. The cracker installs software to scan, compromise, and infect agents with zombies. Agents are loaded with remote control attack software. Agent Systems
SYN Flooding Attack
Let’s be more creative…
We put almost 1 million packets in one minute period on the wire, not so bad….
CPU Consumption..
DoS and DDoS Attack Mitigation Reduce DoS and DDoS attacks by: Protecting yourself against IP spoofing with ingress- and egress-filtering ACLs Using antivirus software to find zombie agents Using anti-DoS features on routers and firewalls ip verify unicast reverse-path  interface command  ACLs to filter all private Internet address space (RFC 1918)   Using traffic rate limiting at the ISP level Use class-based traffic policing on ICMP packets Use SYN rate limiting
Rate Limiting What rate limiting does: Allows network managers to set bandwidth thresholds for users and by traffic type Benefits: Prevents the deliberate or accidental flooding of the network Keeps traffic flowing smoothly Rate Limiting for  Different Classes of Users Network Manager Teachers Students 2 Mbps 10 Mbps 50 Mbps Otherwise, there can be a deliberate or accidental slowdown or freezing of the network.
Example: ICMP rate limiting access-list 170 permit icmp any any Interface f0/0 rate-limit input access-group 170 128000 16000 24000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
Spoofing the DHCP Server An attacker activates a DHCP server on a network segment. The client broadcasts a request for DHCP configuration information. The rogue DHCP server responds before the legitimate DHCP server can respond, assigning attacker-defined IP configuration information. Host packets are redirected to the attacker address as it emulates a default gateway for the erroneous DHCP address provided to the client. Client Rogue DHCP Attacker Legitimate DHCP Server
Everything starts with starvation…
Storm Control can be in help… Interface fastethernet 0/1 storm-control broadcast level 10.00 8.00
DHCP Snooping DHCP snooping allows the configuration of ports as  trusted  or  untrusted . Trusted ports can send DHCP requests and acknowledgements. Untrusted ports can forward only DHCP requests. DHCP snooping  enables the switch to build a DHCP binding table that maps a client MAC address, IP address, VLAN, and port ID.  Use the  ip dhcp snooping  command. Client Rogue DHCP Attacker Legitimate DHCP Server
DHCP Snooping Configuration ip dhcp snooping ip dhcp snooping vlan 20 interface FastEthernet0/13 switchport access vlan 20 ip dhcp snooping trust Switch#sh ip dhcp snooping binnding MacAddress  IpAddress  Lease(sec)  Type  VLAN  Interface ------------------  ---------------  ----------  -------------  ----  -------------------- 00:14:A8:96:2C:40  10.1.2.12  86371  dhcp-snooping  20  FastEthernet0/24 00:14:6A:1D:B8:00  10.1.2.13  86371  dhcp-snooping  20  FastEthernet0/23 Total number of bindings: 2
ARP Spoofing: Man-in-the-Middle Attacks 10.1.1.1 = MAC C.C.C.C ARP Table in Host A IP 10.1.1.2 MAC A.A.A.A A B 10.1.1.2 = MAC C.C.C.C ARP Table in Host B 10.1.1.1 = MAC B.B.B.B 10.1.1.2 = MAC A.A.A.A ARP Table in Host C C IP 10.1.1.3 MAC C.C.C.C 1.  IP 10.1.1.2  ? MAC for 10.1.1.1 2.  Legitimate ARP reply  10.1.1.1 = MAC B.B.B.B 3.  Subsequent gratuitous ARP replies overwrite legitimate replies 10.1.1.1 bound to C.C.C.C 10.1.1.2 bound to C.C.C.C Attacker IP 10.1.1.1 MAC B.B.B.B A B C A = host A B = host B C = host C
Mitigating Man-in-the-Middle Attacks with DAI MAC or IP Tracking Built on DHCP Snooping 10.1.1.1 DHCP Server DHCP Discovery (BCAST) DHCP Offer (UCAST) DAI provides protection against attacks such as ARP poisoning using spoofing tools such as ettercap, dsniff, and arpspoof. Track Discovery Track DHCP Offer MAC or IP Track Subsequent ARPs for MAC or IP 10.1.1.2 DAI Function:
DAI in Action A binding table containing IP-address and MAC-address associations is  dynamically  populated  using  DHCP snooping. 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.2 GARP is sent to attempt to change the IP address to MAC bindings. Gateway is  10.1.1.1 Attacker is not gateway according to this binding table I am your gateway: 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.2
DAI Configuration… ip arp inspection vlan 20 ip arp inspection vlan 20 logging dhcp-bindings all ip arp inspection validate src-mac
Questions & Discussion ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Thank you…

Hacking Cisco

  • 1.
    Hacking Cisco Networksand Countermeasures
  • 2.
    Overview Reconnaissance AttacksPassive Sniffing Ping Sweeps Port Scans (tcp&udp) Active Attacks Password attacks Trust exploitation Port redirection External Attacks IP Spoofing DoS, DDoS Attacks Internal Attacks DHCP and ARP Attacks
  • 3.
    Reconnaissance Attacks Reconnaissancerefers to the overall act of learning information about a target network by using readily available information and applications. Reconnaissance attacks include these attacks: Packet sniffers Port scans Ping sweeps Internet information queries
  • 4.
    Packet Sniffers Apacket sniffer is a software application that uses a network adapter card in promiscuous mode to capture all network packets. There are packet sniffer features: Packet sniffers exploit information passed in clear text. Protocols that pass information in clear text are Telnet, FTP, SNMP, Post Office Protocol (POP), and HTTP. Packet sniffers must be on the same collision domain as the machine that they are targeting. Packet sniffers can be used legitimately or can be designed specifically for attack. Host A Host B Router A Router B
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Packet Sniffer AttackMitigation Here are some packet sniffer mitigation techniques and tools: Authentication Switched infrastructure Antisniffer tools Cryptography Host A Host B Router A Router B
  • 7.
    Port Scans andPing Sweeps Port scan and ping sweep attacks: Identify all services on the network Identify all hosts and devices on the network Identify the operating systems on the network Identify vulnerabilities on the network
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Blocking Ping Sweepsaccess-list 102 deny icmp any any echo access-list 102 permit ip any any interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 10.1.1.254 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 102 in
  • 11.
    Seems like itworked but ???
  • 12.
    We give outtoo much information…
  • 13.
    To block messagesoriginating from the blocking router… access-list 103 permit icmp any any unreachable class-map match-all STOPSHARING match access-group 103! policy-map STOPSHARING class STOPSHARING drop class class-default control-plane service-policy output STOPSHARING
  • 14.
  • 15.
    But this timewe don’t share info…
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
    How to block…access-list 101 deny icmp any any unreachable access-list 101 permit ip any any interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 10.1.1.254 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 101 out
  • 19.
    We don’t sendany unreachable messages…
  • 20.
    After Blocking everythingseems open, some obscurity for scanner…
  • 21.
    Port scans andping sweeps cannot be prevented without compromising network capabilities. Port Scan and Ping Sweep Attack Mitigation However, damage can be mitigated using IPS at the network and host levels. Workstation with HIPS Laptop with HIPS Scan Port Shared Connection IDS and IPS
  • 22.
    Internet Information QueriesSample IP address query Attackers can use Internet tools such as whois as a weapon.
  • 23.
    Access Attacks Intrudersuse access attacks on networks or systems for the these reasons: Retrieve data Gain access Escalate their access privileges Access attacks include: Password attacks Trust exploitation Port redirection
  • 24.
    Password Attacks Hackersimplement password attacks using: Brute-force attacks Trojan horse programs IP spoofing Packet sniffers
  • 25.
    Password Attack ExampleThe bgp_md5crack tool is used for cracking a secret used for RFC2385 based packet signing and authentication. It is designed for offline cracking, means to work on a sniffed, correct signed packet. This packet can either be directly sniffed of the wire or be provided in a pcap file.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
    Trust Exploitation Ahacker leverages existing trust relationships. Several trust models exist: Microsoft Windows: Domains Active directory Linux and UNIX: NIS NIS+ System A User = psmith; Pat Smith System B is compromised by a hacker. User = psmith; Pat Smith Hacker User = psmith; Pat Smithson A hacker gains access to System A . Trust relationships: System A trusts System B. System B trusts everyone. System A trusts everyone.
  • 29.
    Port Redirection HostB Attacker Source: A Destination: B Port: 23 Compromised Host A Source: Attacker Destination: A Port: 22 Source: Attacker Destination: B Port: 23
  • 30.
    Port Redirection ConfigurationOn HOSTA we create a named pipe using the mkfifo commands: #pipe will be the name of our named pipe mkfifo pipe We then create our two way tunnel using Netcat on HOSTA: nc -lvp 25 <pipe | nc -t 10.1.2.253 23 >pipe Then telnet from Attacker machine telnet 10.1.2.1 80
  • 31.
    Here we areconnected to the internal switch…
  • 32.
    IP Spoofing IPspoofing occurs when a hacker inside or outside a network impersonates a trusted source. IP spoofing uses trusted internal IP addresses or trusted external IP addresses. Attackers use IP spoofing for many reasons: To gain root access To inject malicious data or commands into an existing data stream To divert network packets to the hacker who can then reply as a trusted user by changing the routing tables To crash servers by overloading memory (DoS) As a step in a larger attack
  • 33.
    IP Spoofing—Types ofAttack IP spoofing attacks are either: Nonblind spoofing The attacker sniffs sequence numbers (i.e., from inside the subnet of the victim). Blind spoofing The attacker calculates sequence numbers. IP spoofing can lead to these types of attacks: Man-in-the-middle attack DoS attack Distributed DoS (DDoS) attack
  • 34.
  • 35.
    Here we driverouter to reply to the other host..
  • 36.
    Man-in-the-Middle Attacks Aman-in-the-middle attack requires that the hacker has access to network packets that come across a network. A man-in-the-middle attack is implemented using the following: Network packet sniffers (nonblind attack) Routing and transport protocols (blind attack) Host A Host B Router A Router B Data in Clear Text
  • 37.
    IP Spoofing AttackMitigation The threat of IP spoofing can be reduced, but not eliminated, using these measures: Strong access control at the router ACLs on outbound interface ACLs on inbound interface Data encryption Additional authentication requirements Host A Host B Router A ISP Router B IPSec tunnel
  • 38.
    DoS Attacks ADoS attack damages or corrupts your computer system or denies you and others access to your networks, systems, or services. DoS attack techniques almost always use IP spoofing.
  • 39.
    TCP SYN FloodingDoS Attack AttackerTCP Client ------------- Client Ports 1024 – 65535 Victim TCP Server ------------- Service Ports 1–1024 80 ? SYN Packet with Spoofed Source Address TCP Client ------------- Client Ports 1024–65535 TCP Three-Way Handshake 1 SYN 2 SYN and ACK TCP Server ------------- Service Ports 1 – 1024 80 1 SYN 3 ACK 2 SYN and ACK
  • 40.
    DDoS Attacks DoSAttack DoS and DDoS attacks have these characteristics: They are not generally targeted to gain access. They aim at making a service unavailable. They require very little effort to execute. They are difficult to eliminate. DDoS Attack Attacker Victim Attack Control Mechanism Victim Zombie Zombie Zombie
  • 41.
    DDoS Example HandlerSystems Client System The client issues commands to handlers that control agents in a mass attack. The cracker looks for targets. The cracker installs software to scan, compromise, and infect agents with zombies. Agents are loaded with remote control attack software. Agent Systems
  • 42.
  • 43.
    Let’s be morecreative…
  • 44.
    We put almost1 million packets in one minute period on the wire, not so bad….
  • 45.
  • 46.
    DoS and DDoSAttack Mitigation Reduce DoS and DDoS attacks by: Protecting yourself against IP spoofing with ingress- and egress-filtering ACLs Using antivirus software to find zombie agents Using anti-DoS features on routers and firewalls ip verify unicast reverse-path interface command ACLs to filter all private Internet address space (RFC 1918) Using traffic rate limiting at the ISP level Use class-based traffic policing on ICMP packets Use SYN rate limiting
  • 47.
    Rate Limiting Whatrate limiting does: Allows network managers to set bandwidth thresholds for users and by traffic type Benefits: Prevents the deliberate or accidental flooding of the network Keeps traffic flowing smoothly Rate Limiting for Different Classes of Users Network Manager Teachers Students 2 Mbps 10 Mbps 50 Mbps Otherwise, there can be a deliberate or accidental slowdown or freezing of the network.
  • 48.
    Example: ICMP ratelimiting access-list 170 permit icmp any any Interface f0/0 rate-limit input access-group 170 128000 16000 24000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
  • 49.
    Spoofing the DHCPServer An attacker activates a DHCP server on a network segment. The client broadcasts a request for DHCP configuration information. The rogue DHCP server responds before the legitimate DHCP server can respond, assigning attacker-defined IP configuration information. Host packets are redirected to the attacker address as it emulates a default gateway for the erroneous DHCP address provided to the client. Client Rogue DHCP Attacker Legitimate DHCP Server
  • 50.
  • 51.
    Storm Control canbe in help… Interface fastethernet 0/1 storm-control broadcast level 10.00 8.00
  • 52.
    DHCP Snooping DHCPsnooping allows the configuration of ports as trusted or untrusted . Trusted ports can send DHCP requests and acknowledgements. Untrusted ports can forward only DHCP requests. DHCP snooping enables the switch to build a DHCP binding table that maps a client MAC address, IP address, VLAN, and port ID. Use the ip dhcp snooping command. Client Rogue DHCP Attacker Legitimate DHCP Server
  • 53.
    DHCP Snooping Configurationip dhcp snooping ip dhcp snooping vlan 20 interface FastEthernet0/13 switchport access vlan 20 ip dhcp snooping trust Switch#sh ip dhcp snooping binnding MacAddress IpAddress Lease(sec) Type VLAN Interface ------------------ --------------- ---------- ------------- ---- -------------------- 00:14:A8:96:2C:40 10.1.2.12 86371 dhcp-snooping 20 FastEthernet0/24 00:14:6A:1D:B8:00 10.1.2.13 86371 dhcp-snooping 20 FastEthernet0/23 Total number of bindings: 2
  • 54.
    ARP Spoofing: Man-in-the-MiddleAttacks 10.1.1.1 = MAC C.C.C.C ARP Table in Host A IP 10.1.1.2 MAC A.A.A.A A B 10.1.1.2 = MAC C.C.C.C ARP Table in Host B 10.1.1.1 = MAC B.B.B.B 10.1.1.2 = MAC A.A.A.A ARP Table in Host C C IP 10.1.1.3 MAC C.C.C.C 1. IP 10.1.1.2 ? MAC for 10.1.1.1 2. Legitimate ARP reply 10.1.1.1 = MAC B.B.B.B 3. Subsequent gratuitous ARP replies overwrite legitimate replies 10.1.1.1 bound to C.C.C.C 10.1.1.2 bound to C.C.C.C Attacker IP 10.1.1.1 MAC B.B.B.B A B C A = host A B = host B C = host C
  • 55.
    Mitigating Man-in-the-Middle Attackswith DAI MAC or IP Tracking Built on DHCP Snooping 10.1.1.1 DHCP Server DHCP Discovery (BCAST) DHCP Offer (UCAST) DAI provides protection against attacks such as ARP poisoning using spoofing tools such as ettercap, dsniff, and arpspoof. Track Discovery Track DHCP Offer MAC or IP Track Subsequent ARPs for MAC or IP 10.1.1.2 DAI Function:
  • 56.
    DAI in ActionA binding table containing IP-address and MAC-address associations is dynamically populated using DHCP snooping. 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.2 GARP is sent to attempt to change the IP address to MAC bindings. Gateway is 10.1.1.1 Attacker is not gateway according to this binding table I am your gateway: 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.2
  • 57.
    DAI Configuration… iparp inspection vlan 20 ip arp inspection vlan 20 logging dhcp-bindings all ip arp inspection validate src-mac
  • 58.
    Questions & Discussion? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
  • 59.

Editor's Notes

  • #4 Mstream - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/mstream.analysis.txt Stacheldraht - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/stacheldraht.analysis.txt Trin00 - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/trinoo.analysis.txt TFN - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/tfn.analysis.txt
  • #7 AntiSniff - http://www.securitysoftwaretech.com/antisniff/ Check Promiscuous Mode (CPM) – ftp://ftp.cert.org/pub/tools/cpm IFSTATUS - ftp://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/ifstatus/ LiSt Open Files (lsof) - ftp://vic.cc.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof Neped - http://www.attrition.org/security/newbie/security/sniffer/neped.c Promisc - http://www.attrition.org/security/newbie/security/sniffer/promisc.c SNORT - http://www.snort.org
  • #8 AntiSniff - http://www.securitysoftwaretech.com/antisniff/ Check Promiscuous Mode (CPM) – ftp://ftp.cert.org/pub/tools/cpm IFSTATUS - ftp://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/ifstatus/ LiSt Open Files (lsof) - ftp://vic.cc.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof Neped - http://www.attrition.org/security/newbie/security/sniffer/neped.c Promisc - http://www.attrition.org/security/newbie/security/sniffer/promisc.c SNORT - http://www.snort.org
  • #22 Mstream - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/mstream.analysis.txt Stacheldraht - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/stacheldraht.analysis.txt Trin00 - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/trinoo.analysis.txt TFN - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/tfn.analysis.txt
  • #24 Mstream - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/mstream.analysis.txt Stacheldraht - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/stacheldraht.analysis.txt Trin00 - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/trinoo.analysis.txt TFN - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/tfn.analysis.txt
  • #29 Windows Domain Models - http://is-it-true.org/nt/atips/atips307.shtml Linux/UNIX Trusts - http://nim.cit.cornell.edu/usr/share/man/info/en_US/a_doc_lib/files/aixfiles/hosts.equiv.htm
  • #30 Allows traffic entering a compromised machine on a particular port (that is, TCP/22-SSH) to be redirected to a different machine on a different port (TCP/23-Telnet) Allows an attacker to exploit trust relationships to circumvent the firewall for all hosts once he controls one host. Root kit based install allows the redirection process, files, and connections to be hidden.
  • #38 IP Spoofing – an attacker sends a message to a target host with an IP address indicating that the message is coming from a trusted host. The attacker must know the IP address of a trusted host in order to modify the packet headers so that it appears that the packets are coming from that host. TCP Session Hijacking – an attacker sniffs for packets being sent from a client to a server in order to identify the two hosts&apos; IP addresses and relative port numbers. Using this information an attacker modifies his packet headers to spoof TCP/IP packets from the client. The attacker then waits to receive an ACK packet from the client communicating with the server (which contains the sequence number of the next packet the client is expecting). The attacker replies to the client using a modified packet with the source address of the server and the destination address of the client. This results in a RST which disconnects the legitimate client. The attacker takes over communications with the server spoofing the expected sequence number from the ACK that was previously sent from the legitimate client to the server. IP Fragmentation – Firewalls that support stateful inspection of established connections analyze packets to see if they are being received in the proper sequence. In the case of IP fragments, the firewall attempts to reassemble all fragments prior to forwarding them on to the final destination. If an attacker sends repeated incomplete or out-of-order fragmented packets to the firewall it will log and wait for all remaining fragments to be received before handling the connection. As a result, system resources are exhausted due to logging and the firewall is subject to a denial of service. Also, some Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) do not handle IP fragmentation, Out-of-Order fragmentation, TCP segment overlap, and Out-of-Order TCP segments properly; which results in packets slipping through because the IDS failed to alarm!!!
  • #39 Mstream - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/mstream.analysis.txt Stacheldraht - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/stacheldraht.analysis.txt Trin00 - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/trinoo.analysis.txt TFN - http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/tfn.analysis.txt